Thursday, June 16, 2011

Eisenhower's worst fears came true. We invent enemies to buy the bombs - By Simon Jenkins - The Guardian, UK

 -------------------------

AS LONG AS JEWS/ZIONISTS ARE IN IMPORTANT POLICY MAKING POSITIONS IN THE WEST, WAR CANNOT BE STOPPED; AS THEY BELIEVE IN THE DICTUM OF PERMANENT WAR FOR PERMANENT PEACE. ONLY THEIR IDEA OF 'PEACE' IS CERTAINLY NOT SHARED BY REST OF THE WORLD.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

-------------------------

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/16/eisenhower-fears-invent-enemies-buy-bombs

guardian.co.uk home

Eisenhower's worst fears came true. We invent enemies to buy the bombs

Britain faces no serious threat, yet keeps waging war. While big defence exists, glory-hungry politicians will use it

  • Simon Jenkins
  • Why do we still go to war? We seem unable to stop. We find any excuse for this post-imperial fidget and yet we keep getting trapped. Germans do not do it, or Spanish or Swedes. Britain's borders and British people have not been under serious threat for a generation. Yet time and again our leaders crave battle. Why? Last week we got a glimpse of an answer and it was not nice. The outgoing US defence secretary, Robert Gates, berated Europe's "failure of political will" in not maintaining defence spending. He said Nato had declined into a "two-tier alliance" between those willing to wage war and those "who specialise in 'soft' humanitarian, development, peacekeeping and talking tasks". Peace, he implied, is for wimps. Real men buy bombs, and drop them. This call was echoed by Nato's chief, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who pointed out how unfair it was that US defence investment represented 75% of the Nato defence expenditure, where once it was only half. Having been forced to extend his war on Libya by another three months, Rasmussen wanted to see Europe's governments come up with more money, and no nonsense about recession. Defence to him is measured not in security but in spending.   Joe Magee: Guardian The call was repeated back home by the navy chief, Sir Mark Stanhope. He had to be "dressed down" by the prime minister, David Cameron, for warning that an extended war in Libya would mean "challenging decisions about priorities". Sailors never talk straight: he meant more ships. The navy has used so many of its £500,000 Tomahawk missiles trying to hit Colonel Gaddafi (and missing) over the past month that it needs money for more. In a clearly co-ordinated lobby, the head of the RAF also demanded "a significant uplift in spending after 2015, if the service is to meet its commitments". It, of course, defines its commitments itself. Libya has cost Britain £100m so far, and rising. But Iraq and the Afghan war are costing America $3bn a week, and there is scarcely an industry, or a state, in the country that does not see some of this money. These wars show no signs of being ended, let alone won. But to the defence lobby what matters is the money. It sustains combat by constantly promising success and inducing politicians and journalists to see "more enemy dead", "a glimmer of hope" and "a corner about to be turned". Victory will come, but only if politicians spend more money on "a surge". Soldiers are like firefighters, demanding extra to fight fires. They will fight all right, but if you want victory that is overtime. On Wednesday the Russian ambassador to Nato warned that Britain and France were "being dragged more and more into the eventuality of a land-based operation in Libya". This is what the defence lobby wants institutionally, even if it may appal the generals. In the 1980s Russia watched the same process in Afghanistan, where it took a dictator, Mikhail Gorbachev, to face down the Red Army and demand withdrawal. The west has no Gorbachev in Afghanistan at the moment. Nato's Rasmussen says he "could not envisage" a land war in Libya, since the UN would take over if Gaddafi were toppled. He must know this is nonsense. But then he said Nato would only enforce a no-fly zone in Libya. He achieved that weeks ago, but is still bombing. It is not democracy that keeps western nations at war, but armies and the interests now massed behind them. The greatest speech about modern defence was made in 1961 by the US president Eisenhower. He was no leftwinger, but a former general and conservative Republican. Looking back over his time in office, his farewell message to America was a simple warning against the "disastrous rise of misplaced power" of a military-industrial complex with "unwarranted influence on government". A burgeoning defence establishment, backed by large corporate interests, would one day employ so many people as to corrupt the political system. (His original draft even referred to a "military-industrial-congressional complex".) This lobby, said Eisenhower, could become so huge as to "endanger our liberties and democratic processes". I wonder what Eisenhower would make of today's US, with a military grown from 3.5 million people to 5 million. The western nations face less of a threat to their integrity and security than ever in history, yet their defence industries cry for ever more money and ever more things to do. The cold war strategist, George Kennan, wrote prophetically: "Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial complex would have to remain, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented." The devil makes work for idle hands, especially if they are well financed. Britain's former special envoy to Kabul, Sherard Cowper-Coles, echoed Kennan last week in claiming that the army's keenness to fight in Helmand was self-interested. "It's use them or lose them, Sherard," he was told by the then chief of the general staff, Sir Richard Dannatt. Cowper-Coles has now gone off to work for an arms manufacturer. There is no strategic defence justification for the US spending 5.5% of its gross domestic product on defence or Britain 2.5%, or for the Nato "target" of 2%. These figures merely formalise existing commitments and interests. At the end of the cold war soldiers assiduously invented new conflicts for themselves and their suppliers, variously wars on terror, drugs, piracy, internet espionage and man's general inhumanity to man. None yields victory, but all need equipment. The war on terror fulfilled all Eisenhower's fears, as America sank into a swamp of kidnapping, torture and imprisonment without trial. The belligerent posture of the US and Britain towards the Muslim world has fostered antagonism and moderate threats in response. The bombing of extremist targets in Pakistan is an invitation for terrorists to attack us, and then a need for defence against such attack. Meanwhile, the opportunity cost of appeasing the complex is astronomical. Eisenhower remarked that "every gun that is made is a theft from those who hunger" – a bomber is two power stations and a hospital not built. Likewise, each Tomahawk Cameron drops on Tripoli destroys not just a Gaddafi bunker (are there any left?), but a hospital ward and a classroom in Britain. As long as "big defence" exists it will entice glory-hungry politicians to use it. It is a return to the hundred years war, when militaristic barons and knights had a stranglehold on the monarch, and no other purpose in life than to fight. To deliver victory they demanded ever more taxes for weapons, and when they had ever more weapons they promised ever grander victories. This is exactly how Britain's defence ministry ran out of budgetary control under Labour. There is one piece of good news. Nato has long outlived its purpose, now justifying its existence only by how much it induces its members to spend, and how many wars irrelevant to its purpose it finds to fight. Yet still it does not spend enough for the US defence secretary. In his anger, Gates threatened that "future US leaders … may not consider the return on America's investment in Nato worth the cost". Is that a threat or a promise?

Proposed Food Security Bill is a half baked approach: MPJ, Maharashtra

http://twocircles.net/2011jun15/proposed_food_security_bill_half_baked_approach_mpj_maharashtra.html


Proposed Food Security Bill is a half baked approach: MPJ, Maharashtra

Submitted by admin4 on 15 June 2011 - 12:36pm
By TCN News,


Mumbai: “The National Food Security Bill is envisaged as a landmark legislation that will guarantee and legally admit the right for food for all citizens of the nation. But Proposed Food Security Bill is a half baked approach in realizing comprehensive food security for the nation" said Mohammed Anees, Convener, Committee on Policy Initiatives, Movement for Peace & Justice (MPJ), (Maharashtra).


He said that Saxena Report (Ministry of Rural Development) of Aug 2009 opined “We respect that all basic entitlements should be universal. We believe that the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution should never be compromised or undermined; instead they need to be realized, strengthened and further taken forward. Food for all, health for all, and education for all – these should be taken as bottom line.




Mohammed Anees


“Yet what has come out is just a repetition of the earlier fault-prone, targeted, often proven as wrong, divisive and one that contravenes the spirit of the Constitution, a Public Distribution System which fares even weaker in guarantying complete food & nutritional security” he added.


He further said that important aspect in the food life cycle, i.e. ensuring security in terms of food grain production, is not even discussed. Certain non-measurable endeavors on reviving agriculture are mentioned under the chapter “Progressive realization of entitlement,” whose meaning we fail to fathom.


Following are some recommendations by MPJ (Maharashtra) which has consistently been engaged on the issue of food security and agrarian crisis.

Sections
Comment / Suggestion / Alternate
Sec2g:“Destitute Persons” shall mean men, women or children who lack the resources, means and support required for nutrition enabling survival with dignity;
Sec10. Entitlement of Destitute persons
What are the methods of identifying “Destitute Persons” and no clear compensation listed for denial of entitlement of “Destitute Persons”
No mention of entitlement for adolescent girls
The bill does not provide for any entitlement for adolescent girls.
a)Note the successive Supreme Court orders (28th Nov 2001, 7th Oct 2004, 13th Dec 2006) on Universal ICDS have noted the importance of including adolescent girls under ICDS.
b)The presence of large number of anaemic girls (75% in rural India according to Saxena Report Aug 2009), high incidence of low weight birth, this important category cannot be ignored. Adolescent girls must be entitled for nutrition and health benefits thru Anganwadis.
c) Help reduce child marriage and early pregnancy of adolescent girls
d)This is also needed to meet the Millenium Development Goal No 5 “Improve Maternal Health”
e) Sec 84 (2) Duty of Central Government to Frame Schemes: to include adolescent girls as a separate beneficiary
Sec8: Midday meal to Children.- (1) On and from the date of enactment of this Act, the State Government shall provide all children up to class-8..
The benefits of MDM should be extended upto class-10.
Sec13 upto Sec16: Right of persons living in starvation
This section is just an additional elaboration of Art 21 of the constitution. The section should also include compensation for denial of this right and penalties for public servant.
Sec 17, 18 & 19: Identification and Subsidized food grains to rural and urban households
Sec17. Identification of Households: The State Government shall, based on the criteria mentioned in Schedule. … and Schedule … identify households known as the Priority Group and General Group and issue to them appropriate Ration Cards to enable them to receive food grains at the rates applicable to them.
Sec18. Subsidised Food Grains to rural households.- (1) The State Government shall provide to all rural households on the basis of criteria mentioned in Schedule …. to subsidized food grains at the rates specified in Schedule 4 hereto, to be known as the Priority Group.
(2) The Central Government shall have the power, by notification, to add to the criteria in the schedule ….. here to, but so as in a manner by not removing any category from the schedule.
(3) All rural households other than those in the priority group shall be entitled to subsidized food grains at the rates specified in Schedule 4 here to, to be known as the General Category.
(4) The State Government may by notification in the official gazette exclude persons who fulfil the exclusion criteria provided in Schedule … , to be known as the Excluded Category.
Provided, however by making the said exclusion, the State Government shall ensure that not less than 90% of all rural households are entitled to subsidized food grains in accordance with sub section (1) and (3).
Sec19. Subsidised Food Grains to Urban households: (1) The State Government shall provide to all urban households on the basis of criteria mentioned in Schedule …. shall be entitled to subsidized food grains at the rates specified in Schedule 4 hereto, to be known as the priority group.
(2) The Central Government shall have the power, by notification, to add to the criteria in the schedule ….. here to, but so as in a manner not removing any category from the schedule.
(3) All urban households other than those in the priority group shall be entitled to subsidized food grains at the rates specified in Schedule 4 here to, to be known as the general category.
(4) The State Government may by notification in the official gazette exclude persons who fulfil the exclusion criteria provided in Schedule … , to be known as the excluded category.
Provided, however by making a said exclusion, the State Government shall ensure that not less than 50% of all urban households are entitled to subsidized food grains in accordance with sub section 3.
We have serious concerns & disagreement on the approach toward Food & Nutritional security laid out in the bill under these sections.
a)Repeat of the faulty TPDS: Formation of 3 categories viz. Priority, General and Exclusion, we are repeating the mistakes of 1997. The Right to Food Case in Supreme Court have noted major identification errors.
b) Just by assigning different title does not take away the fact that the categories are based on the Tendulkar Report on Poverty, albeit marginally expanded but still less than the Saxena Report suggestion and far below the Arjunsen Gupta’s “poor & vulnerable groups” comprising 77.8% of our population.
c) Recent Planning Commissions submission of Rs15/20 as Poverty Line for Rural/Urban makes clear the intention is to once again repeat the mistakes of the 1997 BPL survey and denial of vast section of deserving from legal entitlements.
d) We suggest “Near Universalise” methodology with simple “exclusion” criteria that will be equivalent to the “food grain provision” requirement for Priority & General category put together.
e) No separate 7kg and 4kg individual entitlements as proposed for “Priority” & “General” categories. An household of 5 members require minimum 50kg food grain. 7kg & 4kg are much less than monthly requirement.
f) Schedule IV does not specify kgs for Rice, Wheat and Millets. We suggest 4kg each of Rice, Wheat & Millet as individual entitlement.
j) Mere provision of Rice, Wheat & Millet makes the entitlement as “Cereal Centric” It contravene the purpose and spirit of Art 21 and Art 47 of the Constitution and repeated again in the Preamble of this Bill for deriving justification of this Act. By making the entitlement as only “Cereal Centric” and by not including pulses and oil as legal entitlements we are not ensuring genuine food & nutrition security.
k) The legal entitlements must remain in perpetuity and must not be linked to the end of the 12th Plan as was mentioned in the Note to NFS Bill dated 21st Jan 2011 by NAC’s working group.
Sec 26: Monitoring the Procurement, Distribution and Sale of Subsidized Food Grains
Add a clause:
The State Government shall appoint a Vigilance committee for every Fair Price Shop at Rural & Urban areas
Sec 29 & 46 Eligibility for appointment of Vice Chairperson and other members of National Food Commission & State Food Commission
(a) who have been or are in an All – India Service or any civil service of the Union or State or in a civil post under the Union or State having knowledge and experience in matters relating to food security, policy making and administration in the field of agriculture, civil supplies, nutrition and health or any allied field;
(b) who are of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, human rights, science and technology, social service, management, nutrition, food policy or public administration;
(c) who have a proven record of work relating to the improvement of the Food and Nutrition Rights of the poor:
Please add the following:
At any given point of time, at least 3 members from of the commission including Vice Chairperson must belong to clause b & c of this Section
Sec62. Appointment of the District Grievance Redressal Officer
Some suggestions:
a)The Short Service type appointment is weak and will not attract the best.
b)The idea of appointment of Defenders of Human Rights for Justice & Reparations in the proposed Prevention of Communal & Targeted Violence to be extended here.
c)We suggest that appointment of two District Grievance Redressal Officers viz. One from the UPSC with a posting of not more than 5 years and the Second from the civil society with experience in monitoring the schemes under this Act.
Sec69(a)(11) Power to give Directions…the District Grievance Redressal Officer…have the power to:
a)Direct the appropriate authority to:
xi. Make regular reports to the District Grievance Redressal Officer regarding implementation of the direction given by the District Grievance Redressal Officer
Correct 69(a)(11)
Make regular reports to the State Food Commission regarding implementation of the direction given by the State Food Commission
Sec 79. Dereliction of Duty by Public Servant
Sec 80. Dereliction of Duty by Government Departments
Both the sections do not cover public servants who have retired but have been proved to be guilty of dereliction of duty.
Sec 81. Power to impose Penalties.- (1) Where the District Grievance Redressal Officer or the State Food Commission or the National Food Commission, as the case may be, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that any public servant discharging duties under the Act has, without any reasonable cause or is guilty of dereliction of his duties in accordance with this Act, it shall impose a penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees in the first instance and of Rs 100 for every day thereafter until the relief, as directed by the District Grievance Redressal Officer, is granted.
(2) The District Grievance Redressal Officer, State Food Commission or the National Food Commission, as the case maybe, shall be competent to direct deduction of the said penalty from the salary of the public servant
a)The penalty under Sec 81 is quite weak and will not act as deterrent.
b) Apart from fines, provision for criminal proceeding should also be included for serious derelictions like denial of entitlement for Destitutes, Homeless and Persons living in starvation.
c) State Food Commission / District Grievance Redressal Officer can refer State Government initiate criminal proceedings against public servants for serious derelictions and sanction is deemed to have been granted by this Act.
d) Essential Commodities Act must also be referred or invoked for dereliction of duties.
e) Public servants in municipal bodies must also be included under the ambit of this Act
Sec95(2). Vigilance Committee
Every vigilance committee shall have, at least, the following:
(a) Two Persons belonging to a Scheduled Caste and/ or Tribe
(b) Two Women and
(c) Two Destitute Persons or disabled people
Add the following categories:
a)   One person from the minority community
b)  At least one person from the civil society known to have genuinely worked on issues of livelihood or aligned with Right to Food Campaign
Sec83. Duties of Central Government to ensure adequate budgetary provisions: It shall be the duty of the Central Government to ensure that adequate budgetary provisions and timely allocation of resources are made within one year from the Act being brought into force, so as to ensure that all the authorities and institutions established under this Act can function at full force and without any constraint whatsoever, as to carry out their mandate under this Act
The need of a comprehensive rights based food security legislation is overdue. The Act must come in effect immediately. The external monitoring apparatus i.e the commissions & redressal officers can be setup within 6 months of the act coming in force.
Sec 93. Duty to identify persons living in starvation: Local bodies (Panchayati Raj Institutions and Urban Local Bodies) shall ensure identification of people living with starvation in their territorial jurisdiction, and alert the district authorities of starvation like conditions, of individuals or groups.
What if the local bodies do not identify the persons living in starvation?
The Rafiq Nagar case of Mumbai is an example wherein the local ward office admitted the deaths of 18 children under-6 within a span of 6 months but made no effort to highlight starvation.
Such behavior of Public Servants must be considered as dereliction of duties under Sec 79 & Sec 80 of this Act
Chapter XVI: TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
We suggest that an Integrated Community Based Monitoring (CBM) be setup for all welfare schemes esp related to Food Security & Healthcare.
CHAPTER – XVII & Sec 96: PROGRESSIVE REALISATION OF ENTITLEMENTS
a)The clause under this chapter are just wish list of any civil democratic government. Most of what is contained in the chapter are already present in the constitution.
b)But 60 years after the dedication of the constitution to ourselves we are still way behind to ensure the basic necessities like food & nutritional security, affordable & quality healthcare, universal education & dignified employment.
c) Unless all these are substantiated with timely actions on the ground, adequate budgetary allocation and commitment by acknowledging these as “Legal entitlements” rather than as “Progressive Realisation of Entitlements”, we will see little being done on the ground.

SP ( Samajwadi Party) campaigns to echo AIMPLB agenda - Pioneer News Service - Lucknow - THE PIONEER Daily

http://www.dailypioneer.com/345192/SP-campaigns-to-echo-AIMPLB-agenda.html




LUCKNOW | Sunday, June 12, 2011 | Email | Print | | Back 


SP campaigns to echo AIMPLB agenda

June 16, 2011   12:45:27 PM


Pioneer News Service | Lucknow

The agenda of All-India Muslim Personal Law Board will now echo in the Samajwadi Party campaigns.

With an eye on the Muslim vote bank, Mulayam Singh Yadav's party has readily agreed to support most of the demands of the AIMPLB.

This transformation has come after AIMPLB member Kamal Farooqui joined the SP during its Agra convention on June 8. Farooqui, who had close links with Congress, is also associated with several eminent Muslim organisations including All-India Milli Council (AIMC). His association with Congress reaped benefits for the party and it rewarded him with the post of Chairman of Delhi Minorities Commission.

"SP supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav has agreed to raise the issue of reservations for Muslims, waqf bill and the minority character of Aligarh Muslim University at national level.

His support will give the much needed force to these demands. I too joined the party after his assurance," Farooqui said at a press conference on Saturday. He also said that the SP was always pro-AIMPLB and now after his formal joining the party, he wold be in a better position to drive his point.

Responding to a querry, Farooqui termed the emergence of various Muslim political outfits as a dangerous sign for the community in the state.

"The demographic characteristic of UP is different from other states like Assam and Kerela. Here Muslims are scattered and any religion-based political outfit will cause polarisation of votes. Muslims should understand this and join the mainstream politics," he said.

Farooqui even claimed that he was having parleys with Dr Ayub of Peace Party, representatives of Ulema Council and had recently launched Welfare Party of India (WPI) for striking truce for a unified front led by SP.

"It is too premature to comment but I am trying my best," he added.