Monday, March 12, 2012

U.S Sergeant on SEAL team had 'breakdown' and shot nine sleeping Afghan children before burning their bodies' in deadly rampage that killed 16 - MailOnline

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113410/US-sergeant-SEAL-team-shoots-dead-16-Afghan-civilians-deadly-rampage.html?ICO=most_read_module




What made him snap? Sergeant on SEAL team had 'breakdown' and shot nine sleeping Afghan children before burning their bodies' in deadly rampage that killed 16

  • U.S. and British officials warn of reprisals against troops after massacre
  • Taliban militants vow to avenge deaths
  • Shooter identified as Army staff sergeant from Fort Lewis, Washington
  • Base regarded as 'most troubled in the military' with history of killings
  • 'Entered three homes, shot 16 dead after suffering mental breakdown'
  • Nine children and three women among those reported dead
  • Relative: He 'poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them'
By Beth Stebner and Thomas Durante
|
Sixteen innocent Afghan civilians - including nine children and three women - were shot and killed by a rogue U.S. soldier who opened fire after suffering a 'mental breakdown' early Sunday morning.
The Army staff sergeant, stationed at a U.S. base in Kandahar, entered three Afghan family’s homes at 3am and began the vicious killing spree. Relatives of the dead said he then 'poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them.'
The shooter is an Army staff sergeant from Fort Lewis-McChord in Washington state, and was believed to have acted alone.
Military officials are investigating the incident and working to discover what made the soldier - believed to be a father of three - snap to such extremes that he would embark on a killing mission.
With tensions rising in the region, U.S. and British officials said they were now braced for a backlash as Taliban militants vowed to avenge the deaths.
Scroll down for videos WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT
Disbelief: Two grief-stricken Afghan men look into the van where the body of a small child lays
Disbelief: Two grief-stricken Afghan men look into the van where the body of a badly burned child lays, wrapped in a blue blanket
Horrific: The bodies of an elderly Afghan man and a child killed in the Alkozai village of Panjwayi district are shown wrapped in blankets
Horrific: The bodies of an elderly Afghan man and a child killed in the Alkozai village of Panjwayi district are shown wrapped in blankets
Station: The shooter was identified by U.S. officials as an Army staff sergeant from Fort Lewis, Washington, which has troubling history
Station: The shooter was identified by U.S. officials as an Army staff sergeant from Fort Lewis, Washington, which has troubling history
Initial reports indicated he returned to his base after the shooting, calmly turned himself in and was taken into custody at a NATO base in Afghanistan.
In a statement, Afghan President Hamid Karzai left open the possibility of more than one shooter. He initially spoke of a single U.S. gunman, then referred to 'American forces' entering houses.

 
The statement quoted a 15-year-old survivor named Rafiullah, shot in the leg, as telling Karzai in a phone call that 'soldiers' broke into his house, woke up his family and began shooting them.
Mr Karzai condemned the attacks as 'an assassination' and furiously demanded an explanation from the U.S.
High alert: American soldiers keep watch at the entrance of a military base near Alkozai village following the shooting of Afghan civilians, after which the Afghan Taliban vowed revenge
High alert: American soldiers keep watch at the entrance of a military base near Alkozai village following the shooting of Afghan civilians, after which the Afghan Taliban vowed revenge
Little is known about the soldier who committed the atrocities, including his name, but a U.S. official said he is married with three children, and served three separate tours in Iraq.
He was assigned to support a special operations unit of either Green Berets or Navy SEALs engaged in a village stability operation.

Such operations are among NATO's best hopes for transitioning out of Afghanistan, pairing special operations troops with villagers chosen by village elders to become essentially a sanctioned, armed neighbourhood watch. He has reportedly been stationed in Afghanistan since December.
Fort Lewis-McChord is about 45 miles south of Seattle and home to about 100,000 military and civilian personnel. 
A former soldier out of Fort Lewis shot and injured a Salt Lake City police officer in 2010, and on January 1, a 24-year-old Iraq War veteran shot and killed a Mount Rainier National Park ranger.
Watchful eye: Afghan soldiers stand guard outside the houses where 16 civilians were shot dead by a U.S. soldier
Watchful eye: Afghan soldiers stand guard outside the houses where 16 civilians were shot dead by a U.S. soldier
Tragedy: Locals people gather outside the houses where 17 civilians were murdered by a U.S. soldier in a horrific house-to-house killing spree
Tragedy: Locals people gather outside the houses where 17 civilians were murdered by a U.S. soldier in a horrific house-to-house killing spree
Four Lewis-McChord soldiers were convicted in the deliberate thrill killings of three Afghan civilians in 2010. The military newspaper Stars and Stripes called it 'the most troubled base in the military' that year.
The attack is sure to further tarnish relations between Afghanistan and the U.S., as it comes weeks after NATO soldiers burned copies of the Koran - the Muslim holy book - sparking a violent protest that has left some 30 people dead.
And the former Commander of British Forces in Afghanistan, Colonel Richard Kemp, said British troops could now be targeted in revenge and that the massacre would also erode the vital trust allied forces have built up with Afghan civilians over the course of the war.
He told ITV's Daybreak: 'I think every soldier in Afghanistan, British, American and other allies, will be sickened by a person wearing their own uniform literally going door to door and killing people as they sleep in their houses.
'These are the very people that this soldier and his comrades are supposed to be in Afghanistan to protect not kill.
'You would have to make a very persuasive case that these actions were due to mental stress, that's not to say that the stress isn't there for every soldier in Afghanistan.'
Neighbours said they had awoken to crackling gunfire from American soldiers, who they described as laughing and drunk.
'They were all drunk and shooting all over the place,' said Agha Lala, who visited one of the homes where killings took place. 'Their [the victims'] bodies were riddled with bullets.'
Tears of grief: An Afghan youth mourns for his relatives, who were allegedly killed by the U.S. service member
Tears of grief: An Afghan youth mourns for his relatives, who were allegedly killed by the U.S. service member
Aftermath: Families gather in the Panjwayi district hours after the rogue U.S. soldier opened fire on innocents in three houses, killing 16 people, including nine children
Aftermath: Families gather in the Panjwayi district hours after the rogue U.S. soldier opened fire on innocents in three houses, killing 16 people, including nine children
A senior U.S. defence official in Washington rejected witness accounts that several apparently drunk soldiers were involved.
'Based on the preliminary information we have this account is flatly wrong,' the official said. 'We believe one U.S. service member acted alone, not a group of U.S. soldiers.'
An AP photographer reported that he saw 15 bodies of Afghans - some of them burned and some covered with blankets - in the villages of Alkozai and Balandi in Kandahar province's Panjwai district.

One man told the AFP news agency of his great loss. ‘Eleven members of my family are dead. They are all dead,’ Haji Samad said.
'They [Americans] poured chemicals over their dead bodies and burned them,' a weeping Mr Samad told Reuters at the scene.
According to Al Jazeera, the soldier went into three separate houses at 3am local time when it was pitch black and shot the civilians, who were sleeping in their beds.
Bloody Sunday: Afghan soldiers and villagers congregate outside the houses where 17 civilians were killed by a U.S. soldier
Bloody Sunday: Afghan soldiers and villagers congregate outside the houses where 17 civilians were killed by a U.S. soldier
Perched: An elderly Afghan man sits next to the covered body of a person who was killed early today by a U.S. service member
Perched: An elderly Afghan man sits next to the covered body of a person who was killed early today by a U.S. service member
Scene of the crime: Afghan men investigate at the site of an shooting incident in Kandahar province
Scene of the crime: Afghan men investigate at the site of an shooting incident in Kandahar province
In shock: Relatives sat in shock in a van also carrying the bodies of their kin wrapped in blankets
In shock: Relatives sat in shock in a van also carrying the bodies of their kin wrapped in blankets
Beyond tears: An Afghan man sits in the back of a bus with the body of a person who was killed by a U.S. service member in Kandahar province
Defiant: An Afghan man guards the dead body of a boy killed by the gunman
Beyond tears: A grieving Afghan sits in a van next to one of the bodies (left) while another man sits in a truck bed keeping watch over the body of a young boy
A resident of Alkozai, where the shootings took place, said 16 people were killed as the U.S. service member went into three different houses and started shooting.
The villager, Abdul Baqi, said he had not seen the bodies himself, but had talked to the family members of the dead.

‘When it was happening in the middle of the night we were inside our houses. I heard gunshots and then silence and then gunshots again,’ Mr Baqi said.
'Eleven members of my family are dead. They are all dead.'
-Haji Samad
Reports say that 15 members from two Afghan families were slaughtered, as well as an unidentified sixteenth person.
Mr Karzai also said that five people were wounded. Their conditions are unknown.
Defence Secretary Leon Panetta called the Afghan president to express ‘profound regret’ and assure him that ‘this terrible incident does not reflect our shared values or the progress we have made together,’ his office said in a statement.
He concluded: ‘We will bring those responsible to justice.’
Maj Jason Waggoner, another spokesman for ISAF said: ‘The civilian casualties were not the result of any operations. The soldier was acting on his own. After the incident, he returned to the compound and turned himself in.’
'Deeply saddened': President Obama talks with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai from the back of his vehicle in Chevy Chase, Maryland
'Deeply saddened': President Obama talks with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai from the back of his vehicle in Chevy Chase, Maryland
Demanding answers: Afghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the shootings as an 'assassination' and said it 'cannot be forgiven'
Demanding answers: Afghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the shootings as an 'assassination' and said it 'cannot be forgiven'
NATO-led International Security Assistance Force deputy commander Lt Gen Andrian Bradshaw would not speculate the reasoning behind the seemingly random attack.
Mr Karzai said in a statement that he was sending high-level authorities to investigate the shooting and deliver a full report. NATO officials, too, are conducting an inquiry.
‘This is an assassination, an intentional killing of innocent civilians and cannot be forgiven,’ Mr Karzai said in a statement, adding that he has repeatedly called for the U.S. to stop killing Afghan citizens.

TENSIONS RISING BETWEEN U.S. AND AFGHANISTAN

Pakistani Muslims shout anti-US slogans, as a US flag is burned, at a protest over the recent burning of Korans in Afghanistan, in Multan on March 2, 2012 The attack by the so-called ‘rogue’ U.S. soldier is the latest in a string of tension points between the two countries.
Last month, violent protests erupted after U.S. troops burned copies of the Koran in Kabul; more than 30 were killed.
In January, a video seeming to depict Marines urinating on dead Afghans went viral. Both U.S. and UN officials called it ‘disgusting’ and ‘inhuman.’
Also in January, a report said that at least 58 Western troops were killed by Afghan soldiers between May 2007 to May 2011, showing deep distrust between Afghan soldiers and their supposed western allies.
The war in Afghanistan began more than a decade ago when the US, UK, and Australia launched 'Operation Enduring Freedom.'
President Obama issued a statement this afternoon saying he is ‘deeply saddened’ by the ‘tragic and shocking’ killing of Afghan civilians by a U.S. soldier.
He said: ‘This incident is tragic and shocking and does not represent the exceptional character of our military and the respect that the United States has for the people of Afghanistan.'
The White House said that Mr Obama phoned Mr Karzai to personally express his regret.
The president also vowed to ‘get the facts as quickly as possible and to hold accountable anyone responsible.’
On Sunday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in a statement: ‘We are deeply concerned by the initial reports of this incident, and are monitoring the situation closely.’
There are precious few details on the alleged shooter. Officials have only said that he was an Army staff sergeant who was acting alone.
On CBS’ Face the Nation, Newt Gingrich commented on the escalating tensions in Afghanistan and elsewhere, saying: ‘I think that we have to reassess the entire region,’ noting Washington’s tumultuous relationship with neighbouring Pakistan as well.
Twelve of the dead were from Balandi, said Samad Khan, a farmer who lost all 11 members of his family, including women and children.
Mr Khan was away from the village when the incident occurred and returned to find his family members shot dead and burned.
One of his neighbours was also killed, he said. It was unclear how or why the bodies were set ablaze.
To prove that the bodies had been set on fire, Afghan villagers brought out badly burned blankets, the New York Times reported. More than 300 people came out to protest the senseless violence.
An AP photo showed the bloodstained corner of a house next to a large black area that was charred by fire. The charred area appeared to be remnants of blankets and possibly bodies that had been set on fire.
Villagers packed inside the minibus looked on with concern as a woman spoke to reporters. She pulled back a blanket to reveal the body of a smaller child wearing what appeared to be red pajamas.
A third dead child lay in a pile of green blankets in the bed of a truck.
Response: U.S. armoured vehicles parked outside the a U.S. base in Panjwai district Kandahar province following the attacks as Afghan citizens looked on
Response: U.S. armoured vehicles parked outside the a U.S. base in Panjwai district Kandahar province following the attacks as Afghan citizens looked on
Standing guard: Afghan National Army soldiers keep watch inside the base after the brutal attacks
Standing guard: Afghan National Army soldiers keep watch inside the base after the brutal attacks
East meets west: A U.S. soldier, part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force the military base and passes a stone-faced Afghan man
East meets west: A U.S. soldier, part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force the military base and passes a stone-faced Afghan man
Eagle eyes: U.S. Army and Afghan soldiers were perched in a guard tower at their base in Panjwai following the deadly shootings
Eagle eyes: U.S. Army and Afghan soldiers were perched in a guard tower at their base in Panjwai following the deadly shootings

OBAMA 'DEEPLY SADDENED' BY 'SHOCKING' AFGHAN SHOOTING

President Obama issued a statement today saying he is ¿deeply saddened¿ by the ¿tragic and shocking¿ killing of Afghan civilians by a U.S. soldier. President Obama issued a statement Sunday saying he is ‘deeply saddened’ by the ‘tragic and shocking’ killing of Afghan civilians by a U.S. soldier.
He said: ‘This incident is tragic and shocking and does not represent the exceptional character of our military and the respect that the United States has for the people of Afghanistan.’
The president also vowed to ‘get the facts as quickly as possible and to hold accountable anyone responsible.’
'This is an anti-human and anti-Islamic act,' said Mr Khan.  'Nobody is allowed in any religion in the world to kill children and women.'
Mr Khan demanded that Karzai punish the American shooter.
'Otherwise we will make a decision,' said Mr Khan. 'He should be handed over to us,’ he told the Associated Press.
‘I cannot explain the motivation behind such callous acts, but they were in no way part of authorised ISAF military activity,’ he said in a statement.
There were reports of protests in Panjwai following the shooting and the U.S. embassy warned travellers in Kandahar province to ‘exercise caution.’
The Afghan Taliban would take revenge for the deaths, the group said in an e-mailed statement to media.
‘The so-called American peacekeepers have once again quenched their thirst with the blood of innocent Afghan civilians in Kandahar province,’ the Taliban’s statement read.
The shooting comes after weeks of tense relations between U.S. forces and their Afghan hosts following the burning of Korans and other religious materials at an American base.
Though U.S. officials apologised and said the burning was purely accidental, the incident sparked violent protests and attacks that killed some 30 people and a host of anti-American protests.
Six U.S. troops have been killed in attacks by their Afghan colleagues since news of the Koran burnings came to light.
Age of innocence: Afghan boys sit on the ground near the scene where Afghans were killed by a U.S. service member
Age of innocence: Afghan boys sit on the ground near the scene where Afghans were killed by a U.S. service member
Furious: Afghan civilians gathered outside the military base today; tensions between the U.S. and Afghanistan have been tense at best for the past decade
Furious: Afghan civilians gathered outside the military base today; tensions between the U.S. and Afghanistan have been tense at best for the past decade
In the capital, meanwhile, Mr Karzai said the government still expects to sign a strategic partnership agreement with the United States by the time a NATO summit convenes in Chicago in May.
The agreement would formalize the U.S.-Afghan relationship and the role of U.S. forces in Afghanistan after NATO's scheduled transfer of security responsibility to the Afghan government at the end of 2014.
'The so-called American peacekeepers have once again quenched their thirst with the blood of innocent Afghan civilians in Kandahar province.'
-Afghan Taliban
 
But Mr Karzai stressed the importance of foreign forces leaving Afghanistan to preserve the country's national sovereignty.
Any international forces that remain after 2014 would have to operate under strict guidelines governing their responsibilities and when they could leave their bases, he said.
‘We have a strong army and police, so it is to our benefit to have good relations with the international community, not have international troops in our country,’ Mr Karzai said at a public event in Kabul.
Retaliation: The political and religious party Jamat-e-Islami burn an effigy of President Obama in response to Koran burnings last month at a NATO base, heightening tensions
Retaliation: The political and religious party Jamat-e-Islami burn an effigy of President Obama in response to Koran burnings last month at a NATO base, heightening tensions
The president has demanded that international forces stop night raids on the homes of suspected militants as a condition to signing the strategic partnership agreement.
The raids have caused widespread anger among Afghans.
All foreign combat troops are slated to withdraw by end of 2014 from a costly war that has become increasingly unpopular.
Assassination attempt: Prominent Afghan women's rights activist Malalai Joya said a gunman tried to take her life Sunday
Assassination attempt: Prominent Afghan women's rights activist Malalai Joya said a gunman tried to take her life Sunday
Also Sunday, a prominent Afghan women's rights activist said gunmen attacked her office in a western province in an apparent assassination attempt.
Malalai Joya, a former Afghan lawmaker and vocal critic of both the Taliban and of criminality in the Afghan government, said the attack on her office in Farah province was the sixth attempt on her life to date.
Armed men tried to storm the compound before dawn on Saturday, she said.
The attackers did not get into the building but two of her guards were seriously injured and are currently in the hospital.
Ms Joya said she was in Kabul at the time but had planned a trip to Farah soon and news of that may have leaked out.
She said she believes the attackers thought she was in the building.
The shooting spree took place in the Panjwai district of Kandahar province this morning.
Captain Justin Brockhoff, Nato spokesman confirmed a U.S. service member had been detained following the attack.
The wounded are receiving treatment at a medical base and U.S. forces are investigating the shooting with Afghan authorities.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2113410/US-sergeant-SEAL-team-shoots-dead-16-Afghan-civilians-deadly-rampage.html#ixzz1otIKhMOq

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Text of the Message of Felicitation to Shri Akhilesh Yadav, CM(designated) of UP - Joint Committee of Muslim Organissations for Empowerment

Joint Committee of Muslim Organissations for Empowerment

D-250, Abul Fazal Enclave,
Jamia Nagar, New Delhi-110025
Tel.: 26946780 Fax 26947346
10 March, 2012



Text of the Message of Felicitation to Shri Akhilesh Yadav, CM(designated) of UP


My dear Chief Minister,

In UP Assembly Election 2012, the Muslim electorate has overwhelming voted for your party. Their votes have been a positive factor not only in the SP securing record 224 seats but also in raising its vote percentage from about 24% in 2007 to about 30% in 2012.

 The Muslim community had no reason to love the BJP. Also collectively they rejected the BSP for ignoring Muslim grievances, recurring communal violence and indifference to their uplift and their linguistic rights. They also rejected the INC because they saw bluff and opportunism in its electoral promises. They also largely ignored the so-called Muslim mini-parties because of their divisive role, sometimes to the profit of the BJP.

On behalf of the Muslim community & the JCMOE I warmly welcome the installation of the Samajwadi. Government in UP & felicitate you as the Chief Minister & all your colleagues and wish you glorious innings. The JCMOE sincerely hopes that apart from the members of your Government, all your MLA’s shall take due notice of the problems the Muslim face and raise them in the Assembly.

Having placed their Convener trust in the Samajwadi Party the Muslims  hope that its government will implement all the promises made by the leaders during the campaign, apart from those stated in its Manifesto. In particular, the Muslims expect  the Samajwadi Party to urgently provide, by executive acton,  reservation of at least 10% to the MuslimsOBCs, within the OBC quota of 27%, as the ratio of Muslim to Hindu OBCs in UP is 5:3. They expect reservation not only in government jobs and higher education but also in distribution of the benefits of social and economic development to all backward groups and sub-groups on the basis of their population in the State & at Zila prakhand and panchayat levels.

The community also hope that UP, Special Development Fund as notified by the Central funds for  20 Muslim concentration districts will be expeditiously utilized for meeting their expectations in the areas they inhabit and not diverted for executing normal development schemes.

The Muslims also request the leaders of the Samajwadi Party to exert all possible pressure on the Central Government for uplifting them and for expediting the implementation of the recommendations of the Mishra Commission as well as for regular  progress reports on the achievements under Sachar Recommendations & the New 15-Point Programme of the Prime Minister for the Welfare of the Minorities, with disaggregated data for the Muslim minority & other minority groups.

To conclude, on behalf of the Muslim community, we wish you as the leader of the Samajwadi Party a glorious term in office and the opening of a new chapter in the development of the state.

With kind regards,

 

Syed Shahabudin

Convener


Shri Akhilesh Yadav,

Chief Minister (Designated) of Uttar Pradesh,

Lucknow-UP

India Eyes Muslims Left Behind by Quota System - Jim Yardley - The New York Times

With a landslide victory for a regional political party in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly election, being widely attributed to a groundswell of Indian Muslim voter support, rejecting the ruling Indian National Congress, the West, is constrained to take note. US media is now focusing on Muslim factor that could usher in a decisive democratic change in India's 65 year old Brahmin rule. After all US considers India to be a key nation in its strategic planning for South East Asia, circling China. Any structural deficiency in India's governance, could be of more concern to the overlords than the lords that are lording in New Delhi.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

<ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>

----------

This article was first circulated by Mr. Pasha Patel of NRINDIAN Google Group:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/10/world/asia/india-eyes-affirmative-action-for-muslims.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all




India Eyes Muslims Left Behind by Quota System


Manpreet Romana for The New York Times

Murtaza Mansuri, a Muslim rickshaw repairman, says India's Muslims need quotas to get ahead.

By

Published: March 9, 2012

MUZAFFARNAGAR, India — Along the narrow lane known as Khadar Wallah, Muslims and low-caste Hindus have lived side by side for years, bound by poverty, if not religion. Yet recently, Muslims like Murtaza Mansuri have noticed a change. Their neighbors have become better off.
World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
Twitter List: Reporters and Editors


Manpreet Romana for The New York Times
Tanveer Ahmed, a Muslim, repairs a tape recorder in his shop.
Manpreet Romana for The New York Times
Affirmative action helped Rajnikant Singh, a low-caste Hindu, get hired as a Transport Department clerk in Muzaffarnagar. 


Manpreet Romana for The New York Times
Hindus, Muslims and others at a school in Muzaffarnagar. Low-caste Hindus and Muslims were once bound by poverty.


The New York Times
Quotas have been promised to Muslims in Uttar Pradesh.
Many of the Dalits, the low-caste Hindus once known as untouchables, have gotten government jobs, or slots in public universities, opportunities that have meant stable salaries and nicer homes. And to Mr. Mansuri the reason is clear: the affirmative action quotas for low-caste Hindus, a policy known in India as reservation, which is not explicitly available to Muslims.

“We are way behind them,” Mr. Mansuri, who repairs rickshaws for a living, said on a recent afternoon. “Reservation is essential for Muslims. If we don’t get education, we will remain backward, while others move forward and forward.”

For decades, the issue of affirmative action for Muslims has been a politically fractious one in India. Many opponents, including right-wing Hindu groups, have long argued that affirmative action policies based on religion violate India’s Constitution and run counter to the country’s secular identity. Quotas, they said, should be strictly reserved for groups that have suffered centuries of caste-based discrimination.

But these arguments have been steadily countered by an undeniable and worrisome byproduct of India’s democratic development: Muslims, as a group, have fallen badly behind, in education, employment and economic status, partly because of persistent discrimination in a Hindu-majority nation. Muslims are more likely to live in villages without schools or medical facilities, a landmark government report found in 2006, and less likely to qualify for bank loans.

Now, the issue of Muslim quotas has bubbled to the surface in the recent election in the state of Uttar Pradesh, where the winner, the regional Samajwadi Party, has promised to carve out a quota of jobs and educational slots for Muslims, an idea first raised by the Indian National Congress Party. Legal and political obstacles remain, and some Muslims are skeptical that leaders will muster the political will to push through a quota, even as many consider such preferences justified and long overdue.

“We also fought against the British for Indian independence,” said Hafiz Aftab, president of the All-India Muttahida Mahaz, an organization that has led protests on behalf of Muslim preferences. 

“We lost so many of our brightest people. But after freedom, the government didn’t make any efforts to uplift Muslims.”

In Uttar Pradesh, the country’s poorest and most populous state, all of India’s caste and religious demarcations are on vivid display. It was here that one of India’s most searing acts of religious violence occurred in 1992, when an ancient mosque was destroyed by right-wing Hindu activists who claimed that it had been built on the site of the birthplace of Ram, the Hindu deity.

Indians in Uttar Pradesh have also witnessed the political rise of the Scheduled Castes, as the Dalits and other “backward” caste Hindus are legally called. Before losing the recent election, Mayawati, the state’s powerful Dalit chief minister (who uses one name), dominated Uttar Pradesh and used her position to reward many of her supporters with jobs, housing and other benefits. Dalits still remain overwhelmingly poor and marginalized in many parts of India, but Ms. Mayawati’s extensive use of the reservation quota system and other preferential policies in Uttar Pradesh provided opportunity to many Dalits.

“These Scheduled Castes were the most deprived people socially and economically in Uttar Pradesh,” said Mr. Aftab in an interview before the state elections. “Now they are the ruling class. This is the result of 64 years of reservation.”

India’s original reservation policies were codified during the drafting of the national Constitution as quotas for Scheduled Castes and tribal groups. Over the years, other Hindu castes were added at both the state and national level, as different groups agitated for inclusion and politicians saw opportunities to carve out new vote banks. 

India’s modernization, rather than erasing caste, was codifying it.

“In India, the deepening of democracy will not happen by erasing all caste-community boundaries,” said Yogendra Yadav, a leading political scientist in New Delhi. “I see it as the next stage of social justice in India.”

Most Muslims in India are the descendants of low-caste Hindus who converted over the centuries, often to escape the deprived status to which Dalits were consigned. Yet those caste affiliations never fully disappeared, meaning that a hierarchy lingered among Muslims in India. Two government commissions sought to include “backward” Muslims in the quota system by using their former Hindu caste identity, along with educational and economic indicators.

India’s four southern states have managed to extend some affirmative action benefits to Muslims, if not explicitly along religious lines, but elsewhere Muslims have largely been excluded. 

The 2006 report, known as the Sachar Committee report, found that Muslims who should have qualified for affirmative action were not getting it, even though they were living in greater poverty than some groups that were getting the benefit.

“Our Constitution says we should not provide reservation on the grounds of religion,” said Mufti Julfiquar Ali, a Muslim leader in Uttar Pradesh. “But basically, reservation was given on the grounds of religion. A Muslim washerman got no reservation, but a Hindu washerman got one. Hindu carpenters will get reservation, but the Muslim carpenter will not.”

Along the lane of Khadar Wallah, Muslims and Dalits last month voiced starkly different opinions about the need for creating a quota to benefit Muslims. Some Muslims had doubts about whether political leaders would fulfill the pledge and whether such a policy could be tailored to truly help them.

But Badruddin, an older Muslim man who uses one name, wanted the benefit. He said affirmative action had enabled many lower-caste Hindus to secure government jobs that provided stability so that their children could remain in school. In many Muslim families, he argued, children must often drop out of school to earn money.

“The Scheduled Castes are better off than we are because they are in government jobs,” he said. “Once you have a government job, you will be uplifted.”

Several Hindus said quotas for Muslims were unnecessary and would dilute already scarce opportunities for lower-caste Hindus. 

“Without reservation, we would not have progressed very much because of discrimination,” said Boharan Lal, 71, a Dalit, adding: “I do not believe that Muslims are more backward. They are doing better.”

Mr. Mansuri, the rickshaw repairman, dropped out of school in the eighth grade, but is still the most educated person in his extended family. “Our only source of income was from my father,” he said, explaining why he went to work.

He has watched as his Dalit neighbors have gotten jobs, or college slots, through quotas that, over time, brought better jobs and salaries. He pointed to the renovated homes of some low-caste Hindus as evidence of what affirmative action can bring, and what Muslim families struggle to afford. He said Muslims were also to blame because for too long they did not push their children to stay in school. But that has changed, he said.

His own house was recently refurbished, with smooth concrete walls painted bright green, and is easily as nice as the homes on the alley owned by Dalit families. Asked about it, Mr. Mansuri explained that the house was an example of how his family had benefited from preferential treatment: An agent had contacted him saying that banks were seeking to loan money to Muslims after the 2006 Sachar Committee report detailed discrimination in banking.

“Earlier, if we had applied,” Mr. Mansuri said, “we would not have gotten a loan.”


Hari Kumar contributed reporting.





Thursday, March 8, 2012

The Politics of Pandering in India - By Dan Morrison - New York Times

http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/indias-congress-party-loses-election-in-uttar-pradesh-for-pandering-to-muslim-voters/

Latitude - Views From Around the World
March 8, 2012, 7:47 am

The Politics of Pandering in India

By DAN MORRISON

DHAKA, Bangladesh – Defeat is usually an orphan, but the election debacle of Congress, India’s ruling party, in Uttar Pradesh on Tuesday has a clear patrimony: pandering to the state’s 36 million Muslims.
 

Rahul Gandhi, leader of Congress, India’s ruling party, in New Delhi on Tuesday.Pankaj Nangia/Associated Press Rahul Gandhi, leader of Congress, India’s ruling party, in New Delhi on Tuesday.

Under the leadership of political scion Rahul Gandhi, the son and grandson of assassinated prime ministers, the Congress party offered a platter of tangible and symbolic offerings to Muslims in the hope of turning them away from the state’s two biggest parties. It proposed job quotas to low-caste Muslims and worked to prevent the author Salman Rushdie from attending a literary festival in Jaipur.


But after more than 20 years in the political wilderness in India’s most populous state and months of hype that a reversal was at hand, Congress woke up Tuesday to find Uttar Pradesh had passed it by. The star power of Rahul Gandhi and his sister Priyanka Vadra had produced massive crowds but few votes. And toying with the state’s volatile balance of quotas and identity politics had brought a nasty blowback.


The regional Samajwadi Party won by a landslide. Congress took a dismal fourth, winning just 28 of the 403 seats in the Uttar Pradesh assembly. Muslim voters seemed less taken by the Congress party’s entreaties than fearful of a backlash by Hindu nationalists against Congress’s very offerings, and they fled into the arms of the Samajwadi Party.


Don’t just take my word for this. Here’s Uttar Pradesh’s outgoing chief minister, Kumari Mayawati: “There was a fear in the Muslim community that the B.J.P. may come to power,” she told reporters Wednesday, referring to the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. And “finding the Congress weak,” she said, “Muslims voted not for the Congress but the S.P.” (Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Partylost 126 of its 206 assembly seats after a term marked by fantastic corruption and waste.)


A Congress political operative I spoke with on Wednesday put the problem this way: “We came too strong with our campaign to Muslims, and they went to Samajwadi in search of some protection from communal elements.”


Congress was supposed to be the party that transcends narrow caste, religious and parochial interests, but in his campaign Gandhi appealed to distinct communities of voters across the state. Clearly, not everyone was buying. As a Muslim politician from the eastern part of the state said to me last month, “If they think they’re fooling anyone, they’re fooling themselves.”


Congress was tone-deaf, perhaps not having realized the electorate has changed. “Our voter is no longer confused,” an editorial in the Indian Express noted. “Nor is she a prisoner of narrow-focus prejudices and loyalties.”


And so despite a reputation for lawlessness and parochialism, the Samajwadi Party, a 20-year—old socialist party founded by a former wrestler, won in every region across the state and now enjoys a broad mandate. In recent years, it advocated removing computers from government offices to increase employment. This time around, it promised a free wireless tablet to teenagers who do well in school — one of many expensive giveaways it will now have to make good on.


It’s a big loss for Congress. Had the party’s dreams come true in Uttar Pradesh, the anemic coalition it leads in New Delhi would have been invigorated. The Samajwadi Party might support it in the national Parliament, but surely only on terms set by the party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav and his 38-year-old Australian-educated son, Akhilesh, one of whom will become Uttar Pradesh’s next chief minister.


The Congress party’s shellacking extended beyond Muslim voters, and beyond the state’s borders. The party lost all five of the assembly seats in the parliamentary constituency of party president Sonia Gandhi. It also lost races in the states of Punjab and Goa.


When exit polls suggested that Congress was in for disappointment, top leaders refused to hear. “These polls are not correct,” the party mandarin Digvijay Singh told reporters earlier this week. “Wait for the real results. We are sure to get 125-plus seats.”


The Congress party may have assumed that its surprise return to national power in 2004 and its even stronger reelection in 2009 had set the stage for greater heights in 2012. On Tuesday, voters in the heartland state of Uttar Pradesh appear to have told it, mediocre is as high as you go.


Dan Morrison is a journalist and the author of “The Black Nile.

9/11 AND ISRAEL: ALAN SABROSKY'S SHOCKING PRESS TV INTERVIEW

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Japanese must tap their 'inner Israeli' - By Glenn Newman - The Japan Times Online



http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fl20120103zg.html








Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012

THE ZEIT GIST

Japanese must tap their 'inner Israeli'

Lessons from Mideast 'island' success story could help this nation out of its rut


By GLENN NEWMAN
 
Aimless, Japan has been struggling to find a suitable vision, or model, for its future. Should it strive to be like Finland, small but prosperous? Should it de-emphasize economic growth and focus on sustainability and lifestyle? Should it look to the go-go '80s for inspiration? Or should it withdraw from active engagement with the world and into its own cultural comfort zone (neo-isolationism, or shinsakokushugi)?
News photo
If walls could talk: Then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visits the Western Wall in Jerusalem in 2006. Japan and Israel are both islands (Japan literally, Israel due to conflict with its neighbors), but the effect of this isolation on each country's people has been very different, with Japanese increasingly turning inward while Israelis opt to break out of the Middle East the first chance they get. AP PHOTO

Without a vision or model to aspire to and measure progress against, Japan will continue to drift. Consequently, I would like to throw one more candidate into the ring as a partial model for Japan: Israel.
I have worked with Israelis fairly often in recent years. Temperamentally, Israelis and Japanese are near-polar opposites. Japanese abhor conflict and strive for harmony; Israelis relish a good argument at any time, for any reason. Japanese practice tatemae; Israelis are pure honne. Japanese demand order; Israelis thrive on chaos. Japanese plan meticulously; Israelis prefer improvisation. Japanese are formal and reserved; Israelis are informal and familiar. Japanese find comfort in settled vertical relationships; Israelis have little use or respect for hierarchy.

Cultural traits aside, however, at a macro level Japan and Israel share a common core: Both nations possess few natural resources but their people. By effective deployment of their human resources, both rose from deprivation to prosperity in, historically speaking, the blink of an eye, leaving many other, seemingly more amply endowed, countries trailing far behind. Japan and Israel both live or die on their wits alone.

But while Japan saw its greatest period of economic growth and wealth creation come to an abrupt end two decades ago, Israel is now in the midst of an economic Golden Age, with healthy growth continuing despite the global financial slowdown and a perpetual state of conflict with their Mideast neighbors, amazing technological innovation at companies big and small, and the development of a wildly disproportionate number of world-beating startup companies.

Israel is punching far above its weight; Japan can't seem to get off the mat. Are there any lessons Japan can draw from Israel's successful management of its human resources to inject new life into its stagnant economy? Let's examine a few of the factors that have contributed to Israel's economic success.

Entrepreneurship

Israel is a hotbed of entrepreneurial activity, especially high-tech startups in telecoms, software, semiconductors, medical devices, clean tech, and so on. This is a recent phenomenon, dating back only to the early 1990s.

What accounts for Israel's success? First, government policies were successfully implemented to encourage new businesses, especially in high tech, by lowering corporate taxes, lifting onerous regulations and creating innovative public-private programs to funnel venture capital to promising startups. Second, Israelis welcome risk and are not cowed by failure. Once Israelis started to see some of their compatriots become successful in new ventures, more took the plunge. Success bred success in a now largely self-sustaining virtuous circle.

Japan can learn from Israel's example and do more to grow its relatively small venture business sector. The Japanese government has already adopted measures to promote business generally by moving towards a cut in corporate taxes, eliminating or softening some meddlesome regulations and, more timidly, promoting a venture capital industry. Regrettably, more energetic measures probably cannot be expected in the short term given Japan's dysfunctional political class.

There may be more hope for progress in cultivating an appetite among Japanese for high risk/high reward business ventures. Japan is already the birthplace of many world-class entrepreneurs. Soichiro Honda, in the face of strong government opposition, created one of the world's great car companies. Konosuke Matsushita built Panasonic from a small light socket and bicycle lamp manufacturer into a multinational consumer electronics giant. Akio Morita and his colleagues made Sony into the Apple of its day.

Today, Hiroshi Mikitani at Rakuten and Yoshikazu Tanaka at Gree are competing with Silicon Valley's powers-to-be as they take their Internet businesses global. The success of these and other innovators is built on boldness and a willingness to learn from failure and persevere (as the Japanese saying goes, shippai wa seikō no moto — success is founded on failure).

Japan has not empowered enough risk-takers, but surely no one can look at the likes of Mr. Honda and Mr. Mikitani and deny that the entrepreneurial spirit is native to Japan. Why aren't there more entrepreneurs in Japan today? It's a multifaceted problem, with the absence of readily available venture capital a big structural component.

But there are other, more human factors. There are, for example, thousands of talented potential entrepreneurs in Japan locked away in the R&D, marketing and other departments of giant, sluggish corporations. These folks may just need a push to get their entrepreneurial juices flowing. Painful as it would be, large-scale layoffs by overstuffed Japanese corporations might be just what the doctor ordered to spur talented people to take their fate into their own hands by launching new businesses. Think of it as a corporate prison-release program.

More newly minted, but un-(or under-)employed Japanese college graduates may also be coming to realize that they would be better off starting their own enterprises than seeking the false security of employment by large corporations or government. Most of these new businesses would fail, but many would succeed. A few might be game changers.

Antihierarchical decision-making

Israeli organizations are fairly flat, and Israelis themselves are informal in their dealings even with their nominal superiors. Israelis don't allow seniority, in terms of rank or age, to inhibit them from advocating for their beliefs or questioning the decisions of their managers. A result is more innovation and out-of-the-box thinking.
As recounted in "Start Up Nation" by Dan Senor and Saul Singer, engineers at Intel's far-flung outpost in Israel engaged in a sustained rear-guard action to persuade their bosses at company headquarters in California to fundamentally change the way Intel designed its flagship microprocessors. HQ finally relented. The Israeli-designed chips proved to be a huge boon for Intel.

Japan has the trappings of a very hierarchical society. Everyone knows the rank and age of their colleagues, with due deference shown. Superficially, Japanese and Israelis seem to have little in common in their attitude toward authority. But, as with many things in Japan, appearances can be deceptive.

Japan is a famously consensus-driven society. While titles are important and rank is respected, decisions cannot easily be made by executive fiat. All relevant constituencies need to buy into important decisions. This need for consensus means that being high in the pecking order often is more about status than exercisable authority.

Moreover, many Japanese companies are already skilled at uncovering and implementing good operational ideas from their rank-and-file (for example, Toyota's constant, incremental improvements to its manufacturing processes based on input from the factory floor). Consensus decision-making can upend hierarchy by requiring that all levels of an organization be involved in the process.

What is often missing in Japan is a sense that employees (junior, middle or even upper management) are safe to challenge a company's strategic decisions or try to move the company in a new or unconventional direction. Olympus and Daio Paper are but extreme examples of the general unwillingness to buck authority.

But there are exceptions. Toyota's Prius and Sony's Playstation were both developed in the teeth of significant internal opposition. I suspect that the advocates for the Prius at Toyota and Playstation at Sony acted a lot like Israelis would have (but without the yelling).

Global thinking

Japan and Israel are both islands (Japan literally, Israel because its borders are largely closed due to conflict or cold peace with its neighbors). The effect of this geographic isolation on each country's people has been very different.

Japanese often have an inward-looking, shima-guni (island country) mentality. This tendency has been further enabled by Japan's large internal market for goods and services, allowing many Japanese firms to prosper even as they restrict their gaze to the domestic market. While many large Japanese companies have obviously been very successful at exporting their products, the layer of people in Japan with meaningful foreign experience, global-mindedness and English language skills is remarkably thin. The situation is arguably getting worse, with the number of Japanese students studying abroad trending downward and, anecdotally, fewer Japanese salarymen attracted to overseas postings.

By contrast, Israelis feel the urge to break out of their Mideast isolation the first chance they get. Large numbers of young Israelis travel the world after they complete military service, exposing themselves to other cultures and ways of thinking. Many work abroad to support themselves during their travels, developing business skills and making contacts that will serve them later in life. 

Because the Israeli market is so small and Hebrew spoken by so few, Israeli businesspeople also know they must depend on foreign markets, and speak English, to achieve business success.

Japan can learn some lessons from Israel. The Japanese market is shrinking and may gradually become too small to produce the good jobs and prosperity that Japanese expect and deserve. To grow, many small- and medium-size Japanese companies that heretofore have focused solely on their backyard will have to look overseas for new markets. And they won't be able to do it speaking Japanese.

Japan has successfully faced this challenge before. In the early years of the Meiji Restoration many elite Japanese were dispatched to Europe and the United States to acquire foreign business, technological and legal know-how to enable Japan to build a modern society. In the postwar period, many up-and-coming Japanese businessmen went overseas to promote Japan Inc. Japan needs to repeat this feat, but this time, as in Israel, the dissemination of foreign thinking and languages (especially English) needs to reach much more deeply into Japanese society. In a knowledge-based, global economy, it is not enough for just an elite few to be able to understand and interact with the world at large.

Immigration

In stark contrast to Japan, Israel is a land of immigrants. Immigration has been a major contributor to Israel's economic success. There is an undeniable link, for instance, between the arrival of hundreds of thousands of immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the '80s and '90s, including many highly skilled engineers, and the rapid growth of Israel's high tech sector. And having citizens with know-how, networks and linguistic skills from around the world has given Israel a leg up in foreign markets. Immigrants are also often hungrier for material success than native-born citizens.

Are there any lessons Japan can glean from Israel's experience with immigration? A couple spring to mind. First, Israel has an "affinity-based" immigration policy. In order for foreigners to qualify for Israeli citizenship, they must either be Jewish or have strong Jewish familial ties. Thus, while there is huge cultural, geographic, linguistic and even racial diversity amongst immigrants to Israel, they all share Jewish roots. Second, Israel's government has a robust system for assimilating immigrants into Israeli society, including intensive Hebrew language programs.

Not long ago, a Japanese friend was preparing for a meeting with a high-ranking, Russian-born Israeli government official and asked me about possible topics for conversation. One that I mentioned was immigration and, specifically, how Israel has been able to sustain its national character and unity (at least when faced with adversity) in the face of massive immigration. Affinity immigration and comprehensive assimilation policies clearly have a lot to do with it. 

They also may present Japan with a road map to its own immigration reform.

The Japanese diaspora is much smaller, in relative and absolute terms, than the Jewish Diaspora that Israel has been able to tap. It is not insignificant, however. There are approximately 2.5 million descendants of Japanese immigrants outside of Japan, predominantly in the United States and Brazil. If even a small percentage were to settle in Japan, they could make a powerful contribution by bringing fresh ideas, knowledge of foreign practices, contacts and language ability.

Considering the depressed U.S. job market, many Japanese Americans might be interested in opportunities in Japan, especially if the welcome mat were laid out for them. And given Brazil's new found status as a BRIC power, renewed efforts to attract Japanese Brazilians (this time perhaps with an emphasis on college graduates) could give Japanese companies a unique advantage in that vast, fast-growing market.

Japan should consider adopting an affinity-based immigration program granting long-term visas to any ethnic Japanese living abroad who is willing to move to Japan. To give the country time to adapt, the numbers could be limited at first by requiring the applicants to have a college degree and at least one Japanese parent or grandparent. The government should also encourage them to acquire Japanese citizenship and, to make their assimilation smoother, offer financial assistance while they are enrolled in a government-run or certified intensive Japanese language and cultural training institute. Affinity immigration would not be sufficient but could be the leading edge of a broader liberalization of Japan's immigration policies.

If Japan can learn from Israel's 21st century economic success story, it may be able to emulate it. Japan will have a brighter future if Japanese can find and nurture their "inner Israeli."
 
Glenn Newman (gnewman@newmanlaw.net) is an attorney and former long-term resident of — and frequent business traveler to — Japan. Send comments and story ideas to community@japantimes.co.jp

Muslims saw through Cong poll promises - By Iftekhar Gilani - DNA, Daily English Newspaper, Mumbai

http://epaper.dnaindia.com/epapermain.aspx?edcode=820009&QuickEdition=yes


Muslims saw through Cong poll promises

Era of tokenism is over, minority community punished Cong for its double game, say community leaders

Iftikhar Gilani
l New Delhi

Muslim representation has shot up to the highest-ever figure of 66 in the Uttar Pradesh (UP) assembly, with the community believed to have gone all out in favour of the winner, Samajwadi Party (SP). As many as 41 Muslims have got elected on the SP ticket, followed by 15 from Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). Just 4 Muslim candidates could make up on the Congress ticket, 3 from Peace Party, 2 from Qaumi Ekta Dal and one from Ittehade Millat Council.

As for the Congress, it’s not just in UP that Muslims rejected it, even in the Muslim majority seat of Malerkotla in Punjab they preferred to go with Akali Dal. In UP, the Congress’s magic mantra of ‘quota within quota’ clearly flopped, so much so that Union law minister Salman Khurshid’s wife Louise Khurshid trailed fifth from the Farrukhabad constituency. Salman Khurshid had risked the Election Commission wrath for enhancing this quota during aggressive campaigning.

While the outgoing assembly had 55 Muslim legislators — the highest since independence — the minority is no longer so in the newly-elected assembly, which has a record 66 legislators. Political analysts believe that Muslims overturned results in as many as 136 seats, with the main contenders — the SP and the BSP — fielding 85 Muslims each, while the Congress giving tickets to 59 Muslims. The BJP had fielded a lone Muslim candidate, Shakeel Alam from Sahaswan in Badaun district, who had to forfeit his deposit.

The 2012 results are being seen as en-masse endorsement of the SP and a rejection of Congress and small ‘Muslim’ parties by the Muslims in the state.

The Peace Party has won just four seats, while Rashtriya Ulema Council has drawn a blank. Shazil Islam Ansari, the lone winner from Ittehad Millat Council, was the wakf minister in the Mayawati ministry but denied a ticket by the BSP.

Secretary general of Welfare Party Dr SQR Ilyas told DNA that the Muslim vote played a crucial role in SP’s overwhelming victory. Explaining reasons for this shift, Dr Ilyas said the Muslim youth were being targeted in the Congress-ruled states even as Mayawati let loose a wave harassment. Also, Muslims have rejected the caste-based politics propagated by smaller Muslim political parties and instead exhibited unity by voting for SP en masse.

While professor and political analyst Dr Zahid Ali Khan of the Aligarh Muslim University said it was for the first time that the community overwhelmingly supported a single party, general secretary of All-India Milli Council Dr Manzoor Alam said the results were a warning for the Congress “The BSP neglected Muslims in a planned way in all spheres. Like other parties, it wanted to win over Muslims just on security issue,” said Alam

As for the reasons why Muslims rejected the Congress, Alam said it was mainly because the party continued targeting Muslim youth in terror charges.

“The Congress played a double game, it must appreciate that era of tokenism is over,” he added.

-----