Saturday, June 19, 2010
Was British Colonial management more accommodative and less cruel than the US invasions for world’s resources?
In as much as US forays into Middle East and West Asia, is directly related to American Jewish Neo-con’s theorizing about the New American Century and how US can use its newly find uni-polar super power and its immense armed resources to corner world’s resources, just to sustain its own extravagant and credit ridden economy, there are signs that its neo-colonialism has transformed into a monstrous vehicle of Zionist subjugation of the world that has entirely different dimensions than the 18th century colonialism of say the British kind. A comparative study would bring out the most grotesque nature of hijacking of a great nation with high ideals of freedom, human rights and justice as its founding principals by unscrupulous Zionist operators, deeply embedded in the US polity and now even in UK and Europe. It is not a coincidence that the Prime Minister of UK and the President of France are both Jewish and have an abiding commitment to promote the New Zionist World Order, with as much relentless cruelty and inhuman blood-shedding, that the European history is already lagging behind in comparison as far as bloodshed in wars are concerned.
The New York Times’ ‘startling’ disclosure of Afghanistan’s immense resources are nothing but the captive media’s contribution to the neo-con driven agenda’s need to calm the detractors at home in the US, who want American troops to pull out. The neo-con Jewish planners have projected the bogey of ‘clash of civilization’ and 9/11, just to find a convenient excuse to hoodwink American people who may not be as greedy as the gnomes of Wall Street, to send out American boys to fight un-winnable wars in distant land which cannot be sustained except through imposing a long term colonial rule on foreign lands. While the American soldiers are dying in the war fronts of Iraq and Iran, the money grabbers at home, were busy milking the US economy of as much moolah, as the system can carry and/or till it collapsed and they will reap further fortunes for reestablishing the tottering financial markets. The same robbers will become whitewashed as saviors.
Even if there are no moral standards applied to the inhumanity of colonial system of world governance, it would appear that the British colonialism was least in a hurry of loot and scoot than the US would appear to be. A fine example is how British have managed Persian/Arabian Gulf emirates by judiciously overcoming their initial distrust and apprehension and quietly transforming the whole region into an area of prosperity and peace. British were able to ensure security in the Gulf with a small but efficient presence in just a small emirate of Bahrain. One night’s journey for a small contingent from the British fleet from Bahrain to Kuwait and Iraq’s Abdul Kareem Qasim pulled back his blanket over his head and went to sleep. British san British Jewry were most efficient and unobtrusive in bringing regime changes in the Gulf. The favourite method was to send the ruler out for medical tests while a new ruler took over in blood less palace coup. In contrast, US cannot manage the ‘security’ without having thousands of forces in all locations from Saudia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar that create the sense of most oppressive imperialist control over the area in a post colonial era. A regime change by the US in Saudia was engineered through an assassin.
Obama has worked on the systems with a longer term reforms in mind. He should come out with new institutions that will demote armed forces and make them subservient to diplomatic initiatives around the world. Hillary does not have to warn nations against ‘consequences’ in public. Let all understand and observe the rules of the game. May be the age of media and communication will find clients other than the unscrupulous politicians and warmongers of the world. And people will live in peace, real or imagined.
Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
No comments:
Post a Comment