Even as minority, Muslims must learn the art of challenging By Dr. Javed Jamil
1. If the writer treats Muslims as a minority in Indian context, we cannot ignore another minority, the Brahmins who are merely 3% of the total Indian population, while Muslims tag at 13 to 15%. If 3% Brahmin can corral a majority of upto 85% for so long and now that their majority is dispersing, Muslim 'minority' could and should lead and for that it has to imbibe the national and international perspective/outlook and not remain tied to its own community's immediate agenda.
2. In practical terms, even in democracy, it is the minority that rules.
3. Islamic traditions always believe in small and insignificant over-riding, big and powerful.
Considering all these factors, Dr. Javed Jamil's focus on art of challenge is most welcome and deserves widest possible exposure.
Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
<ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>
-----------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: javed jamil <doctorforu123@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:50 AM
Subject: Even as minority, Muslims must learn the art of challenging
To:
From: javed jamil <doctorforu123@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:50 AM
Subject: Even as minority, Muslims must learn the art of challenging
To:
Even as minority, Muslims must learn the art of challenging
Dr Javed Jamil
Normally
the questions that are raised about minorities are regarding their
rights particularly their religious, socioeconomic, cultural and
personal rights. Here I will specifically talk about Muslims as
minorities and their ability to influence the global scenario as a whole
and the direction of the national policies in the countries where they
are in minority.
Muslims
are no ordinary minority wherever they happen to be in minority. They
have a strong belief system, which calls for a specific legal, social
and economic system. The pivot on which Islamic system revolves is
different from the pivot on which the so-called New World Order
revolves. The Islamic system revolves around the long term safety and
security of the mankind as a whole; New World Order revolves around
economic fundamentalism and the interests of the dominant economic
forces. The question arises: Should Muslims limit their
aims to merely find a respectable place in society where they can enjoy
some basic rights; or should they endeavour to change the direction of
the system around them? Obviously if they are Muslims with convictions
and their aim is
to liberate the mankind from the clutches of some self-seeking forces,
they cannot simply remain spectators of a drama unfolding at the behest
of the forces of globalisation. They cannot simply sit idle watching
their fellow human beings being consumed by the dangerous
susceptibilities that the economic forces have learned to commercialise
for the purpose of maintaining their hegemony. They must try to
influence the direction of the system, and this poses a great challenge.
There are several factors that need to be considered if this challenge
has to be accepted.
Globally
speaking, Muslims cannot be clubbed as a simple minority. They are the
second largest majority in terms of the global population as well as in
terms of the countries with Muslim majority and significant minority
populations. It can be argued that in truth they are the biggest
majority because more than half of the so-called Christian population is
in fact either that of atheists or that of non-believing Christians. In
contrast more than 95 per cent of the world’s Muslims are believing, if
not practicing, Muslims. It can be safely assumed that the percentage
of believing Muslims is higher than the believing Christians.
Despite
their large numbers, Muslims seem to be currently not in any position
to challenge the Western hegemony. This inability is not on account of
their lack of resources but despite them. In my long 37-episode series,
entitled, “Despite Shortcomings, Muslims are Most Civilised in the
World”, which attracted intense debate on a large number of internet
forums recently, I have given reasons why Muslims can claim to be more
civilized than the West. West can certainly claim that it is the most
developed part of the world in terms of scientific and technological
advancement, infrastructure within their countries and prosperity and
power. Had these attainments resulted in freedom from
violence, within and abroad,
righteousness among people with clear distinction between beneficial and
harmful practices and attitudes, respect and loyalty to relationships,
value of human life and sympathetic behaviour towards smaller nations,
West could definitely have laid its claim to civilisation. But ah! Its
economic, political and military power was not only achieved through
both genuine and wrongful ways, it has also misused them with colossal
destruction of human lives and peaceful living. The bright stars of the
horizon of Westernism have all degenerated into black holes – Democracy
into Corporatocracy, Secularism into negation of religious conscience,
freedom into license to commit evils and human rights into the defence
of criminals and perverts. Despite its prosperity and power, West has been responsible for
Western system has also led to behaviours leading to total disintegration of family system with
Western system has also been responsible for
Can anybody deny these facts? How can then West make even a small claim to civilisation?
Why
can Muslim World claim to be civilised? I have prepared a big table
based on various international statistics collected from well recognised
sources:
Grand Table of Civilisation
Criteria
1. Security
Murder Rate
Rapes
Incarceration Rate Extremely High Extremely Low
Killings in Wars
Terrorism/counter-terrorism
2. Family
Children born out of wedlock Extremely High (30-53%) Rare
Abortions (Induced)
Divorce Rate
Children with Single Parents Extremely High Low
Institutionalized Homosexuality Growing in popularity Unknown
Socially & Legally sanctioned Not sanctioned
Promiscuity
3. Social peace
Sexual abuse of children High Much Lower
Commercial Sexual abuse High Negligible
Prostitution & Pornography Socially & Legally sanctioned
Alcohol consumption and effects Extremely high Low
Gambling revenues and effects High
Life Expectancy at birth High
4. Human Development
Life Expectancy at conception Much Lower Much higher
Literacy Rate
Higher Education
Moral/Religious Education Not very good Very good
Per capita income high to moderate high to moderate in most,
Growth Rate
Income disparity Mostly on higher side mostly low, high in some
5. Personal
Suicides
Religiosity
Note: All these tables have been constructed on the basis of statistics given along with their sources in previous chapters.
Table of Comparison of Criteria of Civilization between Representative Muslim and Western Countries
Below I am comparing the situation of 5 typical Western countries – US, UK, France, Germany and Australia with 5 typical Muslim countries – Qatar, Saudi Arab, Kuwait, Indonesia and Turkey.
Criteria
1. Security
Murder Rate
(per 1000) .04 .01 .01 .01 .01 No one in top 50,
Rapes (per 1000) .30 .14 .77 .14 .09 .01 003 NL 005 .01
Incarceration Rate
(per 100K) 730 NL NL 95 85 Not in top 50, 80
Killings in Wars Majority of 160 million killed in 29th C A Minuscule minority
Terrorism/counter-
terrorism
2. Family
Children born out
of wedlock % 40 44 34 45 45 Almost unthinkable in most
Abortions % 35.2 41.8 54.3 58.4 28.9 Less than 15 pc in most
Divorce Rate
Lone parent families % 9 10 8 7 5 Less than 1 in all
countries
Institutionalized
Homosexuality
Teenage birth rate 52.1 30.8 18.4 9.3 13.1 Unthinkable in most except Indonesia
3. Social peace
Sexual abuse of children Much bigger problem Relatively smaller
Commercial Sexual abuse Much bigger problem Relatively smaller
Prostitution & Pornography Much bigger problem Relatively smaller
Alcohol consumption
litres per capita 8.3 11.2 9.8 14.8 10.2 NR NR NR NR 1.5
Gambling (Loss per
adult in dollars) 380 375 1300 High (ENK) NR NR NR NR NR*
* In Turkey, gambling is relatively high among Muslim countries but is not anywhere in the list of the world giants
4. Human Development
Life Expectancy at birth 78.2 79.4 81.2 80.7 79.4 75.6 72.8
77.6 70.7 71.8
Life Expectancy at conception 50.9 47.7 47.0 39.9 62.2 65.0 58.2
62.0 50.9 57.4
Literacy Rate % 99 99 99 99.0 99.0 93.1 85.0 94.5 92 88.7
Moral/Religious Education Much less religious institutions Much more number of religious/moral inst
Per capita income 1000 $ 47 36 55 41 40 76 16 36 9 10
Growth Rate
5. Personal
Suicides (per 100000) 15.3 11.4 15.9 28.5 15.8 Extremely low in all of them
Religiosity
(% of religion-loving)
(Note:
These results are based on the data provided by various authentic
international sources. The source is mentioned with each position taken
in my coming book, which can also be googled in more than 40 instalments
available on several international websites under the caption, “Despite
Shortcomings, Muslims most civilised”, which was widely debated a few
months back as series on several internet forums. At the end of this
paper, I have mentioned the various sources and links related to the
statistics used to arrive at the verdict given in the above tables.)
The
study is not only about comparing Muslims with the West but also Muslim
countries among themselves. The interesting difference between the
Western and Muslim worlds is that while in the former, prosperity has
inverse relationship with crimes, wars, family stability and peace, in
case of Muslim countries the relationship is direct. The more prosperous
a Western country the more chaotic and violent it is; the more
prosperous a Muslim country is the more peaceful, crime free and
non-violent it is It can be seen that the countries with
highest per capita income have also good life expectancy and good
literacy rates. At the same time these countries are largely free of
violence of all kinds, the level of social evils is markedly less,
suicide rates are almost
negligible showing the mental health of the people and the family system
is extremely strong. See the top ranking 7 Muslim countries:
Why
should then these countries not be called the Most Civilised Nations of
the World? This is despite the fact that some of them are not
democracies, which proves that democracies in themselves are no
guarantee to better conditions. The Western model of Democracy has
proved to be an abysmal failure becoming in effect Corportocracy which
works mostly at the cost of the people. The political leaders in
Democracies – from West to India,
have proved no less corrupt and inefficient than “monarchies”. This
should not be construed as a support to monarchy on my part but as
rejection of
Western Model of Democracy and the need of an alternative Islamic Model.
Despite
this however, the New World Order is largely based on concepts that are
in many ways different from what Islam envisages. This Order is based
on
The biggest challenge for Muslims as minority is to change this global scenario. This
is true for the Muslim world as a whole, as well as Muslim minorities
in countries, which are largely following the path of New World Order. But
the challenge cannot effectively emerge unless they develop
institutions which can turn their ideological positions into alternative
programmes, policies, indices, parameters, models and paradigms. Almost
all the current concepts need to be challenged. I have been doing this
in my own humble and low profile way for several years. But this now
needs to be done at the international level through institutions that
have the intellectual and financial firepower to turn this into a
formidable
challenge to the Westernism. I will enumerate a few here:
Muslims
may be in minority but this should not be a big impediment in an
ideological onslaught against the false ideologies. This onslaught
requires determination and efforts at big scales. Once
they start working for an ideological alternative and use scientific
techniques and social mobilisation for this, they would soon find that
those understanding their viewpoint are no more in minority. I have
always maintained that Muslims must take all religions along in this
fight. Unfortunately “Interfaith” in recent years has become an exercise
to undermine the influence of religion in society. Interfaith seems to
have been hijacked by the forces that want the followers of various
religions to dilute their positions on various moral issues. I strongly
believe that
religions should unite against “Economic Fundamentalism” and must form
an alliance against commercialisation of human susceptibilities,
Economic Disparity and hegemony of certain nations in the world. This is
a challenge that Muslim minorities all over the world must accept. If
they are able to do it on ideological and not on communal foundations,
taking all the right minded people of all religions along them, we will
surely see the emergence of a new world order: a world order that will
bring peace and security along with prosperity.
Muslim
Indians are in a unique position. Legally they are entitled to enjoy
“Minority Rights”, ethnically they are the second largest majority and
socially they are part of the majority, which is socioeconomically
deprived in one way or the other. Fortunately, Muslims in India
are living in an entirely different kind of conditions than the Muslim
minorities living in West. Muslims living in West have to live along
with the people a large percentage of whom does not believe in religion
and inside a system that is largely antagonistic to religion. Muslim
Indians are part of a nation the
overwhelming majority of which has strong faith n God and religion and
in a system that respects religion. Muslim Indians are therefore in a
better position to challenge the atheistic secularism promoted by the
forces of globalisation. They have better chances of developing an
all-religion alliance against social evils, economic disparity and moral
depravity. A nationwide campaign against Dirty Economics and call for
introduction of “Fundamental Prohibitions” in the Constitution along
with Fundamental Rights and Duties can go a long way in changing the
national scenario, which will then have a huge impact on the global
scenario.
Challenging
an established system is an art in itself. A minority can challenge it
only when it realises that an established system too is more often than
not controlled by forces that form minuscule minority. They control the
system at the cost of the majority. Muslims must learn to convert the
minority into majority by creating awareness in the masses irrespective
of their religious or ideological connections how certain forces are
causing havoc with their lives. With a sustained ideological and social
campaign, they will soon realise that they are no more in minority.
Let’s hope the minority in India will show way to the majority!
References
Murder statistics
(Source:
Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of
Criminal Justice Systems (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime,
Centre for International Crime Prevention)
Incarceration
Wikipedia
Wars and civil wars
website copyrighted by Pierie Scruff
terrir statistics
Rapes
Seventh
United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal
Justice Systems, covering the period 1998 - 2000 (United Nations Office
on Drugs and Crime, Centre for International Crime Prevention)
Children born out of wedlock
The U.S. National Vital Statistics Report for April 2010, produced by the Center for Disease Control’s National Center for Health Statistics
Daily Mail 28 June 2002]
Abortions
tatistics
and Computer Resources Br, Div of Reproductive Health, National Centre
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC)
Child Neglect due to Divorce
Maggie Gallahanger report on “Marriage and Children’s Health and Longevity”
Divorce Rate
The Dreaded D-Word, D-Word Statistics, Divorce Around the World
divorcereform.org2004
OECD
Child Abuse
World Report on Violence against Children 200
Dept. of Health and Human Services, Child Maltreatment, 1995
Dr. William C. Holmes of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
· Forward, 1993
Mental Health journal
CNN.com, 17.12,01
Dept. of Health and Human Services, Child Maltreatment, 1995
Violence
and the Family. Report of the American Psychological Association
Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family, 1996
United States. Department of Justice, 1991
National Resource Centre on Child
Browne & Finkelhor, 1986
Kenneth S. Kendler, M.D., et al, Medical College of Virginia Commonwealth University
USA Today,9.9.2001
Third World Women’s Health
World Health Organisation Statistical Information System
Homosexuality
Constanineau, 2007
Boyd, 2008, p. 224
[Haans Ebensten]] (Puar, 2002)
2000 U.S. Census Bureau
2006 by the Williams Institute of the UCLA School of Law
Prostitution and Pornography
Jonathan Nambu, 'Samaritana Bulletin' 1996
National Task Force on Prostitution
Hanna, 2005; Schlosser, 1997
Farley, M. and V. Kelly. 2000. “Prostitution: A Critical Review of the Medical and Social
Sciences Literature.” Women and Criminal Justice
Holsopple, K. 1999. “Stipclubs According to Strippers: Exposing Workplace Sexual
Violence.” Pp. 252-276 in Making the Harm Visible: Global Sexual Exploitation of Women
and Girls, Speaking Out and Providing Services, edited by D. and C. Roche Hughes.
Kingston: Coalition Against Trafficking in Women.
Raphael, J. and D. Shapiro. 2004. “Violence in Indoor and Outdoor Prostitution Venues.”
Violence Against Women 10:126-139.
11:29-63.
Promiscuity
Blaine Powel, Family Therapist, Walmsley and Associates, 1512 Queensway, Prince George, BC
Alcohol
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1990
NIDA Report, the Scientific American and Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario.) Also see Alcohol Consumption and Mortality, Alcohol poisoning deaths, CDC report
OECD Health Data 2005
Gambling
(Ladouceur et al. (1994)
http://www.casinocity.com/
http://www.
Life Expectancy
Sadock, M.D. - 2007 - Medical - 1472 (http://books.google.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
|
No comments:
Post a Comment