Turkey's 'Islamism' and Modi's Hindutva - By Ghulam Muhammed

Turkey's 'Islamism' and Modi's Hindutva 
a critique of article by Meghnad Desai - Secularism in danger - Indian Express

By Ghulam Muhammed

By giving an example of Turkey's new peaceful democratic turn from Kemalist secularism to an experiment in Secularism with accommodation with majority religious ethos instead of stark atheistic secularism, Meghnad Desai is trying to make Hindutva prospects palatable to Indians, and in particular to Muslims, who had been singled-out for acute discrimination in Indian polity throughout its 65 year history after India's independence from the British.

In so many words he proposes that BJP/RSS government like the Turkish AKP would give a stable and economically progressive governance, so that the issues of secularism and communalism will become irrelevant.


The comparison is faulty if not dangerous too. Whatever good governance, BJP/RSS can hope to provide to the nation, first it has to have earned the kind of overwhelming majority that Turkey's Recep Erdogan earned three times in elections. Next, its version of religio-politics is more exclusivist casteist Brahmanical construct than any populist ideology that could garner majorities on its own. In Turkey, Erdogan is not imposing a minority ethos on the majority. The rule of Brahminical elite has wrecked the entire nations in dividing it on religious, ethnic, regional polarisation. BJP/RSS's attempt at the fundamental level to convert all this smorgasbord of a nation to an idealist monolithic whole is a fascist game plan directly borrowed from Mussolini and Hitler.  Hitler too was out to make Germany a strong nation. The end result is too well-known to comment. Desai should have factored in this fascist tendency too, in his apologia for Hindutva. The nation can only be healed back through a broader consensus. That consensus can hardly be achieved by BJP/RSS; especially with its autocratic Narendra Modi as proposed leading man, is saddled with his widely held infamy of organizing a state sponsored pogrom on Muslims of his state of Gujarat. Modi's record of Muslim baiting is too prominent in his so-called 'achievements'  to get him wider popular approval and any majority that can, in the context of Meghnad Desai's comparison with that of Turkey's Erdogan. And both Modi and his BJP are bent on winning the coming parliamentary elections on the plank of that same hardline Hindutva that in real terms means blood bath of Muslims all over the nation. One must ask Meghnad Desai, if Turkey's turn towards 'Islamism' had any such genocidal agenda to gain majorities in elections?

Besides Desai's hard choice - is it better to be secular but poor? - is a clear blackmail and grim foreboding of the fascist plans for India's millions not subscribing to Hindutva.


Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
<ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>

-----------

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/secularism-in-danger/1132526/0

Secularism in danger

Meghnad Desai : Sun Jun 23 2013, 06:18 hrs

While Gandhiji was fighting the British Empire for khilafat, Kemal Pasha abolished it. He also insisted that the Turkish language be written in the Roman script
I don't dabble in social media but I gather they are full of alarmist predictions about what might happen if and when Narendra Modi becomes prime minister. The answer is: look at Turkey. It was made into a secular Republic by its founder Kemal Pasha who had no time for the mullahs. While Gandhiji was fighting the British Empire for khilafat, Kemal Pasha abolished it. He also insisted that the Turkish language be written in the Roman script. Turkey was modernised, secularised and its women were emancipated, unlike in other Islamic countries (or India).

Over the decades, it is the Army which has been the guarantor of Turkish secularism. Like Pakistan, Turkey had an intermittent democratic system. But more recently, the Army has kept away and there have been a succession of democratic governments. It was a great shock for the system when AKP (Justice and Development Party with Islamist origins but says it stands for 'conservative democracy') was formed in 2002 and won a landslide victory in 2003. This was because the other parties, which were nominally secular, proved corrupt and inefficient.

AKP has now been elected thrice, each time with a large majority. While it was cautious about proceeding along its desired lines initially, it has been bolder since. When it first insisted that women cover their heads, this raised alarm among modern Turkish women. Along the way, the government reformed the system, boosted the economy and made Turkey prosperous. Steadily, the government has tested Turkey's secularism without violating it. The Army, which should have guarded the Constitution, was shown to be conspiring and there was a clean-up of its rebellious elements. Recep Tayyep Erdogan, the Prime Minister, has successfully won a constitutional referendum which made the system more democratic and more open.

AKP has also been successful in settling a long-standing dispute with the Kurdish minority which was fighting for its own state. Thanks to these moves, there is truce and negotiations after 50 years of conflict. Erdogan has a lot to be proud of. The secular constitution has not been violated but the government is trying to change the mood music.

Now, there is a mass protest at Taksim square in Istanbul. Its origins are in something Indian readers are familiar with. Prime open land in the middle of the city has been sold off for private residential development. There has also been resentment about the ban on alcohol consumption which the younger generation does not like. The unrest has shaken the government. It may even be that more than the religious gestures, it is the slowing down of growth which has really riled the younger voters. (Brazil, over the last week, has had riots for very similar reasons—faltering growth and inflation and gross wastage of public money.)

What can one learn from the Turkish experience? Firstly, that it is possible for an openly non-secular party to win majority repeatedly in an erstwhile secular country. The test is that the party delivers on development and improves internal security. People put economic and safety issues way above secularism or communalism. The non-secular gestures of the AKP have been mild so far and relate mainly to dress codes etc.

Turkey's secularism is against the majority religion. Its origins are in the atheism of its founder Kemal Pasha. Secularism means a total separation between the State and religion. Indian secularism is not anti-religious. Nehru was an atheist and had zero tolerance for superstitions. He never frequented temples, or swamis, or consulted horoscopes. Indira Gandhi was religious and indeed, insisted on choosing an auspicious day to move into Teen Murti, much to the annoyance of her father. Because of her, secularism means tolerance of all religions but it only cares about protecting the Muslim minority, not Sikhs or Christians.

Muslims have not benefited from this. Yet, paradoxically, Muslim vote is most 'secular' in UP and Bihar where Muslims show the least economic advancement. Is it better to be secular but poor? Social media bloggers are too well-off to find out. The people must answer that question in the voting booth.

Islam’s Civil War - By Patrick J. Buchanan - The American Conservative

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/islams-civil-war/

The American Conservative

-------------

Islam’s Civil War

By Patrick J. Buchanan • May 28, 2013, 12:07 AM

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
• 
• 

Oleg Zabielin / Shutterstock.com

The thrice-promised land it has been called.

It is that land north of Mecca and Medina and south of Anatolia, between the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf.

In 1915—that year of Gallipoli, which forced the resignation of First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill—Britain, to win Arab support for its war against the Ottoman Turks, committed, in the McMahon Agreement, to the independence of these lands under Arab rule.

It was for this that Lawrence of Arabia and the Arabs fought.

In November 1917, however, one month before Gen. Allenby led his army into Jerusalem, Lord Balfour, in a letter to Baron Rothschild, declared that His Majesty’s government now looked with favor upon the creation on these same lands of a national homeland for the Jewish people.

Between these clashing commitments there had been struck in 1916 a secret deal between Britain’s Mark Sykes and France’s Francois Georges-Picot. With the silent approval of czarist Russia, which had been promised Istanbul, these lands were subdivided and placed under British and French rule.

France got Syria and Lebanon. Britain took Transjordan, Palestine and Iraq, and carved out Kuwait.

Vladimir Lenin discovered the Sykes-Picot treaty in the czar’s archives and published it, so the world might see what the Great War was truly all about. Sykes-Picot proved impossible to reconcile with Woodrow Wilson’s declaration that he and the allies—the British, French, Italian, Russian and Japanese empires—were all fighting “to make the world safe for democracy.”

Imperial hypocrisy stood naked and exposed.

Wilson’s idealistic Fourteen Points, announced early in 1918, were crafted to recapture the moral high ground. Yet it was out of the implementation of Sykes-Picot that so much Arab hostility and hatred would come — and from which today’s Middle East emerged.

Nine decades on, the Sykes-Picot map of the Middle East seems about to undergo revision, and a new map, its borders drawn in blood, emerge, along the lines of what H.G. Wells called the “natural borders” of mankind.

“There is a natural and necessary political map of the world,” Wells wrote, “which transcends” these artificial states, and this natural map of mankind would see nations established on the basis of language, culture, creed, race and tribe. The natural map of the Middle East has begun to assert itself.

Syria is disintegrating, with Alawite Shia fighting Sunni, Christians siding with Damascus, Druze divided, and Kurds looking to break free and unite with their kinfolk in Turkey, Iraq and Iran. Their dream: a Kurdistani nation rooted in a common ethnic identity.

Shia Hezbollah controls the south of Lebanon, and with Shia Iran is supporting the Shia-led army and regime of Bashar Assad.

Together, they are carving out a sub-nation from Damascus to Homs to the Mediterranean. The east and north of Syria could be lost to the Sunni rebels and the Al-Nusra Front, an ally of al-Qaida.

Sectarian war is now spilling over into Lebanon.

Iraq, too, seems to be disintegrating. The Kurdish enclave in the north is acting like an independent nation, cutting oil deals with Ankara.

Sunni Anbar in the west is supporting Sunni rebels across the border in Syria. And the Shia regime in Baghdad is being scourged by Sunni terror that could reignite the civil-sectarian war of 2006-2007, this time without Gen. Petraeus’ U.S. troops to negotiate a truce or tamp it down.

Sunni Turkey is home to 15 million Kurds and 15 million Shia. And its prime minister’s role as middle man between Qatari and Saudi arms shipments and Syria’s Sunni rebels is unappreciated by his own people.

Seeing the Shia crescent—Hezbollah in Lebanon, Assad’s Syria, Nuri al-Maliki’s Iraq, the Ayatollah’s Iran—imperiled by the potential loss of its Syrian linchpin, Tehran and Hezbollah seem willing to risk far more in this Syrian war than does the Sunni coalition of Saudis, Qataris and Turks.

Who dares, wins.

Though the Turks have a 400,000-man, NATO-equipped army, a population three times that of Syria and an economy 12 times as large, and they are, with the Israelis, the strongest nations in the region, they appear to want the Americans to deal with their problem.

President Obama is to be commended for resisting neocon and liberal interventionist clamors to get us into yet another open-ended war. For we have no vital interest in Assad’s overthrow.

We have lived with him and his father for 40 years. And what did our intervention in Libya to oust Moammar Gadhafi produce but a failed state, the Benghazi atrocity, and the spread of al-Qaida into Mali and Niger?

Why should Americans die for a Sunni triumph in Syria? At best, we might bring about a new Muslim Brotherhood regime in Damascus, as in Cairo. At worst, we could get a privileged sanctuary for that al-Qaida affiliate, the Al-Nusra Front.

As the Sykes-Picot borders disappear and the nations created by the mapmakers of Paris in 1919-1920 disintegrate, a Muslim Thirty Years’ War may be breaking out in the thrice-promised land.

It is not, and it should not become, America’s war.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” Copyright 2013 Creators.com.

Awami Vikas Party writes to President on the gross injustice of a Presidential decree discriminating against Muslims

Awami Vikas Party writes to President on the gross injustice of a Presidential decree discriminating against Muslims                                                         Date : 09/05/2015 To,                                                                                                                                             Shri  Pranab Mukherjee The President of India. Rashtrapati  bhavan, New Delhi – 110004. Subject: - Request to set aside, cancel the unconstitutional and communally biased order of the President of India, dated 10th August, 1950, regarding the exclusion of all non-Hindu Scheduled Castes, from the reservation, granted under Article 341 of the Indian Constitution and take corrective, and new measures to rectify the injustice done to the Muslim community and adopt policies for the uplift of the Muslim community. Respected Sir, Every citizen of India is aware that in the year 1949, the Constitution drafted by Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar was accepted, and adopted by the government and our present political system is running under the same Constitution. Further, the Preamble of our Constitution guarantees equal rights and opportunities to all citizens irrespective of their religion, equal rights and opportunities to all irrespective of caste, creed and religious beliefs. Article 341 guarantees that people belonging to the Scheduled Castes will be granted reservation, in all spheres of administration in the government and 15% reservation is granted to all Scheduled Castes. Article 341 does not discriminate a citizen on the basis of any religion and it also does not mention the exclusion of any religious group from the purview of this Article. It is applicable to every citizen of India irrespective of caste, creed, religion, sex, etc. In the year 1950, the then Prime Minister, Shri. Jawaharlal Nehru, and the then Home Minister Shri. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, in collusion with some communal leaders, recommended to the first President of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad that the reservation guaranteed under Article 341 of the Constitution, should not be granted to, nor given to any Scheduled Caste persons belonging to communities, who are not practicing Hinduism. Dr. Rajendra Prasad, the then President, without going on the merits of the recommendation , without even applying his mind, accepted the recommendation, which was biased, and communal, and issued order on 10th August, 1950, wherein it was clearly stated that the reservation guaranteed under Article 341 will not be given or granted to those who are not practicing Hinduism. This order was communal and biased and was against the principles laid down in our Constitution, but it was adopted, and since 10th August 1950, the discrimination policy adopted by the then government continues, which has divided communities on the basis of religion and created prejudices in the minds of communities, and a sense of hatred prevails, and it is really sad that some of our national leader are responsible for the divide. In fact, ideally, this recommendation should have been placed before the Parliament and after getting 2/3rd majority in favour of this ordinance, it should have been implemented. However, such an order was unconstitutionally passed and promulgated and implemented. The order passed by Dr. Rajendra Prasad in 1950 created a divide and all minority communities were debarred from the ambit of this reservation under Article 341. The Government of India, in 1950, back-stabbed all minorities and insulted the Constitution of India, without batting an eyelid. In the year 1956, the Scheduled Caste people of the Sikh community agitated against the above order and their agitation led to their inclusion in Article 341. Thereafter, in 1990, the Buddhist community agitated and they were also included in Article 341, but till date no amendment is made in Article 341. Though the order was illegal and unconstitutional, none of the presidents who later occupied the president’s office had the courage and conviction to take up this challenge and the divide between communities continues. Forty classes of the Muslims fall in the category of Scheduled Castes and are entitled to this reservation, and come under the ambit of Article 341, but they were kept away and deprived of their fundamental right of equality and this deprivation has dragged the Muslim community below the poverty line and they have been politically, financially, economically, educationally finished. This exclusion of the Muslim community from the reservation policy has political repercussions. Out of the 543 seats in the Lok Sabha, 107 seats are reserved, where no class of Muslims can contest any election and in many cases of these 107 seats, these seats are reserved in areas in which the majority of the population is Muslim. The consequence which follows is that systematically the Muslims are politically finished and thus lack representation in Parliament as well as state assemblies and cannot participate in the election process, in full strength as other communities do. It seems that this is done deliberately so that the Muslims have no say in the government and would also remain handicapped and toeing the line of the government. Apart from political losses, they are also excluded from services, education and other benefits which other communities are enjoying. This breach and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution has hampered the progress of the Muslim community. This systematic deprivation, it seems, has been done with ulterior motives to keep Muslims backward. As per the directions in the Constitution, so far eight commissions were appointed after independence to find out the political, educational, financial position of the minority communities and every commission one after the other reported the grave situation of the Muslim community which was deteriorating from bad to worse. The Rangnathan mishra commission reported that the representation of minority communities, especially Muslim communities, was finished in politics, services, jobs, education, etc. and also opined that 15% special reservation should be given to socially, politically, educationally, financially backward  communities and also further recommended that Muslims should be given 10% representation, in the name of socially, politically, educationally, and financially backward class. Thereafter, the last commission, the Sachar Commission had concluded by giving a report that the condition of the Muslim community, socially, economically, politically, educationally is worse than the Scheduled Caste people but the most surprising thing is that in spite of the appointment of commissions and eight reports, not a single commission’s report was placed in Parliament for debate, to accept the recommendations of the commission. The government just appoints the commissions for the sake of it, they do not implement the report the commissions, and shy away from implementation of the reports as they do not want the community to progress. The motive is to keep the Muslim community backward and uneducated, so that they can be used as vote banks. The Muslim community in India is the most deprived, backward and neglected community, and we talk of being a secular, sovereign, democratic republic. It is amazing how our political class is ruling this country without giving a damn about the principles of equality enshrined in our Constitution. Various Muslim groups have time and again agitated and requested the government for implementing measures for the uplift of the Muslim community and have also strongly recommended granting reservation under special category of political, economic, social, financial, educational backward class. However, since independence, not a single government at the centre has done anything for the uplift of the Muslim community, to include them in the ambit of reservation. The Muslim community is used for vote bank politics and once elections are won they are disposed of as one disposes tissues. The position of the Muslims was much better during the British regime than post-independence till date. If one goes through the records prior to independence, you will find that the Scheduled Caste of Muslims were given reservation by British rulers, the result being that the Muslim community was representing itself in jobs upto 35% and this has come down to 2% which means the Muslims were better off during the British regime. The Muslims fought for independence along with other communities and got freedom from British rule, but today, they are chained in poverty and backwardness- ironically, by their own people. The policies of the central government are responsible for this and the main culprit being the Congress party, which has ruled the country for almost 60 years. On behalf of the Muslim community, I humbly request you to use your good offices and cancel the order dated 10th August 1950, which will be your absolute constitutional decision, the wrong done by one president can be corrected by the other, by taking up this issue you will be giving justice, not only to Muslims, but also to other minority communities, like Christians, Jains and Parsis. This will be lauded and appreciated by the international community. The last Commission, the Sachar Commission, had also reported that the position of the Muslims was worse than that of the Dalits. Similarly, the Rangnath Commission headed by Rangnath Mihra reported that the share of the minority community is diminishing politically, economically, socially and educationally and for the uplift of the minority’s, 15% reservation under special category should be given. Hence, I request you to consider the eight reports of the eight commissions, and the Muslims be given special category as politically, socially, economically, educationally backward community and the minority community be given 15% reservation so that Parsis, Christians, Jains and Muslims will be benefitted and they will get their share in the government, the share which was deprived to them by the earlier ruling parties. We hope and pray that you will cancel the 1950 order before the 10th day of August 2013 and will, thus, open the door for the progress and development of the Muslim community and you will be remembered by the Muslim community till the end of the world and in the way Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar has become the hero of Dalits, so also you will also become the hero of the Muslim community. I am making this appeal to you as it is my personal opinion that you are a man of calibre and known for your bold decisions and you are one of the strongest Presidents of India. I further request you to cancel the Presidents order on Scheduled Castes, 1950, before the 10th day of August 2013. If you fail to take action, we will presume that you are also uninterested in the uplift of Muslims. I have to further inform you that if we do not get justice as prayed for, till the 10th August, 2013, we will observe 10th August as a black day and portray the first President of India, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, the first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the first Home Minister, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, as the murderers of the Constitution and enemies of Muslims, and this campaign will be carried out in all the states of India and if needed we will knock on the doors of the International Court for the injustices meted out to the Muslim community by the Indian State. Even the birthdates of these three leaders will be observed as a black day. We are sending this letter to all the Chief Ministers and Governors of all the states requesting them to send their recommendations to cancel the communally biased and unconstitutional order of the President of India, regarding Scheduled Castes, dated 10th August, 1950. We will also be seeking a reply from all the Chief Ministers and Governors and seeking their recommendations. If they fail to respond, we will presume that all these states are anti-Muslim states who to the face of Muslims declare that they are well wishers of Muslims but act anti-Muslims and anti-national. Please take this letter in the right spirit, we are hopeful that you, as a bold man, will pass an order at your end and will seek the recommendations of various Chief Ministers and Governors, and will work towards the cancellation of the order. We are forwarding a copy of this letter to the Prime Minister and Mrs. Sonia Gandhi with a request to take steps to cancel the unfortunate order of 1950. We are sending this letter to all the Chief Ministers and Governors of all the states requesting them to send their recommendations to cancel the communally biased and unconstitutional order of the President of India, regarding Scheduled Castes, dated 10th August, 1950. We will also be seeking a reply from all the Chief Ministers and Governors and seeking their recommendations. If they fail to respond, we will presume that all these states are anti-Muslim states who to the face of Muslims declare that they are well wishers of Muslims but act anti-Muslims and anti-national. Please take this letter in the right spirit, we are hopeful that you, as a bold man, will pass an order at your end and will seek the recommendations of various Chief Ministers and Governors, and will work towards the cancellation of the order. We are forwarding a copy of this letter to the Prime Minister and Mrs. Sonia Gandhi with a request to take steps to cancel the unfortunate order of 1950. The Congress government was responsible for the order, now they are in power and can correct their mistakes. If we do not get justice by 10th August 2013, we will start a strong agitation against the government. Since independence, till date the Muslim community has been given a step-motherly treatment and has been driven to the wall. It is high time that we, along with other communities, are brought into the mainstream. If it is not done, I think we should stop calling India a sovereign, socialist, democratic republic. Yours faithfully, Mr. Shamsherkhan Wazirkhan Pathan. President Awami vikas Party           Follow Us on   All Rights Reserved by Awami Vikas Party Designed by.....

India should keep out of Afghanistan - Letter to the Editor - Ghulam Muhammed

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Letter to the Editor

While Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai is in India on a three-day visit, to meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh this evening where he is expected to push for an expansion for India's security involvement in Afghanistan, one cannot help to note from a CNN Farid Zakaria interview of Daryl Dalrymple on the last British involvement in Afghanistan, back in 1860s when out of about 18000 British troops, only one survived the retreat, and in that expedition with the British were about 5000 Indians too – helpless coolies recruited to die, apparently not for the sake of their own country, India. Another episode blurs up the confusion on Afghanistan, when a British soldier, Joe Geldon, on Steven Sucker’s BBC Hardtalk program accuses that UK was merely hanging over the coattails of US and it has no business to be in Afghanistan. With so much world experience being articulated day in and day out even in current media programs, one hopes our Prime Minister will take heed and not drag us Indians into Afghanistan imbroglio, either hanging from the coattails of the US or Hamid Karzai – the later-day Shah Shuja --- whatever promise of gold at the end of the rainbow will be shown to him and his advisers. India should opt for a war-less future for the sub-continent and even with China, it should finalize a neighborly relations just like US has with Canada – open borders, open hearts.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
<ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>

America’s War on Islam 2.0 - By Stephen Lendman

America’s War on Islam 2.0

 

By Stephen Lendman on April 21, 2013

 

Waging war at home or abroad requires enemies. America creates them when none exist. Imperial strategy demands them.

 

Post-9/11, Muslims were targeted for political advantage. Post-Boston bombings, America’s war on Islam continues.

 

Muslims are “war on terror” scapegoats. Washington’s Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia wars rage.

 

It’s the wrong time to be Muslims in America. They’re persecuted for their faith and ethnicity. At times it’s for their activism, prominence, and/or charity.

 

They’re dehumanized, spied on, set up as patsies, hunted down, rounded up, held in detention, kept in isolation, denied bail, restricted in their right to counsel, tried on secret evidence, convicted on bogus charges, given long sentences, and treated harshly as political prisoners.

 

The term “Islamofascism” was popularized. Some call it Islamic radicalism or jihadism. The New Oxford American Dictionary calls it “a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century.”

 

The Urban Dictionary says it “refers to the notion that Islam is not so much a religion as it is a political ideology that in many ways resembles ‘fascism.’ ”

 

“An Islamofascist can either be an Islamic fundamentalist, or someone who uses violence or bullying tactics to impose Islamic principles on others….”

 

It’s used to describe groups like Al Qaeda. In 2008, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) headlined “The Dirty Dozen – Who’s who among America’s leading Islamophobes.” (PDF)

 

FAIR called David Horowitz its “premier promoter.” His 2007 “Islamofascism Awareness Week” attracted leading Muslim haters.

 

Author Robert Spencer was called a prominent Islam-basher. He publishes the “notoriously Islamophobic website” “Jihad Watch.”

 

Daniel Pipes founded the Middle East Forum think tank. Media scoundrels mischaracterize him as an Islamic “scholar.” He defends racially profiling Arab Americans. He calls their presence a “true danger” for Jews.

 

Michael Savage hosts “The Savage Nation.” It’s a nationally syndicated radio talk show. He relentlessly uses hateful language. He once endorsed killing a hundred million Muslims. He did so on air.

 

Pat Robertson calls Islam violent and irrational. It’s “not a religion,” he says. It’s a “worldwide political movement.” It’s “meant to subjugate all people under Islamic law.” It’s a “bloody, brutal type of religion.”

 

Others on FAIR’s list included Fox News’ Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly, conservative political commentator Mark Steyn, self-styled Islamic terrorist expert Steven Emerson, conservative blogger/commentator Michelle Malkin, former Fox News host Glenn Beck, and political commentator Debbie Schlussel.

 

Connect the dots. The Boston bombings connect eerily to 9/11. Muslims were blamed both times. America’s war on terror targets them. It continues at home and abroad.

 

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s a naturalized US citizen. Senators Lindsey Graham (R. SC), John McCain (R. AZ) and Kelly Ayotte (R. NH), as well as Rep. Peter King (R. NY) want him held as an “enemy combatant.” They want him denied fundamental rights.

 

King chairs the House Homeland Security Committee. He’s also an Intelligence Committee member. He wants more surveillance. “It keeps us ahead of the terrorists who are constantly trying to kill us,” he said.

 

Big Brother no longer is fiction. Total surveillance is possible. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, Boston, and other cities use growing numbers of video cameras.

 

They monitor streets, commercial areas, airports, highways, public and private transportation, shopping malls, government and business buildings, as well as other places where people congregate, work, reside, recreate, or inhabit for any reason.

 

King and others want more. Drone surveillance may be expedited. Legislation authorized eye in the sky spying. Civil libertarians call all forms of surveillance an unregulated privacy threat.

 

In his April 20 weekly address, Obama suggested perhaps what’s coming. He called Monday’s incident “an act of terror….But in the days since….Americans refuse to be terrorized.”

 

“….Boston’s spirit remains undaunted. America’s spirit remains undimmed….That’s what makes us strong. That’s why we endure.”

 

“In the days to come, we will remain vigilant as a nation.” Expect the worst to follow.

 

Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are called Islamic terrorists. Media scoundrels characterize them that way.

 

Round-the-clock coverage pronounced guilt by accusation. What’s most important to know is suppressed. Managed news misinformation substitutes.

 

Both brothers were set up as patsies. One’s dead. The other’s seriously wounded. He remains hospitalized. He’s at Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. He’s under heavy guard.

 

He’ll be interrogated when able to respond. He won’t be read his Miranda rights. On April 20, the ACLU headlined a “Statement on Miranda Rights of Boston Bombings Suspect,” saying:

 

“The American Civil Liberties Union reacted to the apprehension of the suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing and statements from federal officials that he would be questioned without being read his Miranda rights.”

 

“Every criminal defendant is entitled to be read Miranda rights. The public safety exception should be read narrowly. It applies only when there is a continued threat to public safety and is not an open-ended exception to the Miranda rule.”

 

“Additionally, every criminal defendant has a right to be brought before a judge and to have access to counsel. We must not waver from our tried-and-true justice system, even in the most difficult of times. Denial of rights is un-American and will only make it harder to obtain fair convictions.”

 

The Center for Constitutional Rights headlined “CCR Condemns Miranda Exception in Boston Marathon Suspect Case,” saying:

 

“The Miranda warnings were put in place because police officers were beating and torturing ‘confessions’ out of people who hadn’t even been formally accused of a crime.”

 

“We cannot afford to repeat our mistakes. If officials require suspects to incriminate themselves, they are making fair trials and due process merely option and not a requirement. To venture down that road again will make law enforcement accountable to no one.”

 

“Like Obama’s expanded killing program and his perpetuation of indefinite detention without trial at Guantanamo, this is yet another erosion of the Constitution to lay directly at the President’s feet.”

 

“Obama’s Justice Department unilaterally expanded the ‘public safety exception’ to Miranda in 2010 beyond anything the Supreme Court ever authorized.”

 

“Each time the administration use this exception, it stretches wider and longer. However horrific the crime, continuing to erode constitutional rights invites continued abuse by law enforcement, and walks us down a dangerous path that becomes nearly impossible to reverse.”

 

Media scoundrels straightaway convicted both brothers. They did so in the court of public opinion. Misreporting continues. FAIR’s Peter Hart calls it a “rush to misjudgment,” saying:

 

“We’ve seen reporting and commentary that talked about the Muslim or jihadist character of the bombs themselves: pressure cookers, ball bearings or nails used.”

 

“These are things that are not unique to al-Qaeda or al-Qaeda-inspired terror attacks.”

 

“We saw references to the Times Square bombing, trying to put this in the context of Islamic terror or previous instances of what the media like to refer to as Islamic terror.”

 

“We even saw references to the fact that two bombs were there. It must have been a follow-up attack trying to hit the rescue workers when they show up – again, a Middle Eastern trait, we’re told.”

 

“This is actually what the United States government has done in places like Iraq and in drone strikes in Pakistan.”

 

“So we have seen this rush to characterize this bombing, without necessarily saying precisely that we know who the perpetrators are, but to put it in this context.”

 

“And I think that creates a climate of fear and suspicion, particularly directed toward certain communities.”

 

“We read headlines, you know, block letters across the front page of the USA Today, the day afterwards, “Terror Has Returned.”

 

“This idea that the United States has not seen a terrorist attack since 9/11. This is a unique event right now.”

 

On April 19, Media Matters headlined “Boston And The Right-Wing Media’s Collapse,” saying:

 

Glenn Beck’s web site (The Blaze) got it wrong saying a Saudi national student was “absolutely involved.” He called him a “dirt bag, possibly the ringleader.”

 

Fox News host Sean Hannity claimed he previously was “involved with a terrorist or terror activity.”

 

Media Matters said “too many players opted to just make stuff up. Prompting witch hunts, they cast innocents as would-be killers and then couldn’t be bothered with apologies.”

 

Murdoch’s New York Post “seemed committed to getting as many stories wrong about the Boston attack as possible.”

 

Before an arrest was made, CNN’s breaking news headlined “Sources: Arrest made in bombings case.” Reporter John King erroneously called him “dark-skinned.”

 

NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous responded, saying:

 

“Our concern is that CNN used an overly broad, unhelpful and potentially racially inflammatory categorization to describe the potential suspect. History teaches us that too often people of color are unfairly targeted in the aftermath of acts of terrorism.” 

Post-Boston bombings, media misreporting was deplorable. It didn’t surprise. “Rush to misjudgment” is commonplace. Washington Post editors headlined “In pursuit of terrorists.”

 

Official reports were accepted as fact. The Tsarnaev brothers were blamed. A Chechen “extremist,” “Al Qaeda” or other “foreign group” connection was suggested.

 

“Much as some in Washington might wish it, the war against terrorism is not over….The Tszrnaevs….may have intended more mayhem: They were reportedly carrying more bombs when they were cornered Thursday.”

 

Note: Media misreporting said at least older brother Tamerlan wore an explosives vest. Photos of his body showed him riddled with bullets and shrapnel head to toe. All limbs were intact. He wasn’t blown to pieces.

 

New York Post editors headlined “The unfinished war,” saying:

 

“….These have been scary days. (It was) chilling to see how successfully the suspects, Chechen Muslim immigrants, were – not just in allegedly killing people, but in instilling widespread fear, especially in the Northeast.”

 

“The week served as a painful reminder that this nation remains in an ongoing fight against terror – and that the homeland is still vulnerable.”

 

“The war on terror isn’t over. Alas, far from it.”

 

Boston Globe editors headlined “Boston after the bombings: a show of character,” saying:

 

“(L)aw-enforcement officials and political leaders….put aside turf wars and expressions of egotism to focus on the killers….”

 

“….Boston’s character needs no further validation. The city is strong, and getting stronger.”

 

Chicago Tribune editors headlined “Accomplishing….nothing,” saying:

 

“….Boston bombing suspects (may) have had no motivation more complex than joyful cruelty.”

 

“This level of preparation, though, suggests that they had some motive more sophisticated than merely marauding through the lives of innocents.”

 

“The Boston massacre no doubt will help authorities worldwide rethink security preparations for mass events.”

 

Numerous print and broadcast reports highlighted a Chechen Muslim connection. The New York Times was typical headlining “Boston Attacks Turn Spotlight on Troubled Region of Chechnya,” saying:

 

Possible motivations of both brothers aren’t yet known. “Yet, with at least one brother talking of Chechen nationalism on the Internet, their reported involvement in the marathon attack throws a spotlight on one of the darkest corners of nationalist and Islamic militancy….”

 

“Whether the Boston bombing was tied to it is still unclear, but a generation of young Chechen men have never known a peaceful homeland (and have had) difficulties finding a place abroad.”

 

America’s war on terror continues. Perhaps last week’s Boston bombings advanced it. Muslims remain America’s enemy of choice. Expect Obama and Congress to take full advantage. Expect the worst of times to follow.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.” http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html. Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.dailycensored.com/americas-war-on-islam

---

Links:

 

CNN - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6PLkR2UUg8

FAIR - Dirty Dozen - http://fair.org/article/the-dirty-dozen

FAIR - Dirty Dozen - pdf - http://www.smearcasting.us/FAIR_Smearcasting_Final.pdf

Islam could be dominant UK religion in 10 years – census analysis - RT

http://rt.com/news/christianity-decline-uk-islam-rise-405/

Islam could be dominant UK religion in 10 years – census analysis

Get short URL

Published time: May 17, 2013 10:08

Shiite Muslims gather in Hyde Park in West London to mark the final day of Ashura. (AFP Photo/Shaun Curry)

Tags
Immigration, Religion, UK

One in 10 people under 25 are Muslim, while Christianity is in decline, the 2011 UK census reveals. An explosion in the Muslim population and an aging Christian demographic could mean Islam will be the dominant religion in the UK in 10 years.
A new analysis of the 2011 census by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that the number of Christians was falling 50 per cent faster than had previously been thought. Earlier analysis of the statistics showed only a 15 per cent decline, but the ONS found that this figure had been beefed up by 1.2 million foreign-born Christians.

Furthermore, the re-analysis showed that the majority of Christians were over the age of 60 and for the first time less than half of young people describe themselves as Christian. As a result the ONS has calculated that in a decade only a minority will classify themselves as Christians in England. Christianity is still the dominant religion in the UK with over 50 per cent of the population regarding themselves as believers.

However, this may be set to change as the British Muslim population has surged dramatically over the past 15 years, increasing by 75 per cent in England and Wales. The 2011 census puts the Muslim population of the UK at around 5 per cent, a total that has been boosted by around 600,000 Muslim immigrants who have arrived in the UK over the past decade.

Muslims attend Friday prayers on a rainy first day of Ramadan, at the courtyard of a housing estate next to a small BBC community centre and mosque in east London (Reuters/Chris Helgren)

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said to UK daily the Telegraph that the decline of Christianity is
“inevitable.” “In another 20 years there are going to be more active Muslims than there are churchgoers,” he said.
Moreover the number of people identifying themselves as atheists has increased by 10 per cent, rising from 15 per cent to 25 per cent. The change has been dubbed as a “significant cultural shift” by the British Humanist Association, while the Church of England has shrugged off the statistics, maintaining they still retain a strong base of believers.
"While this is a challenge, the fact that six out of 10 people in England and Wales self-identify as Christians is not discouraging. Christianity is no longer a religion of culture but a religion of decision and commitment. People are making a positive choice in self-identifying as Christians," said a spokesperson for the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales told press in December.
In addition the census registered an increase in followers of Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Judaism.

‘Sleepwalking into segregation’

The rising number of immigrants and different ethnicities in the UK has given rise to increasing levels of segregation. Think tank ‘Demos’ has labeled the phenomenon ‘white flight’, citing the falling number of ethnic whites in areas where they are minorities.

Demos’ investigation revealed that new ethnic minorities like Somalis where moving into areas where older most established ethnic populations like Afro-Caribbeans had previously been dominant.

Muslims attend Friday prayers on the first day of Ramadan, in the courtyard of a housing estate next to a small BBC community centre and mosque in east London (Reuters)

The population of London is indicative of the change in the British demographic with 600,000 white Londoners moving out of the capital in the past decade. In spite of the fact that the British capital’s population has grown by more than a million, the number of white British residents has decreased from 4.3 million to 3.7 million.
“We do have an integration problem,” said Demos director David Goodhart to RT. The
“changing ethnic composition” of the British capital is causing a large exodus of ethnic white out of the city, he added.
Goodhart went on to say that the problem of integration was not confined to Great Britain and is prevalent all around the EU despite attempts to eradicate segregation.
“Part of the point of the euro was to disperse German power and prevent the rise of nationalism in Europe, but it has done precisely the opposite on both fronts. We now have serious national resentments in countries like Greece,” he stressed.
Trevor Phillips, the former chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission warned that the statistics did not spell good news for integration in the UK and warned the country was

Two terror attacks, four sets of accused, two names in common By Muzamil Jaleel - The Indian Express, Mumbai, INDIA

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/two-terror-attacks-four-sets-of-accused-two-names-in-common/1115309/0

Two terror attacks, four sets of accused, two names in common

Muzamil Jaleel : Mon May 13 2013, 00:13 hrs

As Maharashtra ATS's 7/11 suspects go on trial, a look at contradictions between its claims and those of Mumbai crime branch, and the Malegaon connection
Between July and October 2006, Maharashtra's anti-terrorist squad arrested 13 people and claimed they had confessed they were responsible for that year's July 11 blasts that had killed 187 people in seven trains. The ATS filed a chargesheet that November 29. This was after all the accused had filed written submissions to a court on November 9, saying the confessions had been forced out of them under torture, but these received no attention against the ATS narrative.

The case against them is currently being heard in a special MCOCA court. During the years since their arrest, another set of people has been accused of the same attack by another wing of the police in the same state.

In 2008, the Mumbai police's crime branch arrested five alleged Indian Mujahideen men and claimed they were responsible for all major blasts since 2005, including 7/11. On October 7, 2008, a remand application was filed stating that "Afzal Usmani and the wanted accused who are part of the Indian Mujahideen have carried out the 7/11 train blasts, and all blasts in Mumbai since 2005".

Based on confessional statements attributed to these men, the Maharashtra additional chief secretary (home) in January 2009 and the Mumbai police commissioner in February granted sanction to prosecute Mohammad Sadiq, Ansar Sheikh and Arif Sheikh.

One confession was on October 18, 2008, recorded by DCP Vishwas Nangre Patil under section 18 of the MCOCA. "Sadiq stated that he, with the help of other IM members such as Riyaz Bhatkal, Arif Badar, Dr Shahnawaz and others, had carried out the 2006 train blasts, that they had also carried out all bomb blasts in Mumbai after 2005." The statements of Ansar Sheikh and Md Arif Sheikh, saying that "Sadiq told them that he had carried out the July 11, 2006, Mumbai train blasts" were recorded under MCOCA by DCPs Dilip Sawant and Milind Bharambe.

On February 17, 2009, the crime branch filed a chargesheet against a number of alleged IM operatives for hacking into email accounts and claiming responsibility for various attacks in the country. As reported in The Indian Express then, the chargesheet did not mention the initial claim that five of the accused were also guilty of 7/11. The defence case of the ATS's suspects, however, hinges around that initial claim.

Apart from the fact that two different sets of people were indicted for the same crime, there have been other question marks around the 7/11 probe. Call data records (CDRs) produced in the special MCOCA court have indicated that the phones of Ehtesham Siddiqui, Faisal Sheikh and Asif Bashir Khan, accused by the ATS of planting the bombs, weren't actually near the sites that day. On seven occasions, the ATS had cited CDRs to establish links between these accused and the Lashkar-e-Toiba while seeking their custody in courts, but then failed to produce the CDRs and claimed they had destroyed the records.

Another intriguing twist is that two of the 13 accused, Mohammad Ali Alam Sheikh and Asif Bashir Khan, were accused by the ATS in another case for which a fresh set of people was later indicted — the Malegaon blast of September 8, 2006. NIA investigations have since held a Hindu terror module responsible. These two are among nine ATS suspects; the other seven are out on bail but Sheikh and Asif remain in custody because of the 7/11 charges.

Though the ATS claimed to have arrested Sheikh on September 29, Sheikh claimed to have been in and out of police custody since August 1. Excerpts from his handwritten submission to the court on November 9, 2006:

Sheikh's statement

"I was detained illegally from August 1, 2006, to August 31 for enquiry at Kurla ATS office... On September 7, I was taken to ATS office, Nagpada, and detained there till September 28. I was told I need not worry and I would be allowed to go before Ramzan. On September 29, I was arrested and produced in court and I learnt that I was implicated in the train blast case...

"I was taken to my house and a pressure cooker was taken. When I asked what was happening, I was told they would make me a witness and that I shouldn't tell anybody. The ATS officers constantly asked me who all had come to my house and stayed how many days. I used to answer that no guests used to come as I live in a small house.

"On September 9, at around 6 pm, I was taken to the Nagpada office. I was taken to the office of (then ATS chief) K P Raghuvanshi by (ATS officer) Dinesh Ahir. Shailesh Gaikwad (ATS officer) also came. Raghuvanshi saab asked me if I know Mohammad Ali, a tailor, staying at Road No. 7. I said out of fear that I will enquire if there is such a person. Raghuvanshi saab told me that if I didn't find him, I was to be implicated.

"On September 26, around 5 pm, Raghuvanshi saab came to ATS Nagpada and I was threatened (and told) that my house has been used for working out the train blast. I denied it. I was told I would be given one hour to admit the same or else I would face the same consequences as the other accused.

"On October 3 (four days after the arrest), I told officer Sachin Kadam, 'Sir, why did you implicate me falsely?' On October 17, I was taken for a narco test. On October 20, around 11 pm, at Kala Chowki, Sachin Kadam showed me a photo of the Malegaon blast, abused me and said, 'What you have done in the Malegaon and Mumbai blasts, you have told us'. I told them... as I am not connected in any way in this case, how could I tell? I told the officers to show me the narco analysis CD. They started assaulting me.

"I was taken before Raghuvanshi saab, who had come to Kala Chowki. I begged for mercy. Raghuvanshi saab told me that if I didn't admit it and became an approver, I would be implicated in the Malegaon blast. Raghuvanshi saab hit me on the back. I sat down. I was assaulted on the head with a belt and blows from fists. I screamed in pain but officers Sachin Kadam and Raghuvanshi did not show any mercy. ACP Dhamle came and assaulted me and told me to confess to a false story... that if I don't create a story about the Malegaon blast, my entire family will be implicated.

"Raghuvanshi saab used to take the names of persons whom I had never heard of. He told me to say these persons had come to my house. I was also told by Raghuvanshi saab that Pakistanis had come to my house... I had to say yes to whatever they were saying as I was scared. Raghuvanshi saab had already prepared a story on the Malegaon blast and had written the following names on a piece of paper — Shabir Ahmad (Masiullah), Nurul Huda, Rayiz Ahmed, Dr Salman Farsi, Dr Waheed, Wajid.

"On October 20, 21 and 22, I was assaulted and hung upside down by ATS officers. On October 23, Raghuvanshi saab came to me and told me that now that the stories of both blasts had been prepared, I would be discharged and made an approver. And every month Rs 10,000 would be sent to my house.

"On October 24, A N Roy (then Maharashtra DGP) came with Raghuvanshi saab and told me that if I didn't become an approver and didn't sign on the confessional statement I would have to remain in jail for a long time, and if I cooperated with them, I would be released within one-and-a-half months.

"The ATS officers come to Arthur Road Jail and threaten all the accused. I apprehend the ATS officers will implicate me falsely in the Malegaon case."

Asif's statement

The name of the other man accused by the ATS in both 7/11 and Malegaon 2006, Asif Bashir Khan, had appeared in an alleged confessionn by Shabir Ahmad Masiullah. Masiullah told The Indian Express he was forced to sign on a paper and later found that Asif's name was part of it. Masiullah says he does not know Asif or Mohammad Ali Alam Sheikh. According to the ATS case, Asif had arranged the "leftover RDX" from the 7/11 blasts and given it to Masiullah and others for the Malegaon blast.

Excerpts from Asif's submission to the court on November 9, 2006:

"I was arrested by the ATS on October 3, 2006, from a friend's house in Belgaum. Police officers torture me and beat me brutally and take my signatures on blank pieces of paper... also threaten to shoot me in encounter.

"...I was taken to Bangalore for narco analysis on October 20... They again carried out a narco test on October 28 in Bangalore. On return, they kept me in custody and Mr Deshmukh Sir, police inspector, threatened me that if I did not confess, he would... implicate my brother and father, and my children would be sent to a remand home... The police also took me before the DCP, Borivali... he tried to force me to sign on a written document but I refused. I have been regularly tortured as I have refused to sign. The police also threaten that my family and I will be implicated in the Malegaon case."

Malegaon 2006

It was not the blast that led to the investigation. The probe had predated the attack; it was based on information on what was to come. In a statement that was treated as an FIR, assistant inspector Shripad Balkrishna Kale of Greater Mumbai Police, now DCB in Unit 7 at Ghatkopar, Mumbai, declared he "received information on August 1, 2006, through a reliable informant that one Shabir of Malegaon and Nafis of Shivaji Nagar, Govandi, Mumbai, who are connected with SIMI, were preparing to commit some sabotage acts in the Ganesh Festival". Kale said he informed his seniors and two squads were appointed, with senior inspector Rathod leading a squad to Malegaon and assistant inspector Kamble being sent to Shivaji Nagar, Govandi.

Kamble said the squads brought Masiullah, 38, who made and sold batteries and inverters, from Malegaon, and Nafis Ahmad Jameer Ahmad Ansari, 29, who worked as a computer operator in Mumbai's Shivaji Nagar, to the unit office. "On repeatedly and intensively interrogating the two persons, it was found that both of them are workers of SIMI. Further, it is learnt that both persons, through the said banned organisation, had gone from India to Pakistan via Dubai in or about May-June 2003 where they received arms training," Kamble said. "They had come back from Pakistan to Dubai and entered India from Kathmandu through the Bahraich border. Both of them had torn/destroyed their Indian passports at Kathmandu... the evidence of their having gone to Pakistan." The date of arrest in police records is August, 11, 2006, also the date of registration of the FIR.

Initially the case (FIR 1106/06 dated August 11, 2006) was registered with the Ghatkopar police station, then transferred to the DCB, CID Unit-7, the same day.

Masiullah and Nafis were charged under UAPA. Apart from the alleged plan to bomb the Ganesh festival on August 1, the ATS simultaneously accused Masiullah of planning the bombing of Muslim religious places on Shab-e-Baraat five weeks later in Malegaon. The ATS later alleged that Masiullah was the mastermind behind the 2006 Malegaon blasts. It claimed he and his accomplices had assembled the bombs in the last week of July, and kept them in a godown from where he ran his business of assembling inverters and batteries. He signed his "confession" on November 21, 2006; it was after that (on December 10) that the ATS raided his godown and claimed to have found traces of RDX in soil samples.

The ATS claimed that Mushiullah and Nafis were helping Riyaz Bhatkal, Tariq Sattar and Mohammad Ali Alam Sheikh. This is how Sheikh's name came up in that case. In the affidavit before the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal, senior inspector Udaisingh of Kherwadi Police Station said Masiullah and Nafis "repeatedly met Sattar and Mohammad Ali Alam Shaikh @ Aziz who also induced them to encourage to go to Pakistan" and "helped Nafis in getting a passport and helped both the arrested accused get a visa and plane tickets to Dubai".

Final twist

The government decided to hand over the case to the CBI; the ATS hurried to file its own chargesheet. In December 2010, Swami Aseemanand gave a confessional statement indicating that a Hindu terror module was responsible for the Malegaon blast. In April 2011, the NIA started probing the case afresh. On November 16, Masiullah was granted bail and released with six others. Only the two also charged in 7/11 remained in jail.
On December 15, 2012, the NIA arrested Rajender Chaudhary alias Pehelwan from Ujjain in connection with the Samjhauta Express blasts and he reportedly admitted that he and others had planted the Malegaon bombs too. The NIA chargesheet is expected to be filed soon.