Thursday, February 2, 2012

New York Muslims Fight Back Against Police Department's Institutionalized Paranoia About Islam - ALTERNET.ORG


http://www.alternet.org/story/153957/new_york_muslims_fight_back_against_police_department%27s_institutionalized_paranoia_about_islam?page=entire

AlterNet

New York Muslims Fight Back Against Police Department's Institutionalized Paranoia About Islam

Muslim community leaders say Islamophobia is deep-seated in the New York Police Department.

 By Alex Kane
January 31, 2012  |  
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 
Mayor Michael Bloomberg had a message to New York City's Muslim community: don't worry that the New York Police Department showed an anti-Muslim film to around 1,500 officers, because top cop Ray Kelly “probably visits more mosques” than many Muslims in New York.

Speaking at a press conference in Queens, Bloomberg continued his defense of Kelly: “He has reached out to this community as he has reached out to lots of other communities. We have things regularly at 1 Police Plaza for clergy people of each religion, including Islam. And we'll continue to do that.”  

But Muslim community leaders and activists, backed by a diverse coalition of allies, are having none of that. They want Kelly fired. And they say this latest incident shows how anti-Muslim sentiment has become institutionalized in the NYPD. 

A rejoinder to Kelly's defense was already on display at around the same time Bloomberg spoke, at a January 26 press conference on the steps of City Hall. Protesters held signs labeling Kelly a racist. 

Anger was in the air, and Muslim activists and allies repeatedly called for Kelly's resignation; for “corrective training” for the officers who viewed the film; and for independent oversight of the NYPD. As chants of “Kelly must go” rang through the air, some activists demanded state or federal oversight of New York City police. 

“This outrage is a violation of the honor of our city and those who protect it,” said Cyrus McGoldrick, the civil rights manager for the Council on American-Islamic Relations' New York chapter. 
The battle is centered around an Islamophobic film titled The Third Jihad, which was shown to police officers on a continuous loop during “the sign-in, medical and administrative orientation process,” according to police documents obtained by the Brennan Center for Justice. The film, which is filled with violent imagery and posits that mainstream Muslim groups are in fact secretly plotting to take over the U.S., was financed by the Clarion Fund, a right-wing organization with links to Israeli settlers. Compounding the NYPD and Bloomberg administration's problems is the fact that Kelly willingly agreed to sit down for a 90-minute interview for the film and that NYPD spokesman Paul Browne lied about Kelly's involvement and how many officers saw the film. 

This is hardly the first time NYPD's problematic relationship with the city's Muslims has come to light. But what makes the episode significant is the media firestorm it has created over the spokesperson's lies at a time of increasing awareness of police abuse due to Occupy Wall Street-related arrests and brutality. Muslim activists are looking to capitalize on that energy as they confront the NYPD in the weeks ahead. 

Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, the NYPD has had a fraught relationship with the city's 800,000-member Muslim community, one of the fastest growing religious communities in the city. Billions of dollars have been spent to make NYPD one of the most powerful forces in the fight against terrorism. But the NYPD has been routinely accused of harassing and entrapping Muslims in terrorism-related cases. The final straw for many Muslims came when an Associated Press investigative series published last summer exposed an arbitrary spying program, implemented with CIA help, that targeted virtually all of New York's Muslims. A “demographics unit” established at the NYPD has “monitored daily life in bookstores, bars, cafes and nightclubs” in Muslim communities, as well as mosques, the AP reported. It was also revealed that the NYPD spied on Muslim student associations on college campuses.  

Revelations of the spying program dealt blows to a Bloomberg administration whose relations with the Muslim community were at a relative high note when the mayor defended the Park 51 mosque project near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan.  

“These practices paint a dangerous picture of the ways in which law enforcement engages with Muslim communities under the banner of national security,” reads an August 25, 2011 statement from the Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition. “These McCarthyite spying techniques threaten the civil rights of all Americans, and deepen the long-existing rifts between communities of color and police in the United States.” 

Then came the most recent revelation about the showing of The Third Jihad. Although the Village Voice first reported on the story last January, a Jan. 23, 2012 New York Times report, based on police documents obtained by the Brennan Center, has received a lot more attention due to the AP expose on the NYPD's spying program. 

“Seeing that propaganda like this is being used in training is almost logical in light of Associated Press reports on the NYPD's comprehensive and warrantless surveillance of Muslim New Yorkers,” said CAIR-NY's McGoldrick.  

After the most recent revelations broke, Browne's lies about the NYPD film screening became a hot media topic. The AP ran a January 30, 2012 article titled “New York Police Spokesman Comes Under Fire.” The two free daily papers in New York led with the story after it broke, and some city council members have called for more oversight of the NYPD as a result of the incident. Protests calling for Kelly's resignation have kept the story in the news, and an editorial, an opinion piece and a column in the New York Times were published in recent days criticizing the NYPD. 

A burgeoning alliance between black and Latino activists working against “stop-and-frisk” police tactics, Muslim activists and Occupy Wall Street could keep the momentum going. Jumaane Williams, a black city council member and OWS supporter whose own run-in with NYPD has turned him into an outspoken advocate against police abuse, spoke at the rally and denounced the NYPD's “corrosive culture.” 

The coming together of long-time anti-police brutality activists and OWS was chronicled in The Awl in a report by Michael Tracey. 

Titled “A Fresh Movement Against the NYPD's Culture of Misconduct,” the article detailed how OWS has reinvigorated New York's anti-police brutality movement. As Tracey shows, the alliance is natural given OWS' experience with police brutality—something communities of color have had to combat for decades. And OWS' attention to police brutality has also been a boon to Muslim activists. 

On October 21, 2011, a CAIR-NY-organized day of prayer was held in Zuccotti Park. Although it attracted little attention outside the anti-Muslim blogosphere, it was a sign of an alliance to come. 

“CAIR-NY’s endorsement of Friday Prayer at Occupy Wall Street stems from a conviction that many of the issues brought into the international spotlight by Occupy Wall Street affect Muslim communities disproportionately,” read a statement announcing the action. “Especially in light of the recently exposed NYPD surveillance in Muslim Student Organizations, we need to unite in our repudiation of government corruption and our rejection of the political effort to marginalize our voice.” 

A month of organizing followed the prayer action, and a much larger rally at Foley Square against the NYPD spying program was held in November with hundreds of people, including a contingent from OWS. Muslim youth broke into chants of “We are the 99 percent” as they marched to NYPD headquarters to make their discontent known.  

“It's really critical we create this broad-based movement,” said Faiza Ali, a community activist and organizer who attended the November rally. “On the whole there's a general distaste for the police department and the way they've been operating, especially recently given the police brutality issues being raised at Occupy Wall Street...All of these issues are connected, and [we have] the support of Occupy Wall Street on this issue.”  

Muslim activists like Imam Talib 'Abdur-Rashid, the spiritual leader of the Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood in Harlem, say the public pressure on Kelly and the NYPD won't stop until corrective action is taken. Speaking at the January 26 press conference, Abdur-Rashid promised more public protests on these issues in the coming weeks and laid out the stakes.  

“We are facing the specter of a 21st-century COINTELPRO,” he told reporters. And activists say the fight is just beginning.   

“This is part of a long-term strategy,” Linda Sarsour, a prominent Palestinian-American activist in the NYC Muslim community, recently wrote. “We are not just reacting anymore.” 
 
Alex Kane is a staff reporter for Mondoweiss and a freelance journalist based in New York. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12522848


Gene Sharp: Author of the nonviolent revolution rulebook

Gene Sharp

In an old townhouse in East Boston an elderly stooped man is tending rare orchids in his shabby office. His Labrador Sally lies on the floor between stacks of academic papers watching him as he shuffles past.

This is Dr Gene Sharp the man now credited with the strategy behind the toppling of the Egyptian government.

Gene Sharp is the world's foremost expert on non-violent revolution. His work has been translated into more than 30 languages, his books slipped across borders and hidden from secret policemen all over the world.
 

Key Steps on the Path to Revolution

Gene Sharp book
  • Develop a strategy for winning freedom and a vision of the society you want
  • Overcome fear by small acts of resistance
  • Use colours and symbols to demonstrate unity of resistance
  • Learn from historical examples of the successes of non-violent movements
  • Use non-violent "weapons"
  • Identify the dictatorship's pillars of support and develop a strategy for undermining each
  • Use oppressive or brutal acts by the regime as a recruiting tool for your movement
  • Isolate or remove from the movement people who use or advocate violence
As Slobodan Milosevic in Serbia and Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine fell to the colour revolutions which swept across Eastern Europe, each of the democratic movements paid tribute to Sharp's contribution, yet he remained largely unknown to the public.

Despite these successes and a Nobel Peace Prize nomination in 2009 he has faced almost constant financial hardship and wild accusations of being a CIA front organisation. The Albert Einstein Institution based on the ground floor of his home is kept running by sheer force of personality and his fiercely loyal Executive Director, Jamila Raqib.

In 2009 I began filming a documentary following the impact of Sharp's work from his tranquil rooftop orchid house, across four continents and eventually to Tahrir square where I slept alongside protesters who read his work by torchlight in the shadow of tanks.

Gene Sharp is no Che Guevara but he may have had more influence than any other political theorist of his generation.

His central message is that the power of dictatorships comes from the willing obedience of the people they govern - and that if the people can develop techniques of withholding their consent, a regime will crumble.

For decades now, people living under authoritarian regimes have made a pilgrimage to Gene Sharp for advice. His writing has helped millions of people around the world achieve their freedom without violence. "As soon as you choose to fight with violence you're choosing to fight against your opponents best weapons and you have to be smarter than that," he insists.

"People might be a little surprised when they come here, I don't tell them what to do. They've got to learn how this non-violent struggle works so they can do it for themselves."
 
Catching fire
To do this Sharp provides in his books a list of 198 "non-violent weapons", ranging from the use of colours and symbols to mock funerals and boycotts.

Designed to be the direct equivalent of military weapons, they are techniques collated from a forensic study of defiance to tyranny throughout history.

"These non-violent weapons are very important because they give people an alternative," he says. "If people don't have these, if they can't see that they are very powerful, they will go back to violence and war every time."

After the Green uprising in Iran in 2009 many of the protesters were accused at their trials of using more than 100 of Sharp's 198 methods.

His most translated and distributed work, From Dictatorship to Democracy was written for the Burmese democratic movement in 1993, after the imprisonment of Aung San Suu Kyi.
 

“Start Quote

It was important because some of the Gabonese were talking about a violent option - I was able to say: 'Hang on guys there's another option here'”
Supermodel Gloria Mika

Because he had no specialist knowledge of the country he wrote a guide to toppling a dictatorship which was entirely generic. But Sharp's weakness became the strength of the book allowing it to be easily translated and applicable in any country of the world across cultural and religious boundaries.

The book caught fire figuratively and literally.

From Burma word of mouth spread through Thailand to Indonesia where it was used against the military dictatorship there. Its success in helping to bring down Milosevic in Serbia in 2000 propelled it into use across Eastern Europe, South America and the Middle East.

When it reached Russia the intelligence services raided the print shop and the shops selling it mysteriously burned to the ground.

The Iranians became so worried they broadcast an animated propaganda film on state TV - of Gene Sharp plotting the overthrow of Iran from The White House.

President Hugo Chavez used his weekly television address to warn the country that Sharp was a threat to the national security of Venezuela.
 
Serbian connection
After recent allegations of vote rigging in her home country of Gabon, supermodel and activist Gloria Mika travelled to Boston to meet Sharp.

A Nonviolent Life

  • Born January 1928 in Ohio
  • Jailed for nine months in 1953-4 for protesting against conscription of young men to fight in Korean War
  • Albert Einstein wrote the foreword to his first book - Gandhi Wields the Weapon of Moral Power: Three Case Histories - published in 1960
  • His 1968 Oxford University D Phil, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, formed the basis of a book with the same title, published in 1973
  • Professor (now emeritus professor) of political science at the University of Massachusetts since 1972, while simultaneously holding research positions at Harvard University
  • Founded the Albert Einstein Institution in 1983, a non-profit organisation advancing the use of non-violent action in conflict around the world
"I felt like I was going to meet the main man in terms of non-violent resistance in the world," she says. "It was important because some of the Gabonese were talking about a violent option. They were saying, let's go and kill some people and I was able to say: 'Hang on guys there's another option here.'"

The Serbs who had used his books as a theoretical base for their activities founded their own organisation called the Centre for Applied Non Violence (CANVAS), and alongside their own materials have carried out workshops using Sharp's work in dozens of other countries.

When I met Srdja Popovic the director of CANVAS in Belgrade in November he confirmed that they had been working with Egyptians. "That's the power of Sharp's work and this non-violent struggle," he says. "It doesn't matter who you are - black, white, Muslim, Christian, gay, straight or oppressed minority - it's useable. If they study it, anybody can do this."
 
Photocopies in Arabic
By the time I arrived in Tahrir square on 2 February many of those trained in Sharp's work were in detention. Others were under close observation by the intelligence services and journalists who visited them were detained for hours by the secret police. My own camera equipment was seized as soon as I landed.
 

“Start Quote

This is an Egyptian revolution - we are not being told what to do by the Americans”
Mahmoud Tahrir Square protester

When I finally reached one of the organisers he refused to talk about Sharp on camera. He feared that wider knowledge of a US influence would destabilise the movement but confirmed that the work had been widely distributed in Arabic.

"One of the main points which we used was Sharp's idea of identifying a regime's pillars of support," he said. "If we could build a relationship with the army, Mubarak's biggest pillar of support, to get them on our side, then we knew he would quickly be finished."

That night as I settled down to sleep in a corner of Tahrir square some of the protesters came to show me text messages they said were from the army telling them that they wouldn't shoot. "We know them and we know they are on our side now," they said.

One of the protesters, Mahmoud, had been given photocopies of a handout containing the list of 198 methods but he was unaware of their origins. He proudly described how many of them had been used in Egypt but he had never heard of Gene Sharp.

When I pointed out that these non-violent weapons were the writings of an American academic he protested strongly. "This is an Egyptian revolution", he said. "We are not being told what to do by the Americans."

And of course that is exactly what Sharp would want.

Ruaridh Arrow's film, Gene Sharp: How to Start a Revolution, will be released in spring 2011

Comments posted on Indian Express website over Oped article:Tehran Test -

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

Comments posted on Indian Express website over Oped article:Tehran Test - 

If US wants India to bend, the writer wants India to crawl. It is a pity that nobody with any spine stands up for India to have its own independent policies that not only impacts on its own interests, but in a wider sense, impact the world around us. If US and Israel's security interests, are centered on regime change in Iran, why India's own need for stability and peace in the region should not be openly and vociferously articulated by India in world forums and international media. Nobody wants war in our neighborhood and it would seem, US and Israel are bent to force their high-handed agenda of imposing their will on UN member countries through use of force. India must announce a blanket policy of ‘hands- off’ in such misadventures. People of India will overwhelmingly support their government’s peace initiatives. India does have support from China, Russia and other nations and its should use that influence to ward off all such evil designs of USA and Israel in this area. Let South East Asia be a zone of peace.

Ghulam Muhammed (Mumbai)
------

The Tehran test
Pranab Dhal Samanta : Wed Feb 01 2012, 23:40 hrs

The real problem for India, post sanctions, is political, not financial

On the face of it, India is facing a tough challenge squaring up its oil bill with Iran. The problem gets more complex when one realises that most options are geared towards paying up accumulated dues, while the current oil bill with Iran also continues to rise. The bottom line is that even this year supplies from Iran will be around 12 per cent of India’s total oil import. So when Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee says in the US that India will continue to import oil from Iran, he is actually underlining New Delhi’s compulsion, not taking a position or asserting a point of view.

A concise overview of the situation shows that largely five oil majors, four PSUs and one private company, are commercially exposed to Iran. The onset of UN sanctions led to the collapse of the earlier mode of payment through the Asian Clearing Union mechanism. The RBI then allowed entities to settle payments of legitimate transactions through any acceptable currency outside the ACU.

Indian trade with Iran was being settled through euros. Even later, Delhi continued to make these payments through eurozone banks until bank after bank began to close their Iran account for fear of sanctions. At present, India is making its payments through the Halkbank, Turkey, which too is beginning to feel the pressure.

These knotty details apart, the real problem is political, not financial. For far too long the issue has remained in the realm of the entities themselves, the petroleum ministry or, at the most, the finance ministry, while it was all along a strategic question — an issue of international politics, requiring a more political approach.

It was only a matter of time before the West would target Iran’s petroleum business. The Obama administration has made its first move in an election year after indications of Iran developing a nuclear weapon — although there is still no clinching proof. The EU has followed suit.

Before moving further, it’s important to understand what the US, as lead actor, has actually done. Barack Obama has signed into law this month a fresh set of sanctions on Iran, after due Congressional approval, under the National Defence Authorisation Act. This targets Iran’s proceeds from petroleum exports, which have internationally been allowed to continue because oil is an essential commodity.

Without getting into the tricky affair of placing an embargo on Iranian oil, the US law states that foreign financial institutions which conduct any “significant financial transaction” with Iran for petroleum products will be barred from transaction in the US. This provision becomes effective from March 1.

There’s a second provision, which targets state financial institutions and even foreign central banks, which conduct transaction with Iran on petroleum products. This will kick in six months later. The only pre-condition for these sanctions to become effective is a determination by Obama that the international market position is such that there’s adequate fuel to keep oil prices at a reasonable level.

The US seems to have worked this out with OPEC, which has calculated that removing Iranian oil from the market would result in a loss of about 10 billion barrels per day. It’s reliably learnt Saudi Arabia has officially agreed and, in fact, made a commitment to OPEC for an additional 30 billion barrels a day, in case Iranian oil doesn’t reach the market. This commitment is bound to strengthen Obama’s hand to make such a determination, which could be vital for him in this election year.

Where does all this leave India? There are two routes — an exemption or a waiver, and both, in a sense, are mutually exclusive. The US law states the president can exempt a foreign financial entity for conducting business with Iran provided the country of primary jurisdiction has reduced import of Iranian petroleum products. This would essentially mean Indo-Iran oil trade has to show a declining trend to escape sanctions on Indian financial institutions. However, an exemption would be time-bound and up for periodic review.

As for the waiver, it can only be considered once sanctions have been enforced. This would mean that first an Indian entity must face sanctions, only then can the US consider a waiver which has a lifespan of 120 days, during which the president has to send a report on the country’s compliance with the sanctions.

All this is not a sudden development. That’s why other big economies like China, Japan and South Korea made their own bilateral arrangements with Iran, almost a year ago, to ensure no disruption to their oil supplies. They entered into a barter system of sorts, offsetting oil purchases through increased exports in other goods. The Japanese also drove home the advantage of a fully convertible yen, a currency Iran is happy to hold.

India, on the other hand, has very few exports and the rupee, partially convertible, does not make much sense for Iran. Yet, Tehran has agreed to settle at least 30 per cent (figure could go higher) through the rupee. There’s also the option of project exports by undertaking infrastructure contracts in Iran; re-exporting goods Iran requires from a third country; or high-seas sales and payment, outside either country’s territorial limits. All these measures are under consideration. But they are, at best, innovative responses to a crisis, not a credible solution.

Even at this late stage, India has to work towards a political resolution, else Indian entities will be under constant threat of sanctions. Put simply, India has to build a case for an exemption package and, internally, ensure entities dealing with Iran have minimal or no exposure to the US financial system. To build a case for an India-specific exemption will require political heavy-lifting in Washington because Delhi is likely to want more favourable terms than those laid out in the exemption provision within the law.

This will test the tenacity of the Indo-US strategic partnership and that’s why Delhi will have to broaden the conversation on Iran. For instance, bringing to the table the consequences of India’s gradual disengagement with Iran on the Af-Pak scenario — the US has failed to make Pakistan agree on transit for India, which means Iran remains the best access point for India. Does the US want India’s role to diminish in Afghanistan? Also, targeting Indian entities would pass on the advantage to China, making it almost indispensable to Iran — is that a desirable strategic outcome for the US?

There are many more such connected questions, but for all of this India needs a more focused bilateral dialogue with the US on Iran — giving it the necessary political impetus and aiming for a solution, knowing well this is not about oil alone. The US recognising India’s unique situation and Delhi committing to look at other petroleum sources could be a good starting point.


Monday, January 30, 2012

INDIAN JUSTICE FOR AN INDIAN MUSLIM - " Court acquits 4. So who killed Adnan Patrawala? - Rebecca Samervel - The Times of India, Mumbai, India

INDIAN JUSTICE FOR AN INDIAN MUSLIM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Court-acquits-4-So-who-killed-Adnan-Patrawala/articleshow/11691815.cms

The Times of India
Mumbai

Court acquits 4. So who killed Adnan Patrawala?

Rebecca Samervel, TNN | Jan 31, 2012, 12.34AM IST
MUMBAI: Four-and-a-half years after the sensational murder of Lokhandwala teenager Adnan Patrawala, a sessions court on Monday freed four men accused of the brutal strangulation. Pronouncing the verdict at 1.30pm, judge S A Deshmukh acquitted Sujit Nair, now 33 years of age, Ayush Bhat, 23, Rajiv Dhariya, 28, and Amit Kaushal, 29.

The judgment was pronounced in-camera without the media present. The entire judgment was not read out. Even the families of the accused were not allowed in court when the judgment was pronounced.

Nair's defence lawyer Ashish Chavan, who was present in court during the pronouncement, said, "The court has rubbished the conspiracy theories by the prosecution. With the chain of circumstances not being proved in court, the case has gone in favour of the defence."

The prosecution had alleged that on the night of August 18 and on August 19, Nair, Bhat, Dhariya, Kaushal and a minor had kidnapped Adnan, the son of a Lokhandwala businessman. They drove off with him from Malad's Inorbit mall and allegedly strangled the teenager in Navi Mumbai after a plan to extort Rs 2 crore from his family as ransom went awry and the police got wind of the kidnapping. Patrawala's body was found near his car in the marsh by Palm Beach Road, Nerul, Navi Mumbai.

The entire judgement, along with the reasons for the acquittals, will be available only after the judge releases the document. Special public prosecutor Ujwal Nikam was not present in court on Monday.

Though Patrawala's parents were not in court on Monday, they were keenly involved in all aspects of the case. Patrawala's father Aslam said, "We are in deep shock after hearing the judgment. Justice has been denied to us. It was a clear case for conviction, but I don't know what went wrong. After discussing the details with the special public prosecutor, we will decide our further course of action."

Bhat, when asked for his reaction outside the court after his acquittal, told TOI, "I am very relieved. It hasn't sunk in yet."

During the trial, the prosecution examined about 25 witnesses, of whom one turned hostile. The case was largely based on circumstantial evidence, which the prosecution dubbed as "strong". According to the prosecution, two key witnesses were a man who had seen the victim in a drowsy condition in the company of the accused on the night of the kidnapping and another man who heard the conspiracy being hatched.

The defence had argued that there were several lapses in the investigation. Chavan told TOI, "The court rejected the witness's claim that he had heard the accused hatching the plan to kidnap Adnan in a shopping mall. The entire chain of circumstance is required to establish that the evidence is of believable and cogent nature, and this is lacking. The prosecution has failed to prove the case beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt." Chavan further stated that the court raised questions on the prosecution's claims about the recovery of the body.

A fifth accused, who is a minor, is still to stand trial in a juvenile court for the murder that unfolded during a weekend in August 2007. The observations of the sessions court will be taken into consideration then.

----------http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/11693246.cms

3 cops were moved out for 'botch-up'

TNN | Jan 31, 2012, 03.44AM IST
Days after Adnan Patrawala was murdered, three policemen were transferred from the Oshiwara police station, where the teen's parents had filed a case, to the low-profile Local Arms division. It was claimed that the officers were reassigned because of the mishandling of the Patrawala case, though the police officially denied it then.

Adnan's parents were first contacted on phone by their son's kidnappers on the morning of August 19, 2007, immediately after which they approached the Oshiwara police. The police advised the Patrawalas to negotiate with the abductors. In the meanwhile, though, the news of the kidnapping was leaked-reportedly by some policemen-to TV news channels, which promptly put it on air. The abductors, it is believed, panicked at watching the news and killed Adnan in a bid to get rid of the evidence. His body was recovered from a marsh near Palm Beach Road, Nerul, on August 20.

Less than a week later, assistant police inspector Ashok Ratnaparikh, and sub inspectors Vilas More and Jameel Shaikh were transferred out of Oshiwara police station. Ratnaparikh and More were handling the Patrawala case. Yet, then deputy commissioner of police (Zone 9), Vinay Chaube, had insisted that the transfers were carried out on administrative grounds. Simultaneously, then Mumbai police commissioner D N Jadhav had promised that a probe he had set up would find out "if any police officer had irresponsibly leaked information which resulted in Patrawala's killing".

Friday, January 27, 2012

Write, wrong - By Shahid Siddiqui - The Indian Express, Mumbai

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/write-wrong/904697/0

Sat, 28 Jan 2012

Write, wrong

By Shahid Siddiqui : Sat Jan 28 2012, 03:29 hrs

Here is a fundamental question to friends and supporters of Salman Rushdie: Is the right to speech and expression absolute, without any restrictions, in any democratic society? The right to freedom of expression is recognised as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 19 goes on to say that the exercise of this right carries “special duties and responsibilities” and may “therefore be subject to certain restrictions” when necessary “for respect of the rights or reputation of others, or for the protection of national security or public order, or of public health or morals”. Under democratic constitutions, this right is commonly subject to limitations, such as libel, slander, obscenity, incitement to commit violence or a crime. Hate speech against any group, community, race, religion or colour is a crime in any free and democratic society of the world.
Those who supported Rushdie said that the book, The Satanic Verses, was banned but not the writer. The writer has committed the crime of hate and abusive speech but his freedom of movement cannot be restricted. Did Rushdie and his friends who are questioning Indian democracy, raise their voice when the Indian Islamic preacher Zakir Naik was banned from entering Britain in June 2010 and later banned by the US? The British home secretary then said “coming to the UK is a privilege not a right, and I am not willing to allow those who might not be conducive to the public good to enter the UK”. This is not an isolated case, hundreds of people with valid documents are stopped from entering these great democracies, and their right to free speech and movement are curtailed without any reason, based on the whims and fancies of some bigoted bureaucrats. Islamophobia has become so prevalent in these Western democracies that sometimes mere name is reason enough to stop individuals from entering these countries .

There are hundreds of books critical of Islam, the Holy Prophet or the Quran. Some of these writings are offensive and full of misleading or distorted facts. But there has never been any global public outcry against these books. One can always reply to criticism by writing another book to counter such propaganda, but how do you reply to pure abusive and vulgar writing and imagery? 

According to Islamic studies scholar Anthony McRoy, what Muslims find blasphemous is the name “Mahound”, a derogatory term for Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) used during the Crusades and which means the lowest creature from the depth of hell. In fact, the most offensive parts of the book are the abusive words in Hindi (gaali), freely used against Mahound by Gabriel Farishta, who is a Bollywood film star turned into an angel. A brothel is staffed by prostitutes who take the names of the Prophet’s wives, with Hazrat Omar, the close companion, as the brothel keeper. Saladin, the great Egyptian ruler, who defeated the Crusaders, is depicted as a devil or shaitan. Even the crusaders had nothing but praise for Saladin. Rushdie’s writings are so offensive that they cannot be quoted in any responsible and respectable magazine or newspaper. The result is that not only those who oppose him, but even those who support him, have either not read or understood the context in which Rushdie is creating his magic realism and its not-so-fictitious characters.

I was one of those few persons who was offered the manuscript of The Satanic Verses before its publication by Penguin India to offer my comments, as the publishers themselves were doubtful of the impact the book would create in India. I recommended to the publishers that the book should not come to India as the communal situation at that point (1988) was not conducive to such writings due to the Babri Masjid controversy. Emotions were already inflamed and the book could be used by communalists on both sides of the divide to exploit passions and sentiments. The book was banned quietly by the government, avoiding much controversy or protests from Indian Muslims. It is the fatwa by the Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah Khomeini which led to global protest and the larger controversy. Even then, the majority of Muslims opposed the fatwa. Indian Muslims at no point supported it.

However the Western world, which was desperately looking for a convenient target after the decline of Soviet Union, picked up the chant to protect Rushdie and demonise Islam, Muslims and their governments. They spent millions of dollars not only for the sake of “right to freedom of expression” but to use this issue to garner political support to isolate Iran and justify their Islamophobia. Is it a coincidence that The Satanic Verses unleashed the anti-Islam propaganda, which has led to many unjustified wars, killing of millions of innocent people and demonising a whole religion and its 1,500 million believers around the world.

Salman Rushdie and his publishers took no time in apologising to Indira Gandhi and editing the offensive portions from Midnight’s Children. At that point he and his publishers did not take the moral high ground of absolute, unrestricted right to creative freedom. Is it because her lawyers had filed a libel case in British courts and they might have had to pay a huge amount for this offence? The same people made huge amount of money from the Satanic Verses controversy and turned the abusive writer into a hero, celebrity and millionaire. Many British writers and a section of the media at that time alleged that the publishers stoked the fires of anguish and anger to exploit the controversy.

If Rushdie had written against Jesus Christ what he wrote against the Prophet he would have been prosecuted under the British blasphemy law, which was partisan in nature and under it the maximum punishment was the death sentence. The law was abandoned by the British parliament in May 2008. However, at the time of the controversy in 1988, Rushdie took refuge in England to save himself from prosecution by arguing that he had not offended Jesus Christ, Bible or the basic tenets of Christianity and therefore blasphemy law was not applicable to him.

Denying or questioning the Holocaust is a crime in most European democracies. Many countries have broader laws that criminalise genocide denial. Michael Whine argues that Holocaust denial can inspire violence. Many writers such as Raul Hilberg, Richard J. Evans, Noam Chomsky, Peter Singer and Christopher Hitchens have regarded these laws as limiting the freedom to investigate, research and write.

I don’t deny the right of people to eulogies Rushdie and regard his writings as the litmus test for the protection of right to speech. In India, believers of all faiths have lived together for thousands of years. In the thousand years of Muslims presence in India we do not come across any writing abusive of Hindu gods and religious figures by any prominent writer or poet. We do read the poems of Ras Khan in Brijbhasha eulogising Lord Krishna, or Abdul Rahim Khankhana translating Ramayana and Mahabharata into Persian. A book can well be written on the contribution of Muslim scholars and poets in propagating and appreciating Hindu gods, goddesses and religious books. In India there is hardly any example of writings by Hindu or Sikh writers critical of the Prophet or the tenets of Islam.

I would, therefore, request the supporters of Rushdie not to impose their idea of freedom on Indian society. If they are for absolute freedom of expression, let them first fight for it in Western democracies. Indian intelligentsia will do well to ponder over these issues dispassionately and not be swayed by Rushdie-ism and votaries of unfettered freedom of expression.


The writer is editor, ‘Nai Duniya’ (Urdu), and a former MP [Member of Indian Parliament],
 





Thursday, January 26, 2012

Letter to India's Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh from Ghulam Muhammed (Mumbai)

Dear Prime Minister,

Please watch Vandana Shiva's lecture on Hegemony as a favour to the nation:

http://vimeo.com/channels/tvmultiversity#14641370

Best regards

Ghulam Muhammed, (Mumbai).
  

from: Ghulam Muhammed ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com
to: manmohan sigh
cc: 2020@abc.com,
 aalamisahara@rediffmail.com,
 abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com,
 afzal_mir@hotmail.com,
 aghaksaeed@yahoo.com,
 agnitimes@yahoo.com,
 agnivesh70@gmail.com,
 ahmadinteraction@gmail.com,
 aijazsyed@khaleejtimes.com,
 akhbarenaunews@yahoo.co.in,
 almaeena@arabnews.com,
 amahmadi@detaone.in,
 amana@arf-asia.org,
 ambassador@embassyofpakistanusa.org,
 amkindia@gmail.com,
 anwarhkhan@yahoo.com,
 arshad662@gmail.com,
 ashraf.engineer@hindustantimes.com,
 ashraf@idafa.com,
 asidd66@yahoo.com,
 au_asif@yahoo.co.in,
 ayesha.khan@expressindia.com,
 azim.premji@wipro.com,
 bagsiraj@yahoo.com,
 Bakhtiarspace-articles@yahoo.no,
 Barkha@ndtv.com,
 bbcworld@bbc.co.uk,
 chairmannmc@nic.in,
 cpi@vsnl.com,
 crmohan53@gmail.com,
 ctc-tribletter@tribune.com,
 dateline@nbc.com,
 desk@asianews.it,
 drbhandankar@sify.com,
 editor@chinadailyapac.com,
 editor@islamicamagazine.com,
 editor@metimes.com,
 editor@newageislam.com,
 editor@todayszaman.com,
 editor@usatoday.com,
 editpage@expressindia.com,
 english@palestine-info.co.uk,
 epw.mumbai@gmail.com,
 fair@fair.org,
 Foxreport@foxnews.com,
 ftn@cbsnews.com,
 hardball@msnbc.com,
 hasanshabbir@googlegroups.com,
 humanrights-movement@googlegroups.com,
 info@ap.org,
 info@isim.nl,
 info@muslimobserver.com,
 irenaakbar@gmail.com,
 ismailp@gmail.com,
 jadeedmarkaz@gmail.com,
 jameel.shaik@gmail.com,
 kalingatimes@gmail.com,
 letters@newsweek.com,
 letters@usnews.com,
 m_salam2525@yahoo.com,
 magazine@dawn.com,
 mahmood_madani@vsnl.net,
 manderharsh@gmail.com,
 manoharbiswas@yahoo.co.in,
 markazeislami@gmail.com,
 markazulmaarif@yahoogroups.com,
 mcbmedia@mcb.org.uk,
 mdshafiaga@gmail.com,
 mehmal@gmail.com,
 memehdi_jalil@yahoo.co.in,
 mohammed.kazim@mid-day.com,
 mohsinhamid@hotmail.co.uk,
 morning@npr.org,
 mssondhi@hotmail.com,
 mubasshir.ahmed@gmail.com,
 Muslims_Network@yahoogroups.com,
 mytimesmyvoice@timesgroup.com,
 nasirabid@yahoo.com,
 nation_world@rediffmail.com,
 netaudr@abc.com,
 news@alqamar.org,
 newsbureau@etemaaddaily.com,
 newswatchindia@gmail.com,
 newzmag@yahoo.com,
 nightly@nbc.com,
 np@canadianislamiccongress.com,
 nrindians@googlegroups.com,
 nytnews@nytimes.com,
 ombudsman@npr.org,
 ombudsman@washpost.com,
 Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
 Oreilly@foxnews.com,
 Peaceparty11@gmail.com,
 pervezbari@eth.net,
 prannoy@ndtv.com,
 pressforum@googlegroups.com,
 progressive-interactions@googlegroups.com,
 pti@trans.in,
 publisher@muslimfreepress.com,
 qasimsyed2008@gmail.com,
 qaumiawazdelhi@erdiffmail.com,
 qurban100@gmail.com,
 rahmank@hotmail.com,
 raja.abdulrahim@latimes.com,
 ramguha@vsnl.com,
 rao@indiatribune.com,
 rinaislamicnewsagency@yahoo.co.in,
 rizvisha4u@yahoo.com,
 rshabeeb@gmail.com,
 rush@eibnet.com,
 sadiyachaudhary@gmail.com,
 saeedhameed@yahoo.com,
 sager@grc.ae,
 sahafatdaily@yahoo.co.uk,
 sahildaily@hotmail.com,
 sajadeepti@yahoo.com,
 sardesai.rajdeep@gmail.com,
 sarind@hotmail.com,
 sayeed.myindia@gmail.com,
 secretaryhes@bol.net.in,
 shad.shahid@gmail.com,
 shadabit@yahoo.com,
 shakil_313@yahoo.com,
 shehnaz@vsnl.com,
 shekhargupta-q@express2.indexp.co.in,
 shobha.sivakumar@merinews.com,
 shobhaa@shobhaade.in,
 socialist_pakistan_news@yahoogroups.com,
 south@southasiaanalysis.org,
 Special@foxnews.com,
 sudheenkulkarni@gmail.com,
 sunandadr@yahoo.co.in,
 syed_waseemuddin@yahoo.com,
 syedsajid_aziz@yahoo.com,
 tanveerjafri58@gmail.com,
 tanveerjafriamb@gmail.com,
 tariqali3@btinternet.com,
 teestateesta@gmail.com,
 tharoor.assistant@gmail.com,
 thedailymails@yahoo.com,
 Tinashaikh@yahoo.com,
 today@nbc.com,
 totn@npr.org,
 tsajjad@hotmail.com,
 u_goyas@yahoo.com,
 UrduTalkRadio@googlegroups.com,
 voiceofkashmir@rediffmail.com,
 wahaj321@yahoo.com,
 waseemahmedshaikh@gmail.com,
 wass@spa.gov.sa,
 webmaster@allama-mashriqi.8m.com,
 webmaster@jasarat.com,
 webmaster@nation.com.pk,
 webmaster@rense.com,
 webmaswebmaster@asiantribune.com,
 writeziya@gmail.com,
 yaseen36@gmail.com,
 yawar@yawarbaig.com,
 yogendra.yadav@gmail.com,
 yusufjameel@gmail.com,
 zafar_agha@yahoo.co.in,
 zeeshan.shaikh@hindustantimes.com,
 Zia.Haq@hindustantimes.com,
 SHAHI IMAM AHAMED BUKHARI ,
 786 <786@muslimrevival.com>,
 "[Offline] Mujtaba Farooq" ,
 aariz_mohammed ,
 Abdul Hafiz Lakhani ,
 Abdul Hasib ,
 Abdul Wahid Azad ,
 "abdulrahim92@hotmail.com" ,
 Abdus Sattar Ghazali ,
 "ablipi@yahoo.com" ,
 abu zafar ,
 "abuasimazmi@hotmail.com" ,
 "admin@mcb.org.uk" ,
 afternoonletters ,
 ahmed soroor ,
 "ahmedazam007@yahoo.com" ,
 "ahramdaily@ahram.org.eg" ,
 akbar hasan ,
 Akhtar Ali Khan ,
 Alan Border ,
 "aligarhnetwork@yahoogroups.com" ,
 "alihasan222@aol.com" ,
 Amanullah Khan ,
 Amaresh Misra ,
 "amirali@ilaam.net" ,
 amr_cnbc ,
 andalib akhter ,
 anees ,
 "arifiqbalubr@yahoo.co.in" ,
 arshi khan ,
 "arsna@aol.com" ,
 "ashraf4916@hotmail.com" ,
 "asif_faki@hotmail.com" ,
 aslam ghazi ,
 "atharjnu@yahoo.co.in" ,
 avnery ,
 "ayesha.jalal@tufts.edu" ,
 "ayubpathan@hotmail.com" ,
 Aziz Burney ,
 "b_qasmi@hotmail.com" ,
 Badri Raina ,
 Bashiruddin Babukhan ,
 BBC World Service ,
 "cair@cair-net.org" ,
 CARD ,
 "cdlr_massari@hotmail.com" ,
 Christophe Jaffrelot ,
 "comments@foxnews.com" ,
 "comments@truthout.org" ,
 Cowasjee Dawn ,
 Daily Millat ,
 danish reyaz ,
 Dr A R Mookhi ,
 Dr Arshad G Moh'd ,
 Dr Shahid Geo TV ,
 "Dr. M I H Farooqi" ,
 "Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam" ,
 "DR.QASIM RASOOL ILYAS" ,
 "dr_phirozp@hotmail.com" ,
 "drabdulkarimnaik@yahoo.com" ,
 "drrehmani2003@yahoo.co.in" ,
 drsalimkhan ,
 "dtletters@telegraph.co.uk" ,
 "editet@timesgroup.com" ,
 editor ,
 editor ,
 "editor@aljazeerah.info" ,
 "editor@amperspective.com" ,
 "editor@centralchronical.com" ,
 "editor@deccanherald.co.in" ,
 "editor@deccanmail.com" ,
 "editor@ibnlive.com" ,
 "editor@iexpressusa.com" ,
 "editor@medialens.org" ,
 "Editor@MediaMonitors.net" ,
 "editor@muslimedia.com" ,
 "editor@nawaiwaqt.com.pk" ,
 "editor@newsindia-times.com" ,
 "editor@nytimes.com" ,
 "editor@the-week.com" ,
 "editor@themuslimweekly.com" ,
 "editor@urdutimes.org" ,
 "editorial@indiaabroad.com" ,
 "editors@newsweek.com" ,
 ehtasham khan ,
 "expressletters@express.co.uk" ,
 "f.khan@unsw.edu.au" ,
 "faisal_amaan@hotmail.com" ,
 "faisalmugal39@gmail.com" ,
 Faizee Aleem ,
 Fariduddin Chaudhari ,
 "farrukh15@hotmail.com" ,
 "faruqui@pacbell.net" ,
 "feedback@tehelka.com" ,
 Feroze Mithiborwala ,
 "fffkochi@yahoo.com" ,
 Financial Times ,
 "fpj@vsnl.com" ,
 "FPRI@fpri.org" ,
 Friday Times ,
 "frontline@thehindu.co.in" ,
 "G. R. Siddiqui" ,
 ghaziahmed shaikh ,
 "GM.Shaikh" ,
 "gpshaikh@rediff.com" ,
 habeeb haris ,
 hanif lakdawala ,
 Hasan Shabbir ,
 haseeb ,
 "hasniessa@yahoo.com" ,
 "hina.rind@gmail.com" ,
 "hindustanexpress@yahoo.com" ,
 "hsiddiq@thestar.ca" ,
 "hsitah9@yahoo.com" ,
 "hyd1_munsif@sancharnet.in" ,
 "iahmad@nicholaspiramal.co.in" ,
 "id_nadeem@yahoo.co.in" ,
 "ideamumbai@yahoo.com" ,
 "iftikharigilani@gmail.com" ,
 "iht-letters@iht.com" ,
 "imtiyazkhaleel@gmail.com" ,
 Inayat Lalani ,
 "indermalhotra30@hotmail.com" ,
 Indian Muslim Council ,
 Indian Muslims ,
 Indian Muslims ,
 Info ,
 "info@beiruttimes.com" ,
 "info@ibn.net" ,
 "info@ihrc.org" ,
 "info@jamiat.org.za" ,
 "info@mediareviewnet.com" ,
 "info@merinews.com" ,
 "info@mpacuk.org" ,
 "info@oic-oci.org" ,
 "info@palestinechronicle.com" ,
 "info@prc.org.uk" ,
 "info@shanghaidaily.com" ,
 "info@siasat.com" ,
 "info@yvonneridley.org" ,
 "international@upi.com" ,
 "iqbalgauhar@gmail.com" ,
 "ircg_clhg@yahoo.com" ,
 Irfan Asgharali ,
 "iscrmohan@ntu.edu.sg" ,
 "islam@irf.net" ,
 "j.steele@guardian.co.uk" ,
 "jadidkhabar@rediffmail.com" ,
 "jamaat@del6.vsnl.net.in" ,
 "jamiatulama@bol.net.in" ,
 javed jamil ,
 "javedjamil@rediffmail.com" ,
 "javeed_kn@yahoo.com" ,
 "jawed@muslimsweekly.com" ,
 John Dayal ,
 "jotimes@jpf.com.jo" ,
 Junaid ,
 Juzar Bandukwala ,
 Juzer Mohammed Husain ,
 "kamalfaruqui@hotmail.com" ,
 Karamatullah Ghori ,
 Kaukab Siddique ,
 "kbatarfi@al-madina.com.sa" ,
 "khabardaar@bol.net.in" ,
 Khalid Sabir ,
 "khalidali.alig@gmail.com" ,
 Khan Arif ,
 "khanziya@rediffmail.com" ,
 "khateeb63@msn.com" ,
 "khwaja1956@rediffmail.com" ,
 "kinalur@gmail.com" ,
 "korawa@hotmail.com" ,
 "ktimes@emirates.net.ae" ,
 "kuldipnayar75@yahoo.com" ,
 "letter2editor@gulfnews.com" ,
 "letter@globe.com" ,
 "letters.editor@intoday.com" ,
 "letters@arabnews.com" ,
 "letters@atimes.com" ,
 "letters@dailytimes.com.pk" ,
 "letters@dawn.com" ,
 "letters@hardnewsmedia.com" ,
 "letters@hindustantimes.com" ,
 "letters@independent.co.uk" ,
 "letters@latimes.com" ,
 "letters@msnbc.com" ,
 "letters@newint.org" ,
 "letters@newsday.com" ,
 "letters@slate.com" ,
 "letters@taipeitimes.com" ,
 "letters@theage.com.au" ,
 "letters@thehindu.co.in" ,
 "letters@thetimes.co.uk" ,
 "letters@tribuneindia.com" ,  "letters@washingtontimes.com" , "letters@washpost.com" , "lettertoed@thestar.ca" , "lheard@gulfnews.com" , "lodi@vsnl.com" , "M. Faruqui" , "ma@ajmal.net" , "mahmoodfarooqui@yahoo.com" , Mahtab Alam , "mail@jimas.org" , "mailed@nstp.com.my" , Majid , majlis muslim , malikkazim2000 , Manoj Padhi , "mansur_asgarali@hotmail.com" , "manzoor@ndf.vsnl.net.in" , "manzurejaz@yahoo.com" , "MB. Qasmi" , "mbeg@gsa.state.al.us" , "medasia@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in" , MEDIA CELL , "mediakhalid@yahoo.com" , "mediaw@hotmail.com" , "mehmoodabdi@rediffmail.com" , "mfmas@wiu.edu" , MIRZA ANWARULHAQ , Mirza Taqiuddin , mjamal patiwala , "mkara@radioislam.co.za" , "mkasiddiqui@yahoo.com" , "mkememon@hotmail.com" , "mnazamir@btopenworld.com" , Mohd Sajid Shaikh , "Mohd. Shariq" , Mohsin Khan , muazzam naik , Mujeeb Adil , "mumtaz_1@hotmail.com" , "Munsif Urdu Daily, Hyderabad" , "muqtedarkhan786@yahoo.com" , musaed alsubaie , "muslim@del3.vsnl.net.in" , "muslim@ndc.vsnl.net.in" , "muslimparliament@hotmail.com" , "mzkirmani@hotmail.com" , "nadwa@sancharnet.in" , Nasimul Hasan , "nasimzehra@hotmail.com" , Nasir Rakhangi , navaid hamid , "news@muslimsweekly.com" , "news@timeatlantic.com" , "newseditor@channelnewsasia.com" , Newsfromindia786 , "newsroom@news.com.au" , nigar , "nmuhammadh@yahoo.com" , OIc News , "oiccabinet@arab.net.sa" , "okhalidi@mit.edu" , "Omarhuda@aol.com" , "omerasadshaik@aol.com" , OpEd , "oped@freepress.com" , "opinion@japantimes.co.jp" , "opinion@manilatimes.net" , "outlook@outlookindia.com" , "pioneer@del2.vsnl.net.in" , "politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk" , "post@anitapratap.com" , qureish raghib , "rabeynadwi@yahoo.com" , Radiance Weekly , "radianceweekly@vsnl.com" , "rafiq@thelodhiacenter.org" , "razaacademy@hotmail.com" , "rehmanfaiz2003@yahoo.com" , Reuters , S A Hannan , "sa_02@rediffmail.com" , "sa_khan@eth.net" , "saadskhan@yahoo.co.uk" , saeed naqvi , Saidul Islam , Sajid Siddiqui , "sajid@comcast.net" , "sajjad.khan@newcivilisation.com" , "salimlone@msn.com" , sarfarazarzu , Seema Mustafa , shabana qureshi , Shabih Hasan , "shadab@indianmuslims.org" , shafi wassan , "shah_ashraf@hotmail.com" , Shaikh Sadik , Sherwani Mustafa , "shujasiddique@hotmail.com" , Siraj Wahab , soheb lokhandwala , "stlocal@sph.com.sg" , "stoi@indiatimes.com" , Subhash Gatade , "sufiyans@gmail.com" , "sultanshahin@yahoo.co.uk" , "Swampland - TIME.com" , Syed Khalique Ahmed , Syed Mazhar , syed tausief , syediftikhar , "syedtahirmahmood@hotmail.com" , Syyed Mansoor Agha , "tameditor@aol.com" , "tauheed@sancharnet.in" , "tavleensingh@expressindia.com" , "thawra@net.sy" , The Milli Gazette , The Review , "thehindu@vsnl.com" , "thestatesman@vsnl.com" , "thinktank@pbs.org" , "tips@upi.com" , "ttedit@abpmail.com" , Tufail Shaikh , "twf-org-feedback-59@lb.bcentral.com" , "umargautam@yahoo.com" , United News Network , "vtr@ndf.vsnl.net.in" , "webmaster@dawn.com" , "webmaster@jang.com.pk" , "webmaster@tehrantimes.com" , "webmaster@thejakartapost.com" , "y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk" , "YAHYA BUKHARI (Delhi)" , Yamin Zakaria , "yarahman@msn.com" , YASIR KHAN , Zafar Iqbal , zik , Zohra Javed , ZUBER GOPALANI
  Prime Minister,

Please watch Vandana Shiva's lecture on Hegemony as a favour to the nation:

http://vimeo.com/channels/tvmultiversity#14641370

Best regards

Ghulam Muhammed, (Mumbai).

 Dear Prime Minister,

Please watch Vandana Shiva's lecture on Hegemony as a favour to the nation:

http://vimeo.com/channels/tvmultiversity#14641370

Best regards

Ghulam Muhammed, (Mumbai).