Saturday, February 4, 2012

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/myth-of-the-muslim-bloc/907956/0


Sun, 5 Feb 2012


Myth of the Muslim bloc


Seema Chishti : Sun Feb 05 2012, 02:51 hrs

From being wrapped around shoulders in the Arab world, the kaffiyeh (Arab scarf) has gone on to make appearances on European fashion ramps and sent out fashion and political statements all over the world. It also keeps the looms of Tanda, a small town in Uttar Pradesh, spinning. Says 40-year old businessman Shakeel Akhtar alias ‘Tiger’, “Tanda is the only one to stand up to the invasion of cheap Chinese fabric. We are still holding on to our share of world supplies of kaffiyehs.”

Here in Tanda in Akbarpur district in UP, which goes to the polls in the first phase on February 8, weaving is the mainstay of many families. Despite a daily load shedding of 10-12 hours, weaving is the prime occupation in Tanda which has approximately 50,000 power looms.
In this small town, upper caste well-off Muslims who control the trade rub shoulders with thread suppliers and Momin Ansaris—one of the 67 Muslim backward castes in UP that are now eligible for reservations for minorities.

As Tanda’s residents talk about weaving and reservations, unending lines of girls from the Bunkar (handloom weavers) community of backward Muslims make their way back home from school. Girls in headscarves returning from school may be a common sight in Malappuram in Kerala or Warangal in Andhra, but in UP, it’s a new sight.

With weaving no longer considered profitable, not many in the trade want to continue in it. In this media saturated market, Tanda no longer stands in isolation. It has got a whiff of the outside world and it wants more. In fact, it’s not Tanda alone. The promise of scholarships, mid-day meals at schools and the assiduous wooing of Muslims for the past 15 years and a sense that there is “no immediate threat” to their lives are all factors that are increasingly making Muslims in the state embrace education.

Shabina Bano, 27, one of five daughters in a Bunkar family, teaches at the government-run Shamsuddin Primary School in Tanda. “I have an MA and LLB as well as a B.Ed degree and even in my in-laws’ home, everyone is opting for jobs.”

Her colleague, Nishat Rafi, talks proudly of being the first in her family to be educated. “I have cleared NET (National Eligibility Test) and I can teach anywhere,” she says.

Both Bano and Rafi talk about how their brothers and other relatives have gone off to Dubai and other countries in the Middle-East in search of better prospects.

Change and the vote

So, will changing aspirations impact the way the Muslim voter votes this time?

In UP, where Muslims make up about 18.5 per cent of the population and are influential in about one-fourth of the constituencies, a monolithic Muslim vote is a myth. But communal polarisation since the mid-90s did mean that in their eagerness to “keep out the BJP”, there was tactical voting.

Defeating the BJP remains an objective but who is to be voted in is a decision that’s acquired a complex tone. The variables taken into account make the Muslim voter a much more demanding candidate than ever before. Recognising that their vote matters, Muslims want to see real improvement in their lives—mere promises or assurances from politicians that they will “protect” them, won’t work any longer. In a state obsessed with politics and political representation, this time, material concerns, opportunities and a desire to get ahead dominated election talk.

A few hundred kilometres off Tanda, in Basti, retired commercial tax officer Niaz Ahmed says, “With the BJP now having taken the backseat, the Hindu vote and the Muslim vote is no longer so polarised. Muslims in the state are very keen to be on a par with other communities and fight backwardness. Have you heard the slogan given by Dr Syed Amin, head of Urdu department at AMU? ‘Aadhi roti khaayenge, bacchon ko padhaayenge’.”

Muslim voters in Basti too are looking beyond the community. Says Basti-based writer Mazhar Azad, “Everyone is tired of this community-based system. We want to know who is actually going to help us improve our lives. So now the voter is using different parameters to assess that.”

The ‘4.5’ factor

Reservations could well be one of those parameters. In December-end, the government announced a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the existing 27 per cent quota for OBCs in Central jobs and admission to Central educational institutions.

The Congress expected this announcement to work as a magic wand. But though it has doused some anger over the Babri Masjid issue, there are some questions and concerns being raised over the 4.5 factor as well. Haji Mohammed Sarvar, a trader in Tanda, says, “This is being pushed as Muslim reservation but it’s for all minorities. Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists, who are also eligible and are better off than us, will get it and all we will be left with is the propaganda that it is for Muslims only.”

Muslims are also uneasy that the quota has been carved out of the OBC share. They are wary of upsetting their equation with the Yadavs, a relationship that has existed ever since Mulayam Singh Yadav forged the MY (Muslim-Yadav) combine that took on the formidable BJP wave in the state in the 90s. Khursheed Ahmed, a businessman in Khaleelabad, says, “Why take it away from the OBCs? Could they not have somehow ensured that we get a fair chance without taking away from the share of OBCs?”

The quota having been announced so close to the polls may have helped avert a strong backlash from the OBCs, but it has also meant that lower caste Muslims who are the targeted beneficiaries, know little about it.

From the roof of their house, Mohammed Shakir and Mohammed Wahid, both weavers in their twenties, point to a Kanshi Ram Awas home for the poor and laugh. “Do you know that a poor family had to pay a bribe of Rs 5,000 for that house? And they were told they can’t use chulhas in the house as the walls will get dirty and that they should switch to gas instead. Now in such a system, how will we get the ‘4.5’ reservation? Who will let us access our rights? ”

Shakir says, “They should have given the ‘4.5’ slightly earlier, so that the results of that could have been seen. People are suspicious because so many promises have been made and were rarely fulfilled.”

The Rahul edge

Whether Muslims will trust Rahul Gandhi’s promises remains to be seen but his aggressive campaign has given a push to his ‘number chaar’ party. In places where the Congress has fielded high-profile, ‘good’ candidates, his campaign has drawn Muslims in and away from the SP-BSP binary.

In Basti, where a relative of Congress veteran Jagdambika Pal is contesting, the mobilisation and enthusiasm for a ‘strong’ Congress person is palpable. Mazhar Azad, a writer, says, “In the polarised atmosphere of the nineties, Mulayam Singh wore a topi and walked around picking up votes, but he too was eventually mixing religion with politics, which harms communities in the long run. The Congress would never do that.”

Abdul Waheed, a 30-something resident of Basti, says, “Soch badal rahi hai. I have a wife and children and want to secure their future. Congress is a big party.”

Dr A R Khan, an orthopaedic surgeon, says, “To counter the BJP, we tried the SP and the BSP. They just gave us lollipops. We are now looking at the Congress.”

Voters are not the only ones looking for change. Change is also on the lips of all political parties. The Congress is talking of breaking with the politics of the past 23 years. Mulayam Singh is talking of laptops and education. Mayawati claims she has an empowering model “for all” in her bag. Even the BJP’s campaign has lost its shrill, exclusivist tone of the past.

Change in UP means different things to different people. In Varanasi, 60-year old Fareed Ahmed has an aluminum tool-making unit in his house which he installed after his father, a weaver, ran into bad days. But the change in profession has not translated into a change in fortune. He says he is “neither happy nor angry with Mayawati” but suspects “change” would be good as “baaqi sabko mauqa mil chuka hai.”

Varanasi-based writer Kashi Nath Singh, who won the Sahitya Akademi this year, says, “When Rahul Gandhi went to Azamgarh this time, the elderly and enraged maulanas met him with black flags and told him how angry they were. But that did not stop 60 girls from meeting him and shaking his hand. That is change for me.”

And what does change mean to home-maker Reshma who hails from a backward Muslim family, is illiterate, but holds up her one-year-old daughter Aafreen proudly saying she will educate her. “Aapse yahan khade hoke baat kar rahe hain. Yeh badlaav hai (I am standing here and talking to you. This is change).”
Giving Peace a chance

These elections, political parties in UP face a challenge from another front: the Peace Party. With its promise of making Muslims a force to reckon with, Peace Party, launched in 2008 by the controversial Dr Mohammad Ayub, a doctor and a polarising figure in Gorakhpur, is drawing voters from smaller castes and poor areas.

In Chauri Chaura, a town near Gorakhpur, a group of men stands huddled after the evening prayers. A supporter of the Peace Party and former pradhan of Chauri Chaura, Sharifuddin, whose father incidentally played a key role in an anti-British uprising that led to the death of 23 policemen, calls reservations for minorities a jhaansa, a dhokha.

Others in the town too are disenchanted. Akhlaque Ahmed, a shoe trader, says, “We are seeing how young Muslim men, especially those who studied hard and make it, get picked up and are decreed terrorists. All the parties we have tried and tested are responsible for this so why shouldn’t we try the Peace Party as well?”


State Watch

Muslims make up 18.5 per cent of UP’s population.


They make up over 20 per cent of the population in more than 20 of the state's 71 districts. In Rampur, the figure goes up to almost 49 per cent.


Muslims have a decisive vote in several districts of western UP, such as Moradabad, Bijnore, Amroha, Saharanpur, Muzaffarnagar. Central and eastern UP districts like Sant Kabir Das Nagar, Lucknow, Bahraich, Balrampur, Siddharth Nagar, Barabanki, Shravasti and Bareilly too have Muslims in significant numbers

Friday, February 3, 2012

Abu Asim Azmi: ‘People have stopped coming to state, they prefer Gujarat, Karnataka now’ - Indian Express interview by Swatee Kher

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/people-have-stopped-coming-to-state-they-prefer-gujarat-karnataka-now/907793/0

Sat, 4 Feb 2012


‘People have stopped coming to state, they prefer Gujarat, Karnataka now’


Swatee Kher : Mumbai, Sat Feb 04 2012, 03:29 hrs

With migrants versus locals issue on back-burner now, SP MLA and its most public face Abu Asim Azmi has major plans for the upcoming elections. SP had seven corporators in the outgoing Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and has now fielded 122 candidates for the polls. This includes a few workers who defected from rival Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). Apart from his focus on elections in Mumbai, Azmi is busy campaigning for assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh:

What is your main campaign agenda for the upcoming elections?

We are looking to field candidates who are not corrupt. We do not want candidates who win elections on the basis of money. We mostly work in slum areas and we need candidates who can go and work in slum areas. Water supply and sanitation is our main focus areas in the campaign.

The government has recently decided on the 1995 deadline for slum regularisation, what is your opinion about it?

The government decision is creating division among slum-dwellers in the city. In some parts they have agreed for the 2000 deadline and in others it is 1995. How can such a division be acceptable? They are going against their promise to regularise all slums till 2000. Moreover, once a promise is made, they should ensure that all slum-dwellers get housing.

What can be done now about it? What is your opinion?

Shiv Sena regularised slums till 1995 and said local officers - police, ward officers will be held responsible if slums grow further. After 20 years, no action has been taken against any officials. They are responsible for the slums to grow. Once people start living in the city, it is the responsibility of the government to give them proper housing, water supply, facilities for education and healthcare.

MNS chief Raj Thackeray has once again blamed UP, Bihar migrants for crime in the city. What is your stand?

Are there no Maharashtrians arrested for any crime? These statements are only for political gains. People have stopped coming to Maharashtra, they prefer to go to Gujarat or Karnataka. If Thackeray says he will find locals to work, let him send them to the textile mills in Bhiwandi.

Is MNS your main opponent in the elections?

MNS and Shiv Sena are both our targets because they are regional parties. They have targeted me and my party. They talk on regional lines and are traitors.

You had seven corporators in the civic body, but complaints of water, roads came from their areas as well.

There is little that a corporator can do. The responsibility of clearing-works remains with the administration, which the government controls. Even if the corporator wants to use funds in his area, he has to get them sanctioned.

You were learning Marathi, how much have you progressed?

I did take a few lessons and have collected some books in my office. I can speak and read a little but not very well. Since I am an MLA, I have to understand Marathi as most of my work is conducted in Marathi. I regret that I haven’t been able to pick the language as well as I wanted.

SP was part of the third front formed two years ago uniting republican and other secular parties. Why did the Republican Left Democratic Front (RLDF) not survive?

It was largely due to the division of seats. Many of our colleagues ended up withdrawing their candidates in favour of the Congress. Even after elections MLAs and workers would not regularly attend meetings, I then walked out of the formation.

Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi have recently asked UP residents as to how long they will go to Maharashtra to beg. What is your comment?

They should feel ashamed because their party has been in governance in most parts of the country for a long time. They have not been able to provide facilities in those states because of which people are migrating. To say that they are begging is an insult.

Political Islam In Egypt And The Medina Model By Hasnet Lais - eurasiareview.com

http://www.eurasiareview.com/03022012-political-islam-in-egypt-and-the-medina-model-oped/

Eurasia Review

Political Islam In Egypt And The Medina Model – OpEd

Written by: New Civilisation 

February 3, 2012

By Hasnet Lais

Almost a year on, the developments following the Arab Spring brings the attention of the western political elite to Islam’s political ambitions in a very precarious part of the world. Francis Fukuyama’s ‘End of History’ thesis postulated Islam as a mere irritant in the West’s path to cementing secular democracy as the pinnacle of man’s social and political achievements. Such a prediction, however, seems to have received a contending voice in the religiously inspired politics captivating the Egyptian political scene where the murmured fear is that much of the Muslim citizenry possess an end of history thesis themselves albeit ending in a slightly different crescendo of perfection to the one predicted by Fukayama.

Amidst the quandary which is Egyptian politics in the post-Mubarak era, the Muslim Brotherhood have announced themselves as the main actors in deciding the nations domestic and international relations having gained a majority of votes in the recent parliamentary elections. Much has been made of the discord between the Brotherhood’s old and new guards, with the younger, modern, educated segment objecting to the ultra-conservatives’ authoritarian practices,[i] indicating to many that we are passing through a nascent post-Islamist Middle East. Yet, we cannot afford to ignore the overwhelming recourse to Islam as a way of steering the trajectories of parties like the Brotherhood and the Salafi Al-Nour party. Despite the absence of a soundly delineated political agenda from either party, far from sidelining religious teachings to the peripheries, it would appear Egypt is on the brink of a model of government where Islam is touted as the de facto solution to the country’s social, economic, and political woes. While the appeal to religion as an adequate panacea for a country’s regression is unthinkable in western political circles, the insulation of Islam from the political sphere has been actively reversed by the political aspirations of Muslim Egyptians, and their support for a cross-fertilization between religion and politics has been made patently clear. So, how should interested observers in the western world—many of whom incidentally, are deeply troubled by the religious players at the forefront of the post-Mubarak regime—react to what many have prematurely labelled an ominous development in Egypt’s transition from authoritarianism to pluralism?

Well firstly, it may help to remind some of our misinformed and unenlightened ‘Islamistphobes’ that history bears witness to the successful application of governing systems steeped in Islamic law. One need only look at the Abbasid Caliphate, Muslim Spain, and the Ottoman Empire as identifiable epochs in the political history of Muslims, where the machinations of just government, effective judiciary, and requisite checks and balances were all hallmarks of the Islamic bodi-politik. The perception generated by Orientalist scholarship—that Muslim societies have unvaryingly produced politically incompetent leadership, autocratic governments, and weak legal structures—may be true when we take a cursory glance at the despots and monarchs ruling the Muslim world in the past century, though, it is arguable whether the culpability for this rests with the inability of Muslims to effectively dictate their political destiny or the aggressive colonialism of western powers. However, the view that this was an ineradicable Muslim sensuality from the gestation period of Islam until the end of theOttoman Empire is only advanced by those plunged into the sort of misinformation which makes them uncritically receptive to the commonplace demonization of Muslims and Islamic history.

Those who are cynical about the efficacy of judicial institutions administered by Islamists only need to consult 14th century Islamic court practices where hierarchical appellate structures and system of successor review were trademarks of Islamic legal theory.[ii] In this can be seen a vindication of Islamic Law’s commitment to human rights as conceptualised today. For instance, Article 14 (5) of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states, “Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law”.[iii] In fact, this right of appeal to higher tribunal, so flagrantly dismissed during the Mubarak regime’s wrongful conviction of many political dissidents, was a customary practice of Abu Yusuf, the Chief Justice during the Caliphate of Harun al-Rashid, in 8th century Baghdad.[iv] The Secular liberals who have sounded the alarm at the prospect of Islamist Egypt signalling the demise of constitutionalism and rule of law have, if anything, been poorly served by an erroneous scholarship which fails to recognize Shariah Law’s functional equivalent of a higher court reviewing the decisions of a lower court. This revision and appeal of judgements is contained in the Islamic legal principle of ‘murafa’ah’ and should be favourably received in an Egypt which for too long has witnessed political opposition quashed into silence and post-trial rights aborted. We should welcome the prospect of such formal legal and constitutional structures being reintroduced inEgypt. Islamic legal dispensations can easily lend to the development of a free and independent civilian judiciary which can render the politically repressive and authoritarian methods employed by Mubarak’s military regime as a relic of a bygone era.

Another source from history which ‘Islamistphobes’ are well advised to consult is the central, most animating figure of Islamic history himself—Muhammad. Exactly how much of his life and statesmanship is familiar to the average western politician remains unknown, but if the time-honoured European hostility towards Islam and Muslims is anything to go by, it is probably very little, or certainly subverted by medieval Christian polemics on Muhammad which were informed with a crusading zeal. Concerning the westerners who remain ambivalent at the prospects of an Islamically governed Egypt, it cannot be too much an ask to appeal to their goodwill in order they look beyond the hate-filled scholarship which is detrimental to reasoned judgment. Doing so will open up the intellectual space to engage with the biographies and predominantly Muslim accounts of Muhammad so that lessons and practices from his lifetime which speak directly to the Egyptian political predicament may be identified. This can help bridge the gap between the much played out conundrum between Islamic Law and international human rights law.

For example, it is often alleged that the formal introduction of Shariah law into Egypt’s state machinery will sound the death knell for Christian Copts, minorities, and non-conformists who depart from the state-sponsored orthodoxy, and has raised doubts about any impending government pursuing Islamization. Take for example, the ‘civil death’ incurred by Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd whose call for the revision of conventional approaches to Quranic hermeneutics[v] was treated as apostasy. Or the instances of harassment voiced by Egypt’s Coptic population who are an endogamous people insisting on separate existence largely due to their perception of being targets of planned provocations by the status quo during the Sadat and Mubarak years where censorship of the Coptic press and persecution by state security forces[vi] was quite routine. These cases have left a considerable voice amongst Egypt’s religious minorities feeling, at best, uncertain about Islamist guarantees of rights under international human rights law.

Yet, many Muslims would argue that such discrimination is not only in violation of international legal norms, but contradicts the Prophetic model which enshrines the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and entitles all faith communities to defend themselves from any seditious provocation.[vii] We need to ask ourselves whether any wisdom may be extracted from Muhammad’s interactions with others that can serve as an instructive and educative principle for social organisation in Egypt. Perhaps the ‘Sahifat al-Madina’ is a starting point. Popularly referred to as the ‘Mithaq al-Madina’, it has been described by some as the first constitution in human history[viii] and is entirely accredited to Muhammad and the Islamic faith. Dr Robert Dickson Crane, a former foreign policy advisor to Richard Nixon, writes:

“When the various tribes living in Madina invited the Prophet Muhammad to become their leader as a means to overcome their inter-tribal rivalries and bring peace, prosperity and freedom, there was no such thing as a state in the modern sense. In fact, such a modern concept was not invented until more than a thousand years later, even though there were empires, like the Persian, Chinese, and Incas, based on the modern concept of might makes right. In the Covenant of Madina the various autonomous tribes were incorporated in a single confederation with common rights and responsibilities. The Prophet called this confederation an umma or single community composed of different ethnic and religious ummas as sub-groups.”[ix]

The Madinan charter carried the force of law and was drafted with the intention of effecting better relations between groups and tribes in what was a heterogeneous social composition. Muhammad’s diplomacy then can be perceived as being relevant to the circumstances obtaining in an Egyptian society, where the successful integration and status of different religious communities, ranging from Jehovah’s Witnesses to members of the Baha’i faith, have to be carefully negotiated. One of Muhammad’s aphorisms pertinent in the current context is, “Whoever violates the rights of the People of the Book, I will complain against them on the Day of Judgment”, which is a sufficient Islamic guarantee against the dissolution of minority religious communities.

With the granting of asylum to those requiring protection and the formation of alliances with Jewish and Christian minorities—a prevailing characteristic of Muhammad’s statesmanship in Medina—contemporary critics of political Islam should look with a degree of optimism at the prospect of an Egypt which, far from accosting its religious minorities, can embrace their potential value to the wider Islamic polity, in a parallel manner to Muhammad’s interplay with religious and ethnic minorities in 7th century Arabia.

Hasnet Lais is a freelance writer, with a Masters in Islamic Societies and Cultures from The School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London.





[i] Article written by Fawas Gerges, titled “The irresistible rise of the Muslim Brothers”, Accessed from:  http://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2011/11/brotherhood-egypt-arab-mubarak

[ii] Powers, S.D. (1992), “On Judicial Review in Islamic Law”, Law & Society Review, Volume 26, Number 2


[iv] Baderin, M.A. (2003), ‘International Human Rights and Islamic Law’, OxfordUniversity Press, p. 109

[v] Mayer, A.E. (2007), ‘Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics’, 4th Ed. Westview Press, p. 174

[vi] Arzt, D.E. (1996), “Heroes or Heretics: Religious Dissidents under Islamic Law”, 14Wisconsin International Law Journal, No.2, p. 412-13

[vii] Kamali, H.M. (1992), ‘Freedom of Religion in Islam’, 21CapitalUniversity Law Review, p. 63

[viii] Crane, D.R. (unknown), “Islamic Social Principle of the Right to Freedom (Haqq al-Hurriyah): An Analytical Approach”,  Arches Quarterly, Volume 3, Edition 4, 2009, p. 8

[ix] Ibid.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

New York Muslims Fight Back Against Police Department's Institutionalized Paranoia About Islam - ALTERNET.ORG


http://www.alternet.org/story/153957/new_york_muslims_fight_back_against_police_department%27s_institutionalized_paranoia_about_islam?page=entire

AlterNet

New York Muslims Fight Back Against Police Department's Institutionalized Paranoia About Islam

Muslim community leaders say Islamophobia is deep-seated in the New York Police Department.

 By Alex Kane
January 31, 2012  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 
Mayor Michael Bloomberg had a message to New York City's Muslim community: don't worry that the New York Police Department showed an anti-Muslim film to around 1,500 officers, because top cop Ray Kelly “probably visits more mosques” than many Muslims in New York.

Speaking at a press conference in Queens, Bloomberg continued his defense of Kelly: “He has reached out to this community as he has reached out to lots of other communities. We have things regularly at 1 Police Plaza for clergy people of each religion, including Islam. And we'll continue to do that.”  

But Muslim community leaders and activists, backed by a diverse coalition of allies, are having none of that. They want Kelly fired. And they say this latest incident shows how anti-Muslim sentiment has become institutionalized in the NYPD. 

A rejoinder to Kelly's defense was already on display at around the same time Bloomberg spoke, at a January 26 press conference on the steps of City Hall. Protesters held signs labeling Kelly a racist. 

Anger was in the air, and Muslim activists and allies repeatedly called for Kelly's resignation; for “corrective training” for the officers who viewed the film; and for independent oversight of the NYPD. As chants of “Kelly must go” rang through the air, some activists demanded state or federal oversight of New York City police. 

“This outrage is a violation of the honor of our city and those who protect it,” said Cyrus McGoldrick, the civil rights manager for the Council on American-Islamic Relations' New York chapter. 
The battle is centered around an Islamophobic film titled The Third Jihad, which was shown to police officers on a continuous loop during “the sign-in, medical and administrative orientation process,” according to police documents obtained by the Brennan Center for Justice. The film, which is filled with violent imagery and posits that mainstream Muslim groups are in fact secretly plotting to take over the U.S., was financed by the Clarion Fund, a right-wing organization with links to Israeli settlers. Compounding the NYPD and Bloomberg administration's problems is the fact that Kelly willingly agreed to sit down for a 90-minute interview for the film and that NYPD spokesman Paul Browne lied about Kelly's involvement and how many officers saw the film. 

This is hardly the first time NYPD's problematic relationship with the city's Muslims has come to light. But what makes the episode significant is the media firestorm it has created over the spokesperson's lies at a time of increasing awareness of police abuse due to Occupy Wall Street-related arrests and brutality. Muslim activists are looking to capitalize on that energy as they confront the NYPD in the weeks ahead. 

Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, the NYPD has had a fraught relationship with the city's 800,000-member Muslim community, one of the fastest growing religious communities in the city. Billions of dollars have been spent to make NYPD one of the most powerful forces in the fight against terrorism. But the NYPD has been routinely accused of harassing and entrapping Muslims in terrorism-related cases. The final straw for many Muslims came when an Associated Press investigative series published last summer exposed an arbitrary spying program, implemented with CIA help, that targeted virtually all of New York's Muslims. A “demographics unit” established at the NYPD has “monitored daily life in bookstores, bars, cafes and nightclubs” in Muslim communities, as well as mosques, the AP reported. It was also revealed that the NYPD spied on Muslim student associations on college campuses.  

Revelations of the spying program dealt blows to a Bloomberg administration whose relations with the Muslim community were at a relative high note when the mayor defended the Park 51 mosque project near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan.  

“These practices paint a dangerous picture of the ways in which law enforcement engages with Muslim communities under the banner of national security,” reads an August 25, 2011 statement from the Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition. “These McCarthyite spying techniques threaten the civil rights of all Americans, and deepen the long-existing rifts between communities of color and police in the United States.” 

Then came the most recent revelation about the showing of The Third Jihad. Although the Village Voice first reported on the story last January, a Jan. 23, 2012 New York Times report, based on police documents obtained by the Brennan Center, has received a lot more attention due to the AP expose on the NYPD's spying program. 

“Seeing that propaganda like this is being used in training is almost logical in light of Associated Press reports on the NYPD's comprehensive and warrantless surveillance of Muslim New Yorkers,” said CAIR-NY's McGoldrick.  

After the most recent revelations broke, Browne's lies about the NYPD film screening became a hot media topic. The AP ran a January 30, 2012 article titled “New York Police Spokesman Comes Under Fire.” The two free daily papers in New York led with the story after it broke, and some city council members have called for more oversight of the NYPD as a result of the incident. Protests calling for Kelly's resignation have kept the story in the news, and an editorial, an opinion piece and a column in the New York Times were published in recent days criticizing the NYPD. 

A burgeoning alliance between black and Latino activists working against “stop-and-frisk” police tactics, Muslim activists and Occupy Wall Street could keep the momentum going. Jumaane Williams, a black city council member and OWS supporter whose own run-in with NYPD has turned him into an outspoken advocate against police abuse, spoke at the rally and denounced the NYPD's “corrosive culture.” 

The coming together of long-time anti-police brutality activists and OWS was chronicled in The Awl in a report by Michael Tracey. 

Titled “A Fresh Movement Against the NYPD's Culture of Misconduct,” the article detailed how OWS has reinvigorated New York's anti-police brutality movement. As Tracey shows, the alliance is natural given OWS' experience with police brutality—something communities of color have had to combat for decades. And OWS' attention to police brutality has also been a boon to Muslim activists. 

On October 21, 2011, a CAIR-NY-organized day of prayer was held in Zuccotti Park. Although it attracted little attention outside the anti-Muslim blogosphere, it was a sign of an alliance to come. 

“CAIR-NY’s endorsement of Friday Prayer at Occupy Wall Street stems from a conviction that many of the issues brought into the international spotlight by Occupy Wall Street affect Muslim communities disproportionately,” read a statement announcing the action. “Especially in light of the recently exposed NYPD surveillance in Muslim Student Organizations, we need to unite in our repudiation of government corruption and our rejection of the political effort to marginalize our voice.” 

A month of organizing followed the prayer action, and a much larger rally at Foley Square against the NYPD spying program was held in November with hundreds of people, including a contingent from OWS. Muslim youth broke into chants of “We are the 99 percent” as they marched to NYPD headquarters to make their discontent known.  

“It's really critical we create this broad-based movement,” said Faiza Ali, a community activist and organizer who attended the November rally. “On the whole there's a general distaste for the police department and the way they've been operating, especially recently given the police brutality issues being raised at Occupy Wall Street...All of these issues are connected, and [we have] the support of Occupy Wall Street on this issue.”  

Muslim activists like Imam Talib 'Abdur-Rashid, the spiritual leader of the Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood in Harlem, say the public pressure on Kelly and the NYPD won't stop until corrective action is taken. Speaking at the January 26 press conference, Abdur-Rashid promised more public protests on these issues in the coming weeks and laid out the stakes.  

“We are facing the specter of a 21st-century COINTELPRO,” he told reporters. And activists say the fight is just beginning.   

“This is part of a long-term strategy,” Linda Sarsour, a prominent Palestinian-American activist in the NYC Muslim community, recently wrote. “We are not just reacting anymore.” 
 
Alex Kane is a staff reporter for Mondoweiss and a freelance journalist based in New York. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12522848


Gene Sharp: Author of the nonviolent revolution rulebook

Gene Sharp

In an old townhouse in East Boston an elderly stooped man is tending rare orchids in his shabby office. His Labrador Sally lies on the floor between stacks of academic papers watching him as he shuffles past.

This is Dr Gene Sharp the man now credited with the strategy behind the toppling of the Egyptian government.

Gene Sharp is the world's foremost expert on non-violent revolution. His work has been translated into more than 30 languages, his books slipped across borders and hidden from secret policemen all over the world.
 

Key Steps on the Path to Revolution

Gene Sharp book
  • Develop a strategy for winning freedom and a vision of the society you want
  • Overcome fear by small acts of resistance
  • Use colours and symbols to demonstrate unity of resistance
  • Learn from historical examples of the successes of non-violent movements
  • Use non-violent "weapons"
  • Identify the dictatorship's pillars of support and develop a strategy for undermining each
  • Use oppressive or brutal acts by the regime as a recruiting tool for your movement
  • Isolate or remove from the movement people who use or advocate violence
As Slobodan Milosevic in Serbia and Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine fell to the colour revolutions which swept across Eastern Europe, each of the democratic movements paid tribute to Sharp's contribution, yet he remained largely unknown to the public.

Despite these successes and a Nobel Peace Prize nomination in 2009 he has faced almost constant financial hardship and wild accusations of being a CIA front organisation. The Albert Einstein Institution based on the ground floor of his home is kept running by sheer force of personality and his fiercely loyal Executive Director, Jamila Raqib.

In 2009 I began filming a documentary following the impact of Sharp's work from his tranquil rooftop orchid house, across four continents and eventually to Tahrir square where I slept alongside protesters who read his work by torchlight in the shadow of tanks.

Gene Sharp is no Che Guevara but he may have had more influence than any other political theorist of his generation.

His central message is that the power of dictatorships comes from the willing obedience of the people they govern - and that if the people can develop techniques of withholding their consent, a regime will crumble.

For decades now, people living under authoritarian regimes have made a pilgrimage to Gene Sharp for advice. His writing has helped millions of people around the world achieve their freedom without violence. "As soon as you choose to fight with violence you're choosing to fight against your opponents best weapons and you have to be smarter than that," he insists.

"People might be a little surprised when they come here, I don't tell them what to do. They've got to learn how this non-violent struggle works so they can do it for themselves."
 
Catching fire
To do this Sharp provides in his books a list of 198 "non-violent weapons", ranging from the use of colours and symbols to mock funerals and boycotts.

Designed to be the direct equivalent of military weapons, they are techniques collated from a forensic study of defiance to tyranny throughout history.

"These non-violent weapons are very important because they give people an alternative," he says. "If people don't have these, if they can't see that they are very powerful, they will go back to violence and war every time."

After the Green uprising in Iran in 2009 many of the protesters were accused at their trials of using more than 100 of Sharp's 198 methods.

His most translated and distributed work, From Dictatorship to Democracy was written for the Burmese democratic movement in 1993, after the imprisonment of Aung San Suu Kyi.
 

Start Quote

It was important because some of the Gabonese were talking about a violent option - I was able to say: 'Hang on guys there's another option here'”
Supermodel Gloria Mika

Because he had no specialist knowledge of the country he wrote a guide to toppling a dictatorship which was entirely generic. But Sharp's weakness became the strength of the book allowing it to be easily translated and applicable in any country of the world across cultural and religious boundaries.

The book caught fire figuratively and literally.

From Burma word of mouth spread through Thailand to Indonesia where it was used against the military dictatorship there. Its success in helping to bring down Milosevic in Serbia in 2000 propelled it into use across Eastern Europe, South America and the Middle East.

When it reached Russia the intelligence services raided the print shop and the shops selling it mysteriously burned to the ground.

The Iranians became so worried they broadcast an animated propaganda film on state TV - of Gene Sharp plotting the overthrow of Iran from The White House.

President Hugo Chavez used his weekly television address to warn the country that Sharp was a threat to the national security of Venezuela.
 
Serbian connection
After recent allegations of vote rigging in her home country of Gabon, supermodel and activist Gloria Mika travelled to Boston to meet Sharp.

A Nonviolent Life

  • Born January 1928 in Ohio
  • Jailed for nine months in 1953-4 for protesting against conscription of young men to fight in Korean War
  • Albert Einstein wrote the foreword to his first book - Gandhi Wields the Weapon of Moral Power: Three Case Histories - published in 1960
  • His 1968 Oxford University D Phil, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, formed the basis of a book with the same title, published in 1973
  • Professor (now emeritus professor) of political science at the University of Massachusetts since 1972, while simultaneously holding research positions at Harvard University
  • Founded the Albert Einstein Institution in 1983, a non-profit organisation advancing the use of non-violent action in conflict around the world
"I felt like I was going to meet the main man in terms of non-violent resistance in the world," she says. "It was important because some of the Gabonese were talking about a violent option. They were saying, let's go and kill some people and I was able to say: 'Hang on guys there's another option here.'"

The Serbs who had used his books as a theoretical base for their activities founded their own organisation called the Centre for Applied Non Violence (CANVAS), and alongside their own materials have carried out workshops using Sharp's work in dozens of other countries.

When I met Srdja Popovic the director of CANVAS in Belgrade in November he confirmed that they had been working with Egyptians. "That's the power of Sharp's work and this non-violent struggle," he says. "It doesn't matter who you are - black, white, Muslim, Christian, gay, straight or oppressed minority - it's useable. If they study it, anybody can do this."
 
Photocopies in Arabic
By the time I arrived in Tahrir square on 2 February many of those trained in Sharp's work were in detention. Others were under close observation by the intelligence services and journalists who visited them were detained for hours by the secret police. My own camera equipment was seized as soon as I landed.
 

Start Quote

This is an Egyptian revolution - we are not being told what to do by the Americans”
Mahmoud Tahrir Square protester

When I finally reached one of the organisers he refused to talk about Sharp on camera. He feared that wider knowledge of a US influence would destabilise the movement but confirmed that the work had been widely distributed in Arabic.

"One of the main points which we used was Sharp's idea of identifying a regime's pillars of support," he said. "If we could build a relationship with the army, Mubarak's biggest pillar of support, to get them on our side, then we knew he would quickly be finished."

That night as I settled down to sleep in a corner of Tahrir square some of the protesters came to show me text messages they said were from the army telling them that they wouldn't shoot. "We know them and we know they are on our side now," they said.

One of the protesters, Mahmoud, had been given photocopies of a handout containing the list of 198 methods but he was unaware of their origins. He proudly described how many of them had been used in Egypt but he had never heard of Gene Sharp.

When I pointed out that these non-violent weapons were the writings of an American academic he protested strongly. "This is an Egyptian revolution", he said. "We are not being told what to do by the Americans."

And of course that is exactly what Sharp would want.

Ruaridh Arrow's film, Gene Sharp: How to Start a Revolution, will be released in spring 2011

Comments posted on Indian Express website over Oped article:Tehran Test -

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Comments posted on Indian Express website over Oped article:Tehran Test - 

If US wants India to bend, the writer wants India to crawl. It is a pity that nobody with any spine stands up for India to have its own independent policies that not only impacts on its own interests, but in a wider sense, impact the world around us. If US and Israel's security interests, are centered on regime change in Iran, why India's own need for stability and peace in the region should not be openly and vociferously articulated by India in world forums and international media. Nobody wants war in our neighborhood and it would seem, US and Israel are bent to force their high-handed agenda of imposing their will on UN member countries through use of force. India must announce a blanket policy of ‘hands- off’ in such misadventures. People of India will overwhelmingly support their government’s peace initiatives. India does have support from China, Russia and other nations and its should use that influence to ward off all such evil designs of USA and Israel in this area. Let South East Asia be a zone of peace.

Ghulam Muhammed (Mumbai)
------

The Tehran test
Pranab Dhal Samanta : Wed Feb 01 2012, 23:40 hrs

The real problem for India, post sanctions, is political, not financial

On the face of it, India is facing a tough challenge squaring up its oil bill with Iran. The problem gets more complex when one realises that most options are geared towards paying up accumulated dues, while the current oil bill with Iran also continues to rise. The bottom line is that even this year supplies from Iran will be around 12 per cent of India’s total oil import. So when Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee says in the US that India will continue to import oil from Iran, he is actually underlining New Delhi’s compulsion, not taking a position or asserting a point of view.

A concise overview of the situation shows that largely five oil majors, four PSUs and one private company, are commercially exposed to Iran. The onset of UN sanctions led to the collapse of the earlier mode of payment through the Asian Clearing Union mechanism. The RBI then allowed entities to settle payments of legitimate transactions through any acceptable currency outside the ACU.

Indian trade with Iran was being settled through euros. Even later, Delhi continued to make these payments through eurozone banks until bank after bank began to close their Iran account for fear of sanctions. At present, India is making its payments through the Halkbank, Turkey, which too is beginning to feel the pressure.

These knotty details apart, the real problem is political, not financial. For far too long the issue has remained in the realm of the entities themselves, the petroleum ministry or, at the most, the finance ministry, while it was all along a strategic question — an issue of international politics, requiring a more political approach.

It was only a matter of time before the West would target Iran’s petroleum business. The Obama administration has made its first move in an election year after indications of Iran developing a nuclear weapon — although there is still no clinching proof. The EU has followed suit.

Before moving further, it’s important to understand what the US, as lead actor, has actually done. Barack Obama has signed into law this month a fresh set of sanctions on Iran, after due Congressional approval, under the National Defence Authorisation Act. This targets Iran’s proceeds from petroleum exports, which have internationally been allowed to continue because oil is an essential commodity.

Without getting into the tricky affair of placing an embargo on Iranian oil, the US law states that foreign financial institutions which conduct any “significant financial transaction” with Iran for petroleum products will be barred from transaction in the US. This provision becomes effective from March 1.

There’s a second provision, which targets state financial institutions and even foreign central banks, which conduct transaction with Iran on petroleum products. This will kick in six months later. The only pre-condition for these sanctions to become effective is a determination by Obama that the international market position is such that there’s adequate fuel to keep oil prices at a reasonable level.

The US seems to have worked this out with OPEC, which has calculated that removing Iranian oil from the market would result in a loss of about 10 billion barrels per day. It’s reliably learnt Saudi Arabia has officially agreed and, in fact, made a commitment to OPEC for an additional 30 billion barrels a day, in case Iranian oil doesn’t reach the market. This commitment is bound to strengthen Obama’s hand to make such a determination, which could be vital for him in this election year.

Where does all this leave India? There are two routes — an exemption or a waiver, and both, in a sense, are mutually exclusive. The US law states the president can exempt a foreign financial entity for conducting business with Iran provided the country of primary jurisdiction has reduced import of Iranian petroleum products. This would essentially mean Indo-Iran oil trade has to show a declining trend to escape sanctions on Indian financial institutions. However, an exemption would be time-bound and up for periodic review.

As for the waiver, it can only be considered once sanctions have been enforced. This would mean that first an Indian entity must face sanctions, only then can the US consider a waiver which has a lifespan of 120 days, during which the president has to send a report on the country’s compliance with the sanctions.

All this is not a sudden development. That’s why other big economies like China, Japan and South Korea made their own bilateral arrangements with Iran, almost a year ago, to ensure no disruption to their oil supplies. They entered into a barter system of sorts, offsetting oil purchases through increased exports in other goods. The Japanese also drove home the advantage of a fully convertible yen, a currency Iran is happy to hold.

India, on the other hand, has very few exports and the rupee, partially convertible, does not make much sense for Iran. Yet, Tehran has agreed to settle at least 30 per cent (figure could go higher) through the rupee. There’s also the option of project exports by undertaking infrastructure contracts in Iran; re-exporting goods Iran requires from a third country; or high-seas sales and payment, outside either country’s territorial limits. All these measures are under consideration. But they are, at best, innovative responses to a crisis, not a credible solution.

Even at this late stage, India has to work towards a political resolution, else Indian entities will be under constant threat of sanctions. Put simply, India has to build a case for an exemption package and, internally, ensure entities dealing with Iran have minimal or no exposure to the US financial system. To build a case for an India-specific exemption will require political heavy-lifting in Washington because Delhi is likely to want more favourable terms than those laid out in the exemption provision within the law.

This will test the tenacity of the Indo-US strategic partnership and that’s why Delhi will have to broaden the conversation on Iran. For instance, bringing to the table the consequences of India’s gradual disengagement with Iran on the Af-Pak scenario — the US has failed to make Pakistan agree on transit for India, which means Iran remains the best access point for India. Does the US want India’s role to diminish in Afghanistan? Also, targeting Indian entities would pass on the advantage to China, making it almost indispensable to Iran — is that a desirable strategic outcome for the US?

There are many more such connected questions, but for all of this India needs a more focused bilateral dialogue with the US on Iran — giving it the necessary political impetus and aiming for a solution, knowing well this is not about oil alone. The US recognising India’s unique situation and Delhi committing to look at other petroleum sources could be a good starting point.