Tuesday, September 8, 2009

An irreverent Australian's irreverent conversion to Islam that is never the less most inspiring.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-IuJL8HgvM

An irreverent Australian's irreverent conversion to Islam that is never the less most inspiring.

Have you given your zakat or sadaqah yet?

CAIR

Dear CAIR Supporter,

 

 

As-salaamu alaykum (peace be to you) and Ramadan Mubarak.

 

Think of the benefit of giving your zakat this Ramadan to support the organization that defends your rights.

 

Numerous Muslim scholars have confirmed that zakat is payable to organizations that exist to serve the Muslim community by protecting their rights. This is because the work done by CAIR can be classified as “fi-sabilillah,” which is one of the eight categories of zakat recipients detailed in the Quran (Chapter 9, Verse 60).

 

Since its founding in 1994, CAIR has helped more than 20,000 American Muslims who faced discrimination or who were the target of hate crimes.

 

Every day, CAIR receives reports of civil rights abuses suffered by American Muslims nationwide.

 

Last year, CAIR and our more than 30 chapters processed the highest number of Muslim civil rights complaints ever reported. The number of reported civil rights complaints from mosques and Muslim organizations has also increased.

 

Just recently :

  • CAIR reported racist graffiti was scrawled in a Muslim business in Philadelphia when it was trashed by vandals.
  • CAIR-Seattle met with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials to discuss allegations of racial and religious profiling.
  • CAIR’s Tampa office assisted the family of a Florida Muslim who was acquitted by a jury of terror charges but later held for deportation based on the same allegations. He was subsequently released.

Please support these vital efforts to defend your rights with your zakat and sadaqah during this holy month. All contributions to CAIR are both zakat-eligible and tax-deductible.

 

I urge you to consider giving $5,000, $2,500, $1,000, $500, $250, $100, $50, or whatever you can. We appreciate any contribution you give.

 

 

We realize that there are many worthy causes to support. We look forward to our generous support to this noble cause.

 

Thank you for your support and may Allah bless you and your family.

 

State Senator Larry Shaw (NC)

CAIR National Board Chairman

 

P.S. Please send this appeal to your friends and family,

and post on Facebook, Twitter, and other such sites.

 

 

Donations to CAIR are tax-deductible and zakat eligible. CAIR is a not-for-profit organization recognized as tax-exempt under U.S. Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3).

To learn more about us, visit our website to see our vision, mission and core principles as well as CAIR at-a-glance detailing information about CAIR. You can also read about CAIR national board and key staff and see the leaders of each of our chapters.

 


| Update Email Preferences | Unsubscribe | Visit Our Website |

Council on American-Islamic Relations
453 New Jersey Ave, S.E., Washington, D.C., 20003
Council on American-Islamic Relations Copyright © 2008 All rights reserved



CAIR


Unsubscribe from receiving email, or change your email preferences.

One-nation Theory by Amulya Ganguli - DNA Mumbai daily

http://www.dnaindia.com/opinion/main-article_one-nation-theory_1288289


Home > Opinion > Main Article

One-nation theory

Amulya Ganguli

Monday, September 7, 2009 20:09 IST

The controversy over Jaswant Singh's book has seen the revival of the debate on Partition. What is curious, however, is the support which the saffron camp has extended to something which it earlier condemned as the vivisection of the motherland.

This transition from the earlier yearnings for Akhand Bharat to the acceptance of the reality of a divided India is a new feature of Hindutva politics.It can perhaps be traced to the observations of Girilal Jain, a former editor of The Times of India in his book, The Hindu Phenomenon, where he said that Jinnah "was the greatest benefactor of Hindus in modern times if he was not a Hindu in disguise. That has been my way of saying that Partition was the best thing that could have happened for Hindus ... because without it they could not have produced even a workable Constitution, not to speak of a viable economic and democratic political order".

In a recent interview, Arun Shourie said that "I have come to realise that Girilal Jain was the one who was right" for he argued that if there was no Partition "we would have been bullied and thrashed and swamped by Islamic fundamentalists". Similar views were expressed by a former Union home secretary, Madhav Godbole, in The Holocaust of Indian Partition, where he said that undivided India would have presented "a frightening picture of a country torn asunder by internal dissension, political instability and social and communal tension".

There are at least three factors behind such doomsday predictions. One is a dislike of Muslims, which is undeniably there among sections of Hindus. It was (and apparently still is) a relief to them, therefore, to get rid of the mlechhas. The second factor, which reinforces this sense of animosity, is the dread of the unknown alien with whom there is very little social interaction. And the third is a strange inferiority complex which is evident in the apprehension of being "swamped" by Islamists.

This fear of the Muslims may have increased because of the upsurge of militant fundamentalists in the Af-Pak region. An occasional contributor to a newspaper had wondered, therefore, how a united India could have dealt with the turmoil near the Durand line. He was happy that the Radcliffe line had been drawn.

What is strange about these attitudes is the cursory dismissal of the fact that Hindus and Muslims had lived together in the subcontinent for 12 centuries before 1947 and in divided India for another 60 years after that. Although the saffron brotherhood likes to project the earlier centuries as a period of endless conflict between the two communities, such a view fails to explain the development of the composite culture which wouldn't have been possible in the absence of close and harmonious intermingling.

As historian Akhilesh Mithal pointed out, dhrupad, khayal, thumri and ghazal in the world of music could not have evolved without decades of friendly interaction. Nor would India have witnessed the architectural achievements of the Taj Mahal or its cuisine being enriched by the culinary innovations of what has come to be known as Mughlai food.

The cultural and literary efflorescence of Tulsidas, Surdas, Meera, Mir Taqi Mir, Ghalib and others is also a product of this amicable cohabitation. None of these point to being bullied or swamped.

Instead, Islam itself acquired a gentle face. As the Pakistani historian, Akbar S Ahmed, said, the subcontinental model of sulahkul or peace with all became a feature of Islam, whose most shining example was the dargah of Moinuddin Chisti in Ajmer.

"Can you imagine", he said," a saint living in Rajasthan in the middle ages surrounded by Hindus and propagating peace and harmony through Islam?"The political face of this model could be seen in the Unionist Party of Punjab, which the Pakistani historian, Ayesha Jalal, described as "a cross-communal alliance of Muslim, Hindu and Sikh agricultural interests" led by the two towering regional figures, Fazl-i-Hussain and Chaudhury Chhotu Ram.

Hussain was invited by Jinnah to preside over the Muslim League in 1936 with the words that "no one can give a better lead to the Mussalmans of India than yourself".

Fazlul Huq of Bengal's Krishak Praja Party was another such figure. Neither of them favoured Pakistan because the Muslims were in a majority in their provinces any way. Hussain's successor, Khizar Hayat Khan Tiwana, told Jinnah, therefore, to "keep his finger out of the Punjab pie" while describing the idea of Pakistan as "nonsense".

Yet these men are forgotten today along with their secular compatriot Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan while Jinnah's Direct Action is remembered to justify the break-up in 1947.

Had there been no Partition, it is the likes of Husain and Frontier Gandhi, not to mention Nehru and Gandhi, who would have ensured the continuance of communal togetherness of the last 1,200 years without any side swamping the other.

The writer is a Delhi-based political commentator