Sunday, September 13, 2009

IS INDIA'S MAINSTREAM MEDIA FINALLY COMING TO TERMS WITH ISLAMIC INFLUENCES INEVITABLY IMPACTING INDIAN SOCIETY AND ITS INSTITUTIONS?

IS INDIA'S MAINSTREAM MEDIA FINALLY COMING TO TERMS WITH ISLAMIC INFLUENCES INEVITABLY IMPACTING INDIAN SOCIETY AND ITS INSTITUTIONS?


Sunday Times of India published on single day, 3 stories that positively treat signs of Indian institutions picking up Islamic influences with far reaching consequences for the composite 
society.

1. Left led Kerala govt to start bank on Sharia principles

2. Hindu students shine in Madarsas

3. Bigamy: An issue of one too many: 

Muslims bigamy cases far fewer than Hindus. Muslims give full and equal legal protection to their wives. Hindus do not. Hindu laws may borrow from Sharia to give better rights to Hindu women, including easy divorce, legal status and equality to wives in cases of bigamous marriage.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

---------------------------------------------------------------------


Left-led Kerala govt to start a bank on Sharia principles

Ananthakrisnan G | TNN 


Thiruvananthapuram: The CPM-led Kerala government wants to establish a financial institution compliant with Sharia laws and later convert it into a a full-fledged bank. Work on the project is on and the new entity is likely to start functioning from March 2010. 
    “We commissioned a feasibility study by Ernst and Young and as per the recommendations, a financial institution working under the Sharia principles will be set up,’’ industries secretary T Balakrishnan told TOI. The Kerala State Industries Development Corporation, a state government agency, will have 11% stake in the body. 

    Finance minister T M Thomas Issac told the assembly earlier this week that the venture will have an authorised share capital of Rs 1,000 crore. “KSIDC will also have two permanent directors in the new business model which will have a total of 12 directors,’’ Balakrishnan said, adding that a core group headed by businessman Mohammadali of Gulfar Group had been constituted to give the project its final shape. “By March, we hope to complete all formalities and begin operations by the next financial year,’’ he added. 
    “There will also be a body of Islamic scholars to advise the entity on whether it was complying with laws laid down by Sharia,’’ the secretary said. He said that under current RBI guidelines, an Islamic bank wasn’t feasible and that was why a financial institution was planned. “We want to convert it into a bank with pan-India presence at a later stage.’’ 
    He added, “World over, there have been experiments with alternate financial models especially after the recent recession. There is also economic demand for the product as we’ve a fairly large Muslim population. If the community is happy with a system they feels is fair and inclusive, then why not.’’

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hindu students shine in madrassas

Faizan Ahmad | TNN 


Patna: Are madrassas meant only for Muslim students? Far from it, if results of Bihar State Madrassa Examination Board are anything to go by. Pooja Kumari, Preetam Kumari, Priyanka Kumari and Surya Narayan Sah — all students of Madrassa Islamia, Sandalpur in Araria district — are among 100 Hindu girls and boys who have passed different grade exams conducted by BSMEB this year. The results of the madrassa board for Maulvi, Fauqania and Wastania grade exams, declared last week, showed that about a hundred non-Muslim students have passed these exams. 
    Board authorities, who could provide list of non-Muslim candidates of only Fauqania exam, said 37 of them have passed. They in
clude Sanjay Kumar of Madrassa Islamia, 
Khardaur, Sanam Kumari and Sandhya Kumari of Madrassa Rahmania, Joktia (both in 
West Champaran), Rupa Bharti of Madrassa Munamia, Balia (Begusarai) and Anita Kumari of Madrassa Faiyazul Uloom (Chhapra). 
    ‘‘All non-Muslim examinees were regular students of madrassas,’’ board chairman Maulana Ejaz Ahmad told TOI. He said he spoke to parents of many such students who said education at madrassas was better and their wards were more disciplined. In fact, the second generation of a former legislator is getting madrassa education, he added. 
    This year Muslim girls both outnumbered and outshone boys in madrassa exam in Fauqania (equivalent to matric) and Wastania (equivalent to middle). ‘‘That more girls are joining madrassa and pursuing education is an encouraging trend,’’ Ahmad said. He said enrolment of Muslim girls in all districts has risen.

RELIGION NO BAR: About 100 Hindu students have cleared the Bihar madrassa board exam with flying colours

-----------------------------------------------------

BIGAMY: AN ISSUE OF ONE TOO MANY


More Hindus take two wives than Muslims, according to a survey. Surprised? It’s been that way for more than 30 years

Divya A | TNN 



    The Law Commission recently recommended a good way to prevent a married Hindu man from taking another wife: Deeming such a marriage illegal even if he converted to Is
lam before he wed a second time. 
    That Law Commission report, ‘Preventing Bigamy via Conversion to Islam’, essentially highlighted an important and little-known truth — namely that more Hindus than Muslims commit bigamy. 
    This has been true for more than a quarter of a century. In 1974, a government survey found Muslims to ac
count for 5.6% of all bigamous marriages and upper-caste Hindus accounting for 5.8%. The difference may appear to be small but it is big, in real terms. The 1971 census records 45.3 crore Hindus and six crore Muslims. Allowing for women and children to make up 65% of each group, as many as one crore Hindu men had more than one wife in 1971, compared to 12 lakh Muslim men. 
    The trend continues, says sociologist Asghar Ali Engineer, head of Mumbai’s Institute of Islamic Studies. “The survey was conducted on a large sample in all parts of India and the report wasn’t made public. Further, polygamy was higher in South India than in the north, and more so among rich and middle-class
Hindus than the poorer sections.” 
    Go back still further – to 1961 – and the census records polygamy to be highest among adivasis, Buddhists, Jains, and Hindus, with Muslims right at the end. Engineer says the law matters only up to a point. “With both survey results coming out after the Hindu Marriage Act was passed in 1955, it 
shows that bigamy is basically a problem of a maledominant culture than religion.” 
    Bigamy disadvantages Hindu women more than Muslim, says Chandigarh sociologist Nirmal Sharma. This, because a Hindu man will desert his lawfully wedded wife to live with another, while the multiple wives of Muslim men are entitled to equal legal and social rights. “Closet bigamy in Hindus is 
worse than open polygamy among Muslims,” he says. 
    Fiza alias Anuradha Bali, who married Haryana’s deputy CM after the pair converted to Islam, says, “Our laws were far more liberal in ancient times. Most kings and many of our mythological figures had more than one wife.” Though Chand has con
verted back to Hinduism, Fiza insists she remains his “customary wife while the first one remains the legally-wedded one. There is no way to get out of a dual marriage in spite of a legal ban.” 
    Supreme Court lawyer Praveen Agarwal cautions that Hindu bigamists often go scot free because “the courts can do little until there’s a formal complaint.” And this is not always possible because in many cases, the two wives don’t even know of each other’s existence, says Agarwal. He adds that it is relatively easy for a Hindu man to remarry because temples don’t hold records. “However, if the matter goes to court, the second marriage is declared null and void.” 
    Take the case of K Suryanarayana, the Indian engineer killed in Afghanistan, who left behind a second wife and daughter. Though she laid claim to compensation from the government, the court ruled in favour of the first wife. 
    Agarwal suggests that stringent and time-consuming Hindu divorce may force many men to resort to bigamy. “Instead of going in for long-drawn-out and financially debilitating divorce procedures, men simply desert the first wife and marry again.” 
    Engineer says that bigamy is not as rampant among Muslims as believed. The Quran only offers conditional permission for a man to take four wives: in times of
war or a crisis that sees women outnumber men. “The 2001 census found 935 females for every 1000 males in India. Among Muslims, it was 930: 1000. So it would be difficult to find even one wife for every man,” he says. Engineer says polygamy will never cease to exist. Perhaps it’s better to regulate it, he says.

COMMENTS POSTED ON SUNDAY TIMES OF INDIA WEBSITE OVER SWAPAN DASGUPTA'S ARTICLE - WHY RUN AWAY FROM THE ENEMY?:



COMMENTS POSTED ON SUNDAY TIMES OF INDIA WEBSITE OVER

SWAPAN DASGUPTA'S ARTICLE - WHY RUN AWAY FROM THE ENEMY?:

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Those who ignore the lessons of history, come to grief. British experience in Afghanistan when out of 20,000 only one man survived, was repeatedly cited when both Russia and now US are bogged down in Afghanistan. Nobody paid heed. Taliban had brought peace to the country after Russia left. US had good relations with them. It is their arrogance of power that they had to suffer so much ignominy when they thought they can uproot Taliban and impose their cronies on the country. 

It is still time for everybody that wishes to do business with Afghan to restore the country to their rightful owners and deal with them as equals. 

Afghanistan should be brought into the mainstream of 21st century civilization, with its freedom, dignity and independence fully restored to its people. They are proud and talented people. They will make their mark in the comity of nations.

If the US and NATO leave now, there will be chaos, but the power that emerges will be able to ensure longer term stability, if the world learns the lessons from history and let Afghanistan be left to Afghans.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Why run away from the enemy?
Swapan Dasgupta  Sunday September 13, 2009
There are good reasons why the commemoration of the eighth anniversary of 9/11 was remarkably subdued in both the US and Europe. The initial fear, followed by outrage and a steely determination to cleanse terrorism from the world has given way to frustration, despondency and defeatism. Iraq may have got off the front pages but Afghanistan, where it all began, is now increasingly being perceived as a hopeless war. Both liberals and conservatives in the West seem agreed that there is little point losing more lives and pouring money down a bottomless pit if the Afghans themselves are not sensitive to the charms of democracy and development.

Predictably, the dreaded Taliban with their medieval fanaticism and warped values invite maximum derision. But Western scorn is being dished out in equal measure at president Hamid Karzai whose exotic elegance once induced the perfect multiculturalist wet dream. Karzai is today being cast as a ballot thief and linked to sinister drug barons and ugly warlords. The ethical commitment that galvanised the post 9/11 crusade against the new evil has been considerably blurred by the realisation that the home side also plays foul. In the framework of moral absolutes, "we" are seen to be as imperfect and sinful as "them". The will to fight the "just" war in Afghanistan has evaporated.

The implication is obvious: If the West can't carry the proverbial white man's burden in Afghanistan and, in Kipling's immortal words, "veil the threat of terror/ And check the show of pride", it should concentrate on its own aam admi concerns - like addressing schoolkids, pushing for universal healthcare and coping with the recession. A century ago, empire-builders could take on the fanatical Mahadi and his "Fuzzy Wuzzies" in Sudan to avenge the murder of General Gordon. In those days, public opinion at home didn't count. As former US president Lyndon Johnson discovered to his cost in 1968, today a spectacular domestic track record can be effortlessly nullified by an overseas misadventure.

In the past six months, the West has acknowledged that it no longer has the political and moral resolve to do what it takes to win the Afghan war. Britain can barely stomach the death of 200 soldiers; a reinvented Germany can't get over the collective trauma of having ordered the bombing in Kunduz; and the US Congress is taking a dim view of General Stanley McChrystal's request for a last ditch surge in ground forces.

The war aims of the US-led NATO forces have been dramatically modified. From mounting an assault on a global menace, the West now wants to merely safeguard itself from terror attacks. In other words, if the Taliban can guarantee that it won't mount terror strikes against the West or help those crazies from Birmingham who want videographed martyrdom, they can earn themselves the uninhibited right to thrash every barber, every musician and every unveiled woman. Their pent-up jihadi impulses can be carefully redirected elsewhere, as long as it is not Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, the ones who are likely to oversee the post-withdrawal arrangements.

For Pakistan, the departure of the US-led forces and its own assumption of peace-keeping duties (for a generous consideration, of course) in Afghanistan will be triumph comparable in scale to the recovery of East Pakistan. First, it would have recovered its lost "strategic depth" in Afghanistan, an enormous gain in the context of its hostility with India. Secondly, it would have inherited the entire military arsenal of the retreating army. Third, as a price for guaranteeing zero terrorism against the West, it would have a reserve army of motivated Islamists to work for the "liberation" of India, particularly Kashmir.

India was an unintended beneficiary of Osama bin Laden over-reaching himself and inviting US retribution after 9/11. With the West's likely retreat from Afghanistan, these gains stand in danger of being nullified. With an assertive China in the east and a re-energised Pakistan in the west, India may have reason to be deeply worried. How long can New Delhi live in denial and continue to raise the threshold of tolerance?

Yet, it's not India alone that should be alarmed. When the last helicopter departs from Kabul and Mullah Omar returns to reclaim his lost Emirate, the Islamists would have won a spectacular victory. In just two decades, jihad would have been seen to have vanquished two superpowers - first the Soviet Union and now the US. The inevitable triumphalism is bound to infect the entire Muslim world. In Iran, it will reaffirm the conviction that a self-absorbed, decadent Western civilisation doesn't have the moral gumption to resist a resurgent Islam.

The West should realise that running away doesn't solve a problem; it often emboldens the enemy.
Comments(15)Share
 Rated4.8/5 (39 Votes)
     

    Comments:

    Ali Khan says:September 13, 2009 at 04:04 AM IST
    9/11 is one of the incident in the World which has so many Conspiracy Theories Associated with it. One can just go to YouTube and you find a lot of people talking about it. We have seen 9/11 Truth Demonstrations through out the world but the interesting point is US Government never comes with their explanation or more evidense to support their story. One of the common quesion which we can ask to ourselves is where did the Plane Gone after hitting the Pentagon, the pictures shown were just showing a small hole/crater on one of the wall of pentagon.
    Another interesting thing the series of things happened soon after 9/11 shows that this tragedy has been Politically utilized to its Full Extent by the US Government!!!
    Sameer says:September 13, 2009 at 04:06 AM IST
    9/11 is an Inside Job...
    MUBARAK PATEL says:September 13, 2009 at 05:10 AM IST
    First Super Power USSR (now Russia) and now
    Super Power America,together with other powerful
    allies, are paying the price in fighting enemies
    in primitive Afghanistan. Russia dug in for 10
    years and left hiding the tail between the legs
    incurring heavy losses in terms of human lives
    and arms and ammunitions. America is in 7th year
    and is finding the frustation of war in Afghanis-
    -tan. Financially, all involved in Afghanistan
    are now almost "bankrupt". Very difficult to
    pull on ? World is waiting to see who has the
    last laugh !
    Rajat says:September 13, 2009 at 06:49 AM IST
    Hi,
    your whole article basically stands on the premise that Pakistan or some one there can guaranty that there wont be any strikes against the west post retreat from Afghanistan.
    Americans might be foolish but they sure are not blind, they have seen what happened to the erstwhile USSR, and know that nothing could be more dangerous than giving the Jihadists the slightest chance to proclaim victory.
    You should also know that there can be no end to this problem until either we are able to wipe out the jihadists or the whole world population turns to islam and we start moving back in time.
    Nitesh says:September 13, 2009 at 08:09 AM IST
    A very thoughtful article.
    Once NATO forces go back and the dust settles in Afghanistan and adjoining area of Pakistan,Pakistan will turn the attention of taliban and other islamic fanatics towards India. And jammu & kashmir will again bleed and I shall wait for another terrorist attack in India though on a bigger scale.
    sam the man from pakistan says:September 13, 2009 at 08:41 AM IST
    untill the root causes of the terrorism is not dressed,their will never be a peace.greedyness of israel and india will keep the terrorism alive untill terrorism take them down.solve the palistine and kashmir problem according to the wishes of the people of kashmir and palistine,their will be no more terrorism.
    fait of usa and other involve is going to be worse then rusia.mujahadins will humuliate these forces so bad that they will never dare to attack afghanistan again.
    Azharuddin Masood says:September 13, 2009 at 10:22 AM IST
    The world changed negatively after 9/11, but for Pakistan, it changed for better. Immediately after 9/11 it was well understood and conceived that Pakistani Government, Pakistan’s spy agency ISI was involved in the 9/11 attack. Since Pakistan have always been an ally of US right from the day of creation, Bush administration fully covered Pakistan and heralded as an ally of US and went after Al Qaida and Taliban, instead of waging a war campaign against Pakistan US included Pakistan as a frontline state in the war on terror but in reality Pakistan is the enemy of America, Afghanistan, India and humanity at large PATHOS!!! It was clearly indicated with proof that the then ISI chief General Mahmoud Ahmed instructed Omer Sheikh to transfer $100,000 before 9/11 attack to Atta the ring leader of 9/11. When the ISI chief was exposed of having send the money to the hijackers, the then President Musharraf now mentally retard, forced ISI general to retire immediately. Soon after the invasion of Afghanistan Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders went on run. Pakistan seems to be harboring Al Qaeda and Taliban terrorists. Pakistan knows very well that until terrorists are with them they will continue to get monetary aid and military aid from US which they are accumulating it to use against India. After 9/11 many Pakistani journalists’ referred to Al Qaida as Al-Faeda such was the monetary benefit to Pakistan. 9/11 literally spawned a new industry named “terrorism” for Pakistan. This not at all surprises me; Pakistan is a devil in the face of an ally. The best suggestion is the US should send its military into Pakistan from the western borders from Afghanistan and at the same time India should attack Pakistan from the east. World will never be able to root out terrorism without dismantling Pakistan. 99.9 % of Pakistanis are heavily sympathetic to radicalism. Its enough now and we should stop daydreaming and take a strong stance and attack Pakistan to make this world free of terrorism.
    Gunjan says:September 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM IST
    Very well written article and analysis. But we must not forget that the west would not hesitate to use the nuclear option like it has done in the past to tilt the balance in its favour.
    What can stop them from doing it ? World opinion. But then the world opinion of the powers that matter (Russia, China, Europe, India and even Israel) are themselves fed up of islamism and its dangers. So its not unlikely that after the NATO forces leave, one large attack occurs on the world and the west builds a consensus to nuke the troubled areas of pakistan/afghanistan.
    @ Sam the man from pakistan - palestine and kashmir are excuses that islamists use to justify their inherent need for fighting a holy war at any cost. We have seen it in the past and the world wont be fooled by such excuses to vent your islamic frustration. The moment you get palestine and kashmir, you would find another excuse. Let me give you an example - you as a pakistani - what do you have to do with palestine really ? Just because the palestinians are majority muslims, right ? In the same line of thought, you would find chechnya next, philipines after that, Uighuir chinese next and so on and so forth.
    The cause of islamism does not stop at palestine and kashmir - it extends into world domination. And it is this desire that makes the west their most hated enemy as they cant tolerate the prosperity and power of the western world. THAT is the root cause of islamism and not political issues in faraway lands like kashmir and palestine. They are mere symptoms of the disease.
    Jake says:September 13, 2009 at 12:22 PM IST
    A really well writen article...it shows u have a real concern and understanding of the situation...while there is a lot that i could write on, including the real reasons for these wars, i'm just going to state here that american departure from afghanistan is imminent. The problem that the (the americans) have is that their population is wonderful (though horribly uninformed), and they really won't let this war go on for too long....
    Unfotrunately for the brave afghan people, the taliban will eventually take over (unless there's a sustained effort by the international community to finish them)....Pakistan will be a victim of a monster of its own creation.....and incursions into Indian territory will not cease...
    Never underestimate the afghans....afhanistan is the "graveyard of empires"....
    abhishek says:September 13, 2009 at 12:25 PM IST
    india has to learn some lesson from these attack and take some measure steep to stop it happen again but gov of india loock like to take it easey.
    anonymous says:September 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM IST
    The West must not abandon Afghanistan at this point in time.
    premji jairam says:September 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM IST
    It is strange that Indian dependence on US and western countries`stratagey regarding Af-Pak`terror agenda.This myopic view belittle political acumen of the Indian intellgentia who designed our policies.
    Nitesh says:September 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM IST
    @ sam the man from pakistan
    So you want to say that till the time India and Pakistan doesn't solve Pakistan problem, innocent kashmiri people will continue to die at the hands of the terrorist sent from your factories in Muzaffarabad and elsewhere which produce more terrorists than cotton produced in Pakistan. You see it's a circle and you are seeing the circle anti-clockwise. Try to see it clockwise. Till the time Pakistan stops sponsoring terrorists across the boarder and planning attacks like 26-11 Mumbai attacks, the peace talks will never take off and bear fruits and remain hidden in the rusting files.
    And don't you worry about Afghanistan. Nothing will happen to terrorist's hegemony over there. In some years USA will take it's troops away and then you can always raise another powerful Taliban in Afghanistan and SWAT areas. This time ground Empire State building and Sears towers destroy statues of Buddha in India(World Trade Centre and Bamiyan statues are no more) and establish a rule of Islam whose meaning you fanatics don't understand at all. Make Osama Bin Laden the Secretary General of UN if it at all exists in your Utopian world.
    Vikram says:September 13, 2009 at 01:51 PM IST
    The religious fundamentalist nut jobs should be fought with cold logic. There is no point in getting angry or emotional and making a lot of noise. It only makes them think that they have succeeded in upsetting others.
    If they attack any civilized country, they should be systematically tracked down and eliminated. Also, destroy their irrational ideology with education and logic. Make them realize that there is no Jannat (Heaven) and that the only place they will end up if they become suicide bombers is six feet under the ground and decompose.
    Raj says:September 13, 2009 at 02:05 PM IST
    Sir,
    Whether one agrees or not ,the fact remains that Islam is fastest growing religion on the planet.
    As I understand,in most of the arab countries unless a man has 4 wives and maintains 4 different homes to maintain them,he is considered to be not "strong enough".The result is that muslims population is growing all over disproprtionately.
    In India also Hindus,thanks to their adherence to family planning, are predicted to be minority in next 50 years and either there would be a civil war or another partition in such a case(even though I sincierly hope such things dont happen).
    Even worldwide the these trends are being debated.For example a youtube video describes how Europe would be 30% Muslim in next 40-50 years and white Christian people may lose their liberal way of
    life as Shariyat would implemented in such a case.
    And if the strong leaders like Bush and Blair could not resolve this issue,who could?
    Is it scaremongering and "communal" to raise such issues?I dont think so.
    My suggestion is a frank and open dialoguse between various religions of the world so that consensus of peaceful co-existence could be arrived at.
    Relions must encourage harmony amongst people and not create animosity between them.
    Live and let live should be motto of everyone.