Wednesday, October 5, 2011

My Tweets of today: Wednesday, October 05, 2011

http://twitter.com/#!/GhulamMuhammed

My Tweets of today: Wednesday, October 05, 2011


Ghulam Muhammed

GhulamMuhammed Ghulam Muhammed

Revival of old COLD WAR threatened by the UN SC veto by Russia and China, over US sponsored resolution to impose sanctions on Syria.


Ghulam Muhammed
GhulamMuhammed Ghulam Muhammed

West shud blame itself for playing fast one on Russia & China, getting the Libyan US resolution passed on false pretexts recolonizing Libya


Ghulam Muhammed
GhulamMuhammed Ghulam Muhammed

Now that both Russia & China got the taste of power vetoing US sponsored resolutions, US will find itself in real soup when railroading UNSC

Saturday, September 17, 2011

A NEW DEAL FOR INDIAN MUSLIMS By Ghulam Muhammed

A NEW DEAL FOR INDIAN MUSLIMS

India is at the threshold of a New Deal for 200 million Muslims of India, at the behest of the world's super power, the USA. Signs are unmistakable that the initiative has been forced on India by the US, the world's most experienced and effective regime changer. Obsessed by the uncontrolled spread of Al-Qaeda's revengeful logic in Muslim world and Muslims around the globe, Obama and Clinton are in high-gear to see that Indian Muslims do not catch the bug; especially due to India's institutionalized persecution of and demonetization of their 15% Muslim population, which can hardly be managed to be immunized from world movements unless an organized effort is made to pacify them. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's strong advice to Police officials is certainly part of the campaign. Even Modi's change of face is all openly managed to neutralize any future possibility of the disgruntled Muslim victims of the BJP/RSS century long demonization of Indian Muslims, being reduced to manageable proportions. Earlier, Home Minister P. Chidambaram's management of media reaction to Mumbai blast had the signs of realization that automatic demonization of Muslim in media is counter-productive. Visible courting of different groups within Indian Muslim community, in the best traditions of 'divide and rule' strategies, too is not forgotten by the US. It is unthinkable that a US consulate would organize an exhibition on the lives of US Muslims in the pristine boundaries of Haji Ali Dargah in Mumbai. US authorities have done their home work on Who’s Who in Muslim India --- just as P. Narasimharao had done in the aftermath of Babri Masjid demolition and the alienation of Muslims from Congress. In the coming Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, rumors are afloat that BJP is courting UP Muslims with the bait of a Muslim Chief Minister's prize to 'appease' and entice Muslims into their fold.

It is a wake-up call for the Grand Old Party's deeply entrenched Brahmins to move faster than they are ever used to, if they are not to be sacrificed at the altar of America's regime change spree.

It is unfortunate that changes in Indian polity has to wait for outsiders to force the oligarchs to fully countenance the contours of their anti-Muslim cancer spreading and poisoning India that is poised for a great economic upsurge. However, the speed with which this new peace moves are being implanted, shows how superficial the veneer of anti-Muslim hatred is and how that could be so easily managed, if there is the political will. Even Anna Hazare, who has been accused by some Muslim organizations as being silent on Muslim persecution, has raised his voice against Narendra Modi's farce without bringing in a committed change of heart as is a must if India has to move forward. Though Indian establishment was least bothered about any fate that the community suffered, either physically in communal riots, economically when their hard-earned properties were torched, politically, when their sizable voting strength was collected by the ruling Congress as war-time booty, socially when they are only visible in criminal or accident lists, the priorities are being forced. As the far-reaching effects of globalization and internationalization are knocking at the doors of India Inc., it is being realized that you cannot keep a 200-million community in a pressure cooker, without facing the danger of a blow-out. Big changes could get unleashed unless the political class gets its house in order and keep their looting instincts for later times and harmonize its acts with the emerging trends of the world.

The long suffering Indian Muslim would readily settle with a fair deal.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
<ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com>

------------

THE CHANGE IN PAID MEDIA TOO IS WORTH NOTICING!

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/And-I-am-not-a-terrorist/articleshow/10023637.cms

The Times of India

'And I am not a terrorist…'

Mohammed Wajihuddin, TNN | Sep 18, 2011,
Among the blizzard of reactions to the September 7 bomb blasts in Delhi, the one allegedly aired in a classroom in Jamia Millia Islamia was truly shocking. On that day, P K Basu, an honorary management professor, parroted the anti-Islamic rhetoric of the West, declaring to his class that Islam "sanctioned" violence. Basu, who later denied the charges, has since been banished from Jamia.

The professor did it openly but the scenario is not uncommon. After every blast, Muslims face a fresh wave of hate-mongering, taunts and vilification. In Mumbai too, the numerous terror attacks have forced the community to reconcile to the fact that Muslims must carry the albatross of being "sympathisers" of terrorists, if not actual terrorists themselves.

A few days after Kasab's terror attack on Mumbai, a Muslim journalist visited a an event in an art gallery in South Mumbai. Looking at the journo's card, the manager remarked, "Terrorists are not allowed." Sensing the pain he had caused, he quickly added, "I was joking. Please come in." "That was a cruel joke I will never forget," recalls the scribe.

Mohammed Altaf, who works with a multinational company, saw the attitude of his colleagues change after the July 13 bomb blasts in Mumbai. "A co-worker told me. 'Yeh sab tum logon ki wajah se hota hai (All this is happening because of you people),' " he says ruefully. Another Muslim had to endure an entire train journey listening to an angry co-passenger say that Hindu youngsters would have to "keep pistols to deal with these Pakistanis" (read Muslims).

"Muslims undeniably carry the guilt that Muslim terrorists are wreaking suffering on innocents," says Salim Alware, convener of the Federation of Muslim NGOs in Maharashtra. "Even if the involvement of Muslim terrorists is not proved, the impression is that Islamic terrorists are behind all blasts." The Federation strongly condemned the September 7 Delhi blasts through a press conference and keeps a banner saying 'We condemn the bomb blasts' always at hand.

The need to repeatedly condemn every act of terrorism shows the pit of fear that Muslims have fallen into: the fear of being maligned and framed. The practice began after the Mumbai train blasts of July 2006 with a big conference being held at KC College. Thereafter, Muslim clerics, especially those belonging to Jamiatul Ulema-e-Hind, held a series of anti-terrorism conferences. Exactly a year after the terrorist attacks on the Taj and Trident, an international conference against terrorism was held at the Taj. Even Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deoband sounded a fatwa against terrorism.

Today it has become a ritual to hold a conference against terrorism immediately after every attack. "Take the speeches made on Ganpati visarjan day at the podium created near Nagpada junction to welcome Ganesh bhakts," says Maulana Mustaqeem Azmi, president of Jamiatul Ulema-e-Hind (Maharashtra). "Hindu speakers invariably talked of Bappa's blessings and raised slogans like 'Ganpati bappa moraya'. But almost all Muslim speakers said they wanted the culprits of the Delhi high court bomb blasts hanged outside Parliament House. This betrays the fear in the Muslim psyche."

Azmi gives his own example. "A few months ago, I was going from Nagpada to Haj House," he recalls. "It was raining heavily and I saw a young man with a briefcase standing near the JJ Hospital junction. When he put out a hand, I stopped but apologised that I couldn't give him a ride because I didn't know him." The story of Ghulam Yahya, the imam of Haj House who was accused of sheltering terror suspects a few years ago, was at the back of Azmi's mind. "What if the youth was a suspect and I got framed too for sheltering him even if just for a few minutes?" he asks.

The antennae of anti-Muslim folk also get activated after terror episodes and vitriol is spewed from different platforms. Janata Dal president Subramanian Swamy's poisonous piece in a national daily after the July 13 blasts in Mumbai titled 'How to wipe out Islamic terror' declared, "The Muslims of India can join us (in the fight against terrorism) if they genuinely feel for the Hindus. That they do I will not believe unless they acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors were Hindus."

"It was an open humiliation of Muslims and an attempt to create discord among communities. Yet the police ignored it," protests former vice-chairman of Maharashtra state minorities' commission Abraham Mathai, who petitioned the high court after the police refused to lodge a complaint. Little wonder, therefore, that most Muslims now dread their own shadow and feel the need to reiterate their patriotism at every opportunity.

India to back Palestinian bid for U.N. membership - THE HINDU

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2462323.ece

Return to frontpage

New Delhi, September 17, 2011

India to back Palestinian bid for U.N. membership

Special Correspondent

Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai.

  Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai.

India was among the first countries to recognise Palestine when it was proclaimed in November 1988: Ranjan Mathai
India will support a Palestinian bid for membership of the United Nations at a meeting of the General Assembly scheduled for later this month, Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai said on Friday.


The announcement came hours after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas went on television to announce that his administration was “going to the United Nations to request our legitimate right, obtaining full membership for Palestine in this organisation.” Future negotiations with Israel, Mr. Abbas said, “no matter how difficult, will be between one state and another.”

Mr. Mathai told journalists that India “will support the resolution on Palestine seeking membership of the United Nations” and that India was among the first countries to accord the state of Palestine diplomatic recognition when it was proclaimed in November 1988.
Frustrated at a two-year deadlock with Israeli negotiators, the Palestinian Authority hopes its application for the U.N. membership would strengthen its demand that Israel cede territories it occupied during the 1967 war. These territories include East Jerusalem, which Israel now claims as part of its capital, and has been a key stumbling block in the negotiations.

The Palestinian application will need the backing of the Security Council and a two-thirds majority in the General Assembly — but is almost certain to be blocked by the U.S.

The U.S. Senate, in a resolution passed in June, has called on President Barack Obama to veto the Palestinian bid. Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the U.N., said this summer that the U.S. could also withdraw funding for the international body — estimated at $500 million a year — if the vote went through. “I cannot frankly think of a greater threat to our ability to maintain financial and political support for the United Nations in Congress than such an outcome.”

European Union diplomats had been seeking to avert a potential showdown at the U.N., attempting to mediate a deal that would have kick-started Israeli-Palestinian talks. The EU had also suggested that the Palestinians seek to be recognised as an “entity” rather than a full-blown state.

Though the Palestinian issue is likely to be at the centre of diplomatic attention at the U.N., India will also seek to underline its concerns on a welter of other issues.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who will travel to New York later this month, is scheduled to address the General Assembly on September 24. He will also meet several world leaders — though at least one of those he might have spoken to, Pakistani Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani, has cancelled his planned visit because of the severe floods in his country.

Mr. Mathai said the Prime Minister's address would focus on the challenge of the rising food and fuel prices, global counter-terrorism cooperation, reforms to the U.N. Security Council, and the need to resolve the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East “through negotiation and diplomacy rather than the use of force.”

Thursday, September 15, 2011

MUMBAI’S URDU ‘INQUILAB’ UNDERGOES A POLITICAL ‘INQUILAB’ - By Ghulam Muhammed

Friday, September 16, 2011

MUMBAI’S URDU ‘INQUILAB’ UNDERGOES A POLITICAL ‘INQUILAB’

Alarms bells were sounded among Urdu readership, when Mumbai’s prominent Urdu daily, Inquilab, changed hands and was bought together with the parent company, Mid-day by a Hindi newspaper group. Though the Hindi group put out word that there will be no change in Inquilab’s steller role in projecting Muslim issues, today’s edition shows how political pressure would have worked, when Inquilab did not put the gory details of Bharatpur riots in which  4 Muslims died and police is accused of being most brutal with Muslim protestors over a public Qabarastan dispute. The other 3 Mumbai’s Urdu newspapers, Urdu Times, Sahara and Sahafat, all carried the news of Bharatpur riots on front page; some covering the news in across the front page headlines and giving full perspective of the riots. Unfortunately, Inquilab could only spare a small one column space on the front page, though clearly making out that all dead were Muslims.

India’s Muslims had always had to contend with communalized press that is owned by other than their community. It is only those that made a conscious effort to stick to the line of secular reporting, that at times have did justice to the aggrieved community that has been routinely mauled and attacked by both rioters and police, all throughout Free India’s 64 year history. Even yesterday’s Bharatpur Riot, has been ignored by Time of India; though more mainstream newspaper, The Indian Express has given a fairly detailed account on its 2nd page.

For all practical purposes, the main concern of Indian Muslims has remained security. Hundreds of communal riots from cities, to smaller towns to villages, has been organized by the dominant political and social groups to deprive Muslims any semblance of a peaceful and dignified life. They are tolerated only as far as they can vote en mass to give the essential marginal push to winning side. These communal riots are at times organized with dual purpose in mind: force Muslims to vote for any particular political party or candidate, or on the other side, impress Hindu majority that the ruling government and its police force is not ‘appeasing’ Muslims. The police has to resort to harsh measures to attack Muslims, their properties, their homes and their dignity, to prove to their bosses that they are on the job.

This sordid saga of forced democracy, has never been given full attention by the Election Commission of India, to go after the genesis of such riots that distort and debase democratic elections in the ‘world’s largest democracy’.

And to compound the tragedy, avenues for Muslims to voice their grievances, are being restricted day after day. It is therefore a sad day for readers of Urdu ‘Inquilab’ that a newspaper that has a long history of secular affiliations, should fall into the hands of people who hardly have any sympathy for Muslim lives in India.

Some fault lies with the community, which had a robust media presence during freedom struggle days, has now completely forgotten its leadership role and has not bothered to own or participate in Media and Media related activities, so that their community’s issues get publicized. Community leaders should realize that in this modern age of communication, media is the first line of defence to any beleaguered community. Besides, it is a very lucrative business industry that should attract sizable investment.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
-------

Day after clash, tension in Bharatpur continues

Submitted by admin4 on 15 September 2011 - 1:00pm
By IANS,

Jaipur : Tension persisted in Rajasthan's Bharatpur district Thursday, a day after clashes between two communities over a plot of land claimed at least four lives and left 21 injured, mostly with gunshot wounds, police said.

Curfew was imposed in Gopalgarh and nearby areas in the district, about 170 km from here, and prohibitory orders banning the gathering of five or more people on the outskirts were enforced by the district administration to contain the tension.

"Curfew has been imposed in Gopalgarh, Kaman, Sikari, Pahari, Jurhata and Kaithwara police station areas," said an official.
The armed forces have been called in.


"Situation is tense, but under control. People are not being allowed to come out of their houses. No untoward incident was reported after the clash," said Bharatpur Superintendent of Police Hinglaz Dan.

A district administration official added that bullets continued to be fired from both sides till about 10 p.m. Many shops were set on fire and looted.

Amongst the injured is a Rajasthan Administrative Service (RAS) officer, who was deputed as additional district magistrate (ADM) in Bharatpur.

Police said the dispute between the Gujjar and Meo communities was over a piece of land with one group claiming that it was for a burial centre and the other that it was for a pond.

"In the revenue records of the district administration, the land had been allotted for a burial centre mistakenly. When people approached senior officials, the case was referred to a sub-divisional magistrate. The other group claimed the disputed land was for construction of a pond," said an official.

A meeting to discuss the issue was held Wednesday in the presence of two legislators.

"As soon as the meeting ended, incidents of arson and stone pelting were reported in the area and soon both groups got engaged in a gunfight," the official said.

Home Minister Shanti Dhariwal told reporters that police had also fired in the air to disperse the crowd.

There was confusion over the death toll. The administration first said eight people were killed but Thursday morning brought the number down to four.
----------

Fri, 16 Sep 2011

 

Bharatpur clash: Day after, no arrests, death toll four



Posted: Fri Sep 16 2011, 01:57 hrs Gopalgarh:

Empty cartridges strewn over the road and charred remains of what used to be shops are reminders of the violent evening that shook the sleepy village of Gopalgarh in Rajasthan on Wednesday.

The police had opened fire on two groups who were engaged in a gun battle after firing in the air through the day in a show of might during an ongoing land dispute. Bodies of three people were taken away from the spot on Wednesday night, while another was found decaying in a field nearby on Thursday morning.

Krishan Kunal, District Magistrate of Bharatpur, where Gopalgarh is situated, said two of the 21 others who were injured were critical.
However, a day later, authorities were yet to arrest or detain anyone or even seize any firearm that may have been used in what they said was a fierce gun battle that lasted well over an hour.

“We have registered a criminal case of murder, rioting and arson. No one has been detained so far, nor have any seizures been made,” said Hinglal Dan, SP, Bharatpur. Dan said they had not yet taken a count of how many rounds the police fired. Another senior police officer said they had identified at least 15 rioters.

When asked about the weapons that the warring groups may have used, DM Kunal said, “All I can tell you is, they had good weapons.” Rescuers were till late on Thursday trying to pull out from a well nearby what could be two more bodies, but Dan said only a post mortem could confirm if they were human remains.

The deathly silence that prevailed in the empty streets of Gopalgarh on Thursday was broken only by the loud hum of riot control trucks and police jeeps.

Kunal said law and order had been fully restored by Thursday morning and security personnel were taking out flag marches in and around the village. The police said a curfew enforced in six police station areas adjoining Gopalgarh will continue on Friday too.

All the four who died in the gun battle belonged to the dominant Meo community, while among the injured were also those from the rival Gujjar community, the police said. The warring groups attacked each other with guns, butcher’s knife and anything they could lay their hands on, the police said.

The DM said the trigger was a piece of land a little more than six bighas situated next to the village mosque. The Meos say the land belongs to graveyard that shares its boundary with the plot, while the Gujjars say they own it. Kunal said the dispute has continued for nearly four decades. “After the two communities fought again two months back, we asked the Sub Divisional Officer to begin a case to settle the ownership dispute. The case is subjudiced,” Kunal said.

Fresh trouble began when men from the two communities began arguing over the land again on Tuesday, and rumour spread that the Imam had been roughed up. The unrest began to simmer when on Wednesday morning hundreds of Meos and Gujjars from neighbouring villages converged at Gopalgarh, the police said. Some Jats also came.

District management and police officials who had reached the place called representatives of the two communities to the police station less than 50 m away to resolve the dispute, said officials. Just when a resolution was about to be made, gun shots were heard outside, policemen recalled. “We ran outside and saw the two groups had begun firing at each other. A few senior officers who ventured nearer to the rioters had to rush back,” a policeman said.
-----

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Suspended police officer Sanjiv Bhatt's open letter to Narendra Modi - NDTV Correspondent,

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/suspended-police-officer-sanjiv-bhatts-open-letter-to-narendra-modi-133735%26cp

NDTV.com homepage Updated: September 15, 2011 11:51 IST

Suspended police officer Sanjiv Bhatt's open letter to Narendra Modi

NDTV Correspondent, Updated: September 14, 2011 22:28 IST

Ahmedabad:  Suspended police officer Sanjiv Bhatt criticised Narendra Modi for misinterpreting the Supreme Court verdict and has written an open letter to the Gujarat Chief Minister. The Supreme Court had, on Monday, ruled that it will no longer monitor the case against him for the communal riots at Gulbarga Society - one of the epicentres of the riots that ravaged Gujarat in 2002, killing 1200 people, most of them Muslims.

Here is the text of the letter:

Dear Shri Modi,

I am glad you chose to write an open letter to the 'Six crore Gujaratis'. This has not only afforded me a window to your mind but has also given me an opportunity to write to you through the same medium.

My dear brother, it seems you have completely misconstrued the judgement and order passed by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in Criminal Appeal No. 1765 of 2011 arising out of S.L.P. (CRL.) No. 1088 of 2008 viz. Jakia Nasim Ahesan & Anr. Versus State of Gujarat & Ors. It is very likely that your chosen advisors have once again misled you and have in turn, made you mislead the 'Six crore Gujaratis' who look up to you as their elected leader.

Let me as a younger brother-Gujarati, help you decipher the judgement and order that has led to unequivocal gloating and jubilatory celebrations among some sections of the political spectrum. It has been stated in your letter that "One thing is apparent from the Supreme Court's judgment. The unhealthy environment created by the unfounded and false allegations made against me and Government of Gujarat, after 2002 riots, has come to an end". Let me clarify that even by a long shot, the order of the Honourable Supreme Court has nowhere, even remotely, suggested that the allegations contained in the complaint filed by Mrs. Jakia Jafri were unfounded or false. The truth is that the order of the Honourable Supreme Court is in fact, a very major leap in the direction of delivering justice to the hapless victims of the Gujarat pogrom. As you are well aware, Mrs. Jafri had approached the Honorable Gujarat High Court with a prayer for registering her complaint as an FIR. The said petition was disallowed by the Honourable High Court of Gujarat. Mrs. Jafri, therefore, approached the Honourable Supreme Court of India by way of a Special Leave Petition against the order of the High Court. The Honourable Supreme Court directed the SIT to look into her complaint and subsequently also directed the learned Amicus to examine the evidence collected by the SIT. At the end of this long and arduous exercise the Honourable Supreme Court has not only allowed the Appeal of Mrs. Jafri and directed the SIT to virtually treat the complaint of Mrs. Jafrri as an FIR, but has also directed the SIT to file a report under section 173(2) of the CrPC Let me clarify for your benefit and for the benefit of your six crore brothers and sisters of Gujarat, that this report under section 173(2) of the CrPC is colloquially known as Charge-Sheet or Final Report. The honourable Supreme Court of India has also directed the SIT to place all the evidence collected by it, including the reports of the learned Amicus before the magistrate empowered to take cognizance. I am sure you will appreciate that in order to let the law of the land take its due course, this was the best option available to the Honourable Supreme Court as per the scheme of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

What the Honourable Supreme Court of India has given to Mrs. Jafri is much more than what she had originally prayed for. The order over which some of us are gloating in feigned glee, is in fact, a very cleverly worded order that takes the perpetrators and facilitators of the 2002 carnage a few leaps closer to their day of reckoning. The false bravado comes across as a very smart attempt to mislead the gullible people of Gujarat and instill a false sense of confidence in the political rank and file. Please be assured that we will see a very different picture as the actual import of the order starts settling in and takes judicial effect.

As one of the 'Six Crore Gujaratis', I feel deeply pained and cheated when the likes of you, consciously or inadvertently, mislead the people of Gujarat for ulterior motives. The theory propounded and practised to perfection by Paul Joseph Goebbels, one of Adolf Hitler's closest associate and Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany, can definitely work with the majority of the populace for some time. But all of us know from historical experience that Goebbelsian Propaganda cannot fool all the people for all the time.

I fully endorse your realization that "Hate is never conquered by hate." Who would know this better than you, who has served this state for the last one decade; and I, who has served in the Indian Police Service for the last 23 years. I had the misfortune of serving with you during those days of 2002 when the dance of hatred was choreographed and perpetrated at different venues in Gujarat. Albeit this is not the appropriate forum for me to discuss and reveal the details of our respective roles, I am sure that both of us will be getting ample opportunities before appropriately empowered fora to disclose our knowledge about the dynamics of hatred in the realpolitik of Gujarat. I hope you and your cronies, within and without the Government, will not hate me more for this.

I cannot agree more with you when you say that "the credibility of those who have been spreading lies and defaming Gujarat has come to its lowest ebb. The people of this country will not trust such elements anymore". But my dear brother, you seem to have got it entirely wrong as to who are the ones spreading lies and defaming Gujarat. To my mind, Gujarat has gained infamy not because of the hapless victims who have tirelessly crusading for the cause of justice and truth, but because of the despicable actions of the people who sowed and cultivated hatred to reap political and electoral benefits. Please give it a thought. Introspection can prove to be very revealing at times.

I am deeply touched by your concern and efforts to "further strengthen Gujarat's environment of peace, unity and harmony." Thanks to you and your kinsmen, Gujarat has been free from any large scale eruption of communal violence since 2002. The reasons for this may not be very obvious to our fellow 'Six Crore Gujaratis". This is my 24th year in the IPS. I was allotted to the Gujarat cadre during a time when the State was passing through the throes of widespread and sporadic communal violence. Having been baptised by fire, I have been since trying to understand and deal with the likes of you, who deal in the divisive politics of hatred. It is my well founded observation that the polity of Gujarat has now crossed the stage where communal violence can accrue electoral benefits to any political party, as the process of communal polarisation is very nearly complete in Gujarat. The experiments in the divisive politics of hatred have been very successful in the Gujarat Laboratory. You and your likes, in the political arena, have been largely successful in creating divides in the hearts and minds of the "Six Crore Gujaratis". The need to resort to any further communal violence in Gujarat is already passé.

In a constitutional democracy like ours, it is incumbent upon the state to act in good faith at all times and under all circumstances. Over the last nine and a half years many friends have fallen prey to the misleading campaign that the Gujarat carnage of 2002 was a spontaneous reaction to the condemnable action at Godhra on the fateful morning of 27 February 2002. The Newtonian Law was never abused more. You had resorted to your knowledge and understanding of Newtonian physics in March 2002 and had sought to apply it to polity and governance at the peak of the Gujarat Carnage of 2002. But what you might have deliberately missed then, and what many of us seem to be inadvertently missing now; is the universally accepted principle of governance which mandates that in a constitutional democracy, an avowedly secular State cannot be allowed to be partisan. It was the bounden duty of the State to have anticipated and controlled the possible Newtonian reaction, if any; not orchestrate and facilitate systematic targeting of innocent individuals! Be that as it may, as an expression of solidarity with your stated objective of spreading Sadbhavana in the land of the Mahatma, I resolve to join you in your Sadbhavana Mission. What better way to do this than helping the truth to come out and let the spirit of justice and goodwill prevail. As all of us understand, there can be no Sadbhavna or Goodwill without truth and justice. I hereby reaffirm my resolve to contribute my might towards the restoration of Sadbhavana in the administration and polity of Gujarat.

But let me warn you that genuine heartfelt goodwill is something we cannot demand, buy or extort... we can only strive to deserve it. And it is not going to be an easy task. The land of the Mahatma is slowly but surely coming out of its hypnotic state.

As the most powerful person in Gujarat you may think that you do not need to feel accountable to the perceptions of all sections of the community. But believe me, history has proved time and again, that power without genuine goodwill is a path fraught with dangers... it is also a path of no return.

Samabhava is a condition precedent for Sadbhava. Governance by equity and goodwill should not only be the first article of your faith but should also be the last article of your creed.

The truth is more frequently than not, a little bitter and not very easy to swallow. I hope that you will take this letter in the true spirit in which it is written and you or your agents will not indulge in direct or indirect acts of retribution as is your wont.

In the words of Martin Luther King Jr. - Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. The spirit of the hapless victims who have been struggling for justice in Gujarat may occasionally flag but it will not be suppressed by any amount of false Goebbelsian propaganda. The struggle for justice is never easy anywhere in the world...it calls for everlasting patience and unfailing perseverance at all times. The spirit of the crusaders for truth and justice in Gujarat is epitomised in this poem by Bhuchung Sonam, an alumnus of MS University, Baroda.

I have principle and no power
You have power and no principle
You being you
And I being I
Compromise is out of the question
So let the battle begin ...
I have truth and no force
You have force and no truth
You being you
And I being I
Compromise is out of the question
So let the battle begin ...
You may club my skull
I will fight
You may crush my bones
I will fight
You may bury me alive
I will fight
With truth running through me
I will fight
With every ounce of my strength
I will fight
With my last dying breath
I will fight ...
I will fight till the
Castle that you built with your lies
Comes tumbling down
Till the devil you worshipped with your lies
Kneels down before my angel of truth.
May the kind God give you the requisite strength to be equitable and benevolent
towards one and all!
Satyamev Jayate!
With best wishes.

Yours sincerely,
(Sanjiv Bhatt)

Sunday, September 11, 2011

The New American Century (2009) FULL LENGTH MOVIE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fk6qkHs0oM

The New American Century (2009) FULL LENGTH MOVIE


YouTube - Videos from this email
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: President Barack Obama <president@messages.whitehouse.gov>
Date: Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:10 AM
Subject: Serve and Remember
To: ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com




The White House, Washington
  Good morning,

Tomorrow, on the tenth anniversary of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, we will mourn the innocent lives lost, honor the heroic first responders who rushed to the scene, and pay tribute to our troops and military families who have served over the past ten years to keep us safe and strong.
But, I also hope you'll remember how the worst terrorist attack in American history brought out the best in the American people. From giving blood, volunteering time, and donating clothing, food and money, in the weeks and months after the attacks, we were united as a nation, everyone doing their part to lend a hand and help the country move forward together.

With just a small act of service, or a simple act of kindness towards others, you can both honor those we lost and those who serve us still, and help us recapture the spirit of generosity and compassion that followed 9/11. 


September 11th has been designated as a National Day of Service and Remembrance. Americans across the country will come together to honor the victims of 9/11 and to reaffirm the strength of our nation with acts of service and charity. In Minneapolis, volunteers will help restore a community center, in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, members of the community are building new homes for deserving families, and once again, Michelle and I will be joining a local service project as well.

There are so many ways to get involved, and every American can do something. You can join me in participating in the National Day of Service by finding a service opportunity in your area on Serve.gov.

A decade ago, our fellow citizens and first responders rushed up stairwells, into flames, and into that cockpit and gave their lives to save others. In the decade since, a new generation -- our military personnel, intelligence officers, and law enforcement -- has stepped forward to serve our country and keep us safe.

This weekend, I encourage all Americans to remember not only the innocent lives we lost on that day, but to remember the ordinary goodness and patriotism of the American people and the spirit of unity that brought us together during the days and weeks after the attacks of September 11th. 

Sincerely,
President Barack Obama

 

  This email was sent to ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com.
Unsubscribe ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com | Privacy Policy

Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111
 
-------------------------------

Arab news
Click Here

Don't forget 9/11's other victims

On this anniversary, spare a thought for those killed in American wars
By AIJAZ ZAKA SYED

HERE we go again. It's the 10th anniversary of Sept.11 attacks and the whole world is going bananas. There has already been a deluge of special reports and commentary in anticipation of the anniversary. Newspapers and television networks have been going on and on about the events that we have heard and read about ad nauseam over the past 10 years - every year.


It's as though this is the end of the world. Every pundit and columnist worth his/her share of audience must come up with his/her own take to mark the occasion. In the end though, most of us end up solemnly churning out the same old, trite and tiresome arguments and theories that everyone seems to expect and few really pay attention to. And it's not just the media that faithfully goes through this ritual every year. There is a complete industry out there catering to this market, regularly peddling books that claim to offer new light on the events that apparently changed the world. 

Most of these tomes, however, add little to the existing corpus of theories and interpretations about the stunning attacks on the symbols and icons of American power and glory. What distinguishes these ostensible attempts to understand Islam and "Islamic terrorism" though is their pathological hatred of the Other and incredible ignorance or willful misrepresentation of Islam, Arabs and Muslims.
Bernard Lewis' The Crisis of Islam, Daniel Pipes' Militant Islam Reaches America, David Horowitz's Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left and Efraim Karsh's Islamic Imperialism: A History are only some of the most "respectable" names that ostensibly cater to the heightened curiosity about Islam and Muslims.
In the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 events, many horrified Americans understandably asked: Why Do They Hate Us? So even as most of us were as outraged by the horror of 9/11 as most Americans and Westerners had been, we nurtured a faint, innocent hope that perhaps now the US would see reason and review its policies and actions all these years. We had hoped that 9/11, unacceptable and totally reprehensible as it was, would perhaps make the US pause and ponder the cause of this corrosive anger and source of this conflict. Of course, we were wrong - and how!

Whoever carried out those attacks on New York and Washington, they turned out to be the greatest enemies of Islam and Muslims. They have managed to visit the greatest catastrophe on Muslim lands since the Mongol invasion eight centuries ago. The Mongols raped and pillaged Baghdad, the capital of Abbasid caliphate, and virtually every Muslim city. When the Mongols left Baghdad, the richest and greatest city in the world then, they had left behind two million dead, including the caliph and his sons who were bundled in a carpet and trampled by Mongol horses.  River Tigris was full of blood and darkened by the ink of millions of books and rare manuscripts that were burned down by the invaders.  

What Baghdad has witnessed under the Coalition of the Willing hasn't been much different. And if anyone thought the 9/11 would prompt America to mend its ways, well, they need to think again. Clearly, America - the militant global superpower America that we get to see and experience far beyond its borders and not American people - doesn't seem to give a damn one way or another.

According to a new poll by the Pew Research Center, Americans today are more willing to believe that US policies in the Middle East might have motivated the 9/11 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Reflecting a remarkable shift in US public opinion over the past decade, today 43 percent of Americans feel the attacks may have been motivated by something "the US did wrong in its dealings with other countries." However, 45 percent think otherwise. In the wake of attacks, 55 percent of respondents had rejected the notion.

Clearly, all is not lost yet. There's still hope for America, that is, people's America, the nation of Abe Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Mark Twain and Martin Luther King that once inspired and beckoned dreamers from around the world. The Land of the Free where it is possible for a black man with a Muslim father to pursue his "audacity of hope."

That America, however, seems to have lost its way in a wasteland where no morals, no justice and no principles exist. Some of my fellow travelers have convinced themselves that the original Land of the Free has been hijacked by a bloodthirsty, amoral and lunatic fringe. I wouldn't know the truth. After the betrayal at the hands of our hero, the change-we-can messiah who helped the world amend its view of America, I am not sure about anything anymore.


Coming back to the issue at hand, trust me all of us share the pain of those who lost their loved ones that cold morning in September 2011. Like me, most of us remember where we were that fateful day - I was watching the horror unfold on television in my cabin at the paper I worked back then in India-and how our hearts went out to those trapped inside the World Trade Center. Those who perished in that awful tragedy were innocent folks like you and me.

Representing the rich diversity of the country, there were many Muslims among the victims, just as there had been people from all faiths and ethnicities. It was no jihad, if it was indeed carried out by Al Qaeda - which is now increasingly challenged by independent researchers and experts like Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a Vietnam and US Navy veteran. It was murder, pure and simple. And you know what the Qur'an says about murder? Taking one innocent life is equal to killing entire humanity. Whoever perpetrated that outrage deserves severest punishment in this life - and next.    

That said, I have to ask this: What about the hundreds of thousands of innocent lives the US and its ever willing allies have expended - and continue to-in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere since 9/11?
Amid all this brouhaha and grand ceremonies to mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11, does anyone spare a thought for the innocent victims of America's endless war? Comparisons are odious but ask one must: How many people died in 9/11 attacks? 2,751. In its overwhelming response, the US and its allies have ravaged Afghanistan and killed more than a million in Iraq alone. And this war is far from over, although the bible-thumping crusader in White House has been replaced by someone who never tires of singing paeans to peace and has already been feted with a Peace Nobel (I know not for what!)! So, dear America, while shedding tears for 9/11 victims this year, please spare a thought for the million plus victims of your wars.


- Aijaz Zaka Syed is a commentator on the Middle East and South Asian affairs. Write him at aijaz.syed@hotmail.com

Ghulam Muhammed's Comment on Aijaz Zaka Syed's recounting of pillage of Baghdad by Mongols: We should not forget that after a time all Mongol invaders converted to Islam. That too is history that may repeat itself. Inshallah.