Sunday, January 3, 2010

Rattling the Cage: A taboo question for Israelis - By Larry Derfner -THE JERUSALEM POST

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1262339377294&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull



LARRY DERFNERLARRY DERFNER
Dec 30, 2009 21:26 | Updated Jan 3, 2010 11:08

Rattling the Cage: A taboo question for Israelis

By LARRY DERFNER 



There's a question we Israelis won't ask ourselves about the Palestinians, especially not about Gaza. The question is taboo. Not only won't anyone ask it out loud, but very, very few people will dare ask it in the privacy of their own minds.


However, I think it's time we start asking it, privately and in public. If we don't, I think there's going to be Operation CastLead II, then Operation Cast Lead III, and each one is going to be worse than the last, and the consequences for Palestinians and Israelis are going to be unimaginable.


The question we have to ask ourselves is this: If anybody treated us like we're treating the people in Gaza, what would we do?


We don't want to go there, do we? And because we don't, we make it our business not to see, hear or think about how, indeed, we are treating the people in Gaza.
All these shocked dignitaries, all these reports, these details, these numbers - thousands of destroyed this and tens of thousands of destroyed that. Rubble, sewage, malnutrition, crying babies, humanitarian crises - who can keep up? Who cares? They did it to themselves. Where to for lunch?


IT'S NOT that we can't imagine life in Gaza. It's that we are determined not to try to imagine. If we did, we might not stop there. Next we might try to imagine what it would be like if our country were in the condition in which we left Gaza. And sooner or later we might try to imagine what we would do if we were living over here like they're living over there.


Or not even what we would do, just what we would think - about the people, about the country, that did that to us and that wouldn't even allow us to begin to recover after the war was over. That blockaded our borders and allowed in only enough supplies to keep us at subsistence level, to prevent starvation and mass epidemics.
What would we think, what would we do, if somebody, some country, did that to us?


A lot of people here, I'm sure, would reply angrily: So why won't the Gazans try making peace?


But is that how we would react? Is that what Israelis would do if a foreign army did to this country what the IDF did to that one a year ago? If another country sent F-16s, Apache helicopters, white phosphorous, drones, tanks and battalions into Israel, if any nation bombed and killed over here like we bombed and killed in Gaza, then rubbed our noses in it afterward, would we want to make peace with them?


Forget we; does anyone know a single Israeli who would?


I'M SURE a lot of people would argue: What about Sderot? Didn't the terrorists in Gaza bomb and kill in Sderot? Let's the turn the question around: What would the Gazans have done if another country did to them what they did to the people in Sderot?


Fair enough. Yes, they would have hit back, too. They're not pacifists, either, to say the least. In fact, their elected leaders are fanatical, murderous Jew-haters sworn to Israel's destruction. That's extremely important to remember, and we do. But what we don't want to remember, what we make 100 percent sure to forget, is that we do all sorts of hateful things to Gaza that they don't do to us, and that this is the way it's been since 1967.


Aside from choking the flow of goods to Gaza by land, we blockade their entire coast. We don't allow ships to sail into Gaza or out. Does anyone stop ships from coming and going at the ports of Eilat, Ashdod or Haifa? What would Israel do if anyone tried? (Think of what Israel did two weeks after Egypt blockaded the port of Eilat in May 1967.)


We also blockade Gaza's airspace, preventing planes from flying in or out. Does anybody stop planes from flying in and out of Israel? Would we stand for it if someone did?


For 37 years, between 1967 and 2005, our soldiers and settlers were the overlords of the Gaza Strip. If foreign soldiers and settlers tried to come in and take over Israel, what would we do?


And regarding the years of rocket attacks on the people in Sderot, I've never been through such an ordeal, but I imagine it's hell. However, I've also never been through the ordeal that people in Gaza have gone through, and are still going through, yet I know - as everyone in the world knows, except Israelis - that life in Gaza is incomparably worse than life in Sderot ever was.


DURING THE 2008 US presidential campaign, Barack Obama visited Sderot, saying, "If missiles were falling where my two daughters sleep, I would do everything in order to stop that."


Absolutely right. I wonder, though, what sort of empathetic reaction he might have had if he'd also visited the Jabalya refugee camp that summer. I wonder how he'd react if he visited Jabalya now.


And how would we react? If we Israelis could go to Gaza and see in person what we've done to that place and its people, would we be capable of empathy? If we thought of our children living in a country that was just like postwar Gaza, would we allow ourselves to think what we might do?


We can't go to Gaza, but we have to start using our imagination. We have to dare to put ourselves in those people's place. And we have to stop doing to them what we would never allow anyone to do to us. Otherwise, we Israelis have no conscience, and little by little we become capable of anything.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Comments posted on THE WASHINGTON POST website over Charles Krauthammer's article: A terrorist war Obama has denied

Comments posted on THE WASHINGTON POST website over Charles Krauthammer's article: 



Your Comments On...

A terrorist war Obama has denied

The administration's response to terrorism has been incompetent and incomprehensible.
 - 

 By Charles Krauthammer

 
Comments
Abdulmuttallab may be used by agencies to whip up the flagging interest in war on terror. His kid glove treatment with foreknowledge of all his moves, point to a controlled experiment to hoodwink people that Al Qaida is still active. If Al Qaida is active, there are reasons to believe that US agencies have handlers manipulating some of its moves. People should be wary of Neo-cons like Krauthammer, who still have plants in US administration and committed to build up a scenario of world wide terror to continue to be in business.
1/3/2010 12:54:00 AM





Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home

A terrorist war Obama has denied

President Obama makes a statement Monday on the attempted bombing of Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day.
President Obama makes a statement Monday on the attempted bombing of Northwest Flight 253 on Christmas Day. (Kent Nishimura/getty Images)
  Enlarge Photo    
TOOLBOX
COMMENT 
1213 Comments  |  View All » 
POST A COMMENT
Your washingtonpost.com User ID,ghulammuhammed3, will be displayed with your comment.

WHO'S BLOGGING
Friday, January 1, 2010
Janet Napolitano -- former Arizona governor, now overmatched secretary of homeland security -- will forever be remembered for having said of the attempt to bring down an airliner over Detroit: "The system worked." The attacker's concerned father had warned U.S. authorities about his son's jihadist tendencies. The would-be bomber paid cash and checked no luggage on a transoceanic flight. He was nonetheless allowed to fly, and would have killed 288 people in the air alone, save for a faulty detonator and quick actions by a few passengers.
Heck of a job, Brownie.
The reason the country is uneasy about the Obama administration's response to this attack is a distinct sense of not just incompetence but incomprehension. From the very beginning, President Obama has relentlessly tried to play down and deny the nature of the terrorist threat we continue to face. Napolitano renames terrorism "man-caused disasters." Obama goes abroad and pledges to cleanse America of its post-9/11 counterterrorist sins. Hence, Guantanamo will close, CIA interrogators will face a special prosecutor, and Khalid Sheik Mohammed will bask in a civilian trial in New York -- a trifecta of political correctness and image management.
And just to make sure even the dimmest understand, Obama banishes the term "war on terror." It's over -- that is, if it ever existed.
Obama may have declared the war over. Unfortunately, al-Qaeda has not. Which gives new meaning to the term "asymmetric warfare."
And produces linguistic -- and logical -- oddities that littered Obama's public pronouncements following the Christmas Day attack. In his first statement, Obama referred to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as "an isolated extremist." This is the same president who, after the Fort Hood, Tex., shooting, warned us "against jumping to conclusions" -- code for daring to associate the mass murder there with Nidal Hasan's Islamist ideology. Yet, with Abdulmutallab, Obama jumped immediately to the conclusion, against all existing evidence, that the would-be bomber acted alone.
More jarring still were Obama's references to the terrorist as a "suspect" who "allegedly tried to ignite an explosive device." You can hear the echo of FDR: "Yesterday, December 7, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy -- Japanese naval and air force suspects allegedly bombed Pearl Harbor."
Obama reassured the nation that this "suspect" had been charged. Reassurance? The president should be saying: We have captured an enemy combatant -- an illegal combatant under the laws of war: no uniform, direct attack on civilians -- and now to prevent future attacks, he is being interrogated regarding information he may have about al-Qaeda in Yemen.
Instead, Abdulmutallab is dispatched to some Detroit-area jail and immediately lawyered up. At which point -- surprise! -- he stops talking.
This absurdity renders hollow Obama's declaration that "we will not rest until we find all who were involved." Once we've given Abdulmutallab the right to remain silent, we have gratuitously forfeited our right to find out from him precisely who else was involved, namely those who trained, instructed, armed and sent him.
This is all quite mad even in Obama's terms. He sends 30,000 troops to fight terror overseas, yet if any terrorists come to attack us here, they are magically transformed from enemy into defendant.
The logic is perverse. If we find Abdulmutallab in an al-Qaeda training camp in Yemen, where he is merely preparing for a terror attack, we snuff him out with a Predator -- no judge, no jury, no qualms. But if we catch him in the United States in the very act of mass murder, he instantly acquires protection not just from execution by drone but even from interrogation.
The president said that this incident highlights "the nature of those who threaten our homeland." But the president is constantly denying the nature of those who threaten our homeland. On Tuesday, he referred five times to Abdulmutallab (and his terrorist ilk) as "extremist[s]."
A man who shoots abortion doctors is an extremist. An eco-fanatic who torches logging sites is an extremist. Abdulmutallab is not one of these. He is a jihadist. And unlike the guys who shoot abortion doctors, jihadists have cells all over the world; they blow up trains in London, nightclubs in Bali and airplanes over Detroit (if they can); and are openly pledged to war on America.
Any government can through laxity let someone slip through the cracks. But a government that refuses to admit that we are at war, indeed, refuses even to name the enemy -- jihadist is a word banished from the Obama lexicon -- turns laxity into a governing philosophy.
letters@charleskrauthammer.com

Thursday, December 31, 2009

TIMES OF INDIA & JANG PAKISTAN AUGUR A NEW 'LOVE PAKISTAN' / 'LOVE INDIA' INITIATIVE WELCOMING NEW YEAR 2010


THE TIMES OF INDIA STARTED THE NEW YEAR 2010 WITH A FULL FRONT PAGE 'ADVERTISEMENT' ANNOUNCING AN IND0-PAK MEDIA INITIATIVE: 'LOVE PAKISTAN', TOGETHER WITH JANG GROUP OF PAKISTAN. AFTER 62 YEARS OF HATE-MONGERING AGAINST EACH OTHER, MEDIA, IS CHOSEN TO LEAD A PEOPLE TO PEOPLE EXERCISE TO CUT DOWN ON INSTITUTIONALIZED HATE THAT DIVIDES THE CONTINENT AND TO USHER IN A NEW ERA OF FRIENDSHIP AND COOPERATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE COMMON PEOPLE WHO NEVER BENEFITED FROM THE LONG NIGHT OF HATE AND DIVISION THAT HAD BEEN UNLEASHED BY THE DEPARTING COLONIALISTS. 

THE PRESENT INITIATIVE, THOUGH LONG OVERDUE, BUT STILL APPEARES TO BE MANAGED BY THE SAME COLONIZING POWERS THAT KNOW THAT THEY  AND ONLY THEY CAN IMPOSE THEIR WILL ON US HAPLESS PEOPLE. 

IF THEY WANT US TO HATE EACH OTHER, WE WILL HATE LIKE ZOMBIES. IF THEY WANT US TO LOVE EACH OTHER, THEY WILL HELP RELEASE A FULL PAGE ADVERTISEMENT IN BOTH COUNTRIES' PRIME NEWSPAPERS TO CALL IT A DAY. 

IT IS FOR US TO REFLECT AND QUESTION IF THESE PEACE MOVES HAVE BEEN AUGURED TO COINCIDE WITH ANY FOREIGN POWER AGENDA TO RE-ENTER THE SUBCONTINENT WITH RENEWED VIGOUR AND ONCE AGAIN HIJACK IT TO ABUSE ITS PEOPLE, ITS TERRITORY, ITS RESOURCES BY DIVIDING THE PEOPLE INTO HAVES AND HAVE-NOTS AND IMPOSE THEIR HEGEMONICAL WILL ON THE UNTHINKING MASSES AND UNCARING CLASSES OF THE SUBCONTINENT.

LET PEOPLE OF THE SUBCONTINENT UNITE, BUT ON THEIR OWN TERMS, ON THEIR OWN VOLITION, ON THEIR OWN REALIZATION OF THE DIRE NEED FOR UNITY IN A FREE, INDEPENDENT SUB-CONTINENT; --------- KEEPING THE OUTSIDERS OUT.

GHULAM MUHAMMED, MUMBAI

 Reply
 Reply to all
 Forward
MAILER-DAEMON@mail.networksolutionsemail.com
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
10:57 AM (0 minutes ago)
postmaster@hotmail.com
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to ...
10:57 AM (0 minutes ago)
Mail Delivery System
This is the mail system at host mta.npr.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you ...
10:57 AM (0 minutes ago)
 
Reply
 

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Beware of Brahminical Cartelization ofIndia’s democracy and politics By Ghulam Muhammed


Wednesday, December 30, 2009

A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Beware of Brahminical Cartelization ofIndia’s democracy and politics

The hectic moves by the newly ‘appointed’ BJP President, Nitin Gadkari, to organize an All Party meet to introduce ‘reforms’ in India’s election rules and regulations, is a blatant attempt to bypass the people and mould the whole process of electoral reforms to suit the Brahminical political groupings now ruling the country through hijacking of Indian democracy. People should challenge the move this ‘All Party’ powwow may impose on India, without bringing in real reforms to reflect the deeper aspirations of grass root Indian voter to infuse their true will and power into the electoral processes. A general debate must proceed any attempt to consolidate the electoral system to ensure high caste concentration at the highest level of Indian administration, to the detriment of the majority of people, who are systematically used and abused to perpetrate this permanent Brahminical hijacking of Indian democracy and its electoral processes to turn India as a cash cow for the ruling politicians. The reluctance of Congress to form the government in Jharkhand by tacitly vacating the space for BJP, is a clear sign that both the Brahminical parties are hand in glove to perpetuate their corruption regime and help each other by turn to milk the poor citizens of the country. Their movers and shakers are all hand in glove and their open fight for space is merely a fraud on the people. Unless Brahmins are out of equation and other caste and minority groups are not brought in to reflect the true democratic will of the people, the country will be resting on a very fragile foundation. That will not be good for the integrity, security and sovereignty of Indian republic. India must face to the grave challenges ahead with its house in order and in disorder.


Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

Monday, December 28, 2009

A VERY SAD DAY FOR ‘SECULAR’ INDIA By Ghulam Muhammed


Tuesday, December 29, 2009

A VERY SAD DAY FOR ‘SECULAR’ INDIA

Today’s issue of The Indian Express on its front page carries a story that exposes the depth of ingrained communal feelings against Muslims in India. It narrates how in Modi’s Gujarat, Muslims are changing their Muslim names to Hindu names, just to get jobs, which would have been denied to them, if their Muslim identity is known.

I will blame Congress, Nehru, Indira, Rajiv and now Sonia for this state of affair.

It is they who had indulged in double game and systematically reduced 150- 200 million Indian Muslims to such a level of desperation that their very survival as Muslims at grass root level has been so thoroughly become impossible. The other day, Indian Express had carried an interview with World Human Right Watch. A Pew report mentioned in The Times of India earlier gave India the dubious distinction of being wrecked by communal strife of the same intensity that has wrecked Iraq.

It is time, world at large takes note of how oppressed Muslims are in the so-called ‘secular’ and democratic India. If Muslims are forced to change their religion by undergoing such hardships for their very survival, this is cause for serious alarm.
Muslims should thank The Indian Express and Times of India, for swimming against the tide and forcing themselves against odds to bring such unpalatable ghastly truth into the public arena.

Congress must pass very stringent hate crime laws to punish those who have enjoyed absolute freedom and unaccountability to carry out their nefarious hate campaigns. If Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is so reputedly enomoured of his US connections, let him be bold and courageous enough to press for the same criminal laws that USupholds to fight religious hatred and criminal acts within their communities.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai

------------------------------------






To get job in Surat, Muslim took Hindu name; revealed when he was killed


Kamaal SaiyedTags : peoplemuslimshinduPosted: Tuesday , Dec 29, 2009 at 0144 hrsSurat:
All Mehboob Pathan (50) of Valak village on Surat’s outskirts wanted was a job in the city. Having a Muslim name, he felt, came in the way. So, to get himself a job in Surat’s diamond units, he passed himself off as Jayenti Bhatti, and managed to find work in two separate units in the Kapodara area.


Early this week, his “cover” was blown, after he was brutally killed over a monetary dispute. As the distraught family stepped forward to admit that Jayenti Bhatti was indeed Mehboob Pathan, they worried that having been cremated as a Hindu, the practising Muslim’s soul may not find peace.


In the ledgers of Surat’s diamond units, there are many leading a double life like Pathan. His son Mushtaq is registered as Mukesh and daughter Samina as Sharmila, and both are afraid of losing their jobs if the fact was known.


Diamond industry sources and workers say many Muslims assume Hindu names to find work in the city’s lucrative diamond business.
One of them, Allarakha Khan, admits to having passed himself off as a Hindu like many others from his village. “We would not get a job if we are known to be Muslims. We have been doing this for a long time, and we take great care not to reveal our real names or addresses at work,” he told The Indian Express.



Rohit Mehta, president of the Surat Diamond Association, however, denied knowledge of Muslims passing themselves off as Hindus for jobs. “We will inquire into this,” he said.

Pathan’s story came to be known after his body was found in a farm at Antroli last Monday, with the head smashed in. The police registered a case and kept the unclaimed body in the Palsana Primary Health Centre mortuary till Thursday. Then they arranged to give Pathan alias Bhatti a Hindu funeral, with all the rites.


His family, who had been looking for Pathan, had filed a missing complaint. Then, seeing news stories in local newspapers about an unclaimed body, Mehboob’s brother-in-law Iqbal Pathan decided to check. By that time, Pathan had been cremated, but the brother-in-law identified him from a photo of the body.


The family says Pathan was a pious Muslim and the change of name was just so that he and his children could find and keep a job. “We are too poor to do anything, but how could the police dispose of his body the Hindu way?” asks son Mushtaq. “A genital examination would have shown he was a Muslim.” Sub-Inspector of Kadodara police V R Malhotra said they had kept the body in mortuary hoping someone would turn up. “We disposed it of according to Hindu rites not knowing he was a Muslim. The family turned up too late and we are now helpless.”