From: Iqbal A. Ansari <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:08 PM
On the eve of the last NIC meeting in October 08 ,I had addressed a letter to the PM.It started thus:
You are presiding over the destiny of a nation ,which claims to be the largest democracy in the world without rule of law and a secular state without secular justice."
.The latest example of the lawlessness of the Indian State is the recent report on fake encounter killing of Ishrat Jahan and three others by police officers in Gujarat in which most damning aspect is the collusive role of the Union Home Ministry .No less harrowing is to recall the media – official collusive reporting of the event by likes of Praveen Swami of the Hindu and most electronic news channels as a definite case of L-e-T /J-e-M backed acts of terrorism aimed at enabling one mass murderr wear the halo of martyrdom .
What does the Unioin Minister for Law and Justuice ,Mr.Veerappa Moily mean by stating that revelations in Ishrat Jahan encounter case was a "very serious matter for the country and in any other foreign country Narendra Modi would have been in some other place" ? as reported by the Indian Express of 9Sep 09.It is an obvious admission of absence of rule of law in India ,which largely obtains in Western democracies, irrespective of their lawlessness while dealing with others .
Why do Advanis ,Uma Bharatis,Kalyan Singhs ,Bal Thackerays,Singhals,and Modis enjoy not only impunity but respectability because even Human Rights activsts swear by Indian Secularism which means equal respect for all religions ,not effective equal enjoyment of human rights including equal protection of the law by all ,especially vulnerable minorities and weaker sections.
Have the human rights groups ,like the PUCL,taken any notice of the Special Report on India by the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief released in Feb 09 in which it has warned about repetition of Ayodhya /Mumbai 1992 and Gujarat 2002 if the guilty continue to enjoy impunity ?
It is time that victims asked senior human rights and peace activists, who unambiguously gave their verdict of genocide/pogrom about Gujarat 2002, why did they not show any perseverance in demanding dismissal of the Modi government by the UPA government soon after its coming into power in 2004, followed by appointment of a special Tribunal for trial of members of the government and officials responsible for mass hate crimes on the additional ground of the Supreme Court's strictures about systematic subversion of justice in Gujarat and on the ground of its non –compliance of norms and directions on relief operatios by the NHRC.The fig leaf of Modi having won popular mandate was too thin to provide any real protection in the Court against exercise of article 356 by the Union Government if it had the will to punish the guilty and rehabilitate the victims .Whenever article 356 has been or will be appropriately used,it will be exercised against popularly elected government in the event of serious breakdown of constitutional functioning of the system in the state as was the justification for its recourse in 1992. ,which got upheld by the Supreme Court.
We know why the Government led by Manmohan Singh-Sonia Gandhi,who had stalled the functioning of the Parliament for a number of days in 2002 over their demand for dismissal of the Modi Government ,lacked the will to try and punish Modi and company.They must have got terrified by the ghost in the mirror ,very palpable in 1984 but also by very many others like Nellie 1983 ,Hashimpura-Maliana 1987,Bhagalpur 1989 etc etc
But why do we not muster courage and perseverance?The question requires us to widen the perspective and raise ethical-philosophical questions like the Hindu attitude to pain and suffering of the innocent other ,explained in terms of the previous life / or perceived wrongs of history and the Partition.
How long will the Indian Muslims be required to live under the shadow of a Partition for which they alone are not to blame.?
Are we not willig
From: PIPFPD@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PIPFPD@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Khalid Azam
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:45 AM
To: Khalid Azam
Subject: [PIPFPD] Shabnam Hashmi: An Open Letter to Dr Manmohan Singh, Hon'ble PM of India
FYI - A very powerful letter from Shabnam
An Open Letter to Hon'ble Prime Minister
Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon'ble Prime Minister of India
September 8, 2009, 1.02am
Dear Dr Manmohan Singh.
I had written a small article in The Hindustan Times in June 2004. It was called 'Come Shoot Me: I am a Terrorist'. It was to express my anguish on Ishrat Jahan's killing in Gujarat.
The Magisterial Enquiry, which is mandatory in every encounter case (and which was never done in the Batla House encounter) has finally termed it Ishrat jahan's killing as a fake encounter yesterday in a metropolitan court. It is not a matter of surprise for us as we knew that she was killed in cold blood. Perhaps you will also agree that such things are happening and happened in Gujarat under Modi. But I am not writing to talk about how bad Modi is.
I am writing this to ask you a small favour.
I know you have absolutely hectic schedules and thousands of issues to handle so I am putting down here the facts, gathered from various media reports.
On June 15, 2003, the Ahmedabad city crime branch, then headed by the now jailed IPS officer D G Vanzara, shot four young people –Ishrat Jahan, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Jisan Johar. It was propagated that these four young people were alleged Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) operatives who were allegedly on mission to kill chief minister Narendra Modi.
Ishrat, was a 19-year old student of Khalsa College in Mumbra, a Mumbai suburb.
Ishrat's mother filed a petition in the high court in 2004 demanding death compensation and a CBI probe. Ishrat Jahan's mother's Petition alleged that it was a fake encounter as one of the many that the present government regime in Gujarat headed by Narendra Modi had done to achieve Political Mileage to publicly create panic and sympathy that the Chief Minister was sought to be assassinated.
The crime branch carried out the operation and the same agency conducted investigation.
When the petition was heard by Justice KS Jhaveri , he immediately proposed, almost on line taken by the Supreme Court in the infamous Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, for which Vanzara was jailed along with other policemen, that a five-member team - all of the rank of additional DGP - should probe this case.
The encounter was done by the infamous D. G. Vanzara and his team who are presently arrested under Orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of fake encounter of Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausarbi. Sohrabuddin's encounter has been admitted by the state to be fake and recently on 11/08/2008, they have agreed to deposit an amount of Rs. 10.00 Lakhs as interim ex-gratia compensation for being paid to the Kith and Kin of the two.
There are allegedly 28 encounters which were fake and have been covered up.
In Ishrat Jahan's matter the CBI was impleaded as a Party and it took a stand that if the Court so orders they are willing to carry out fresh investigations and unearth the truth. Such stand triggered panic with the State Government and it seems even with some Officers of Central Home Ministry. After UPA came to power some tainted CBI officers placed in Gujarat during the NDA with questionable track record were removed after a lot of pressure and almost two years but they soon found plush positions in Delhi under UPA regime.
To our dismay we realized last month through the media reports that the Ministry of Home Affairs in an affidavit stated that Ishrat, Javed and two others Jisan Johar and Amjad Ali Rana were all operatives of Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba.
Maintaining that the four were terrorists, the Union government told the high court, "No proposal for CBI investigation is under consideration of the Centre nor does it consider the present case fit for CBI probe."
Moreover, the Centre claimed that there is no question of independent inquiry, as an additional DGP (CID & Intelligence) had carried out an independent probe into the incident and the officer is neither working with crime branch nor is he a subordinate to the crime branch, which carried out the operation and later investigated the case itself."
If you remember Hon'ble prime Minister when I met you regarding the Package for the Gujarat 2002 victims along with other activists from Gujarat I had jokingly said, "The news that UPA has replaced NDA at the centre has not reached your Home Ministry as yet'. I had said this precisely in the connection of how the tainted officers promoted by the BJP were still being pampered under the UPA.
The reason behind filing of the Affidavit by the Central Government was to dissuade the Court from appointing a strong S I T and give a message that even the Central Government had approved the act of fake encounter. But for the magisterial enquiry the Central Home Ministry had left no stone unturned to prove that Ishrat deserved to be killed.
The logic used always is what will happen to the morale of the officers. My question is what happens to the morale of the officers when they torture innocent young people, when they kill them, when they illegally detain them, beat them. What happens to their morale then? Do they just go home and sleep?
Why don't we as nation stop playing the farce of being a secular nation and why don't we remove the article from the constitution which says all citizens are equal?
The affidavit filed by the Home Ministry is a proof of the fact that in Ishrat Jahan's fake encounter case UPA has connived with the Gujarat government in a blatantly communal manner. With 3 days to go before assembly bye election in 7 seats in Gujarat 5 more innocent boys have been picked up in Baroda and declared' terrorists'.
I do not know if this letter will be also lost on the way and find itself in a dustbin as I have never received any acknowledgment from your office, so I will be forced to circulate it to others to lodge a strong protest against this blatant connivance of the Home Ministry with the Gujarat government.
My request to you is that if your government has any political will then please ask your home ministry to tender a public apology for filing the affidavit against the innocent girl who was so brutally murdered. It requires some courage and conviction.
You are fond of poetry.
Faiz ke chand lines apki nazar kar rahi hoon:
Tujh ko kitnon ka lahoo chahiye ae arz-i-watan, Jo tiray arz-i-berang ko gulnaar karein
Kitni aahon se kaleja tira thanda hoga, Kitne aansoo tiray sehraon ko gulzaar karein
How many sighs will soothe your heart; How many tears will cause your deserts to bloom.)
Member, National Integration Council
Cc: Media & fellow human rights activists