Showing posts with label Seema Mustafa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Seema Mustafa. Show all posts

Monday, January 2, 2012

No mean feat, this - By Seema Mustafa - The Free Press Journal, Mumbai, India

http://www.freepressjournal.in/news/40721-no-mean-feat-this.html

logo


No mean feat, this
  • By Seema Mustafa
  • Jan 02, 2012

It was because of Hazare and the support he had got from the people that the government had been forced to strengthen its earlier Lokpal Bill

The politicians from the ruling party and its allies in government consoled themselves by ridiculing the ageing Gandhian Anna Hazare sitting on fast in Mumbai; the media that has long ago stopped thinking for itself joined the finger pointing, writing and talking about the 'fading glory'of the Hazare movement as the crowds had not turned out in expected numbers. But in the process both forgot that it was because of Anna Hazare and the support he had got from the people that the government had been forced to somewhat strengthen its earlier Lokpal Bill and extend the winter session of Parliament to table the legislation, discuss and pass it if possible.
This was no mean feat, and has to be factored into any analysis of the high voltage drama the country has been experiencing over the last few days in particular.

There can be no two opinions that the Lokpal Bill needs to be strengthened.

And that in its present form it will not serve the purpose of setting up a high powered, independent authority that can impartially and fearlessly probe cases of corruption till the logical end. For this it is imperative that the government hold on the appointment and removal of the Lokpal under the present Bill is relinquished to a representative body comprising renowned persons from the judiciary, Parliament and perhaps even other walks of life that can be expected to act impartially, without fear or favour. It is also necessary to bring the cases falling under the purview of the Prevention of Corruption Act to the Lokpal for investigation and adjudication, which basically means that the independence of the Central Bureau of Investigation ( CBI) has to become subordinate to the Lokpal Authority on these matters. It is no secret that the CBI is used by the party in power to take revenge and control political foes with the proverbial carrot and stick policy helping run coalition governments. The governments unwillingness to bring the CBI under the Lokpal Authority is an indication of its unwillingness to give up its control, and stop using the CBI as a weapon to settle political scores.

The Congress party lost power in several states across the country in the 1980s because of an inherent authoritarianism that undermined the federal structure of the Indian Constitution.

Unfortunately, it has not learnt from the past experience and rarely misses an occasion to diminish the independence of the Indian states that make up the Union of India. An interesting aspect of the debate in Parliament has been the strong opposition from the regional parties to the provisions of the bill directing them to set up Lokayuktas, according to set guidelines. This, representatives of the regional parties pointed out one after the other, cut into the Constitutional provisions allowing the states full jurisdiction on such and related matters.

The CPM moved a good amendment to resolve this issue, whereby through an additional clause the bill would re- establish the autonomy of the states on this issue, without taking away from the Centres desire ( as expressed through the bill) for similar bodies to be set up in the states. MP Sitaram Yechury explaining this pointed out that with just an additional clause of a couple of lines, the government could ensure that the states were able to take their own decision on this issue within a span of six months.

But while the debate continues under the watchful eye of Anna Hazare and his supporters across the country - it is important to keep the background against which the Lokpal Bill is being discussed in and outside Parliament.

Corruption has never been so rampant, and can be directly traced to Prime Minister Manmohan Singhs economic reforms that have given the space for crores of rupees to exchange hands illegally, and in the process generate a parallel economy based entirely on black unaccounted money. Bribes that the corporates like to call commissions determine government decisions today, with ministers ( some in jail but most still outside) greasing their palms as they bring in policies to enable 'reforms'and furbish corporate coffer through lucrative deals.

Hundreds and thousands of farmers have committed suicide, and even today the levels of desperation in affected states have not abated. Poverty continues to take a heavy toll on lives, with the gap between the rich and the poor widening as levels of poverty deepen. 

It is true that a strong and effective Lokpal Bill will not be the panacea for all ills, and will not erase corruption but in a country where governments balk at any kind of action on this issue, it is at least a beginning. And a good beginning if some of the excellent amendments are pushed through, and the legislation becomes stronger and far reaching in its scope.

The debate in the Rajya Sabha has been largely on substance, and less on the kind of absurd issues raised by Lalu and his ilk in the Lower House.

The issue of reservations for Muslims for instance was just a ruse to derail the bill by hyping emotions and bringing the minorities into conflict with the rest. Fortunately the start of the debate in the Rajya Sabha moved away from such absurdities, with the political stalwarts making it clear that they wanted a good, sound piece of legislation that helped the country address the issue of corruption.

In its present form the political leaders outside the Congress were agreed, the bill was merely giving more powers to the perpetrators of corruption and not to the Lokpal Authority.

Anna Hazare has finally decided to save his energy for a political campaign across the country. He called off the fast partly because of failing health and partly because of the poorer than expected response in Mumbai. But even if the journalists do not know, he should know that the support has not diluted and people do want action against corruption.

The media and sections of the ruling party have been ridiculing his decision to campaign during the Assembly elections in five states, almost as if he does not have the right to do so, and that by being political he is somehow compromising himself. Strange reasoning as he, and everyone else in this country, is free to campaign for or against candidates and political parties. And if he can make a difference in the manner he hopes, well more power to him and his team. Meanwhile, let us wait for the government and Parliament to prove itself.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Sharad Pawar begins political poker - By Seema Mustafa - THE SUNDAY GUARDIAN, New Delhi

While millions are groaning under the astronomical inflation in everyday food items, the shenanigans of Sharad Pawar is being covered up by mainstream media, for reasons best known to their owners. A rare breaking of rank has Seema Mustafa breaking the news behind the news about how Sharad Pawar is engaged more in maneuverings to wreck Congress government and willfully playing truant rather than working to remedy price rise through his Agricultural ministry. Isn't it preposterous that now there is news floating around about permitting the export of sugar.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai


---------

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/1821-pawar-begins-political-poker-



Sharad Pawar begins political poker



SEEMA MUSTAFA  New Delhi | 2nd Jan
Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar
nion Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar, quite unperturbed about spiralling prices and farmers' suicides, is busy building bridges with Congress detractors. Fishing in troubled UPA waters, Pawar is currently stoking disgruntled allies to form a pressure group within the government with a view to garnering support as an interim Prime Minister if Dr Manmohan Singh is compelled to resign in the New Year.
Pawar, who was on a shaky wicket when UPA 2 came to power as he did not get the expected number of MPs from Maharashtra, has survived the IPL controversy to emerge as a contender for the top post. Buoyed by a troubled Parliament and a stronger Opposition, the Agriculture Minister has doubled efforts to bring the UPA allies and other parties to his side. His meeting with rebel Jagan Reddy in New Delhi has caused concern within Congress circles that see it as part of the "Pawar ploy" to give support to Congress detractors.
Sharad Pawar was close to Jagan's father, the late Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, Y.S. Rajashekhar Reddy. Congress leaders have always suspected him of supporting Jagan's rebellion, with the recent 45-minute meeting being seen by the party as a confirmation of this. It might be recalled that Jagan Reddy's has been spearheading a campaign against Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and has emerged as a recognizable political force in Andhra Pradesh. Congress members point to the fact that Pawar had earlier made common cause with party rebels like V.C. Shukla and K. Karunakaran and was "only acting in pattern".
{
Congress leaders have always suspected Pawar of supporting Jagan's rebellion, and the recent 45-minute meeting is being seen as a confirmation of this
Pawar, who has a good rapport with Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mamata Banerjee has been strengthening lines of communication with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi, a powerful ally in government. The two jointly addressed an Agriculture Conference in Tamil Nadu where the DMK leader was full of praise for Pawar and said that he had been personally invited by the Union Agriculture Minister. Sources pointed out that both leaders are now in "close contact".
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is unable to tame the Agriculture Minister or make him accountable for food supplies and prices. He has managed to evade responsibility and the Congress is not able to confront him on these issues as Pawar's support has become indispensable for the party to survive in Maharashtra, the only other major state it controls now besides Andhra Pradesh. In the latter too Pawar, sources said, is busy fomenting dissent, with the Congress particularly perturbed as several of its legislators are hovering around Jagan Reddy.
An emboldened Pawar has now launched a frontal attack against Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh on the Lavasa Lake City project near Pune, for proposing action against it. Defending the project Pawar has said that the Environment Minister "should have consulted my ministry". There has been no immediate reaction from a stunned government. The Agriculture Minister has also come out, once again, in strong defence of industrialist Ratan Tata embroiled in the Niira Radia tapes controversy. He is the only Union minister to take this position.
As a senior Congress leader who has known Sharad Pawar for a long time said, "Pawar is able to sense trouble before it actually hits government, and obviously he is preparing the ground for himself." The 2G scam has weakened the Congress in Parliament, and the Opposition insistence not to back off from its demand for a JPC probe heralds prospects of a troubled Parliament through 2011.
----------------------

http://www.sunday-guardian.com/a/2038


Congress snub for inflationary Sharad Pawar Print E-mail
KOTA NEELIMA  New Delhi | 9th Jan
Sharad Pawar (Reuters)
ongress had to sideline Sharad Pawar this week to deal with food inflation that soared to 18.32%, widening the cracks in the UPA coalition further. The Ministries of External Affairs, Finance, Commerce and Industry tackled various aspects of price rise, a primary responsibility of Pawar's Ministry of Food, Public Distribution and Consumer Affairs.
A sulking Pawar left for Mumbai on Friday as it became clear that he played little part in the fire-fighting and no meetings were scheduled over the weekend.
The Congress had long been suspicious of Pawar's interventions ahead of and during the food price crisis. This comes along with a sense of unease about his political motives in overlooking his responsibilities as minister, especially about anticipating food supply and prices.
The latest episode started in December 2010 when onion prices saw a steep increase from Rs 35 a kg to Rs 65 a kg in just a few days.
According to the Finance Minister on Thursday "three-fourths of food inflation is explained by inflation in vegetables". The current rate of food inflation was recorded for the week ending 25 December and to which onion price rise was a major contributory factor.
{
The Congress had long been suspicious of Pawar's interventions ahead of and during the food price crisis.
Even while the cause for the onion shortage is being pinned on unseasonal rains, experts in government felt that the damage to the crop could not have affected production beyond 20%.
It was also suspected that hoarding and speculation could be the cause for price escalation, to counter which and increase availability the government banned the export of onions till 15 January.
However, on 21 December, commenting on the crisis, Pawar said, "Onion prices will remain high for the next three weeks and the situation is likely to improve only after two-three weeks." This statement was criticised as being counter-productive and since then Pawar has stayed away from commenting about price rise. NCP's D.P. Tripathi argues, "The Cabinet works under the rule of collective responsibility and there is no point in blaming one minister for this crisis." But even with Pawar to blame, it might not be easy for the Congress to answer why it had been slow in countering the price crisis which had been brewing for about a year.
Even on the issue of onion imports from Pakistan, the Ministry of External Affairs swung into action only after the food inflation figures headlined on Thursday this week. The action against hoarders, similarly, was taken on Friday after the extent of the crisis became public.
Food prices had remained beyond the reach of the common man through last year. For the week ending 16 January 2010, food inflation had been 17.40% due to high prices of vegetables and pulses. Even high farm output had failed to correct the grim situation as thousands of tonnes of food grains were lost due to inadequate warehousing facilities. This year, with the rate of inflation worsening, the government might be forced to resort to short-term remedies to bring immediate relief than more sustainable solutions

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Doha Debate in Delhi : 'Do Muslim get a fair deal in India'.

RE: Doha Debate in Delhi : 'Do Muslim get a fair deal in India'.

Andrew Buncombe, a British Journalist with Independant newspaper, left Doha Debate in Delhi, with the impression that the majority of the audience appears to support the the motion that Muslims do not get a fair deal in India?
 
To his utter surprise, next day he finds that audience has voted against the motion.
 
He should not be surprised. This incident itself proves how deep is the negative feeling against Muslims in India and how little sympathy they get from an elitist crowd of middle class, upper caste Hindu milieu. The worst part is that like Sachin Pilot, his own Congress Party has been guilty of gross discrimination in public affairs and horrendous violations of Human Rights of Muslim minority, though declaring their governed nation to be a model of secularism and democracy. Congress double game is the the biggest fraud that Muslims have suffered in their own country. Even with level-headed leaders like Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, the rank and file of Congress thrives on demonising Muslims and paying only lip service to their upliftment.

The daily media chorus against Muslim seems to be a must to get a samblance of unity among the diversified pluralist society. Only Muslim bashing can give the minority of Brahmins, the bare electoral majority to rule the country. That scenerio is hard to change, given the electoral compulsion of the political class. Some drastic changes imposed on the system of governance can only do justice to 150 to 200 million Muslims of India.
 
Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Siraj Wahab <sirajwahab@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2010 4:29 PM
Subject: [nrindians] Do Muslims get a fair deal in India?
To: nrindians@googlegroups.com

 

 Last night I was in the audience for the filming of the of the latest of the Doha Debates, the series of discussions headed by Tim Sebastian and broadcast by BBC World News. Held within the quite solace of St Stephen's College, one of the most prestigious colleges within Delhi University, the debates were breaking new ground by holding their first event in Asia.

 I had been in two minds whether to go, mainly because I thought the issue being discussed, "This house believes that Muslims are not getting a fair deal in India", seems to be so overwhelmingly obvious. Ever since the government-appointed
Sachar Committee reported in 2006 that Muslims in India had less access to education, government jobs and survived on lower incomes than average, it seemed the issue was settled. Of course, there are plenty of Muslims who reach the heights in India, from politicians through to Bollywood stars such as Shah Rukh Khan, but taken as a whole it would be hard to argue that Muslims did not suffer discrimination.
 
  Indeed, when the debate got started it seemed everyone taking part agreed on this issue, including the two participants challenging the motion. The veteran journalist MJ Akbar, who has spent much of his career highlighting discrimination in India, was one of the two taking on this task and even he admitted "you cannot say that Muslims get an entirely fair deal". Sachin Pilot, a young government minister, (he is also the son of a former Congress minister) and an alumni of St Stephen's, also admitted things were not perfect. Yet he argued that there were many elements within Indian society that suffered and it was not that Muslims suffered particular discrimination.
 
 Against this, Seema Mustafa, a journalist and political commentator, said the government had done little for Muslims who had been especially victimised by security forces since the 9/11 attacks. Teesta Setalvad, a prominent civil rights activist, claimed that Muslims were being excluded from the "elite political and economic leadership of India". "The Muslim today lives in a segregated class leading to ghettoisation and a consequently very dangerous situation. Above all, Muslim women are discriminated against to make sure a credible leadership does not emerge," she said.

 They also mentioned the Indian establishment's refusal to properly bring to justice those responsible for attacks on Muslims, be it the destruction of the 
Babri Masjid of the appalling misnamed Gujarat "riots" in which hundreds of Muslims were brutally murdered in a systematic operation assisted by elements within the local government, headed by the right-wing nationalist Narendra Modi, a man who has been tipped as a possible future leader of the country.

 In fact, so obvious to me was the outcome of the debate, that I left early. I was rather surprised therefore to wake up and discover that the vote had gone the other way. The vote by the students of the college, alumni of which account for six current government ministers, found that 63 per cent opposed the motion while only 37 agreed.

 So what to make of this? In a situation where the statistics apparently prove one thing, how could a group of such young smart people have voted the other way. Were they really taken in by Sachin Pilot's disingenuous argument that "everyone in India has an equal opportunity" or what it simply that was this was what they wanted to believe (and who would not wish for such a situation). 
I couldn't help thinking there was something of a cycle here: if the sorts of people that get to become government ministers in India are drawn from educational establishments seemingly so blind to the obvious pitfalls of their society then maybe that's why nothing get's changed. And yes, one could say the same thing about plenty of other countries all around the world.