Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Spain: Barcelona Attack Was Preventable


Spain:
Barcelona Attack Was Preventable


by August 22, 2017 at 5:00 am




§  The measures to place bollards or planters in public
areas were never implemented in Barcelona because the leaders of the Catalan
independence movement did not want to be seen as taking orders from the central
government in Madrid.
§  Far more difficult to explain is why no one reported
suspicious activity at the chalet.
§  Although some Catalans are having second thoughts about
the wisdom of promoting Muslim mass immigration as a strategy to achieve
Catalan independence, at least 10,000 Catalans with links to the separatist
movement have actually converted to Islam in recent years..


As details emerge of the August 17 jihadist attack in Barcelona,
the evidence points to one overarching conclusion: the carnage could have been
prevented if a series of red flags had not been either missed or ignored.

The failure to heed intelligence warnings, enhance physical
security and report suspicious activity are all factors that facilitated the
attack, which had been in the planning stage for more than six months.

The attack was also enabled by the idiosyncrasies of Spanish
politics, especially the tensions that exist between the central government and
the leaders of the independence movement in Catalonia, the autonomous region of
which Barcelona is the capital.

Failure to Install Bollards on Las Ramblas

The Barcelona attack could have been prevented had municipal
officials complied with an order to install bollards, vertical poles designed
to prevent car ramming attacks, on the Rambla, the city's main tourist
thoroughfare.

On December 20, 2016, one day after a Tunisian jihadist drove a
truck into a Christmas market in Berlin, killing 12 people and injuring 56,
Spanish National Police issued a circular ordering all central, regional and
municipal police departments in Spain to "implement physical security
measures to protect public spaces" to prevent jihadist attacks "in
places with high numbers of people." The circular advised:

"Municipalities should protect these public spaces by
temporarily installing large planters or bollards at access points to hinder or
prevent the entry of vehicles."

The measures were never implemented in Barcelona because the
leaders of the Catalan independence movement did not want to be seen as taking
orders from the central government in Madrid.

After receiving the directive, Catalan autonomous police, known as
the Mossos d'Esquadra, accused the central government of "alarmism"
and insisted that it would not order municipalities in Catalonia to implement
this "indiscriminate measure." The Mossos also claimed to have the
jihadist threat under control, that local police were trained to "detect
symptoms or radicalization," and that there were "no concrete
threats."

After the Barcelona attack, Deputy Mayor Gerardo Pisarello blamed the absence of bollards on the Catalan Interior
Ministry. "The City of Barcelona has never refused to install bollards.
Whenever it has been requested, we have done so," Pisarello said. Ada
Colau, Barcelona's leftwing mayor, however, has repeatedly refused to
"fill Barcelona with barriers," insisting that it must remain "a
city of liberty."
El Periódico de Catalunya, a paper based in
Barcelona, elaborated:

"The total absence of police collaboration between the Mossos
d'Esquadra, which is the police force deployed on the ground, and the National
Police and the Civil Guard translates into huge security deficiencies. The
relationship between police forces — influenced by the political situation — is
terrible and, in the case of the Mossos and the National Police, it is open
war.

"The result is that the information services of the Mossos,
on the one hand, and those of the National Police and the Civil Guard, on the
other, do not exchange information. The cooperation is reduced to the personal
relationships of individual agents who, without the knowledge of their
superiors, exchange information and put safety first."

On August 19, hours after the jihadist attack in Barcelona,
Spanish Interior Minister Juan Ignacio Zoido repeated that it would be "appropriate" for all
municipalities to comply with the December circular. His ministry issued a new
letter calling on municipalities to install safety measures in the neuralgic
points of cities. It remains to be seen if Catalan officials will now implement
the recommendations.




Too little, too late.

Police officers line the street on Las Ramblas on August 18, 2017, near the
scene of the previous day's terrorist attack in Barcelona, Spain. (Photo by
Carl Court/Getty Images)

Failure to Heed Warnings

In June, the CIA reportedly warned Catalan police that Barcelona
was being targeted by jihadists: "Two months ago the Central Intelligence
Agency warned Catalan police of a threat to Las Ramblas," according to El Periódico.

Additionally, on June 30, two weeks before the Barcelona attack, a
Twitter account associated with the Islamic State warned of an impending attack against al-Ándalus,
the Arabic name given to those parts of Spain, Portugal and France occupied by
Muslim conquerors from 711 to 1492. Many jihadists believe that territories
Muslims lost during the Christian Reconquest of Spain still belong to the realm
of Islam and that Islamic law gives them the right to re-establish Muslim rule
there.

It remains unclear why Catalan authorities failed to increase
security in light of the warnings and threats. El Periódico wrote:

"In recent years Barcelona has become a city known all over
the planet. Both because of its attraction as a tourist destination and because
of the media impact of the Barça football club, the Catalan capital is a world
icon. In the eyes of the jihadists, that makes it a priority objective, as they
seek to attack sites that generate a great impact at the international level.

However, neither the authorities nor the citizens seems to have
realized that their city is on the same list of targets as other major cities
such as New York, Paris, London or Madrid."

Failure to Report Suspicious Activity

The jihadists prepared for the Barcelona attack at a chalet in the
beachfront town of Alcanar, situated 200 kilometers (120 miles) south of
Barcelona. A year ago, the terror cell "occupied" the property, which
was foreclosed and had been vacant. Squatters are protected by Spanish law, so
it is common for youth in Catalonia to take over vacant
properties. This may explain why neighbors did not contact the police.

Far more difficult to explain is why no one reported suspicious
activity at the chalet. During the course of several months, the jihadists
collected more than 100 large gas canisters, which investigators believe were
to be used as car bombs. An explosion on August 16, the night before the
Barcelona attack, leveled the property.

Investigators later found traces of the
explosive triacetone triperoxide (TATP), also known as the "Mother of
Satan," a substance widely used by members of the Islamic State in Europe.

Failure to Follow-Up on Leads

Police found the remains of at least two people in the rubble of
the Alcanar chalet. The head of the Mossos d'Esquadra, Josep Lluís
Trapero, confirmed that one of the bodies was that of Abdelbaki
Es-Satti, a Muslim cleric who is suspected of organizing the terror cell and
radicalizing its members.

Es-Satti, a Moroccan national who lived in the Catalan town of
Ripoll, served in a local mosque. He was a convicted drug trafficker who had
spent four years at a prison in Valencia, where he is believed to have met
Rachid Aglif, known as "The Rabbit," one of the main plotters of the
2004 Madrid bomb attacks that killed 192 people and wounded 2,000. Police are
now looking into whether Es-Satti was involved in the ISIS attacks on the
Brussels airport and metro in 2016.

Ali Yassine, the director of the mosque in Ripoll, said that he
had reported Es-Satti to local police more than a year ago as part of a
security protocol to monitor Muslim preachers. Authorities did not place him on
a watch list, however, even though he had been convicted of trafficking drugs
and violating Spanish immigration laws.

Catalan Migration Policy Fuels Radicalization

Catalonia not only has the highest Muslim population in Spain, it
is also one of the most Islamized regions of the country. Catalonia has 7.5
million inhabitants, including an estimated510,000 Muslims, who account for around 7% of the
total Catalan population. In some Catalan towns, however, the Muslim population
is above 40% of the overall population.

In his book "Jihadism: The Radical Islamic Threat to
Catalonia," Catalan terrorism analyst Jofre Montoto estimates that
at least 10% of the Muslims in Catalonia are "radicals" who are
hardcore believers in the "doctrine of jihadism."

A five-page diplomatic cable, dated October 2, 2007, described the link between mass immigration to Catalonia
and the rise of radical Islam in the region:

"Heavy immigration — both legal and illegal — from North
Africa (Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria) and Southeast Asia (Pakistan and
Bangladesh) has made Catalonia a magnet for terrorist recruiters. ... The
Spanish National Police estimates that there may be upwards of 60,000
Pakistanis living in Barcelona and the surrounding area; the vast majority are
male, unmarried or unaccompanied, and without legal documentation. There are
even more such immigrants from North Africa. ... They live on the edges of
Spanish society, they do not speak the language, they are often unemployed, and
they have very few places to practice their religion with dignity. ... Individually,
these circumstances would provide fertile ground for terrorist recruitment;
taken together, the threat is clear....

"There is little doubt that the autonomous region of
Catalonia has become a prime base of operations for terrorist activity. Spanish
authorities tell us they fear the threat from these atomized immigrant
communities prone to radicalism, but they have very little intelligence on or
ability to penetrate these groups."

Many of Catalonia's problems with radical Islam are
self-inflicted. In an effort to promote Catalan nationalism and the Catalan
language, Catalonian pro-independence parties have deliberately promoted
immigration from Arabic-speaking Muslim countries for more than three decades,
in the belief that these immigrants (unlike those from Latin America) would
learn the Catalan language rather than speak Spanish.
Although some Catalans are having second thoughts about the wisdom
of promoting Muslim mass immigration as a strategy to achieve Catalan
independence, at least 10,000 Catalans with links to the separatist movement
have actually converted to Islam in recent years.

It is believed that two out of every ten Catalan radicals who
belong to the Republican Left of Catalonia (ERC), a far-left political party,
are converts to Islam.

 The ERC, which now governs Catalonia, has
vehemently refused to sign a cooperation agreement with the central
government in Madrid to fight jihadist terrorism.

Soeren Kern is
a Senior Fellow at the New York-based
 Gatestone
Institute

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The
articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of
Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents
may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of
Gatestone Institute.
---
Catalonia location on the Spain map



Saturday, August 12, 2017

why Saudi Arabia and Israel have united against Al-Jazeera, Robert Fisk, The Independent UK

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/al-jazeera-saudi-arabia-israel-policy-terrorism-isis-iran-prince-mohamed-netanyahu-a7885851.html



  1. Voices

If you're wondering why Saudi Arabia and Israel have united against Al-Jazeera, here's the answer

There are still honourable Israelis who demand a state for the Palestinians; there are well-educated Saudis who object to the crazed Wahabism upon which their kingdom is founded; there are millions of Americans, from sea to shining sea, who do not believe that Iran is their enemy nor Saudi Arabia their friend. But the problem today in both East and West is that our governments are not our friends
24K
may-saudi.jpg
Theresa May has already suppressed a report so it wouldn’t upset the Saudis. And we wonder why we go to war with the Middle East AFP
When Qatar’s Al Jazeera satellite channel has both the Saudis and the Israelis demanding its closure, it must be doing something right. To bring Saudi head-choppers and Israeli occupiers into alliance is, after all, something of an achievement.
But don’t get too romantic about this. When the wealthiest Saudis fall ill, they have been known to fly into Tel Aviv on their private jets for treatment in Israel’s finest hospitals. And when Saudi and Israeli fighter-bombers take to the air, you can be sure they’re going to bomb Shiites – in Yemen or Syria respectively – rather than Sunnis.
And when King Salman – or rather Saudi Arabia’s whizz-kid Crown Prince Mohammad – points the finger at Iran as the greatest threat to Gulf security, you can be sure that Bibi Netanyahu will be doing exactly and precisely the same thing, replacing “Gulf security”, of course, with “Israeli security”. But it’s an odd business when the Saudis set the pace of media suppression only to be supported by that beacon of freedom, democracy, human rights and liberty known in song and legend as Israel, or the State of Israel or, as Bibi and his cabinet chums would have it, the Jewish State of Israel.
So let’s run briefly through the latest demonstration of Israeli tolerance towards the freedom of expression that all of us support, nurture, love, adore, regard as a cornerstone of our democracy, and so on, and so on, and so on. For this week, Ayoob Kara, the Israeli communications minister, revealed plans to take away the credentials of Al Jazeera’s Israeli-based journalists, close its Jerusalem bureau and take the station’s broadcasts from local cable and satellite providers.
0:00
/
3:52
Al Jazeera exclusive: Former leader of al-Nusra Front confirming split from al-Qaeda
This, announced Ayoob Kara – an Israeli Druze (and thus an Arab Likud minister) who is a lifelong supporter of the colonisation by Jews of Israeli-occupied Arab land in the West Bank – would “bring a situation that channels based in Israel will report objectively”. In other words, threaten them. Bring them into line.
Bibi Netanyahu long ago accused Al Jazeera of inciting violence in Jerusalem, especially in its reporting of the recent Jerusalem killings – but since just about every foreign journalist in and outside Israel who has dared to be critical of the state has at one time or another been accused of incitement as well as anti-Semitism and other lies, this is just par for the course.
Personally, I have found Al Jazeera’s reporting from Israel pretty pathetic, its fawning reverence for the state all too painfully illustrated when its Qatar anchorwoman expressed to an Israeli government spokesman live on air her channel’s condolences on the death of Ariel Sharon, the monstrous Israeli ex-defence minister who was held responsible for the massacre of up to 1,700 Palestinians in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camp massacres of 1982.
0:00
/
1:32
Independent candidate claims Amber Rudd shut down his speech about arms sales to Saudi Arabia
Ayoob Kara, however, has actually taken his cue from his fellow Arabs. And he admits it. Israel had to take steps, he said, against “media, which has been determined by almost all Arab countries to actually be a supporter of terror, and we know this for certain”. So the Israelis, it appears, now receive lessons on media freedoms from “Arab countries”. Not just the Saudis, of course, but from “almost all Arab countries” whose unfettered media – one thinks at once of the untrammelled liberal press of Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Algeria and yes, “almost” the entire media of the Gulf – are bastions of truth-telling, hard-hitting opponents of authoritarian regimes, constitutionally protected from dictatorial abuse. Forgive the hollow laughter. But is this really how Israel wants to define itself?
Well, yes it is, I suppose. For if an unwritten alliance really exists between Saudi Arabia and Israel, then all options – as US presidents and secretary Hillary Clinton used to say – are “on the table”.
Imprisonment without trial, extrajudicial executions, human rights abuses, corruption, military rule – let’s say this at once: all these characteristics belong to “almost all” Sunni Muslim Arab nations – and to Israel in the lands it occupies. And as for being a “supporter of terror” (I quote Israeli minister Kara again), one must first ask why Sunni Gulf Arabs have exported their fighters – and their money – to the most vicious Sunni Islamists in the Middle East. And then ask why Israel has never bombed these same vile creatures – indeed, ask why Israel has given hospital treatment to wounded fighters from the Sunni al-Nusra – in other words, al-Qaeda, the perpetrators of 9/11 – while attacking Shiite Hezbollah and Alawite (Shiite) led-Syria, and threatened to bombard Shiite Iran itself which is a project, I should add, of which Kara himself is all in favour.
0:00
/
0:23
Saudi Arabia arrest singer for ‘doing a dab’
Nor must we forget that America’s insane President and his weird regime is also part of the Saudi-Israeli anti-Shiite confederation. Trump’s obscene $350bn arms sales to the Saudis, his fingering of Iran and his hatred of the world’s press and television channels makes him an intimate part of the same alliance. Indeed, when you look at one of Trump’s saner predecessors – George W Bush, who also hated Iran, kowtowed to the Saudis and actually talked to Tony Blair of bombing Al Jazeera’s own headquarters in Qatar, he who made sure the wealthy bin Laden family were flown out of the States after 9/11 – this American-Saudi-Israeli covenant has a comparatively long history.
Being an irrational optimist, there’s an innocent side of my scratched journalistic hide that still believes in education and wisdom and compassion. There are still honourable Israelis who demand a state for the Palestinians; there are well-educated Saudis who object to the crazed Wahhabism upon which their kingdom is founded; there are millions of Americans, from sea to shining sea, who do not believe that Iran is their enemy nor Saudi Arabia their friend. But the problem today in both East and West is that our governments are not our friends. They are our oppressors or masters, suppressors of the truth and allies of the unjust.
0:00
/
0:44
May denies suppressing report into Saudi Arabia’s funding of extremism to protect arms deals
Netanyahu wants to close down Al Jazeera’s office in Jerusalem. Crown Prince Mohammad wants to close down Al Jazeera’s office in Qatar. Bush actually did bomb Al Jazeera’s offices in Kabul and Baghdad. Theresa May decided to hide a government report on funding “terrorism”, lest it upset the Saudis – which is precisely the same reason Blair closed down a UK police enquiry into alleged BAE-Saudi bribery 10 years earlier.
And we wonder why we go to war in the Middle East. And we wonder why Sunni Isis exists, un-bombed by Israel, funded by Sunni Gulf Arabs, its fellow Sunni Salafists cosseted by our wretched presidents and prime ministers. I guess we better keep an eye on Al Jazeera – while it’s still around.