Showing posts with label conversion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conversion. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

In the wake of Raj Nath questions:Conversion: natural phenomenon if allowed to be natural - By Dr. Javed Jamil

In the wake of Raj Nath questions: Conversion: natural phenomenon if allowed to be natural
 
Dr. Javed Jamil
 
Home Minister Raj Nath Singh has chosen a minority platform to ask a few questions on conversion: Is conversion necessary? Can social service not be performed without resorting to conversion? Can no religion prosper without encouraging conversion? Will any country allow changes in its demographic character? And is it not true that the minorities demand anti-conversion law all over the world but not in India?
 
The questions clearly bring to surface the fear that the majority community in India has about its losing a position of dominance in the country that it has been enjoying since Independence. They have succeeded in doing this through the use or misuse of the constitution that has guaranteed reservations for only Hindus, through misuse of India’s democratic exercise which makes it impossible for minorities to make an impact on the governance, through the use of privatization which has allowed the rich and Upper-caste Hindus to dominate the economic as well as educational scenario and through the brutal use of their muscle power with the support of the government machinery. The questions also reflect the lack of confidence in Hindu mindset about the survival of their own religion. They have already used the Constitution to stop conversion from Hinduism to Islam and Christianity through a blanket ban on the continuation of reservation in case Dalits convert to Islam or Christianity. Now they want to expand this ban further by just stopping the right of any man to abandon the religion in which he was born.
 
There are several basic concepts regarding conversion that need to be clarified. There is a general perception that “conversion” relates to change from one religion to another. The truth is that conversion is a ubiquitous phenomenon and involves all the ideologies and the subsects within the religions. As part of the international campaign against religion as a whole, the forces of economics have been relentlessly campaigning against religion calling it the root cause of all the problems. In this process, they are using all their arsenals to convert the people to their ideologies of various kinds of liberalism including the commonly known ones, the communism and the capitalism. There have been lobbies of various kinds – pro-abortion-anti-abortion, pro-gay-anti-gay, pro-war-anti-war, and many others that are always busy in converting people to their sides. NGOs these days are funded by the international agencies and corporate sector to advance the ideas that suit them. If for example, an NGO applies for funds to campaign against abortions as a whole, it is not likely to be solicited; but if it applies for an exclusive campaign against female infanticide, it is highly likely to get the funds. If an NGO wants funds to raise awareness against the threats posed by prostitution and to campaign for a ban on it, it will never get funds; but if it asks funds for the regular medical check-up of prostitutes to keep them of HIV-free (so that their clients need not fear coming to them), they will get a good amount.
 
The conversion has been used by Hindus themselves in the past to a great effect. Just before the beginning of this millennium, in the days of Asoka “the Great”, the majority of Hindus had converted to Buddhism. Later, the Hindu organisations swung into action, changed certain concepts of their own religion (stressing vegetarianism for instance) to reconvert the Hindus back to Hinduism. This was despite the fact that Buddhist did not come from outside. Within Hinduism also, there have been various movements aimed at converting from one ideology to the other. There was a strong Arya Samaji movement a few centuries back, and it continued to have a strong presence till Independence. Now, there are few Arya-Samajis left in the country. In recent decades, Sai Baba clan has continued to grow among Hindus.
 
Conversions within Islam and Christianity have also been a continuous phenomenon. There has been a war between Catholics and Protestants, both being busy in converting Christians to their respective ideologies. Within Islam also, Shiites, Ahle-Hadith and other Sunni groups have also been trying to lure people to their respective sects through reasoning and influences.
 
Atheism in itself has emerged as a formal ideology in the 19th Century. An overwhelming majority of “Christians” in European countries including Britain, France and Germany, is that of atheists; many of them refuse to call them Christians.
 
This proves that the change of ideologies is a permanent phenomenon, and no attempts to stop it can ever succeed. Nobody can be forced to continue in the ideology (religious or non-religious) of his family, and he has the right to follow what appeals to him most.Everybody has the right to think his religion/ideology is best and if he thinks so, he will always try to argue his case privately or publicly. What is to be stopped is the use of temporary lures or force in pursuing objectives.
 
Can social service not be performed without resorting to conversion? I would like to tell Raj Nath that social service is the right as well as the duty, which every group irrespective of its ideological positions wants to perform. Even corporate sector has a social sector attached to it. Political parties do also have programmes of social service. Almost all religions also want to prove to the world that their concern is not limited to a few theological issues but they are also concerned about the welfare of the people. This is a positive aspect of their activities, and it will be nonsensical to create obstacles in their way by levelling the allegations of attempts to convert in the garb of social service. Any ideological group has the right to influence people through service, and religion based organisations cannot be denied this right. Contrary to the popular perception that only Christian or Islamic organisations are using social service to influence the people, Hindu organisations too have been actively involved in expanding their clout through various social services. There is a chain of Shishu Mandirs in the country imparting primary and secondary education. Jains have a big chain of institutions, and of course Christians have been particularly successful in the field of education. Organisations belonging to almost all religions have established health centres and hospitals for public service. Muslims of India in fact lag behind in this area compared to other communities. These efforts need to be encouraged, not discouraged. Private institutions established by corporates are involved in spreading Western models of education because they suit their machinations.
 
Can no religion prosper without encouraging conversion?The fact cannot be denied that the proponents of every ideology, religious or non-religious, have the hidden desire to see the whole world accepting their beliefs and practices. There is no exception to it. This is natural. If anyone considers his religion or ideology as best, he would want everybody to do the same. Again, what is to be stopped is the use of questionable methods to influence people.
 
Will any country allow changes in its demographic character? Again, Mr. Singh has to be told that the demography of the countries has continued to change, and it has often changed quite rapidly. In the beginning of the 6th Century, the whole Arab world, East Africa, Persia and Southern Europe was following Paganism, Zoroastrianism or Christianity. The rise of a single man, Muhammad, the Final Prophet of the Religion of God, which assumed the Arabic name Islam with his advent, the whole of this area converted to Islam before the arrival of the next century. During the reign of Asoka, India became a Buddhist dominant country. Within a few centuries, it again became a Hindu country. The whole Europe used to be a Christian continent till the beginning of the Industrial revolution. Now the majority of Europeans are atheists even if they are counted as Christians, and in next twenty years, Muslims may well become the majority in most European countries. The demography of all countries continues to change depending on various factors including large-scale migration and reproductive tendencies.  
 
Now coming to the final question: And is it not true that the minorities demand anti-conversion law all over the world but not in India? This is of course not true, at least in the case of Muslims. The confidence of Muslims in their own religion is so strong that they do not worry about the conversion of Muslims to other religions. Of course, they oppose any questionable ways of conversions. In Europe, they are in minorities, but despite all the adverse propaganda against Islam, the conversion to Islam is biggest in the continent. This is equally true of America, Canada and Australia. I have never heard about any minority demanding a ban on conversions in any country.
 
Every human being has the right to follow his beliefs. Every human being has the right to help others. But no one has the right to malign other beliefs or faiths, or use obscene words against the esteemed figures of any ideology. Use of force or lure of money and positions have to be stopped. But stopping people from joining any ideological clan, religious or non-religious, through law will be counterproductive. It will stall the evolution of thought. It will ultimately be an obstacle in the peaceful survival of the human beings as Mankind. India is a country where more than 95 percent of the people believe in God, religious morality and family system. There is a huge threat to religious morality and family system from the forces of economics, which are bent upon using human susceptibilities for commercial ends. It is high time all religious communities in India united against the threat to social and family system. Once they realize this larger aim, the differences between various communities and mutual rivalries will automatically subside, and India will emerge as a role model for the whole world.
 
·          Dr Javed Jamil is India based thinker and writer with over a dozen books including his latest, “Quranic Paradigms of Sciences & Society” (First Vol: Health), “Muslims Most Civilised, Yet Not Enough” and “Muslim Vision of Secular India: Destination & Road-map”. Other works include “The Devil of Economic Fundamentalism”, “The Essence of the Divine Verses”, “The Killer Sex”, “Islam means Peace” and “Rediscovering the Universe”. He can be contacted at doctorforu123@yahoo.com or 91-8130340339

Thursday, December 18, 2014

Politics of conversion - By Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr - DNA


The RSS, with its me-too Christian evangelical spirit, has no understanding of the Hindus. The Hindus are easygoing, modern, hedonistic, with an indolent sense of sensuous spirituality. They take pride in liberal Indian, but not Hindu, nationalism. The RSS’s antagonistic acts of conversion will cause revulsion among a majority of Hindus and the BJP will lose its Hindu constituency. 


http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-politics-of-conversion-2044864

DNA logo


Politics of conversion
Thursday, 18 December 2014 - 5:00am IST Updated: Wednesday, 17 December 2014 - 8:25pm IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: dna








Right-wing Hindu organisations unsuccessfully imitate Christian missionaries

One of the curious things about the debate on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) affiliates going aggressive on converting Muslims and Christians to Hinduism is the outrage of the liberals. “How can (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi remain silent when the RSS is going on the rampage on conversions?” is their pointed question. They say that Modi did not utter a word of Hindutva during the election campaign and, therefore, neither he nor the RSS can consider the electoral victory as an endorsement of Hindutva. Therefore, the RSS’ predatory acts of conversion are untenable. They feel that Modi should control the RSS-wallahs.

There are loopholes in the argument of the liberals, though their rage has a charmingly righteous ring to it. The first loophole: The RSS and the BJP cannot be expected to play by liberal rules. The RSS’ hostility towards the religious minorities is barely concealed. The BJP maintains an ambivalent attitude towards them. They are right-wing and they will do right-wing politics — that is majoritarian politics. The second loophole: the liberals rationalise conversions of the Hindu lower castes to either Christianity or Islam saying that the Hindu caste order is unjust, and the Hindu lower castes and classes have every right to throw off the yoke of caste and escape into other religions. Despite the good intent, the argument turns out to be inconsistent because if choosing a faith is an individual decision, then the individual can turn to any religion. For example, if a Hindu can convert to Christianity or Islam, so can a Muslim or a Christian to Hinduism. The liberals are wary on this point.

The problem is that conversion is never an individual choice in India as it is in contemporary Europe and America, where individuals freely convert to other religions, especially to Islam and sometimes to Buddhism. In India, conversion is a political act. Ambedkar and his Mahars converting to Buddhism was a political gesture. But there is a bit of complicated history to conversion in modern India, especially from 19th century on. The Christian missionary activity in north India, in contrast to what had happened in Kerala in the first century of the Common Era (CE), had intensified during the British rule though the government of the day kept a meticulous distance from the evangelical activities of the various churches.

The Hindu response to Christian missionary activity was curious. Sections of the modern Hindu middle classes saw Christianity as part of modern Western civilisation which was a misperception. Modern West had gone through various revolts, the Protestant revolt against the Roman Catholic Church, and the revolt of Age of Reason against both. They did not notice this. Many of the modern Hindus wanted to reform the superstitious Hinduism of their day on Protestant Christian lines. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Swami Dayananda Saraswati followed the Christian model in different ways. Roy’s Brahmo Samaj was a Protestant congregation without idols. Saraswati too rejected idol worship and he wanted to go back to the Vedas, cleansed of their unscientific liturgical portions. He had also introduced what he called the Shuddhi Movement, which is conversion of Muslims, Sikhs and Christians to Hinduism.

Brahmo Samaj turned out to be tepidly rationalist and withered away in due course. Arya Samaj was dismissed by the orthodox Hindu establishment of the day, and it remains on the fringes of Hindu society till this day. Saraswati had better success in Punjab, where he antagonised the Sikhs. Khushwant Singh in the second volume of his A History of the Sikhs argued that the Singh Sabhas were a response to the Arya Samaj. The RSS has inherited the Arya Samaj legacy in Punjab and the friction with the Sikhs, especially the Akali elements of the community, persists. 

Swami Vivekananda’s Ramakrishna Mission is again an imitation of the Christian missionary model. Vivekananda realised that what made the Christian missionaries acceptable was their social work, setting up of hospitals and schools and their solicitude towards the poor and the marginalised. Vivekananda’s ‘Christian socialist’ vision never took root in the work of the Ramakrishna Mission.
The RSS has taken to the Christian missionary mode in the 1970s and 1980s. The evangelical activity that the RSS had undertaken in scheduled tribes areas of Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha and Gujarat is again an attempt to follow in the footsteps of the missionaries. But it does not seem to have succeeded in its act of imitation because it lacks the Christians' religiosity and compassion. The Christian missionaries were once part of the Western colonial and imperialist quest, but now only the religious quest — of spreading the message and converting people — remains. The global Christian missionaries are seasoned evangelists and the RSS cannot counter their sophisticated approach. The RSS cannot hope to go out of India and convert people of other countries and faiths to Hinduism the way the Christian evangelists did.

The RSS, therefore, turns conversions into a political act, having failed to inspire on the social and religious fronts. The RSS through the conversion campaign wants to ensure national unity through Hinduism. It follows the old Protestant assumption, especially in England of the 17th century, where Roman Catholics were suspected to have extra-territorial allegiance. Religion as a means of national unity is the credo of right-wing political parties in Europe, and the RSS believes in it as well.

Meanwhile, Muslims in India after the First World War falsely believed that the Ottoman Empire was a symbol of global Muslim unity. They had failed to contend with the nationalist aspirations of the various Arab countries. Modern Muslims entertained the romantic notion of pan-Islam, which remained a figment of the imagination of poets like Iqbal. Modern Arabs too dreamed of pan-Arabism and they found out the hard way that it was unrealistic.

The RSS’s dreams of national unity based on Hinduism will meet the same fate as that of the pan-Islamists and the pan-Arabists. The RSS believes, and the BJP subscribes to the illusion, that the Turkish invasions of 11th and 12th centuries were due to disunity among the Hindus, and they want to unite Hindus now to preserve India. The RSS, with its me-too Christian evangelical spirit, has no understanding of the Hindus. The Hindus are easygoing, modern, hedonistic, with an indolent sense of sensuous spirituality. They take pride in liberal Indian, but not Hindu, nationalism. The RSS’s antagonistic acts of conversion will cause revulsion among a majority of Hindus and the BJP will lose its Hindu constituency. 

The author is editorial consultant with dna

----- ----- -----

.