Thursday, January 15, 2015

ePetition - http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/73584

ePetition

We want to know the boundaries and limits to the term "Freedom of Speech" in the UK.

When Jews are ridiculed, it's Anti-semitism. When ethnic minorities are targeted, it's racism. When Islam is defamed, it's "Freedom of Speech"?!

We call on the British Government to draw the lines for us, what's acceptable, what's not?

We want a common law for ALL.

We want to detach ourselves from these never-ending Double-standards.

It's the least we can do.


We need 100,000 signatures for it go further.

Stand up for your rights.

Get Involved + SIGN!

Forward to contacts.

Share on Social Media.


Why compensation only to victims of 1984 anti-Sikh riots: Abu Asim Azmi - By Kanchan Srivastava - DNA English Daily, Mumbai, India.





http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-why-compensation-only-to-victims-of-1984-anti-sikh-riots-abu-azmi-2052018


DNA logo


Why compensation only to victims of 1984 anti-Sikh riots: Abu Azmi

Tuesday, 13 January 2015 - 6:55am IST | Agency: dna

Launching a scathing attack on the Narendra Modi-led BJP government at the centre, state unit chief of Samajwadi Party, Abu Azmi, on Monday, said the saffron government was discriminating against Muslims in the country by announcing compensation only to kin of Sikhs who had been killed in New Delhi in 1984 in the wake of then prime minister Indira Gandhi's murder. Azmi demanded that additional compensation be paid to the victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots also.
  •  
Launching a scathing attack on the Narendra Modi-led BJP government at the centre, state unit chief of Samajwadi Party, Abu Azmi, on Monday, said the saffron government was discriminating against Muslims in the country by announcing compensation only to kin of Sikhs who had been killed in New Delhi in 1984 in the wake of then prime minister Indira Gandhi's murder. Azmi demanded that additional compensation be paid to the victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots also.

The central government had last October announced compensation of Rs5 lakh each to the kin of 1984 anti-Sikh riot victims, and has written to all states to disburse the fund as early as possible. This compensation is in addition to what the victims have so far received from the government and other agencies.

Azmi, who is a legislator from Govandi-Mankhurd constituency, said: "If Modi thinks that victims of 1984 riots need to be compensated additionally, then victims of 2002 Gujarat riots and 1992-93 Mumbai riots also deserve similar treatment."

Azmi said he would write to the prime minister seeking similar relief for victims of these two riots. He is set to mobilise the community to press his demand by organising a public meeting in Nagpada which has considerable Muslim population.

"Most of the victims in these two riots were Muslims and therefore they are being deliberately ignored by the BJP government. By such grave discrimination, Modi is polarising the country on religious grounds," said Azmi, who added that the kin of many of the victims of both these riots were yet to be compensated due to red-tape. He did not however provide any details.

Raising doubts about the intentions of the Modi government, Azmi said: "Modi is playing politics of compensation. Delhi elections are here and by paying additional compensation, he is seeking to secure Sikh votes."

Azmi blamed the prime minister for insulting the community. "Modi has always rated Muslims as second grade citizens. He never wears a skull-cap."

He also accused the state government of similar biases against the minority community. "Modi's discrimination policy is being followed diligently by the Fadnavis government which decided against granting reservation to Muslims in educational institutions even after the Bombay high court had okayed it."

Riot death toll

1984 anti-Sikh riots: 3,325 deaths; 2,733 were killed in Delhi alone; rest of the victims were from Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, etc.

1992-93 Mumbai riots: 900 deaths. 2002 Gujarat riots: 1,169 deaths and 2,548 injured.

Monday, January 12, 2015

Muslim outfits plan meet to discuss minority concerns - By Seema Chisti - The Indian Express

The convenor is Mahmood Madani, former Rajya Sabha MP The convenor is Mahmood Madani, former Rajya Sabha MP

Written by Seema Chishti | New Delhi | Posted: January 13, 2015 2:07 am

A number of Muslim organisations, which have so far preferred to remain quiet about the change of government at the Centre, are organising a daylong colloquium on ‘Country and Crossroads’ Sunday to discuss “recent developments in the country which are a source of concern to all peace-loving persons” and to discuss implications of the “unchecked activities of some people and organisations.”

The organisations hosting the colloquium include Jamiat Ulem- e-Hind, Jamat e Islami Hind, Jamiat Ahle Hadees e Hind, Muslim Personal Law Board, Milli Council and the Delhi-based Institute of Objective Studies. The outfits last came together in 2007 to start a process that resulted in the anti-terror Fatwa adopted at Deoband by Dar ul Uloom in 2008.

Of the sessions held the colloquium on Sunday, one will be on attacks on Muslims’ constitutional safeguards. There will be a session on the slogan of ‘inclusive growth’— to point out discrepencies like ignoring the Muslim claim to reservations in Maharashtra even after a court nod, but going ahead with the Maratha reservation. There will also be a session on the security of the average Muslim citizen under the new government.

The convenor is Mahmood Madani, former Rajya Sabha MP, and co-convenor is former SP leader Kamal Farooqui.

An organiser said the outfits had not come together out of fear. “It is a clear-eyed resolve to tackle what is making us uneasy so as to build bridges with groups outside ours, whether they are a minority or not. We know there are many who feel like us,” he added.

Mahmood Madani said: “We met informally recently and are concerned at what we see unfolding despite talk of Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas. This meeting is a platform for several people who are bechain (restless) at the events in recent times”.

The organisers said that in the New Year, “naked threats” from BJP MPs and the PM’s silence on them has raised concerns “either the RSS is running the show or there is a plan that the RSS weakens foundations of the country and tries to attack fundamental rights of the Minorities, while the government pretends nothing is amiss and speaks misleadingly of Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas,”

Farooqui pointed out that apart for some fringe elements amongst Muslims who have reacted or hit out, there has been silence and patience from the mainstream Muslim community. “There was a genuine feeling that the Personal Law Board also expressed, urging to not pre-judge the new government,” he said.

However, he added that the “statements going unchecked” was taking its toll on Muslim youth. “An attempt is being made to even use the unfortunate events in Paris to needle Muslims,” he said.

.

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

The Attack on Charlie Hebdo By Amy Davidson - The New Yorker Magazine

The Writer of the following article: Amy Davidson, appearing to be Jewish by her name, is reporting on Charlie Hebdo with a bit of circumspection, as the Weekly was known to be equally critical of Jews and Zionism. It is an open question, who was the mastermind behind this horrific attack, as since the attackers were named Muslims, the worldwide condemnation, in a knee-jerk reaction will focus on Muslim extremists.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ghulam Muhammed <ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:38 AM

Subject: From newyorker.com: The Attack on Charlie Hebdo
In 2011, just six days after the Paris office of Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical magazine under threat for having run cartoons of the prophet Mohammed, was gutted by a firebomb, the staff put out a new issue with a cover drawing of a bearded, presumably...

January 7, 2015

The Attack on Charlie Hebdo

By


Credit PHOTOGRAPY BY MARC PIASECKI/GETTY In 2011, just six days after the Paris office of Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical magazine under threat for having run cartoons of the prophet Mohammed, was gutted by a firebomb, the staff put out a new issue with a cover drawing of a bearded, presumably Muslim man kissing a cartoonist. The caption was “L’amour: Plus fort que la haine,” which translates to “Love: Stronger than hate.” The cartoon was a properly irreverent combination—an affirmation of the most universal truth, a commitment to the magazine’s own very particular identity. To be brave, one needn’t ever be saccharine. The magazine and its artists, editors, and staff believed in all of that and lived those values, in a way that few of us are ever asked to. At midday this Wednesday, ten of them were killed, along with two Paris policemen who rushed to their aid when what were reportedly two or three hooded men, armed with AK-47s—some of the details are not yet clear—went into the office, in Paris’s Eleventh Arrondissement, and started firing, apparently at anyone they could find. In addition to the dead, twenty people were injured, according to French police statements. There is a video in which the gunmen can be heard shouting “Allahu Akbar”—God is great. This was, as President François Hollande said after rushing to the scene, “undoubtedly an act of terrorism.” And, though the exact identity of the shooters will need to be determined, in these first hours there are strong signs that it is an act of Islamist terrorism.

Charlie-Hebdo-Secondary1 The dead include Stéphane Charbonnier, who used the pen name Charb and was the very brave editor of Charlie Hebdo; the cartoonists Jean Cabut (who signed his work Cabu), Bernard Verlhac (Tignous), Georges Wolinski, and Philippe Honoré; Moustapha Ourrad, a copy editor; the columnists Bernard Maris and Elsa Cayat; Frederic Boisseau, described as a building maintenance worker. Ahmed Merabet and Franck Brinsolaro were police officers. Michel Renaud was visiting the office when he was shot dead. (Vox has a list.) They were assassinated. The gunmen were not on a suicide mission; they fled and stole a car, which the latest reports suggest has been located in the Twentieth Arrondissement. (The Guardian and others have live updates; these include video clips of a shoot-out.) The gunmen were still at large in Paris, as of the early afternoon there, and presumably armed. Children were evacuated from schools near the Charlie Hebdo office, which was in the same building as at least one other media organization. Some workers in the building managed to hide from the shooters, but it was, reportedly, a production day at the magazine, busy and crowded. This was an attack on a publication and a neighborhood, a country and its press, and on any journalist, in any city. The magazine made fun of people—of many faiths, for many follies, which we all need to be reminded that we have. Some of the cartoons were blatantly, roughly sexual, and not designed to endear them to Jews or Christians. Satire was Charlie Hebdo’s mission, and a necessary one. There were times when the French government asked the magazine to hold back, but the magazine kept being itself, which is what one wishes for in a free press. Wednesday’s crime should not cause anyone to second-guess Charlie Hebdo’s editorial decisions. Silence is not where the answers to an incident like this lie.
Charlie-Hebdo-Secondary2 Recently, the magazine had mocked the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham, or ISIS. The last tweet on the magazine’s account before news of the attack was of a cartoon of the group’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. As the BBC noted, there are questions about its exact timing and provenance. But making fun of al-Baghdadi is not recklessness; it’s how one knows that ISIS has not won, and never will. There ought to be more tweets that do so.* (Whether ISIS in particular had a role in this attack is a question that can’t be answered at this stage; its members are, sadly, not the only ones in the terrorism business.) The current issue of Charlie Hebdo, published the day of the shooting, featured a caricature of the novelist Michel Houellebecq on the cover. Houellebecq’s new novel, “Submission,” also out Wednesday, according to the Times, “predicts a future France run by Muslims, in which women forsake Western dress and polygamy is introduced.” The drawing of Houellebecq, accompanied by a joke about Ramadan, is not flattering. The French police have added the protection of Houellebecq to their list of priorities on what is, by all accounts, a traumatic and disorienting day for the entire country. He deserves safety, and not chastisement. Barack Obama, David Cameron, and Angela Merkel have all quickly condemned the attack and the wider assault on the press. The rector of Paris’s Grand Mosque added his voice, saying, according to the Times, “We are horrified. … Our community is stunned by what just happened. It’s a whole section of our democracy that is seriously affected.”
France, it will be said in the next days, has failed, in a profound way, when it comes to making sense of its own diversity. What will be strongly debated is the nature of that failure, and what its opposite might look like. Marine Le Pen, the leader of the National Front, will, inevitably, offer one set of answers, with her characteristic, glossy coat on her much uglier injunctions that often add up to the same thing. Who in France, and in other countries, whose policies and commitment to a free press were, again, targeted in the attack on Charlie Hebdo, is going to come forward with other, better answers? This is a dangerous moment for France, both in the frighteningly immediate sense—there are armed terrorists loose in the capital—and because the decisions that a nation makes at a time of terror are not always the best ones, for anybody. “L’amour: Plus fort que la haine,” as Charlie Hebdo put it years ago—and what makes that line meaningful, and not some trite filler of empty air in a shot-up office—is remembering who you are.
*Clarification: The reference to the tweet has been revised to reflect questions about it.



  • Email
  • Print
amy davidson
Amy Davidson is a New Yorker staff writer. She is a regular Comment contributor for the magazine and writes a Web column, in which she covers war, sports, and everything in between.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Mumbai ‘touch-and-go’ situation kept cops on toes - Written by Zeeshan Shaikh - THE INDIAN EXPRESS, MUMBAI

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Blaming all Muslims for 9/11 is un-American By Greg Kesich - Portland Press Herald

 
logo
Blaming all Muslims for 9/11 is un-American

We don't hold Christianity responsible for the crimes of a few, and it should be the same with Islam.

By GREG KESICH

To call Muslim worship in the same neighborhood as Ground Zero a “desecration of hallowed ground” makes a connection between the Islamic faith and an act of war that is at odds with the core beliefs America was built on.

In this country, we believe in individual responsibility and don’t believe in collective guilt. The Muslims of New York City should build their facility wherever the local zoning laws allow.

 The people who planned and carried out the destruction of the World Trade Center may have been Muslims, but opponents of this project act as if all Muslims bear some responsibility for this crime. Why else would the mere presence of an Islamic center — not at Ground Zero but two blocks away in a busy city neighborhood — be considered an affront? This attitude smacks of religious scapegoating and something that should be intolerable to all Americans.
 
This is not a legal question but a moral one, and one that strikes at our basic founding principles. Those beliefs are why we put individual Nazi war criminals on trial at the end of World War II when it would have been much easier to punish all Germans.

We were operating under a concept of justice that holds individuals responsible for their actions — but only their own actions. This comes in sharp contrast to the Nazis, who condemned a whole people to the gas chamber.

Yes, 9/11 was perpetrated by al-Qaida, which bases its war on America on an idiosyncratic reading of the Koran.

But you don’t have to be an expert on religion to recognize that the goal of al-Qaida is less than spiritual and all about exerting power and control over others.

Osama bin Laden would probably like nothing better than to manipulate the United States into a war with Islam and its 1.5 billion believers, rather than with his tiny splinter group.

Hundreds of millions of Muslims all over the world practice their faith without ever feeling called to commit a violent act. Claiming that the entire faith of Islam bears some special responsibility for the actions of al-Qaida is as outrageous as it would be to blame all Christians for bombing abortion clinics, sexually abusing children or the financial excesses of a few televangelists.

Remember, the Godfather was a Christian, too.

This Islamic center plan has gone from a local zoning issue to a platform for talk-radio ranting because some politicians have irresponsibly used it as a wedge to leverage the still-tender wounds of many Americans into voting their way in November.

They should just stop before they cause more damage.

There were Muslims in the Twin Towers on Sept. 11, 2001, who were also victims of al-Qaida’s attack. Their families still grieve.

The perpetrators of 9/11 may have been Muslim, but all Muslims have nothing to apologize for.

This is America, where we don’t tell people how to worship. And we don’t hold a whole group responsible for the crimes of a few.


Saturday, January 3, 2015

Kashmir — Mushawarat urges PDP to shun communal forces

Press Statement

Kashmir — Mushawarat urges PDP to shun communal forces

Original_aimmm-logo-white
All India Muslim Majlis-e-Mushawarat / The Milli Gazette Online
Published Online: Jan 03, 2015
New Delhi, 3 January 2015: All India Muslim Majlis-e Mushawarat (AIMMM), apex body of Indian Muslim organisations, urged People Democratic Party (PDP) leaders, Mufti Muhammad Saeed and Mehbooba Mufti, to shun short-term expediency and avoid any truck with communal forces having a definite agenda which is inimical to the interests of the majority of J&K people. AIMMM national president Dr. Zafarul-Islam Khan said here that PDP has the option of forming the next government in J&K with the help of secular forces. Therefore, it should not ally with communal forces which will use the opportunity to consolidate themselves and prepare to rule the state on their own after the next assembly elections.

Dr. Khan said people of the Valley have elected PDP with the hope that it will stop the impending political deluge and they have also totally rejected candidates of communal forces. As such, it will betrayal of the mandate if PDP goes with the communal forces. Dr. Khan said PDP should not ruin the future of Kashmir by opting a short-term strategy which will harm in the long-term. Dr. Khan appealed to the leaders and people of Kashmir to prevail upon the PDP leadership not to go against the interests of the coming generation of the Kashmiris.

فرقہ پرستوں سے دور رہے پی ڈی پی: مشاورت
 
نئی دلی، ۳جنوری ۲۰۱۵: ہندوستانی مسلم تنظیموں کی وفاق آل انڈیا مسلم مجلس مشاورت نے آج یہاں پیوپلزڈیموکریٹک پارٹی کے لیڈران مفتی محمد سعید اور محبوبہ مفتی سے مطالبہ کیا کہ وہ وقتی فائدہ کے لئے فرقہ پرستوں کو ترجیح نہ دیں اور کشمیر کے مستقبل کو دیکھتے ہوئے ان فرقہ پرستوں سے دوری بنائے رکھیں جن کا کشمیر کے لئے واضح ایجنڈا ہے جو ریاست کی اکثریت کے مفادات کے خلاف ہے۔ مسلم مجلس مشاورت کے قومی صدر ڈاکٹر ظفرالاسلام خان نے کہا کہ پی ڈی پی سیکولر طاقتوں کی مدد سے ریاست میں حکومت بناسکتی ہے۔ اس لئے اس کو فرقہ پرست طاقتوں سے اتحاد نہیں کرنا چاہئے جوکہ اس موقع کو استعمال کرکے ریاست میں اپنے پنجے گاڑیں گی اور پھر اگلی حکومت اپنے بل بوتے پر بنانے کی تیاری کریں گی۔
 
 ڈاکٹر خان کہا کہ وادی کے عوام نے جہاں پی ڈی پی کو اس امید کے ساتھ جتایا ہے کہ وہ آنے والے سیاسی سیلاب کا سدباب کرے گی، وہیں عوام نے فرقہ پرستوں کو پوری طرح سے وادی میں نا منظورکر دیا ہے۔ اس لئے پی ڈی پی کا فرقہ پرستوں کے ساتھ جانا اپنے مینڈیٹ سے غداری ہوگی۔ ڈاکٹر خان نے کہا کہ پی ڈی پی کو مختصر وقتی فائدے کے لئے کشمیر کا مستقبل تباہ نہیں کرنا چاہئے۔ اس طرح کی قصیر مدتی اسٹریٹجی کا نقصان آنے والی نسلیں برسوں تک بھگتیں گی۔ ڈاکٹر خان نے کشمیر کے عوام اور لیڈروں سے اپیل کی کہ وہ پی ڈی پی کے لیڈران پر دباؤ بنائیں کہ وہ کشمیر کی اگلی نسلوں کے مفاد کے خلاف کوئی اقدام نہ کریں۔
 
(ختم)


 
Issued at New Delhi on 3 January 2015 by
 -------------------------------------------------------
ALL INDIA MUSLIM MAJLIS-E-MUSHAWARAT
[Umbrella body of the Indian Muslim organisations]
D-250, Abul Fazal Enclave, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi-110025  India