Let Muslims again rule India (‘Akhand Bharat’) - Hem Raj Jain -

Let Muslims again rule India (‘Akhand Bharat’)     Hem Raj Jain	11:25 AM (7 hours ago)
to me, girls.school, globalwireless., gm, mail-noreply, gnsaibaba, goldstarele, goodluckplasti., gopalvhprkp, goyal_dr2000, gpolya, graceful.ali, grambabu, gs.sdpi

To
The Editor

Sub:- Killing of Hindus & Muslims in Muzaffarnagar riots should constrain Muslims to launch their political party

Ref:- (i)- Congress in 1984 at Delhi, BJP in 2002 at Gujarat, SP in 2013 at U.P. proved that Hindus are simply unfit to rule India.

(ii)- UP Muslims should take lead in reviving spirit of Indian Muslims to once again rule undivided India with legacy of Akbar the Great.

(iii)- Like Mayawati in UP, Muslims can also come to power with ~ equal % age of their support base in entire India.

(iv)- Solution of Kashmir problem & of infiltrators in N-E is bound to usher in unified India (Akhand Bharat)

(v)- ‘Akhand Bharat’ will have 2:1 Hindu Muslim ratio (much beneficial to Indian Muslims) instead of present 5.5:1 ratio

(vi)- Muslims should also push aggressively the Islamic Banking in India to garner support of majority of Hindus.

(vii)- Indian Muslims should also take lead for solving globally hugely important (also for India) gory Arab-spring problem.

Dear Sir / Madam

Hindus or Muslims etc are not the victims of communal / caste riots, but what is relevant & important is the citizens of the country who are the victims in any riot.  The history of incessant communal riots / genocides in India (with Congress in 1984 in power at Delhi, with BJP in 2002 in power at Gujarat, with SP in 2013 in power at U.P. (Muzaffarnagar, where 48 persons have already been killed and many more injured and displaced) to name only the few, have proved irrefutably that Hindus are simply incapable of ruling India (Hindu politicians meekly allowed partition also where India lost one third of its territory along with horrible killings & migration of millions of people) .

Hence it is time Indian Muslim come forward to again rule (through their political party) not only present day India but even undivided India (‘Akhand Bharat’ with Pakistan & Bangladesh in it) as given below:-

(1)- First and foremost this Muslim Political Party (MPP, with any suitable name) should rest assured that Hindus or Muslims in India historically have no problem with Muslim or Hindu rulers (in present case political party) as long as ruler rules with justice and (to use present democratic vocabulary)  with secular credentials like famous in this regard, Akbar the Great.

(2)-  Secondly like Mayawati in UP, Muslims can also (with proper alliances & social engineering) come to power with ~ equal % age of their support base in all the States of India. If MPP is launched immediately then they can easily be the king maker in all the States and parliamentary elections of 2013 & 2014 to start with. Moreover with passage of little time MPP can come in power through majority seats in number of States and also at centre.

(3)- For this spectacular political miracle to happen, Indian Muslims will have to do four things:-

(i)- MPP should demand Solution of Kashmir problem (by retrieving POK, may be even military) and of the problem of rehabilitation of millions Kashmiri Pundits & POK refugee. This will constrain Pakistan to merge with Indian Federation. MPP should also demand (after identifying and tracking them) the expulsion of millions of infiltrators in N-E which is bound to usher in the merger of Bangladesh in Indian Federation.

(ii)-  In India where thousands of farmers have been committing suicide and where two third of pauperized India (~ 810 millions) are so poor that they can’t afford even food without immense government help (through Food Security Program), MPP should push aggressively for Islamic Banking in India to garner support of majority of farmers and small entrepreneurs from Hindus, who will get interest free loan under Islamic Banking for boosting their economic condition.

(iii)- MPP should demand that in view of collapse of present ‘Veto Power Global Order at UN’, there should be new global order at UN with voting rights to all UN members as per formula based on contribution of men (including martial for Peace Keeping Force & civilians as election conducting personnel), material (m/c, equipments, armaments etc) and money (mainly based on GDP of the member countries) to UN. This will not only deprive China (India’s arch military rival since 1962) the veto power at UN but will also solve the problem of gory Arab-spring too in Muslim NAME & Neighboring countries who are very important due to huge petroleum imports and remittance to India from this region. In this regard MPP should also demand that:-

 (A)- Optional protocol OP – 1 of ICCPR should be replaced with mandatory protocol MP – 1 so that UN can intervene (even militarily through Peace Keeping Force) in case of serious violations of human rights in any erring member country of UN.

(B)- Elections in NAME etc should be under Secular Constitution (chosen out of 4 – 5 secular democratic models) offered by UN Election Commission (UNEC), which will ensure that fundamentalist (including terrorist) forces do not gain ascendancy in these Muslim democratic countries.

(C)- ‘International Political Parties’ (IPP) should be there which will be regulated by UNEC. This will give direct influence of countries of established democracies through membership in IPP in the newly democracy acquiring Muslim countries also.

(iv)- In order to achieve economic miracle and harmony in India, MPP should demand genuine federalism in India where only martial subjects would be with Union and all civilian subjects (including natural sources) shall be with States.

(4)- There will be one very great advantage to Indian Muslims in Unified India because then ‘Akhand Bharat’ will have 2:1 Hindu Muslim ratio (much beneficial to Indian Muslims) instead of present 5.5:1 ratio in present partitioned India. Therefore in ‘Akhand Bharat’ there will be less chances of communal riots (without balance heavily tilted against Muslims as is the case in present partitioned India of 5.5:1 Hindu Muslim ratio).

(5)- Indian Muslims have every thing to gain and nothing to loose by launching MPP, hence Indian Muslims should not listen to Muslim leaders in existing political parties of India / States (including in U.P. where Muslim leaders from ruling and opposition parties will shed crocodile tears for the victims of Muzaffarnagar riots and will especially appeal to Muslims to give them another chance for politically patronizing Muslims in U.P.).  

(6)- Instead Indian Muslims should launch their own political party, the MPP immediately. Of-course for the launch of MPP the initiative should come from presently angered Muslims of U.P. (which will have tremendous impact in view of coming Parliamentary elections as presence of MPP in U.P. will be decisive in shaping the destiny of ruling party / alliance at the centre).

Yours truly 

 Hem Raj Jain 

A-3, Mahavirdham, Shri Mahavirji - 32220,  District Karauli, Rajasthan 

Presently at: S-72, Maya Indraprastha, J.P. Nagar VI th, Bengaluru – 560078, India.  

Mo: 08385064101

Communalism gains new ground in rural India - Gyan Varma - MINT with Wall Street Journal

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/Lmv1m7PQ9zb9YQlWidPwzO/Communalism-gains-new-ground-in-rural-India.html?ref=dd

Communalism gains new ground in rural India

Incidence of violence grows in scale as rural areas turn into a battleground for communal politics

Gyan Varma

First Published: Thu, Sep 12 2013. 07 55 AM IST

Security forces chase rioters, unseen, during a curfew in Muzaffarnagar on Monday. Photo: AP

Also Read

• SC agrees to hear PIL for CBI probe in Muzaffarnagar violence
• Curfew relaxed in Muzaffarnagar, constable injured in Baghpat
• Muzaffarnagar riots: Curfew eased in 3 areas, toll rises to 38
• 21 killed in Muzaffarnagar; Army moves in
• Uttar Pradesh nixes VHP plan to mobilize support for Ram temple

Updated: Thu, Sep 12 2013. 12 46 PM IST

For 29-year-old Kherunisa Qureshi, who lost her husband and two other family members in the Hindu-Muslim riots raging in Muzaffarnagar and its vicinity, returning to her village is no longer an option.

A resident of Shamli district, adjacent to Muzaffarnagar, she managed to escape with her two daughters, aged 5 and 10, and with bullet and stab wounds, took refuge at the local government hospital. She doesn’t want to return home because she fears being attacked once again after security forces deployed in her village are withdrawn.

Qureshi’s predicament captures the new battleground of communal politics: rural India. It is worrying because, in the past, communal violence tended to be concentrated in urban areas. This time, the spectre of Hindu-Muslim violence is also threatening to alter the political landscape in western Uttar Pradesh, a region that last seen riots of such scale, again mostly in urban areas, in the 1980s.

Not only is it causing a cleavage between rural communities, it is, in the run-up to the next general election, likely to further polarize the electorally crucial states of UP and Bihar, both of which have been witness to several low-intensity episodes of communal violence over the last two years. Such violence has grown in scale in recent months.

It is yet unclear whether and how it will alter the electoral arithmetic in UP, which at present is perceived to be a largely four-cornered contest between the state’s ruling Samajwadi Party, Congress, Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). UP sends 80 members to the Lok Sabha, the largest contingent from any single state.

“It is true that such riots are now happening in more rural areas. People in villages are more close knit and everyone knows each other. However, one needs to go deeper to find out why the communal forces are targeting villages,” said Badri Narayan, a professor at the G.B. Pant Social Science Institute, University of Allahabad.

The rural phenomenon

NH 58, a normally busy highway to Muzaffarnagar, an industrial town in western Uttar Pradesh, is almost deserted. There are check posts at regular intervals manned by the army and paramilitary forces. In the city, no shops and business establishments are open because of curfew.

Jats make up around 30% of the population of western Uttar Pradesh, Muslims some 40%, Dalits 10% and Brahmins and Rajputs together the remaining 20%, said Vishesh Gupta, an associate professor and head of the department of sociology at Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University in Bareilly.

Gupta attributes the spread of violence to rural areas to the involvement of the “new generation” and the growing distance between communities in the hinterland.

“Riots have happened in villages because of the involvement of new generation.
The dialogue and harmony between communities which was present in the earlier times have gone down and the new generation is getting into conflicts with each other,” Gupta said.

According to the city administration, 38 people have died in the violence so far. Ambulances speeding by with their sirens wailing are evidence that the violence in the rural areas and the city hasn’t ended yet.

“The situation in both city and rural areas has improved but it is still tense. We are keeping a close watch and curfew was relaxed twice today so that people could buy essential commodities,” said Arun Kumar, the additional director general of Uttar Pradesh who is in-charge of the law and order situation in the state. “I have served in Muzaffarnagar as superintendent of police in 1995 but never heard of any violence in rural areas. This is a new phenomenon.”

A surgeon at the Muzaffarnagar civil hospital, who did not wish to be identified, said violence had spread to nearby villages in districts like Baghpat and Shamli.

“Violence in villages is not known. This is the first time. We have received 68 injured so far and some have been referred to government hospital in Meerut equipped with better medical facilities,” the surgeon said. “Most of the people coming to the hospital have either have bullet wounds or wounds made by sharp-edged weapons.”

As a consequence of the violent attacks, daily wage labourers, both Hindu and Muslim, have fled. Business associations in Muzaffarnagar are concerned that they may never return.

“Most of the labourers are Hindus or Muslims. There was never any differentiation on the basis of religion,” said Pankaj Aggarwal, chairman of the local paper mills association.

Electoral politics

Most residents are blaming political parties and the state administration for allowing the violence to escalate to such a scale.

“This is a very unfortunate incident which looks like it was sponsored by the ruling Samajwadi Party and Bharatiya Janata Party. BJP can do well in the Lok Sabha election only by polarizing the people. The SP government wants to appease the people of a particular community (Muslims) for vote-bank politics,” said Dinesh Kumar, a retired principal of SD Degree College, the biggest in Muzaffarnagar.

“Mulayam Singh wants to be Prime Minister and believes this to be shortest way to success,” said Dinesh Kumar, referring to the president of the Samajwadi Party.

The riots that started on 7 September and went on unchecked for nearly three days have brought back memories of the Hindu-Muslim clashes that erupted in the summer of 1987 in Meerut. Around 350 people died in those clashes, according to a report by the People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL).

Some see a pattern underlying the revival in communal violence. The genesis, say analysts, was the overt attempts by both the Congress and the SP to woo the crucial Muslim vote in the state. Sensing a vacuum, fringe Muslim and Hindu groups sought to stoke communal sentiments, Mint reported on 4 December, 2012.

This trend in polarization got a fillip after the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) attempted to revive the demand for building a temple at the disputed site where the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished in 1992, Mint reported on 25 August. Hindu nationalists say the site is Ram Janmabhoomi—the birthplace of the warrior-god Ram.

This calibrated polarization is now giving way to large-scale communal clashes.

“The poisoning (of relations) between the two communities that took place during the Ram Janambhoomi agitation is the real cause of this violence. What was the need for VHP leader Ashok Singhal to meet Mulayam Singh Yadav,” said Zahoor Siddiqui, a retired historian from Delhi University who now lives in Bhagpat district, which has also seen a face-off between Hindus and Mulsims.

“The communal clashes in the rural areas are significant because they had never happened in the past. Riots are known to take place in cities and not villages. People have changed,” said Siddiqui, who runs a school for underprivileged children.

Residents of the Muzaffarnagar say the violence is likely to benefit both the ruling Samajwadi Party and the BJP and limit the influence of the Congress party in the entire western Uttar Pradesh region.

The violence erupted after a girl belonging to the dominant Jat community was subjected to street harassment by some young Muslims in Kawal village. The incident led to clashes between Jats and Muslims in the village in which three people died.

“I believe it was premeditated. The SP and BJP have strategically used people to polarise the situation in their favour. We expect more such incidents before the elections because politicians of both the parties will make use of these incidents for election campaigning,” said Ram Kumar Gautam, retired biology teacher in Shri Arvind Inter College.

Anuja contributed to the story.