http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/fp_uploaded_documents/111117_Ijaz%20memo%20Foreign%20Policy.PDF
Monday, November 21, 2011
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Malappuram goes to London to get govt school English teachers - The Indian Express, Mumbai - India
" Britons were ready to take classes free of cost and even bore the cost of the air tickets. Only local accommodation has been provided by the municipality."
http://m.indianexpress.com/
Malappuram goes to London to get govt school English teachers
Posted: Sun Nov 20 2011, 09:03 hrs
Nilambur: It was in 1990 that Malappuram, the district with the highest number of Muslims in the country after Murshidabad in West Bengal, decided to turn its fortunes around with education. Census 2011 put the literacy figures for the district at 93.55 per cent; this March, it registered 88.55 pass percentage in Class X exams. Now this Kerala district has gone one step further, flying down native Britons to teach the English language to its next generation of students.
Four of them have joined as special English teachers at the Government Vocational Higher Secondary School at Nilambur, under ‘Sadgamaya’, a project jointly implemented by the Education Department and the Nilambur municipal body, with UNICEF association. Two more will fly down from the UK next month to teach English to students of Classes VIII and IX till February end.
The teachers were selected through an interview held in London, that weaned out anyone not a natural Briton (to avoid varying accents). They underwent a brief workshop before taking up the assignment.
Nilambur municipal chairman Aryadan Shoukkathu, an award-winning film producer and a Congress leader, says it is perhaps the first time in the state that teachers from Britain have been brought to teach English.
General Education Secretary M Shivashanker said they placed an advertisement in a leading travel magazine in the UK to attract the teachers, a clever idea considering Kerala’s popularity as a tourist destination.
The idea was to attract professionals who take a break from work to travel and were interested in spending their vacations contributing to society. “Some of the teachers’ training institutes in the UK which I had visited were ready to provide more people in this manner,” says Shivashanker.
“The advertisement, which demanded teaching experience from the applicants, evoked 200-odd expressions of interest. To get English teachers from Britain who could teach a correct and uniform accent, we avoided applications from German and French citizens living in the UK. The six teachers were selected after interviewing 10 shortlisted applicants.”
Municipal chairman Shoukkathu says the Britons were ready to take classes free of cost and even bore the cost of the air tickets. Only local accommodation has been provided by the municipality.
One of the teachers, Imelda Devlin, who was an education advisor at University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, says there are many retired professionals in the UK interested in teaching English. “Many retired due to economic factors without exhausting the desire to teach,” says Devlin, who took voluntary retirement last year. “I had been to India as a tourist. After retirement, I had been missing my classes. One of my friends intimated me about the project.”
Management consultant Andrew Allport and his wife Beverly, a college teacher, see the assignment as an opportunity to spend time in Kerala. The project period also coincided with the onset of winter in the UK. “We may be able to get new ideas in teaching,” say the couple.
Carle Flack, the youngest in the group, has done a course at the teachers’ training institute. A project conservator in a museum, Flack says: “During the free hours at school, we interact with the students to help neutralise their Malayalam accent.”
Seeing the level of interest from both sides, officials are now planning to implement the project in 70-odd schools in the region next.
http://m.indianexpress.com/
Malappuram goes to London to get govt school English teachers
Posted: Sun Nov 20 2011, 09:03 hrs
Nilambur: It was in 1990 that Malappuram, the district with the highest number of Muslims in the country after Murshidabad in West Bengal, decided to turn its fortunes around with education. Census 2011 put the literacy figures for the district at 93.55 per cent; this March, it registered 88.55 pass percentage in Class X exams. Now this Kerala district has gone one step further, flying down native Britons to teach the English language to its next generation of students.
Four of them have joined as special English teachers at the Government Vocational Higher Secondary School at Nilambur, under ‘Sadgamaya’, a project jointly implemented by the Education Department and the Nilambur municipal body, with UNICEF association. Two more will fly down from the UK next month to teach English to students of Classes VIII and IX till February end.
The teachers were selected through an interview held in London, that weaned out anyone not a natural Briton (to avoid varying accents). They underwent a brief workshop before taking up the assignment.
Nilambur municipal chairman Aryadan Shoukkathu, an award-winning film producer and a Congress leader, says it is perhaps the first time in the state that teachers from Britain have been brought to teach English.
General Education Secretary M Shivashanker said they placed an advertisement in a leading travel magazine in the UK to attract the teachers, a clever idea considering Kerala’s popularity as a tourist destination.
The idea was to attract professionals who take a break from work to travel and were interested in spending their vacations contributing to society. “Some of the teachers’ training institutes in the UK which I had visited were ready to provide more people in this manner,” says Shivashanker.
“The advertisement, which demanded teaching experience from the applicants, evoked 200-odd expressions of interest. To get English teachers from Britain who could teach a correct and uniform accent, we avoided applications from German and French citizens living in the UK. The six teachers were selected after interviewing 10 shortlisted applicants.”
Municipal chairman Shoukkathu says the Britons were ready to take classes free of cost and even bore the cost of the air tickets. Only local accommodation has been provided by the municipality.
One of the teachers, Imelda Devlin, who was an education advisor at University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, says there are many retired professionals in the UK interested in teaching English. “Many retired due to economic factors without exhausting the desire to teach,” says Devlin, who took voluntary retirement last year. “I had been to India as a tourist. After retirement, I had been missing my classes. One of my friends intimated me about the project.”
Management consultant Andrew Allport and his wife Beverly, a college teacher, see the assignment as an opportunity to spend time in Kerala. The project period also coincided with the onset of winter in the UK. “We may be able to get new ideas in teaching,” say the couple.
Carle Flack, the youngest in the group, has done a course at the teachers’ training institute. A project conservator in a museum, Flack says: “During the free hours at school, we interact with the students to help neutralise their Malayalam accent.”
Seeing the level of interest from both sides, officials are now planning to implement the project in 70-odd schools in the region next.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Get out, leave AF to Pak - By Shekhar Gupta, Senior Editor, The Indian Express, Mumbai
http://www.indianexpress.com/
Get out, leave Af to Pak
Sat, 19 Nov 2011
Get out, leave Af to PakPublish Post
Publish Post
Shekhar Gupta
Tags : shekhar gupta, columnist, indian express, Get out, leave Af to Pak
Posted: Sat Nov 19 2011, 03:12 hrs
The sharply polarised political debate on the nuclear deal was the most significant instance of the so-called holy national consensus on foreign policy breaking in India. Some of this spirit keeps returning vis-a-vis Pakistan any time the government reaches out to Pakistan, or when there is another terror attack. But beyond that, the larger consensus remains intact. It is not healthy for a democracy, and particularly not when it has a strategic community that has had even greater continuity than its establishment economists, defying all changes of government, leaders, ideology. That is why the time has come to question, or at least intellectually challenge, some other aspects of this lazy “consensus”. Even at the risk of inviting the charge of apostasy, therefore, the time might have come to question the wisdom and prudence of our totally unquestioned, un-debated idea of engaging in a dirty little cold war with Pakistan in Afghanistan once the Americans withdraw from there.
Today, everybody seems to be accepting the idea that Afghanistan is of great strategic significance to India, and we can neither cede it to Pakistan, nor leave them to fill the power vacuum that the Americans will leave behind. Similarly, that this is the Great Game country, and we are back to the Great Game, somehow inheriting the mantle of the British power in the 19th century, except that we might have to deal with an additional distraction called Pakistan. Further, that Afghanistan is a resource (mineral)-rich land where we have future commercial stakes, and is a gateway to Central Asia, making transit rights of such paramount importance for us.
There is some truth to some, but not all, of these. But the larger picture may look very different on closer examination. Also, engaging in a policy that puts us permanently and, inevitably, violently at odds with the Pakistanis is an idea that is being accepted much too readily. As if this is our destiny, part of an ongoing blood feud. As if we have no choice.
All of this, frankly, is lazy, self-serving rubbish, dished out by a strategic establishment that suffers terminally from a cold war mindset, and does not quite know, like all bigger powers (the US included), when to declare victory, and when to cut its losses.
The more curious thing is, some of this is happening under a prime minister who never tires of exhorting his policy-makers to “think out of the box” and a national security advisor who has built a formidable reputation for doing exactly this, not just now but over many decades of diplomatic service.
What kind of strategic importance does Afghanistan have for us now? Yes, we need transit to Central Asia. But to reach Afghanistan, we have to first persuade the Pakistanis to grant us transit. The more we jostle with them for influence in Afghanistan, the lesser the chances of their being so nice to us. Yes, Afghanistan is resource-rich and the Chinese may get there if we are not there.
But what are we, meanwhile, doing with our own mineral resources? So many of our mines are shut, or not accessible. We might get a hundred times more value by either fighting, or bribing (as everybody eventually does with insurgents in Afghanistan), our own Maoists to be able to exploit our own mines. And the Chinese will get there before us anyway. And yes, there will be a power vacuum in Afghanistan. It will still be a country of great strategic importance. But for whom, is the question. It will be of no strategic importance to us. None of our supplies or trade come to Afghanistan. None of our bad guys hide there. No Afghan has ever been involved in a terror attack on India. In fact, almost never has a terror attack on us been even planned in the more precise Af-Pak region. They have all been planned and executed between Muzaffarabad, Muridke, Karachi and Multan. Almost never has an Afghan, Pakhtun, Baluch, Tajik, any ethnicity, been involved in a terror attack in India. It’s always been the Punjabis. Ask anybody in the Indian army who has served in Kashmir and he will tell you that the intruders he fought were exactly of the same ethnic stock as the bulk of the Pakistani army he may have to fight in a real war: the Punjabi Muslims.
Yes, as we said earlier, Afghanistan is still a country of great strategic importance. But for Pakistan, and certainly not for us.
Pakistan has a long, unsettled border with it and a more-than-latent irredentist Pathan sentiment on both sides of the Durand Line that it dreads spinning out of control as (and if) Afghanistan breaks up along north-south-west ethnic lines. From tribal ties, to funny trade-links, like gun and drug-running, an unsettled Afghanistan will be a permanent thorn in Pakistan’s side when six divisions of its army are already not able to get the measure of the armed anarchy in FATA.
Why should India then get into this unwinnable mess? More importantly, why should India give the Pakistani army and the ISI just what they need, a great, holy, moral justification to pour into Afghanistan to “fight the Indian challenge”?
Leave Afghanistan to the Pakistanis. If the Pakistani army thinks it can fix, subdue and control Afghanistan, after the British, Soviets and Americans have failed to do precisely this at the peak of each one’s superpower-dom, why not let the Pakistanis try their hand at it? If they pour another ten divisions and half of the ISI into that hapless country now, isn’t it that much of a relief for us on our western borders? What could serve our strategic interests better than having the Pakistanis discover a permanent strategic threat/ challenge/ opportunity along their western borders? Won’t that be some relief?
And if the Pakistani army thinks it can succeed in a mission in which their mightier predecessors, the British and the Soviet empires and the Americans, failed, good luck to them. Because it will fulfil a fantasy of “strategic depth” they have nursed since they were rocked by totally fictional visions of massive Indian tank assaults through the desert cutting their mainland into two during General Sundarji’s Operation Brasstacks in 1987. It is since then that the Pakistani strategic establishment has been seeking “strategic depth” in Afghanistan. Now, if any army wants to seek the “depth” of Afghanistan for its armour, vital air force assets, or even nukes, good luck to them. In fact, it would be interesting to see how the rest of the world, particularly the Americans, would react if such a thing was even contemplated. Far from being a security asset ever, Afghanistan, for the Pakistani army, will be exactly what it has been for any other invading army in its history: a permanent Waterloo in slow motion.
So shall we leave the Pakistani army and ISI to their own devices in Afghanistan? Whether they fail or succeed, it will confirm only one widely held view in the global strategic community: that howsoever dashing it may be tactically, the Pakistani military-intelligence establishment’s strategic thinking emerges not from its brains but that some place lower down in human anatomy. Maybe then, the best way we can serve our own strategic interests in Afghanistan is to stay out of their way.
sg@expressindia.com
Tags : shekhar gupta, columnist, indian express, Get out, leave Af to Pak
Posted: Sat Nov 19 2011, 03:12 hrs
The sharply polarised political debate on the nuclear deal was the most significant instance of the so-called holy national consensus on foreign policy breaking in India. Some of this spirit keeps returning vis-a-vis Pakistan any time the government reaches out to Pakistan, or when there is another terror attack. But beyond that, the larger consensus remains intact. It is not healthy for a democracy, and particularly not when it has a strategic community that has had even greater continuity than its establishment economists, defying all changes of government, leaders, ideology. That is why the time has come to question, or at least intellectually challenge, some other aspects of this lazy “consensus”. Even at the risk of inviting the charge of apostasy, therefore, the time might have come to question the wisdom and prudence of our totally unquestioned, un-debated idea of engaging in a dirty little cold war with Pakistan in Afghanistan once the Americans withdraw from there.
Today, everybody seems to be accepting the idea that Afghanistan is of great strategic significance to India, and we can neither cede it to Pakistan, nor leave them to fill the power vacuum that the Americans will leave behind. Similarly, that this is the Great Game country, and we are back to the Great Game, somehow inheriting the mantle of the British power in the 19th century, except that we might have to deal with an additional distraction called Pakistan. Further, that Afghanistan is a resource (mineral)-rich land where we have future commercial stakes, and is a gateway to Central Asia, making transit rights of such paramount importance for us.
There is some truth to some, but not all, of these. But the larger picture may look very different on closer examination. Also, engaging in a policy that puts us permanently and, inevitably, violently at odds with the Pakistanis is an idea that is being accepted much too readily. As if this is our destiny, part of an ongoing blood feud. As if we have no choice.
All of this, frankly, is lazy, self-serving rubbish, dished out by a strategic establishment that suffers terminally from a cold war mindset, and does not quite know, like all bigger powers (the US included), when to declare victory, and when to cut its losses.
The more curious thing is, some of this is happening under a prime minister who never tires of exhorting his policy-makers to “think out of the box” and a national security advisor who has built a formidable reputation for doing exactly this, not just now but over many decades of diplomatic service.
What kind of strategic importance does Afghanistan have for us now? Yes, we need transit to Central Asia. But to reach Afghanistan, we have to first persuade the Pakistanis to grant us transit. The more we jostle with them for influence in Afghanistan, the lesser the chances of their being so nice to us. Yes, Afghanistan is resource-rich and the Chinese may get there if we are not there.
But what are we, meanwhile, doing with our own mineral resources? So many of our mines are shut, or not accessible. We might get a hundred times more value by either fighting, or bribing (as everybody eventually does with insurgents in Afghanistan), our own Maoists to be able to exploit our own mines. And the Chinese will get there before us anyway. And yes, there will be a power vacuum in Afghanistan. It will still be a country of great strategic importance. But for whom, is the question. It will be of no strategic importance to us. None of our supplies or trade come to Afghanistan. None of our bad guys hide there. No Afghan has ever been involved in a terror attack on India. In fact, almost never has a terror attack on us been even planned in the more precise Af-Pak region. They have all been planned and executed between Muzaffarabad, Muridke, Karachi and Multan. Almost never has an Afghan, Pakhtun, Baluch, Tajik, any ethnicity, been involved in a terror attack in India. It’s always been the Punjabis. Ask anybody in the Indian army who has served in Kashmir and he will tell you that the intruders he fought were exactly of the same ethnic stock as the bulk of the Pakistani army he may have to fight in a real war: the Punjabi Muslims.
Yes, as we said earlier, Afghanistan is still a country of great strategic importance. But for Pakistan, and certainly not for us.
Pakistan has a long, unsettled border with it and a more-than-latent irredentist Pathan sentiment on both sides of the Durand Line that it dreads spinning out of control as (and if) Afghanistan breaks up along north-south-west ethnic lines. From tribal ties, to funny trade-links, like gun and drug-running, an unsettled Afghanistan will be a permanent thorn in Pakistan’s side when six divisions of its army are already not able to get the measure of the armed anarchy in FATA.
Why should India then get into this unwinnable mess? More importantly, why should India give the Pakistani army and the ISI just what they need, a great, holy, moral justification to pour into Afghanistan to “fight the Indian challenge”?
Leave Afghanistan to the Pakistanis. If the Pakistani army thinks it can fix, subdue and control Afghanistan, after the British, Soviets and Americans have failed to do precisely this at the peak of each one’s superpower-dom, why not let the Pakistanis try their hand at it? If they pour another ten divisions and half of the ISI into that hapless country now, isn’t it that much of a relief for us on our western borders? What could serve our strategic interests better than having the Pakistanis discover a permanent strategic threat/ challenge/ opportunity along their western borders? Won’t that be some relief?
And if the Pakistani army thinks it can succeed in a mission in which their mightier predecessors, the British and the Soviet empires and the Americans, failed, good luck to them. Because it will fulfil a fantasy of “strategic depth” they have nursed since they were rocked by totally fictional visions of massive Indian tank assaults through the desert cutting their mainland into two during General Sundarji’s Operation Brasstacks in 1987. It is since then that the Pakistani strategic establishment has been seeking “strategic depth” in Afghanistan. Now, if any army wants to seek the “depth” of Afghanistan for its armour, vital air force assets, or even nukes, good luck to them. In fact, it would be interesting to see how the rest of the world, particularly the Americans, would react if such a thing was even contemplated. Far from being a security asset ever, Afghanistan, for the Pakistani army, will be exactly what it has been for any other invading army in its history: a permanent Waterloo in slow motion.
So shall we leave the Pakistani army and ISI to their own devices in Afghanistan? Whether they fail or succeed, it will confirm only one widely held view in the global strategic community: that howsoever dashing it may be tactically, the Pakistani military-intelligence establishment’s strategic thinking emerges not from its brains but that some place lower down in human anatomy. Maybe then, the best way we can serve our own strategic interests in Afghanistan is to stay out of their way.
sg@expressindia.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)