Friday, September 25, 2009

HOW OBAMA WAS GANGED UP TO ISSUE NEW WARNING TO IRAN

HOW OBAMA WAS GANGED UP TO ISSUE NEW WARNING TO IRAN

A RARE INSIGHT INTO HOW A HANDFUL OF CONSPIRATORS CAN FORCE THE WORLD TO THE BRINK OF WAR WHERE MILLIONS OF INNOCENTS DIE



Cryptic Iranian Note Ignited an Urgent Nuclear Strategy Debate

Published: September 25, 2009

PITTSBURGH — On Tuesday evening in New York, top officials of the world nuclear watchdog agency approached two of President Obama’s senior advisers to deliver the news: Iran had just sent a cryptic letter describing a small “pilot” nuclear facility that the country had never before declared.

Can Sanctions Work Against Iran?

Room for DebateWhat strategies might be deployed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons?
Join the Discussion »
The Americans were surprised by the letter, but they were angry about what it did not say. American intelligence had come across the hidden tunnel complex years earlier, and the advisers believed the situation was far more ominous than the Iranians were letting on.


That night, huddled in a hotel room in the Waldorf-Astoria until well into the early hours, five of Mr. Obama’s closest national security advisers, in New York for the administration’s first United Nations General Assembly, went back and forth on what they would advise their boss when they took him the news in the morning. A few hours later, in a different hotel room, they met with Mr. Obama and his senior national security adviser, Gen. James L. Jones, to talk strategy.


The White House essentially decided to outflank the Iranians, to present to their allies and the public what they believed was powerful evidence that there was more to the Iranian site than just some pilot program. They saw it as a chance to use this evidence to persuade other countries to support the case for stronger sanctions by showing that the Iranians were still working on a secret nuclear plan.


It was three dramatic days of highly sensitive diplomacy and political maneuvering, from an ornate room at the Waldorf, where Mr. Obama pressed President Dimitri A. Medvedev of Russia for support, to the United Nations Security Council chamber, where General Jones at one point hustled his Russian counterpart from the room in the middle of a rare meeting of Council leaders.


General Jones told his counterpart, Sergei Prikhodko, that the United States was going to go public with the intelligence. Meanwhile, in the hallways of the United Nations and over the phone, American and European officials debated when, and how, to present their case against Iran to the world.


European officials urged speed, saying that Mr. Obama should accuse Iran of developing the secret facility first thing Thursday morning, when he presided over the Security Council for the very first time. It would have been a stirring and confrontational moment. But White House officials countered that it was too soon; they would not have time to brief allies and the nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and Mr. Obama did not want to dilute the nuclear nonproliferation resolution he was pushing through the Security Council by diverting to Iran.


In the end, Mr. Obama stood on the floor of the Pittsburgh Convention Center on Friday morning, flanked by President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain, and called the Iranian facility “a direct challenge to the basic foundation of the nonproliferation regime.”


Added Mr. Brown, “The international community has no choice today but to draw a line in the sand.”


This account of the days leading up to the announcement on Friday is based on interviews with administration officials and American allies, all of whom want the story known to help support their case against Iran.


The Iranians have continued to assert that their nuclear program has peaceful intentions. And while American officials say the secretive nature of the program lends support to the view that it is truly an expanding weapons program, even United States intelligence officials acknowledge that there is no evidence that Iran has taken the final steps toward creating a bomb.


There was “a fair amount at anger” within the administration over Iran’s disclosure, a senior administration official said. But there was also some satisfaction. A second senior official said: “Everybody’s been asking, ‘Where’s our leverage?’ Well, now we just got that leverage.”


Administration officials said that Mr. Obama had two goals in going public: to directly confront Iran with the evidence, and to persuade wavering nations to take a hard line on Iran.


In fact, the makings of the administration’s strategy was hatched months before, when the White House first came to believe that the complex, built into a mountain on property near Qum controlled by Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guards, might be a part of the nuclear program. Over time, the file that intelligence officials accumulated on the facility developed as a cudgel, a way to win over wary allies and test if the Iranians were being truthful in their disclosures.


Senior intelligence officials said Friday that several years ago American intelligence agencies under the administration of George W. Bush discovered the suspicious site. The site was one of Iran’s most closely guarded secrets, the officials said, known only by senior members of Iran’s nuclear establishment. The officials said that housing the complex on the base gave it an extra layer of security.


Mr. Obama was first told about the existence of the covert site during his transition period in late 2008, White House officials said, after he had been elected but before he was inaugurated. But it was not until earlier this year that American spy agencies detected the movement of sensitive equipment into the facility — a sign, they believed, that whatever work was involved was nearing its final stages.


American officials said Friday that the facility could have been fully operational by next year, with up to 3,000 centrifuges capable of producing one weapon’s worth of highly enriched nuclear material per year.


“Over the course of early this year, the intelligence community and our liaison partners became increasingly confident that the site was indeed a uranium enrichment facility,” a senior administration official said. He said that Mr. Obama received regular intelligence updates on the progress of the site.


The officials said that they developed a detailed picture about work on the facility from multiple human intelligence sources, as well as satellite imagery. A senior official said that intelligence was regularly shared among American, British and French spy agencies, and that Israeli officials were told about the complex years ago. They were not more specific about when they first learned about it.


At some point in late spring, American officials became aware that Iranian operatives had learned that the site was being monitored, the officials said.


As the administration reviewed its Iran policy in April, Mr. Obama told aides at one point that if the United States entered into talks with Iran, he wanted to make sure “all the facts were on the table early, including information on this site — so that negotiations would be meaningful and transparent,” a senior administration official said.


As the summer progressed, British, French and American officials grew more worried about what Iran might do now that it was aware that security at the complex had been breached.


In late July, after the mass protests over Iran’s disputed election had died down, Mr. Obama told his national security team to have American intelligence officials work with their British and French counterparts to secretly put together a detailed presentation on the complex.


“That brief would be deployed in the case of a number of contingencies,” the administration official said. “If Iran refused to negotiate, in the case of a leak of the information, and even an Iranian disclosure.” Mr. Obama asked his aides to have the presentation ready by the General Assembly meeting.


“We could not have negotiations of any meaning if we were only going to talk about overt sites and not covert sites,” a senior administration official said.


As late as last weekend, American officials were still uncertain about when to publicly present the intelligence about the secret enrichment facility. The game plan changed Tuesday, when officials from the nuclear watchdog agency informed the Americans that Iran had sent the letter describing the “pilot” facility.


At his meeting at the Waldorf the next morning, Mr. Obama decided that he would personally tell Mr. Medvedev, the Russian president, when they met Wednesday afternoon for a previously scheduled meeting. Mr. Obama also spoke with Mr. Sarkozy and Mr. Brown. Meanwhile, Jeff Bader, a senior White House adviser for China, informed his Chinese counterparts.


On Thursday, while Mr. Obama was leading the Security Council meeting, General Jones left his seat behind Mr. Obama, walked over to Mr. Prikhodko, the Russian national security adviser, and whispered in his ear. Mr. Prikhodko got up and followed General Jones out of the room. Minutes later, General Jones sent an aide back to get his Chinese counterpart as well.


Administration officials said they were gratified with Russia’s reaction — Mr. Medvedev signaled he would be amenable to tougher sanctions on Iran. The Chinese, one administration official said, were more skeptical, and said they wanted to look at the intelligence, and to see what international inspectors said when they investigated.
The lessons of the Iraq war still lingered.


“They don’t want to buy a pig in a poke,” the senior administration official said.



Helene Cooper reported from Pittsburgh, and Mark Mazzetti from Washington.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Diminished US President Lectures to the World at UN - By Ghulam Muhammed





Thursday, September 24, 2009

A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Diminished US President Lectures to the World at UN

Another fine piece of rousing oratory and US President had done his bit for the day. He rushed out of the UN premises as if his tail was on fire. In fact, his oratorical high notes were drowned by behind the scene guffaws he earned for trying to tame Israel and falling on his face. Weeks his special envoy has spent in Israel, feeding media with daily photo ops shaking hands with Israel’s indomitable hard-line Prime Minister but there was no news if the Mount Sinai moved even a measly centimeter. And still Barack Obama soldiered on. Though Obama has much tougher challenges testing his mettle, Israel stands out as the barometer to the world of US President’s limits of credibility. If he cannot tackle America’s most lauded ‘ally’, to fall in line with his worldview, the stark gossamer fragility of his presidency could only generate derision among his detractors and pity in his admirers.

Time is flying and given the past record of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, delays and procrastination favour only one side that has dragged on the peace process of any kind for the last forty years. The drama starts with the every new US President taking office and ends with the end of his presidency, with Israel using the interregnum to dug in more and more in ways that would leave hardly any thing left to negotiate. Obama has come with a bold new commitment to change the US and the world with it. But half a way in his first 4-year presidency, he has barely touch the contours of war in Afghanistan, a monumental economic recession, his pet project of universal health care, and the way his cards are played out, he seems to be playing more of a bluff game than a winning hand.

Israel has cleverly positioned Iran as the most pressing issue for the world to come to terms with while it merrily whips up its assembly line in West Bank creating facts on the ground. The UN sponsored Goldstone report on war crimes in Gaza is snowed under by Jewish dominated world press’s cabalist propaganda of bias, even though the South African judge, Richard Goldstone is himself a Jew and a self-confessed Israel supporter. The dire train of event that may land Israel in International Court of Justice at The Hague is so alarming to Israel that it has mounted a concerted attempt to discredit the Human Rights report.

The worst part is that even the Muslim governments around the world are so insensitive to the plight of their brethrens in Gaza; there is no world-wide move to get Israel into the docks for its most horrendous crimes on Palestinian civilians including children, women and old people.

President Obama is seized of the fact that war on Al Qaeda could not get any support from even the well meaning masses in the Muslim world, unless US makes Israel-Palestine settlements its number one priority. Israel will use every trick in the trade to turn world focus away from its rape of Palestinian entity, in any shape it tries to survive. It is up to Barack Obama not to be taken in by Israeli ruses to postpone the inevitable as far into the future as possible. It is for the US, to realize how its acts of commission and omission are encouraging Israel to lead a life of an outlaw nation that thrives in defying international laws and committing genocidal attacks on hapless Muslims of Palestine.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com
www.GhulamMuhammed.Blogspot.com

BRITISH WAR CRIMES IN IRAQ - Gaurdian.co.uk

BRITISH WAR CRIMES IN IRAQ

guardian.co.uk home



Baha Mousa inquiry: father alleges 'revenge' by UK troops


Daoud Mousa says son's death in military custody came after claim British soldiers had looted hotel where Baha worked
A family photograph of Baha Mousa with his wife and two children
A family photograph of Baha Mousa with his wife and two children. Photograph: Reuters



The father of an Iraqi hotel receptionist who died in British militarycustody has told a public inquiry his son may have been killed in a "revenge" attack.
Daoud Mousa is giving evidence at the inquiry into the killing of his son,Baha Mousa, six years ago. Baha, 26, died in September 2003 while being held by British soldiers on suspicion of being an insurgent.
Daoud said he had reported British soldiers for alleged looting after they raided the Ab al-Haitham hotel, where Baha worked, and feared this had caused his son to be "treated worse" than other detainees.
Daoud, who today rejected the apology of the only man convicted in connection with his son's killing, told the hearing he had driven to the Basra hotel on 14 September to collect Baha.
When he arrived, he found British military vehicles parked outside and a soldier standing guard.
Daoud said he had seen three or four British soldiers breaking into a safe at the hotel and removing money, which they stuffed into the pockets of their uniform and inside their shirts.
"I thought that it was a violation of English dignity and honour, and the honour of English troops," he told the inquiry.
Daoud reported the alleged thefts to a British officer. He told the inquiry he believed it was after this that British soldiers identified Baha as his son. He said Baha was lying face down on the floor of the hotel with a number of Iraqi men.
"I pointed to my son. The soldiers were standing by," said Daoud.
"I think they knew the one I was pointing to was my son. Therefore, they wanted revenge against me."
He added in his statement to the inquiry: "I believe that my son may have been treated worse than other people because I had made a complaint … that money was being stolen from the hotel safe.
"That is certainly the view that was reached by other men who were detained with Baha."
Daoud earlier told the hearing his son had hated Saddam Hussein and had been pleased when British troops arrived in Basra. He told the inquiry Saddam had forced him out of his job as a police major in the southern city of Basra.
"[Baha] hated Saddam because he was hearing that Saddam removed me from my employment," Daoud said.
"He was happy when the British troops came in."

Soldiers from the former Queen's Lancashire Regiment arrested Baha and the other detainees at Basra's Ibn al-Haitham hotel in the early hours of 14 September 2003 and took them to Battle Group Main camp, known as BG Main.
Once there, they were subjected to "conditioning techniques", including being forced to maintain painful "stress positions", hooding and deprivation of sleep and food, the inquiry has heard.
Baha died in the camp on 15 September 2003. He had sustained 93 separate injuries, including fractured ribs and a broken nose.
In July, at the start of the hearing, a video was played showing a British soldier forcing detainees, with their hands bound and wearing hoods, to maintain "stress positions".
In July last year, the MoD agreed to pay £2.83m in compensation to the families of Baha and nine other Iraqi men whom British troops had mistreated.
Giving his evidence to the public inquiry, Daoud dismissed the apology of Corporal David Payne, who in 2007 pleaded guilty at a court marshal to treating civilians inhumanely in relation to Baha Mousa's death. Four other soldiers accused of involvement were acquitted.
Michael Topolski QC addressed Daoud Mousa on Payne's behalf.
"I want you to understand very clearly, sir, that [Corporal Payne] regrets what he did. He apologises to you and your family for the death of your son. I hope that you will accept that from me," the lawyer said.
The dead man's father replied curtly, "I will not accept the apology of a criminal."

Monday, September 21, 2009

26/11 MUMBAI TERROR ATTACK'S AMERICAN SURVIVOR CONVERTS TO ISLAM


26/11 MUMBAI TERROR ATTACK'S  AMERICAN SURVIVOR CONVERTS TO ISLAM 


http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20090921/LIFE/909210320/1005/LIFE


delawareonline.com


Trauma leads Del. man on journey of faith

Terror-attack survivor becomes student of Islam

BY SEAN O'SULLIVAN • THE NEWS JOURNAL • SEPTEMBER 21, 2009

WILMINGTON-- After surviving a terrorist attack in Mumbai, India, 10 months ago, when armed men targeted westerners in two five-star hotels, Greenville resident Dennis O'Brien did not turn to hate.
Instead, he sought to understand the root faith the people behind the attacks claimed to practice and discovered it had been twisted by the gunmen.
Eventually, he came to embrace it.
On Sunday, standing before a crowd of thousands, following prayers to mark the end of Ramadan, O'Brien, a Catholic, embraced Islam in a testimony of faith called Shahada, where he publically declared that there was only one God and the Prophet Muhammad is his last messenger and servant.
O'Brien, who heads up the education committee of St. Anthony's Catholic Church in Wilmington, said the move was a surprise, even to him.
But said he was at peace with it.
"Today I feel free of sin," he said.
After several months of studies and asking questions of Muslim friends and associates, "I feel comfort in Islam," he said.
O'Brien said he wanted to express solidarity with Muslims, even though extremists who say they practice the faith "tried to kill me."
Pastor John F. McGinley, of St. Anthony's, said Sunday he had not heard of O'Brien's embrace of Islam.
McGinley said he knows O'Brien is inquisitive and has expressed concern about the young men involved in the Mumbai attacks.
He would not say if the declaration of another faith would affect O'Brien's position at the church, noting he had not spoken to him about Sunday's events.
"I think this is part of his journey of faith and we can work with that," McGinley said.
Indeed, while others called it a conversion, O'Brien said he is not abandoning Christianity or Catholicism. He said he would not disgrace his family by disavowing what he was raised to believe and what they believe in.
He said he sees Sunday's declaration as a continuation or extension of his beliefs, noting how elements of Christianity and Judaism are a part of the Islamic faith.
He said he hopes to continue his work with the Catholic Church, even as he plans to regularly attend weekly Muslim prayers.
Asked what he will say when asked about his faith, he said he will now answer that he is "a student of Islam."
He said he did not consider himself to be entirely Muslim. "I'm a work in progress," he said.
While most Muslims believe Jesus Christ was a great man and a prophet of God, they do not believe he was the son of God as Christians do. O'Brien said he still believes in Christ, that he ascended into heaven and will return one day.
He said he prayed a great deal about the recent move and Saturday was a day of lengthy contemplation.
He said his path to Islam started Nov. 26, 2008, in room 343 of the Taj Mahal Palace & Tower hotel in Mumbai when he heard gunshots.
O'Brien was there with fellow Delawarean C. Rich Diffenderffer, on business.
The two later said skipping dessert that night may have saved their lives.
Instead of remaining in the restaurant, O'Brien retired to his room and Diffenderffer went to the business center.
Minutes later, armed militants stormed the hotel, throwing grenades and spraying bullets.
By the end of the 60-hour assault, at least 170 were dead.
O'Brien said he peered out his door at one point and saw three of the attackers carrying assault rifles, all shouted as they passed.
While O'Brien, a former Marine who served in Vietnam, briefly entertained the notion of leaving his door open and attempting to disarm any gunman who tried to enter his room, he decided to bolt his door and push a couch in front of it.
Later, his room began to fill with smoke and he tried to make a run for it but was turned back by a wall of fire. He was rescued by firefighters with a ladder.
Diffenderffer, who was on the fifth floor, was rescued with a cherry picker.
While O'Brien cites that night as the start of his journey, he said it was not until a month later that he seriously started to consider "joining the Muslim movement" after he read the Koran, the Muslim holy book.
That was followed by about six months of study, and questions.
"I was brought up Christian and taught when someone attacks you, you have to love them," he said. "What I discovered as I investigated Islam ... I became enamored with the faith and the people I met."
He credited business partner, Ahmad Amer, a Muslim, with guiding him on his current path.
On Sunday, O'Brien was one of the last to leave the room where prayers had been held -- the first full Muslim prayer service O'Brien has attended. He was besieged by well-wishers who shook his hand and welcomed him to the community.
As he departed, he said he found Islam to be "a community of men who have integrity and I want to stand with these men of integrity."

Saturday, September 19, 2009

ISRAELI WAR CRIMES - ATTACK ON UNRWA SCHOOL IN BEIRT LAHIA, GAZA, PALESTINE

( UNRWA SCHOOL IN BEIT LAHIA, GAZA , PALESTINE ) 


( UNRWA SCHOOL IN BEIT LAHIA, GAZA , PALESTINE )
b781f7.jpe
b78207.jpe
b78216.jpe
b78226.jpe
b78235..jpe
b78245.jpe
b78255.jpe
Error! Filename not specified.
b78264.jpe

b78284.jpe



b782c2.jpe
b782d2.jpe
b782e1.jpe
b782f1.jpe
b78301.jpe
b78310.jpe
b78320.jpe
b7832f.jpe
b7833f.jpe
b7834f.jpe
b7835e.jpe
b7836e.jpe
b7837e.jpe
b7838d.jpe
b7839d.jpe
b783ac.jpe
b783bc.jpe
b783cc.jpe
b783db.jpe

 





b783eb.jpe

 

PLEASE PASS THIS MAIL .. LET THE WORLD KNOW

 

The irony is that Israel recently wants inquiry about Human Rights violations by Sri Lankan government in the war against LTTE terrorists.