Tuesday, October 13, 2015

There is surely a method to this Beef Madness

ONE COMMENT

  1. There is surely a method to this Beef Madness. Both for longer term targeting of Muslims, in one case as businessmen and in another as voter. While the world has come to realize that India is the second most important beef ( actually Buffalo beef and not cow or bull beef) exporter, not much is known by wider circles that Muslims are the main beneficiaries of this huge export business opportunity. RSS/BJP/Brahmins cannot tolerate Muslims making money and improving their economic status at least in some pockets. Once in the saddle at the Central and some state governments, they have now cracked down on beef slaughter. The manipulation may be to hijack the entire been export to their own Hindu exporter and let Muslim be the menial worker. So this is a longer term plan being executed at breakneck speed, lest BJP does not come into power again. Second, is of course, the electoral compulsion. The more Muslim is identified and vilified as killer of the mother cow, the more consolidation of Hindu vote will be against the Muslim voters as well as the supporting secular classes. If beef crackdown can polarise the communities, BJP can assure itself a complete control of the both houses of parliament and pass legislations without bothering for any opposition from any quarters forthwith. So there is a method to this Beef Madness, that has to be addressed by the victims and opposition to frustrate RSS/BJP’s dirty games tactics. The way they have antagonized the entire world against their open fascist methodology to rule India, the world has to be rightfully alarmed. India is most vulnerable at so many levels and BJP/RSS cannot confront the world as much as they would like.

Sunday, October 11, 2015

Saudi employer denies chopping maid’s hand - By FPJ Bureau - The Free Press Journal, Mumbai, India.

The details now emerging from Saudi Employer's statement show how media, especially Western media is quick on the draw in demonizing Muslims, Arabs and Saudis, in an ongoing Islamophobic crusade. 

In this case, it is regrettable that India's top Foreign Office minister Shushma Swaraj, with full Riyadh Embassy staff at her command, should follow the 'hand chopping' media headline news to issue India's strong reaction, --- reality being damned.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

--- 


http://www.freepressjournal.in/saudi-employer-denies-chopping-maids-hand/

Inline image 1

Saudi employer denies chopping maid’s hand

— By FPJ Bureau | Oct 11, 2015 12:21 am

 
“India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj reacted on Twitter: “Chopping of hand of Indian lady – we are very much disturbed over the brutal manner in which Indian lady has been treated in Saudi Arabia.” Sushma Swaraj / External Affairs Minister reacted on Twitter
Riyadh : The Saudi Arabian employer of an Indian domestic help whose hand was “chopped off” has said the woman had to get her hand amputated in hospital after she damaged it badly while jumping from the third floor of their house in Riyadh.
Arab News newspaper quoted the First Secretary (Community Welfare) of the Indian Embassy Anil Nautiyal as saying on Friday that the Indian mission has demanded a full-scale inquiry into the incident, reports IANS.The Saudi sponsor told Arab News that the right hand of Kasturi Munirathinam, 55, was amputated as a result of her failed attempt to flee by jumping from a window.
He said she was recruited two months ago to serve his mother who is 70 and lives alone in an apartment in Riyadh. On Thursday, the housemaid went to her room while my mother was performing Asr prayer and locked herself inside. “She knotted together bed sheets and some of her clothes and dangled the rope out of the window so that she could jump from the third floor.
“An expat worker on the street saw her trying to jump, and when she fell she landed on two electricity boxes, which caused severe damage to her hand.
“The worker then informed the building guard and my mother informed police and the Red Crescent about the incident. “The rescuers arrived on the scene and transferred the housemaid to the hospital where she underwent amputation surgery to her right hand,” he told the newspaper. “Police investigated the accident and checked all the evidence at the site and concluded that the woman tried to jump from the window and fell from the  third floor,” he said. The doctors who performed surgery on Kasturi informed embassy officials that she was out of danger and would soon be able to travel. India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj reacted on Twitter: “Chopping of hand of Indian lady – we are very much disturbed over the brutal manner in which Indian lady has been treated in Saudi Arabia.”
---

Saudi employer denies chopping off maid's hand

english.manoramaonline.com/.../saudi-employer-denies-chopping-off-ho...
16 hours ago - Saudi employer of the domestic help whose hand was 'chopped off' has said the ... Saudi employer denies chopping off housemaid's hand ... TheSaudi sponsor told Arab News that the right hand of Kasturi ... Radhika Thilak, that gentle sweetness, is gone much before her time · Don't disturb, Supt. is in  ...

Saudi employer denies chopping off Indian woman's hand ...

www.hindustantimes.com/.../saudi-employer-denies-chopping...indian...
12 hours ago - The Saudi Arabian employer, accused of chopping off the hand of anIndian domestic help, has claimed that the ... From The WebFrom Hindustan Times ...Saudi diplomat case: Given 1 roti a day, says maid who escaped.

Saudi employer denies chopping off Indian woman's hand ...

https://in.news.yahoo.com/saudi-employer-denies-chopping-off-indian-...
17 hours ago - 'Saudi employer denies chopping off Indian woman's hand' on Yahoo ... According to Kasturi's sister S. Vijayakumari, the maid was forced to take up ...NASA Pictures Of The Apollo Missions Released For First Time On Flickr.

Indian maid's hand severed during escape bid in Saudi ...

14 hours ago - The Saudi family which employed the Indian maid has denied claims by the maid that her hand was chopped off by her employer for ... building watchman who called my mother who was not aware at that time of the incident.

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

‘LAW WON’T PROTECT SINNERS LIKE YOU’: SCROLL.IN REPORTER COVERING BEEF PROTEST HELD FOR SEVEN HOURS - MumbaiMirror

http://www.mumbaimirror.com/news/india/Law-wont-protect-sinners-like-you-Scroll-in-reporter-covering-beef-protest-held-for-seven-hours/articleshow/49237554.cms


‘LAW WON’T PROTECT SINNERS LIKE YOU’: SCROLL.INREPORTER COVERING BEEF PROTEST HELD FOR SEVEN HOURS

Mumbai Mirror | Oct 6, 2015, 09.48 AM IST






By Mayank Jain

On Sunday at noon, as I emerged from New Delhi's Patel Chowk Metro station, I was startled to find about a dozen police officers on high alert on the street outside. They were conducting vigorous checks of people's bags. They weren't looking for bombs - they were inspecting the contents of their lunchboxes. 

Last week, a group of students from Delhi posted a notice on Facebook announcing a demonstration outside the Bharatiya Janata Party headquarters to protest against the ruling party's refusal to condemn the lynching of a 50-year-old man in Dadri, ostensibly because he had killed a calf and stored the meat in his refrigerator. Participants were urged to to BYOB - bring your own beef - and eat it at a "Beefy Picnic" on Ashoka Road. 

The Delhi police, it seems, had been stationed at all the metro stations in the area to detain anyone headed to the event. 

As a reporter, it was just another day in the field for me. I expected to see some posters and listen to some sloganeering. The police had other plans. I was stopped right outside the metro station since the policemen refused to believe that my press card was genuine. The fact that I wasn't carrying containers full of beef failed to convince them otherwise. 

After I was frisked, a burly policemen grabbed my hand and pulled me to the side. From the Delhi police website, I would later learn that he was Dinesh Kumar, the Station House Officer at the Parliament Street Police Station. After waiting for 15 minutes, another constable arrived with a smartphone. They started scrolling through photographs on the phone. From their conversation, they wanted to check if I was the one. 

CHECKING FACEBOOK 

It would later become clear that they had found the Facebook invitation the organisers had created for the event, and were looking at the profile of the person who had posted the notice. 

After they established that I wasn't the organiser, Kumar let me go with a warning: "Unse mat milo, kaat ke fenk dunga. (Don't join them. I will cut you into pieces and throw them away.) As I strolled towards the BJP office, two people asked for directions to the BJP headquarters. One of them told me that his name was Gaurav Jain and it turned out that he was the organiser of the protest. He said that they had escaped security check at the metro station by hiding the beef deep inside their bags. Evidently, the police search hadn't been as thorough as it should have been. 

As we were chatting, an SUV stopped in front of us. A group of policemen grabbed us and asked us to step into the car. We were being taken to the Parliament Street Police Station, one of the constables said. As protesters started phoning Gaurav Jain to ask why he had not arrived at the venue, I explained repeatedly to SHO Kumar that I was a journalist and I was only doing my job. He would have none of it. 

Soon enough, we found ourselves in his office at the police station where they made us write down all our details, surrounded by a scrum of constables and inspectors. There was even a senior officer from the CID who said he was investigating the case, but didn't bother to ask or verify my credentials. 

The fact that my surname is Jain was enough to enrage the SHO. "Today's kids are throwing Hinduism into a gutter," he said. "Is this what your parents teach you? That you go out and eat beef?" 

My protestations were met with a command to "shut up" and threats of slaps and "dhaaras" (sections of the law). 

After my repeated insistence that I was a journalist, he asked me to prove it. I gave him my press card as well as the visiting card, both of which clearly mention my designation as a reporter at Scroll.in. 

"It's all fake media," Kumar said. He tore up my visiting card and threw the pieces at me. "I can get this made at home." 

DENIED WATER, WASHROOM 

I was ushered out of the room by two policemen and kept in a sub-inspector's office, along with Gaurav Jain and the woman who accompanied him. I was not allowed to phone my family or a lawyer. "The law can protect criminals but it won't protect sinners like you," a constable declared. 

I pleaded to be allowed to drink some water and use the washroom. It was half an hour before I was allowed to. I wasn't allowed to eat, or use my phone. We had to get up from our seats or sit down when we were ordered to. 

Around 4 pm, I was called into the SHO's office, where he sat with a police inspector who was struggling to turn on the computer. He was using Google to search for the term "Beefy party". 

The idea was to find everyone who interacted with the page and use it as evidence. Since they couldn't find anything about me, they asked me to help them look up Gaurav Jain's profile. I refused. This angered the SHO and he asked me to "get out" right away. 

Finally, at 8 pm, the SHO called me to tell me that I would be let go after writing an apology. "What do I apologise for?" I asked. He replied, "Just do what we say and don't open your mouth." 

The sub-inspector gave us another lecture on how we were a "disgrace" to the country and how the government wasted its personnel and time to keep protests in check. 

NO FORMAL COMPLAINT 

Almost seven hours after being detained, there had been no written complaint, no First Information Report, no paperwork of any sort to prove that we had actually been detained. When we asked why we had been taken in, we were told that we had "offended feelings of a lot of people" for which we would be "punished". After another 30 minutes of waiting, they finally let me go without forcing me to make an apology. But my press card was missing. I asked the SHO to return it to me. "I crushed it and tore into pieces," he said with a laugh. He finally ordered one of the constables to fetch it. 

He bent the hard plastic back and forth before giving it back to me. I was asked to "leave and run as soon as possible". I got away with a damaged press card and a first-hand experience of strategies employed by the state to silence opinions it finds inconvenient. 

This account originally appeared on scroll.in.

---



My Tweets on Dadri lynch murder on beef eating rumor:



  1. Ghulam Muhammed: Dadri’s dire warning: If Modi fails to give India ... http://ghulammuhammed.blogspot.com/2015/10/dadris-dire-warning-if-modi-fails-to.html?spref=tw 0 retweets0 favorites

  2. Destroying Muslim economics is ongoing agenda of Brahmin mindset. Communal riots destroyed Aligarh Moradabad Varanashi's Muslim businesses.
    0 retweets0 favorite
  3. Beef ban activated in response to export trade enriching Muslims. Destroying Muslim economics is an ongoing agenda of Brahmin mindset .0 retweets0 favorites
  4.  Ghulam Muhammed Retweeted
  5. Yakub Shaikh died when his co-worker Santos Arekar inserted an air blower pipe into his rectum saying I'll take out all mutton U ate on Eid.
  6. Next door to Delhi, mob kills 50-year-old [Muslim], injures son over 'rumours' they eat beef ... http://ghulammuhammed.blogspot.com/2015/09/next-door-to-delhi-mob-kills-50-year.html?spref=tw 

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Dadri’s dire warning: If Modi fails to give India change, it’s because of enemies within his house - Written by Tavleen Singh - The Indian Express

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/fifth-column-dadris-dire-warning/

The Indian Express


Dadri’s dire warning: If Modi fails to give India change, it’s because of enemies within his house


Akhlaq’s death was foretold from the moment Bharatiya Janata Party chief ministers started banning meat on the excuse of festivals during which it has never been banned before.


Written by Tavleen Singh 
Updated: Oct 4, 2015, 7:41

About Author

  • Tavleen Singh

  • Tavleen Singh


  • Tavleen Singh, a leading Columnist associated with The Indian Express.


 2
Dadri man beaten to death, Dadri beef ban death, beef ban, man beaten to death, beef ban death, Mohammad Akhlaq, Dadri, Bisara beef ban death, beef, lucknow news, dadri news, indian express
·        Akhlaq’s daughter and her cousin, in Bisara village Wednesday. Akhlaq was killed when a mob attacked his house following rumours that he and his family stored and ate beef. His son, severely injured in the attack, is in hospital. (Express Photo by: Prem Nath Pandey)

This week I would have written about the Foreign Minister’s excellent speech at the United Nations, but images from Dadri got in the way. Ever since the barbaric, senseless murder of Mohammed Akhlaq, I have been haunted by those images of a family with modern, middle-class aspirations destroyed by the savagery that lies so close to the surface of Indian modernity. Mohammed Akhlaq’s brutal murder gives the Prime Minister a chance to confront the reality that, if he fails to give India change, development and prosperity, it will be because of enemies inside his own house.

Akhlaq’s death was foretold from the moment Bharatiya Janata Party chief ministers started banning meat on the excuse of festivals during which it has never been banned before. They did this without concern for the jobs that would be lost and without noticing that Muslims would become an automatic target. Where better for this to be demonstrated than in a Hindu village with less Muslim families than you can count on the fingers of one hand? But Akhlaq’s cowardly murder raises other more serious questions.

When he was in Silicon Valley, the Prime Minister talked proudly about his plans to use digital technology to transform rural India. What use is this kind of talk when a murderous mob can gather in a village on the edge of Delhi without the police being able to do anything? The men who planned the murder of Akhlaq, and the attempted murder of his son Danish, used WhatsApp to spread lies about cow slaughter days in advance, but the police did not notice. 

What use is digital technology if it cannot improve basic policing? What use are cellphones in villages if the temple priest who made the announcement that caused Akhlaq’s death could not use it to alert the nearest police station? Even if the Prime Minister succeeds in spreading the use of digital technology to improve policing and governance, what is he going to do about the primitive mindset of members of his own party?

What will he do with the ex-MLA who said that if the meat found in Akhlaq’s fridge was beef, then the violence was justified? What will he do with BJP spokesmen who justified the murder in other ways? Some said that farmers in the area were relying on their cattle to survive because of the drought and in the village of Bisara a calf had disappeared. Others, including the local MP, dismissed the murder as an ‘accident’ and the result of a ‘misunderstanding’.

It was a shameful display of primitive, provincial thinking, and Mr Modi would do well to notice that, along with the ‘ghar wapasi’ nonsense that went on through his entire first year in office, it serves to distract from the reasons why he became prime minister. The vote was for change and development and not Hindutva. Anyone who tells him otherwise is lying. And yet he has done nothing to stop the theft of his mandate by people who would not have been ministers or members of Parliament if his slogan of ‘parivartan’ and ‘vikas’ had not found such resonance.

Akhlaq’s murder reminds us of how superficial India’s modernity is. The men who killed him and tried to kill his son would have all had cellphones in their pockets and colour television sets in their homes. Some may even have had access to computers and the Internet, and still all it took was a rumour for them to turn into savages. It is only savages who can turn so quickly into a killer mob. And in recent months a very ugly atmosphere has been created across the country by BJP chief ministers and Modi’s own ministers, and he has done nothing to stop them. Nor has he made the smallest effort to call a halt to the misguided ‘ghar wapasi’ (homecoming) campaign launched by his former comrades in the RSS. If the RSS is truly interested in serving India, and if they are true believers in the Sanatan Dharma, then they must concentrate their activities on more useful things like cleaning the Ganga and helping the Swachh Bharat campaign. Ghar wapasi is the antithesis of the idea of the Sanatan Dharma.

Meanwhile the Prime Minister must realise that the investors he woos on his travels in foreign lands halt in their tracks every time they see signs that beneath its new highways and shining malls, India remains a primitive country. Akhlaq was stoned to death in a village less than 50 kilometres away from Delhi and his young son, if he lives, could live with serious head injuries. Do we require more proof that we are going to need more than digital technology to make India into a country that truly belongs in the 21st century, instead of in some hideous, primordial time warp?

Saturday, October 3, 2015

A beef-eating Hindu demands his rights - By SA Aiyar - Sunday Times of India, Mumbai, INDIA

My comments posted on Sunday Times of India webpage article: 'A beef-eating Hindu demands his rights':

Ghulam MuhammedMumbai2 mins ago

As much as I appreciate Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyars's article: " A beef-eating Hindu demands his rights" published in Sunday Times of India, today, I feel his demand is based on a very narrow base of rights of Brahmins, rather than rights of Hindu or much wider legitimacy as rights of an Indian. Beef eating should be allowed as constitutional right to life and not on the basis that some Brahmins had been eating beef in the past and so the beef ban should be lifted. The beef ban should be lifted not on the basis was what the Brahmins in one group is countering the other group. This is not a fight between Brahmins and Brahmins. It is a fight between those in power imposing their narrow agenda on the rest of the people in this democratic nation.
---

Inline image 1

A beef-eating Hindu demands his rights


October 4, 2015, 12:00 AM IST  in Swaminomics | India | TOI

As a beef-eating Hindu, I am utterly outraged at the killing of Mohammed Akhlaq in Dadri by a Hindu mob claiming the man had beef in his house. Even worse is the attempt of BJP politicians to sanitize the lynching.
Culture minister Mahesh Sharma claims it was just “an accident.” Former MLA Nawab Singh Nagar says those who dare hurt the feelings of the dominant Thakurs should realize the consequences. He claims the murderous mob consisted of “innocent children” below 15 years of age. Many BJP leaders blame the Muslims for eating beef. Vichitra Tomar wants cow-killers to be arrested, not Muslim killers. Srichand Sharma says violence is inevitable if Muslims disrespect Hindu sentiments. Sorry, but these are all lame excuses for murder.
Mob fury at Dadri began when a temple priest said a calf had been killed. Later, the priest admitted he had been pressured to make this false statement by two Hindu youths. So, this was a planned, murderous riot.
The police have sent the meat found in Akhlaq’s house to determine whether it was beef or mutton. Why? How does it matter? The mob will be just as guilty of murder if it is beef. Muslims have every legal right to eat beef, just as I do. Several states have bans on cow slaughter, while allowing the slaughter of bulls and buffaloes. But there is no ban on eating beef.
Hindus who hear a cow has been slaughtered can ask the police to investigate a possible violation of cow slaughter laws. But if instead they organize lynch mobs, they are murderous thugs, and should be treated as such. If Modi refuses to condemn such incidents, he will, rightly, be seen as blessing them.
atm1
Bloodlust: Ancient literature talks of beef consumption by Hindu sages. The modern intolerance of Hindu goons is a cruel rejection of great Hindu traditions.
The claim that all Hindus oppose cow slaughter is false. Yes, there is a strong upper-caste tradition today against beef, but Dalits and tribals have always eaten beef. “Beef is one of the most affordable sources of protein for the Dalit community,” says Mohan Dharavath, president, Dalit Adivasi Bahujan and Minority Students’ Association.
Ancient Hindu scriptures establish beyond doubt that even upper-caste Hindus and great rishis ate beef in days of yore. For a quick primer, read Nirad Chaudhuri’s ‘The Continent of Circe’. He says, “Love of cows in the Vedas goes with every possible economic use of cattle, including, of course, their slaughter for food”. There was a long debate, says Chaudhuri, between opponents and defenders of cow slaughter. The two ideas co-existed, very much like the debate today about vegetarianism. The Mahabharata mentions, “without thinking it necessary to add any excuse, that a very hospitable king used to have 20,100 cattle slaughtered every day for his guests.” On the other hand, another story tells of a king who has slaughtered a cow to entertain a sage, an act that is criticized as sinful by another sage.
Such differences and debates were the very essence of ancient Hinduism. It was not a rigid religion. By the time the Dharma Shastras were penned, beef consumption had “ceased or virtually ceased”. Nevertheless, Bhavabuti’s famous play, Uttara-Rama-Charitra, written in the 8th century AD, has the following dialogue between two hermit boys at Ayodhya, Saudahataki and Dandayana.
D: It is no less a person than the revered Vasishta himself.
S: Is it Vasishta, eh?
D: Who else?
S: I thought it was a tiger or a wolf. For, as soon as he came, he crunched up our poor tawny heifer.
D: It is written that meat should be given along with curds and honey. So every host offers a heifer, a big bull, or a goat to a learned Brahmin who comes as a guest. This is laid down in sacred law.
In India today, such a play would be banned, and its author threatened with death. But ancient Hindu traditions gave Bhavabuti an honoured place in literature, with no censorship or fear of mob lynching. The modern intolerance of Hindu goons is a cruel rejection of great Hindu traditions.
In ancient times, neither untouchables nor tribals were regarded as Hindus. Early 19th century censuses did not count dalits and tribals as Hindus. But modern Hinduism claims as its own these two groups whom it cruelly reviled and oppressed through the ages. I am all for the change. But that change must allow for the fact that Dalits and tribals have always eaten beef.
As a libertarian believer in free choice, I have always championed the freedom to eat anything one likes. But I also claim the right to eat beef as part of the ancient Hindu tradition highlighted by Bhavabuti. As a Brahmin, I am happily following in the footsteps of the sage Vasiishta.
DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.