Showing posts with label Sonia Gandhi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sonia Gandhi. Show all posts

Monday, August 22, 2011

World's #9 Most Powerful Person Now Accused of Corruption -- Will She Fall? - Cleo Pascal - Huffingtonpost.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cleo-paskal/worlds-9-most-powerful-pe_b_853132.html



Cleo Paskal

Cleo Paskal

Associate Fellow, Royal Institute of International Affairs
GET UPDATES FROM Cleo Paskal
13

World's #9 Most Powerful Person Now Accused of Corruption -- Will She Fall?

Posted: 04/25/11 07:17 AM ET

share this story

New Delhi. Some of India's biggest fish are getting caught up in the country's fast-growing wave of anti-corruption activity. In what could be India's equivalent of a judicial jasmine revolution, previously invulnerable politicians, business icons, and pillars of the community are all nervously keeping their lawyers on speed-dial.

The anti-corruption push is an unprecedented coming together of myriad facets of Indian society. Religious leaders are concerned about the effects on morality and spiritual growth. NGOs speak of the effects on the poor. The middle class is angry about its future being stifled by a smothering blanket of day-to-day corruption. The intelligence services see corruption a clear threat to national security. And the business community, thanks to globalization, has seen how efficiently things can operate without having to constantly pay bribes or be tangled in red tape, and they want the same thing at home.

Even the Supreme Court is fed up, with Justice B. Sudarshan Reddy saying about the vast sums of Indian money being illegally hidden away in Liechtenstein Bank:
We are talking about the huge money. It is a plunder of the nation. It is a pure and simple theft of the national money. We are talking about mind-boggling crime.
The scandals are bursting on to the front pages fast and thick. Suresh Kalmadi, a Congress Party politician and the former head of the corruption-plagued Commonwealth Games, was arrested April 25. 

According to a report by the Indian Comptroller and Auditor General, the 2G spectrum scam alone, in which 2G licenses were sold off in a manner that was, to say the least, less than transparent, cost close to $40 billion in lost revenue.

All across India, people are saying enough is enough. And suddenly the unthinkable is starting to happen. People considered above reproach, or at least untouchable, are coming under the judicial cross-hairs. 2G alone has seen charges laid against one former government minister and several captains of industry.

And the latest high profile target is one of the biggest fish of all, Congress Party President Sonia Gandhi, currently #9 on Forbes list of the World's Most Powerful People.

Sonia Gandhi has one of the most remarkable life stories in international politics. Born Edvige Antonia Albina Maino into a family of modest means in rural Italy, she didn't even get a chance to complete high school before heading to the UK for work. There she met Rajiv Gandhi, son of Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. She eventually married him and the young family moved in to Indira Gandhi's New Delhi's home, putting her literally in the heart of Indian politics.

After Indira Gandhi's assassination in 1984, Sonia's husband Rajiv became Prime Minister. Following Rajiv's 1991 assassination by Tamil terrorists, there were rumors that Sonia was going to put herself forward as Prime Minister.
As she herself later said, she "could not walk past the portraits of my husband, my mother-in-law and her father and not feel that I had some responsibility to try and save the party they had given their lives to."
2011-04-25-SoniaCongress.jpg
Given her focus on the party, it was fitting that instead of becoming Prime Minister, she ended up as President of the powerful Congress Party. Politically, it proved to be a smart move as it gave her power without direct responsibility -- while she is #9 on Forbes list of power people, the actual Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh, is only #18. According to Forbes, "Gandhi remains the real power behind the nuclear-tipped throne [...] she has cemented her status as true heiress to the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty."
Her image is of a dutiful, submissive Indian wife, now widow. When her husband was alive, she would walk behind him. In public she wears saris. Although a devout Catholic, she is often photographed at Hindu Temples. And like a good Indian mother, though she has decorously pulled herself out of the race for Prime Minister, she is happy to encourage her son, Rahul, to take the job.
However there have been growing, persistent murmurs about questionable business deals and inexplicable exponential jumps in the personal wealth of her and her family.
The allegations came out in the open in 1995 when M. D. Nalapat, then Resident Editor (Delhi) of the world's largest English language newspaper, the Times of India, began a groundbreaking series of articles about Sonia.
The articles made the controversial (at the time) claim that the public docility was just a ploy, and that Sonia actually had serious political ambitions (later confirmed by her role in Congress). Also, crucially, the series said that her desire for power wasn't simply altruistic and that the wealth not only of her, but of her Italian relatives, rose stratospherically after Rajiv Gandhi became Prime Minister in 1984.
Nalapat's articles could not be ignored as he was one of India's most respected journalists and had, throughout his career, taken on corrupt politicians, social inequity and institutionalized discrimination.
This however was a 'topic too far'. While the facts in the article were never refuted, Nalapat was forced out of journalism in 1998 and moved into academics.
Next came public questions from another highly reputed source, Sten Lindstrom, Sweden's special prosecutor investigating the pay-offs associated with the sale of weapons by Bofors to the government of India. His investigation showed that a close friend of Sonia's, Ottavio Quattrocchi, has received kickbacks in the millions.
In 1998 Lindstrom gave an interview in which he said:
the Gandhis, particularly now Sonia, should explain how Quattrocchi-owned companies got such fat sums as payoffs from the Bofors deal. After all, what is the connection of Sonia and the Gandhi family to Quattrocchi? Who introduced Quattrocchi and his AE Services to Bofors? At least one thing is certainly known now. A part of the payoffs definitely went to Quattrocchi. [...] the papers all pointed to the Gandhi family.
Not only have the questions not been answered by Sonia, but in spite of substantial evidence against him, Quattrocchi has managed to evade prosecution in India, and has even had his kickback funds unfrozen from overseas accounts.
Part of the genius of Sonia Gandhi is her ability to present herself as a helpless victim, convincing even her political rivals not to fear her as she is fatally flawed. In 1998, India was being led by BJP Prime Minister Vajpayee. When Nalapat spoke with him about Sonia, he was bluntly told to lay off, as, "so long as a white Christian lady is head of the Congress Party, I [Vajpayee] and my party will always be in power". Vajpayee and his party lost power to Sonia's Congress in 2004.
But the most serious threat to Sonia -- and, as she is at the apex of the Congress Party, and so to Congress itself -- is now lying on the desk of #18, the Prime Minister of India.
On April 15, former Law and Justice Minister and Harvard Professor Dr. Subramanian Swamy asked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for leave to lay corruption charges against Sonia Gandhi. In a meticulously researched 200+ page submission Dr Swamy alleges Sonia Gandhi has been involved in corruption in India since 1972 and personally benefited from the Bofors scam (1986), has held billions in non-Indian bank accounts since at least 1991, illegally profited from the Iraqi oil-for-food deals (2002), and even accessed KGB payoffs during the Cold War.
The Prime Minister has three months to decide whether or not to grant sanction to prosecute. If he doesn't, Dr. Swamy can take the case directly to the Supreme Court, which under Chief Justice Kapadia is showing a definite proclivity towards facilitating corruption cases.
While, so far, the corruption cases in India have caught up some pretty big fish, if charges are laid against Sonia Gandhi, it won't just be part of a wave, it will be a sea change.
Sonia Gandhi is not just an individual, she is the steely core of a pillar of Indian politics. If she crumbles, it will shake the foundations of the venerable Congress Party, and possibly leave a gaping hole in the political scene. Meanwhile, a range of polarizing and regional parties are ready to rush in and stake their claim. Given the growing importance of India in our heavily globalized world, this is not just an Indian story, this is one all should be following very closely indeed.

Follow Cleo Paskal on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cleopaskal

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Does western Regime Change strategies include mixed marriage route? -- By Ghulam Muhammed

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Does western Regime Change strategies include mixed marriage route?

Western TV news channels are agog with extra-ordinarily long-winded coverage of the reported release of Myanmar (Burma) leader Aung San Suu Kyi from her long house arrest. The western media is celebrating the event as if they had virtually conquered a new territory to add to their string of client states to fit into their economic, financial as well as warmongering agenda.

BBC has sent its veteran correspondent John Simpson, visible only in the most sensitive areas of world strategic developments not only as BBC correspondent, but mostly as keen observer as well as points man. His contacts may lead him to be a valuable link to MI6 and other agencies too. The most significant criteria to support Aung San Suu Kyi, by the British appears to be her marriage to a British and her British sons from the mixed marriage.

A similar mixed marriage has come into headlines in India too. A front ranking Hindutva extremist leader of RSS, the parent of BJP, the other Brahmin political party aspiring to come to power in the next election, K S Sudarshan has declared in a meeting organised to attack Congress party for its exposure of Saffron terrorism, that Congress Party’s President and the Chief of National Security Agency, Sonia Gandhi is a CIA agent and that she was in someway instrumental in the assassination of both her mother-in-law Indira Gandhi and her husband Rajiv Gandhi. Both these murders of India’s former Prime Ministers, both belonging to Pandit Nehru’s family, are widely believed to be the handiwork of CIA.

Sonia Gandhi is born Italian married to late Rajiv Gandhi and is a naturalized citizen of India. She is overwhelmingly popular with Indian masses. However, time and again her foreign origin and her journey to the top of Indian politics and governance are cited as the result of support by the US and other western countries. That foreign origin had been so virulently opposed by Hindutva forces, that she was rightly advised to shun the ambition of becoming the Prime Minister of India, though her Congress Party was so captive of her clout, that the post of Prime Minister of India, was hers for the asking. Her decision to forgo that route to power has been projected as her great sacrifice in the cause of India’s harmony and integrity. However, it cannot be denied that it is only after the death of Rajiv Gandhi, that the move of liberalization and globalization was ushered in by people like PV Narasimha Rao and World Bank official Manmohan Singh widely believed to be working in tandem with the United States of America.

Mixed marriages in India are a definite plus for advancement in ruling class political parties like Congress and BJP. The sprinkling of Muslims visible in the higher echelons of Brahmin-dominated parties, Congress, BJP and Communist, can be traced to have Hindu or Christian spouses and that fact heavily tilting in their favour as far as ‘secular’ credentials have to be propagated. While all such mixed marriage are projected as India’s coming of age as a modern nation, there are always state reasons that support the trend and that is nothing new in India. India’s Mughals married into Hindu Rajput families to buy their loyalty to Mughal India. However, when the entire future of a country is stake, such marriage of convenience does come into serious scrutiny and for good reason too.

Both Burma and India, as a part of the developing region that is poised to take off as the new area of future economic power, have to nurture and nourish strong forces that will counter all western moves to once again enslave the developing nations through their clever tactics of regime change without having to fire a single shot. For the Western conspirators, only a world wide media campaign is enough to hoodwink the people and take over entire nations.


Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Why Obama is angry? Why Sonia is hibernating? - By Ghulam Muhammed


Friday, June 18, 2010


Why Obama is angry? Why Sonia is hibernating?

The British Petroleum undersea oil well explosion has robbed US President Obama’s sleep for days and weeks now. He has treated the oil disaster that had taken the lives of 11 workers and is now impacting livelihood of thousands around America’s Gulf coast states’ beeches and fishing grounds, as a war on the USA. Obama has directed all his ire on British Petroleum, even though British Petroleum has changed its name to BP, possibly to hide its national identity in a globalized world. But that has not detracted Obama from naming British Petroleum again and again without any quarters being given to any ‘special relationship’ that British always claimed having with the USA. Obama has forced BP to stop any dividend that the company has announced earlier and instead to place an initial sum of US$20 billion in a special fund to clear the resulting mess, to rehabilitate the affected people and compensate for their livelihood and business losses.

It reminds one how Ghalib would have said:

Dekho is tarah se kahte hain sukhanwar sehra

In contrast, since the storm blew up over the court judgment, sentencing the accused in Bhopal’s biggest historical industrial disaster of the world, where thousands died and generations of hundreds and thousands are suffering the leakage of lethal gas that poured out from the US owned Union Carbide plant, India’s highest political authority, the President of the ruling coalition Congress, Sonia Gandhi is for all purposes hibernating. Her valiant soldiers are fighting a losing battle with public opinion and opposition political parties and trying to make the issue the usual blame game to erode public attention, she has shown no sign that she is at all concerned with any measures that remotely match the zeal and passion of an Obama.

The difference is that Obama has stakes, while Sonia is secured in her throne, complacent that India’s democratic feudalism will not touch her or her party. The people in the estimation of our political oligarchs, are just nothing.

The other extenuating factor is India’s very standing with the US and its political establishment. Thanks to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

US can roar. India can only mew.

It does not matter that India’s case is just and fair and equitable in demanding similar rehabilitation package from a US corporate and/or its successors for the human sufferers in India; it all depends if the feudal Congress really believes Indians are as much humans as the Americans are.

Indian politicians and other member of the corporate oligarch can think in big money terms commensurate with the going terms in the globalized world, but turn extreme misers and stingy when it comes to valuing their vassals that dutifully vote for them in regular elections and work for them in their burgeoning enterprises. Even Naxals have not shaken their hibernation.

India should immediately send a tough talking Ramesh or Kamal Nath or a diplomat Tharoor to meet Obama for a dual agenda --- to first and foremost sympathise with the people of the USA, that are victims of the money grabbing greed of the big Corporates that cut on safety measures and --- at the second instance, to enlist Obama’s active assistance to chalk out a legal and political strategy to inveigle a similar Relief Fund for the Bhopal victims.

India should not be ashamed of valuing the lives of its people and their property in international value terms. Let there be no compromises on that.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Vitol - Masefield AG - Sonia Gandhi $16.8 m

http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:3BJhf5KJrvkJ:intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2005_11_06_archive.html+The+Indian+Fraternity+Forum,+Doha+Qatar+%2B+Hasan+Chogle&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in



NOVEMBER 11, 2005

Vitol - Masefield AG - Sonia Gandhi $16.8 m

Oil or grease? Vitol - Masefield AG - Sonia Gandhi (one million barrels $16.8 m)
Here are the key contact details for Vitol. In the chart appended to the Deccan Chronicle report (Nov. 12, 2005), Volcker report cites the LCs assigned by BNP Paribas SA for each oil lift, and information sourcd through SECO.



Volcker report Table 4 notes two contracts and two LCs.


1. Contract No. M/10/57 (LC N 731924); and Table 3 provides details of Non-contractual beneficiaries. On this LC, VOlcker report claims Masefild AG lifted oil against contract M/10/57 for a non-contractual beneiciaty it claims was the CONGRESS.
2. Contract No. M/09/54 (LC D726806); and Table 3 of Volcker Report claims Masefild AG lifted oil against contract M/09/54 for a non-contractual beneficiary it claims was former external affairs minister NATWAR SINGH.

Now the questions to be answered by Antonia Maino (aka Sonia Gandhi, President of Congress Party) are:

1. When did Congress Party register with Govt. of India as a oil-dealer or oil-broker?

2. Why is Congress Party interested in acquiring oil?

3. Is it unhappy with the likes of Reliance or IOC or other oil companies operating in Bharat?

4. Is Congress Party a public or private limited or privately-held company?

It is one thing to claim comraderie between Baathist Party and Congress Party as two parties representing two great civilizations (assuming that the representation is true); it is quite another to follow up the two letters Sonia Gandhi (aka Antonia Maino, President of Congress Party) wrote to Saddam Hussein with special meetings between Natwar Singh (and his comrades) with Tareeq Aziz and Saddam Hussein.

What benefit did Bharat receive from this international dealing by Congress Party without getting prior permission from the 'executive' branch of the then government in powe in Bharat to meet foreign dignitaries in Iraq?

Sonia, aka Antonia, come clean. There is a lot of cleaning-up called for. Pathak commission or inquiry authority will not be this clean-up.

5. Why hasn't an FIR beeen lodged against the President of Congress Party in this act of financial impropriety causing loss to the nation's exchequer?

6. Answer this simple question of fact: did Congress Party did or did not receive the benefit cited in Volcker Reprot as a non-contractual beneficiary, through Masefield AG/Vitol financial link-up? (We are assuming that oil did get delivered by the Congress Party).

7. What oil? What grease?



Vitol Asia Pte Ltd., India Liaison Office
617 Maker Chambers V, 6th Floor, 221 Jamnalal Bajaj Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 India
Tel (91 22) 2288 5615
Tel (91 22) 2287 5069
Tel (91 22) 2283 1843
Fax (91 22) 2287 5070
Tlx 1183786

A VITOL CLUE


New Delhi, Nov. 11: The Volcker Committee report on the Iraq-oil-for-food programme has alleged that a global oil trading company named Vitol is the "underlying financier" for the oil barrels allegedly lifted by Masefield AG of Switzerland.


Masefield is the company that the Volcker report claimed had lifted oil for the Congress and former external affairs minister K. Natwar Singh, who it listed as "non-contractual beneficiaries" in the Iraq oil-for-food programme.


The UN-ordered probe report defines "underlying financier" as the "entity or party assuming financial responsibility for letters of credit (LC) used to buy oil in the programme..." A letter of credit links a company to the recipients of moneys.


Vitol is a global company involved in physical oil marketing with offices in many countries. It has an India liaison office at Maker Chambers V, Nariman Point, Mumbai. When the Vitol India liaison office was contacted by this newspaper in Mumbai on Friday, a Mr Sumeru Hattiramani there said he knew nothing of this matter and referred this newspaper to their Singapore office.


The office of Vitol Singapore Pte Ltd, when called, said it would not comment on anything and asked for a written set of questions to be faxed to them. This was done on Friday and this newspaper was awaiting a response from them at the time of going to press.


Both, the Congress and Mr Natwar Singh, have repeatedly denied any connection to the Iraq oil-for-food programme. The Volcker report has said the persons or entities who made surcharge payments may not have been aware that their payments were in contravention of the UN guidelines for the oil-for-food programme.


Table 3 of the Volcker report, titled "Non-Contractual Beneficiaries", has given contract number M/10/57 for the transaction it claimed involved Masefield AG and for which it alleged the Congress party was the "non-contractual beneficiary". In the case of its allegations against Mr Natwar Singh, the Volcker Committee says one of two contract numbers for the oil transactions was M/09/54. Both contract numbers next appear in Table 4, titled "Known Underlying Oil Financiers", and are listed under "Underlying Financier VITOL". The entries in Table 4 also mention Masefield AG as the "contracting company".


Table 4 claims Vitol was the "underlying financier" for the contracting company Masefield AG for "contract number M/10/57". Against this, it lists letter of credit number N731924 for the lifting of 1,000,896 barrels of oil for LC amount $16,808,457. This is the same contract number as that listed under the Congress party's name (against Masefield AG) in Table 3 of non-contractual beneficiaries.
Against contract number M/09/54 it lists letter of credit number D726806 for contracting firm Masefield AG for the lifting of 300,000 barrels of oil for LC amount $5,669,919. This contract number is the same as that listed under Mr Natwar Singh's name (against Masefield AG) in Table 3 of non-contractual beneficiaries.