Thursday, March 17, 2011

US EMBASSY CABLE ON INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS'S BUYING OF MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT VOTES FOR CASH: Wikileaks - THE HINDU

http://www.thehindu.com/news/the-india-cables/article1544916.ece

THE HINDU


News » The India Cables

March 17, 2011

162458: Cash-for-votes ahead of confidence motion

Political horse-trading continued in anticipation of the special session of parliament to consider the confidence vote on July 21 followed by the vote itself on July 22.


162458 7/17/2008 13:23 08 NEWDELHI 1972 Embassy New Delhi SECRET 08 KOLKATA 209 "VZCZCXRO9793OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPWDE RUEHNE #1972/01 1991323ZNY SSSSS ZZHO 171323Z JUL 08FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHITO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2668INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVERUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVERUEAIIA/CIA WASHDCRHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DCRUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDCRHEHNSC/NSC WASHDCRUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDCRUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1566RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6661" "S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 04 NEW DELHI 001972
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/17/2018 TAGS: PREL, PARM, TSPL, KNNP, ETTC, ENRG, TRGY, IN SUBJECT: POLITICAL BARGAINING CONTINUES PRIOR TO KEY VOTE IN PARLIAMENT

REF: KOLKATA 209


Classified By: Charge D'Affaires Steven White for Reasons 1.4 (B and D)


1. (C) SUMMARY. Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and his delegation departed for Vienna on July 17 to brief the 35 Board members of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and another 19 members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) on the U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative. In Delhi, government officials responded positively to suggestions about how to address concerns emerging from Vienna, particularly the need to begin negotiating an IAEA Additional Protocol and for the IAEA to circulate India's (INFCIRC) already-public separation plan as an official IAEA document. Political horse-trading continued in anticipation of the special session of parliament to consider the confidence vote on July 21 followed by the vote itself on July 22. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader L.K. Advani each plan to host a dinner for supporters on July 20; the parties will presumably have to chose one or the other. An estranged Congress Party MP and three Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) MPs publicly stated their intention to vote against the UPA, leaving the government still clinging to a slim majority. Small parties representing collectively about 20 votes find themselves with generous suitors; one party chief has reportedly succeeded in having the Lucknow airport renamed after his father. The unrequited Left continued its anti-government rant, but showed signs of internal strain. Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee refused to resign despite pressure from within the Communist party to do so and has made it clear that he was not in favor of the Left voting with the opposition BJP against the government, a position that seems to have resonance among comrades disinclined to face early elections.
END SUMMARY.


GOI to Address IAEA Member Concerns, Fumbles on Scheduling
- - -



2. (SBU) Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon departed for Vienna on July 17 for his briefing on July 18 to IAEA Board members and NSG members on the U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative. Local media had reported statements by an IAEA spokesman on July 16 that the briefing by the visiting Indian delegation had been canceled. In fact, the briefing was scaled down from all 140 IAEA members to just the 35 Board members, in addition to the 19 others that comprise the 45-member NSG that do not also sit on the IAEA Board. Menon is traveling with Department of Atomic Energy director for strategic plans Dr. R.B. Grover, Department Of Atomic Energy's (DAE) Gitish Sharma, and Chief of Staff Naveen Srivastava. They will be joined in Vienna by Geneva-based Ministry of External Affairs Counselor Venkatesh Varma, a veteran of nuclear deal negotiations.


3. (C) Pursuant to recommendations from the U.S. Mission to the IAEA, PolCouns raised two issues of concern to IAEA Board members on July 16 with Ministry of External Affairs Joint Secretary for the Americas Gaitri Kumar and Virender Paul in the National Security Adviser's office. PolCouns stressed the importance of starting negotiations on an Additional Protocol as soon as possible, relaying that such agreements usually take about a year to conclude but that IAEA Legal could have a model text ready quickly if the Indians ask to begin negotiations. PolCouns also reported, following messages from UNVIE, that some IAEA delegations did not understand the connection between the safeguards agreement (with its blank safeguarded facilities list) and the separation plan listing the civil nuclear facilities that would fall under safeguards (already a public document). PolCouns shared that the IAEA is prepared to circulate the separation plan as an official IAEA document if the Indians request it. Both Kumar and Paul promised to get on these two tasks ""right away"" to set things up for a productive trip to Vienna for Menon. On the Additional Protocol, the Prime Minister's Special Envoy will have to push the Department of Atomic Energy, which will have the lead. On the facilities list, an instruction could go to India's mission in Vienna fairly quickly.


UPA Maintains Precarious Lead In Vote Count
- - -

NEW DELHI 00001972 002 OF 004


4. (SBU) The special session of parliament to consider the confidence vote will begin on July 21 and conclude with a vote on July 22. Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Vayalar Ravi claimed on July 15 that the government would prevail in the July 22 confidence vote with over 280 votes cast in its favor. Kuldip Bishnoi, an estranged Congress Party MP who had been suspended for floating the idea of forming his own party in December 2007, confirmed his intention to defect in the confidence vote. (This development was apparently expected by party insiders and not a leading indicator of further fragmentation within the party.) Consulate Chennai reported on July 17 that the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) has publicly stated it will vote against the UPA. One of its three members of parliament has broken from the party, but is unlikely to support the government because the TRS has positioned the trust vote as a statehood issue, so voting for the UPA would mean voting against Telangana interests.


5. (SBU) Our best guess at this time show the government maintaining its slim majority with the anticipated vote count at about 273 in favor, 251 opposed, and 19 abstentions. A similar analysis from the British High Commission tracks closely with our numbers.
Dueling Dinners Force Parties to Declare Loyalties - - -


6. (SBU) Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader L.K. Advani each plan to host a dinner for supporters on July 20, the evening before the special parliamentary session begins on July 21. Media reported that Advani will use the dinner as a strategy session to field MPs to speak against the confidence motion. Advani will also reportedly meet the BJP's National Democratic Alliance (NDA) supporters on July 17, including Chief Ministers of the states where NDA constituents are in power. Rajasthan Chief Minister Raje reportedly plans to skip the meeting, raising the ire of the BJP leadership.


7. (SBU) Prime Minister Singh's dinner on July 20 will include the Congress Party's new allies in the Samajwadi Party as well as other recent converts and fence-sitters from smaller parties. The Telegraph quoted a senior government source who said that PM Singh was ""neither crunching numbers nor seeking daily briefings on the political sensex. His bottom line is clear."" It also claimed that PM Singh was upset with the BJP for allegedly recanting on an ""understanding"" that it would support the deal. The article concludes that if the government survives the July 22 vote, PM Singh's priority would be to implement flagship social programs to thank his party for rallying behind him.


Votes For Sale
- - -

8. (SBU) Behind the scenes, the Congress Party machine is working overtime. Sonia Gandhi reportedly plans to meet Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) leader Shibu Soren and Janata Dal Secular (JD-S) leader H.D. Deve Gowda. Retaining the support of JMM's five seats and the JD-S's three seats is reportedly vital to the UPA government's strategy. In exchange for retaining the support of the three votes of the Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD), the Congress Party has reportedly pledged its support to rename Lucknow's Amausi airport after Chaudhary Charan Singh, father of RLD leader Ajit Charan Singh, who may also get a cabinet seat.


9. (C) On July 16, PolCouns met with Captain Satish Sharma, a Congress Party MP in the Rajya Sabha, a former Indian Airlines Pilot, and a close associate of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi considered to be a very close family friend of Sonia Gandhi. Sharma mentioned that he, as well as others in the party, was working hard to ensure that the UPA government wins the confidence vote on July 22. He said that the Prime Minister, Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi were committed to the nuclear initiative and had conveyed this message clearly to the party. Sharma said that PM Singh and others were trying to work on the Akali Dal (8 votes) through financier Sant Chatwal and others, but unfortunately it did not work out. He mentioned that efforts to encourage Shiv Sena (12 votes) to abstain were on-going. While different Congress operatives were working on different groups of MPs, Sharma said that Rahul Gandhi was personally working Omar


NEW DELHI 00001972 003 OF 004


Abdullah's Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (J&KNC), whose two MPs are inclined to vote in favor of the UPA. Sharma mentioned that he was also exploring the possibility of trying to get former Prime Minister Vajpayee's son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya to speak to BJP representatives to try to divide the BJP ranks. He mentioned that if the party wins the trust vote, they would then prefer to go for national elections in February or March 2009, which would give the UPA time to control prices and bring down inflation.


10. (S) Sharma's political aide Nachiketa Kapur mentioned to an Embassy staff member in an aside on July 16 that Ajit Singh's RLD had been paid Rupees 10 crore (about $2.5 million) for each of their four MPs to support the government. Kapur mentioned that money was not an issue at all, but the crucial thing was to ensure that those who took the money would vote for the government. Kapur showed the Embassy employee two chests containing cash and said that around Rupees 50-60 crore (about $25 million) was lying around the house for use as pay-offs.


11. (S) Another Congress Party insider told PolCouns that Minister of Commerce and Industry Kamal Nath is also helping to spread largesse. ""Formerly he could only offer small planes as bribes,"" according to this interlocutor, now he can pay for votes with jets.""

""What If""s: No Vote or a UPA Defeat
- - -


12. (SBU) PM Singh appears to have opened the door to the Left to call off the vote, telling media on July 16 that the government had the numbers to prevail in the confidence vote and that it was ""unfortunate"" that the special session had to be foisted upon parliament and distract the government from addressing urgent issues like inflation. PM Singh publicly acknowledged trying to get the BJP to support the nuclear initiative by reaching out to former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee, but Vajpayee reportedly deferred to opposition leader L.K. Advani to make the call.


13. (SBU) There are some signs that the GOI may decide to go ahead with the nuclear initiative even if it loses the confidence vote on July 22. Media quoted Rahul Gandhi on July 16 as saying, ""I support the PM 100 percent on the nuke deal. We are going to win the trust vote, but even if the government falls, so be it."" He also claimed the BJP was divided over the nuclear initiative, saying, ""There are people in the BJP who support the deal and do not know why their party is opposing it."" Rahul Gandhi also recalled how Left parties in the mid-1980s had stonewalled his father Rajiv Gandhi's efforts to introduce computers in government offices and vision of a computerized India. Congress Party Chief Sonia Gandhi said in Andra Pradesh on July 17 that the government ""will not compromise on the nuclear deal because it is in the national interest.""


Disagreements Among Comrades: Left Shows Signs of Strain
- - -

14. (SBU) The Left continued its rant against the government. The Community Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) Polit Bureau groused that the Prime Minister's Office set a ""dangerous precedent"" by meeting industrialist Mukesh Ambani on July 14, during which Ambani reportedly offered help in securing Shiv Sena support for the UPA government. The CPI-M said the government's rejection of the use of force against Iran by Israel was ""timely,"" but that it would only be credible if the government were to cut military ties with Israel.


15. (SBU) The Left has also begun to show signs of internal strain. CPI-M Polit Bureau member Sitaram Yechury told media on July 15 that the party erred in listing Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee among its members who withdrew support from the UPA government on July 8. 

Chatterjee said he does not want to step down as Speaker despite pressure from within the party to do so. He also wrote a letter to Prakash Karat making it clear that he was not in favor of the Left voting with the opposition BJP against the government. (Chatterjee has looked to the UPA government to help him keep his position as Speaker and appears to be rallying moderate CPI-M members disinclined to join their comrades in voting with their rival BJP against a government that they supported for


NEW DELHI 00001972 004 OF 004


several years.) Also on July 15, Samajwadi Party leader Amar Singh and two other SP leaders called for Chatterjee not to quit his post.


16. (SBU) Consulate Kolkata reported on the growing split within the CPI-M (reftel). Many CPI-M members, particularly Muslims, cannot fathom voving with the ""communalist"" BJP. A large group of West Bengal MPs do not want to bring down the government and are angry at Karat for his failed strategy. If the government falls, they fear the CPI-M could lose 10-15 seats in new elections based on unfavorable recent local election results. If the government survives, the Left will be embarrassed for having achieved nothing on the issues that are important to their constituents, few of whom care about the nuclear initiative. Though defection is a possibility, Communist Party discipline remains strong and members are unlikely to vote with the government.


Communists Find Muslims To Be More Anti-BJP Than Anti-American
- - -

17. (SBU) A Times of India report on July 17 claimed that Muslim MPs do not view the nuclear initiative confidence vote as a communal issue, but rather one of differences in perception of national interest based on party positions. Of the 37 Muslim members of parliament, 26 are in parties that have declared their support to the government for the confidence vote, while 11 are with anti-deal parties. Mayawati's Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) has tried to turn the confidence vote into into a communal issue by reaching out to Muslim councils (""bhaichara"" committees) and Islamic scholars in Uttar Pradesh and claiming that the Congress Party has compromised their interests. This strategy appears to be failing, partly because Muslims view the BJP as a more immediate threat than closer relations with the U.S. Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) MP and central committee member Hannan Mollah reportedly told media, ""Let's see what strategy can be worked out to convince the Muslim electorate that we are not working in tandem with the BJP."" Media reported a Forward Bloc local assembly member in West Bengal, Mehboob Mondal, saying, ""It's becoming difficult to explain that we are not with the BJP. It's clear that Muslims are not happy with us and their feelings may well reflect on Lok Sabha results."" 


WHITE 

Gaddafi son tells Sarkozy to return money - HERALD SUN - AFP

The treacherous Cameron and Sarkozy, both Jewish, have no shame in first courting Qaddafi and bilking private money from him to come to power in their 'democratic nations' and now ready to dump him to invade Libya for its oil wealth. Britain and France, the old die-hard colonists can never be trusted by developing world. They are the scourge of the earth.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai


---------------

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/gaddafi-son-tells-sarkozy-to-return-money/story-e6frf7jx-1226022932520


Gaddafi son tells Sarkozy to return money

  • From correspondents in Paris
  • From: AFP
  • March 17, 2011 5:04AM

LIBYAN leader Muammar Gaddafi's son overnight told "this clown" French President Nicolas Sarkozy to "give us back our money" allegedly used to finance his 2007 election victory.
Saif al-Islam told Euronews that "we have all the details and are ready to reveal everything" as Mr Gaddafi's forces closed in on rebels in the eastern city of Benghazi who France recognised as Libya's legitimate representatives.

"Sarkozy must first give back the money he took from Libya to finance his electoral campaign," Mr Gaddafi's son said when asked about France, which has along with Britain been leading calls for military intervention in Libya.

"We funded it and we have all the details and are ready to reveal everything. The first thing we want this clown to do is to give the money back to the Libyan people.

"He was given assistance so that he could help them. But he's disappointed us: give us back our money. We have all the bank details and documents for the transfer operations and we will make everything public soon."

 
The French presidency denied the allegation.
Libya's state-run news agency Jana reported recently that it would soon publish a "grave secret" that would lead to Mr Sarkozy's downfall.

Mr Gaddafi himself said yesterday that his "good friend" Mr Sarkozy had "gone mad".

"He is my friend but I think he has gone mad. He is suffering from a psychological illness," Mr Gaddafi told German television. "That is what people say who are close to him. His aides say that he is suffering from a psychological illness."

Asked about the rebellion, Saif al-Islam dismissed looming UN Security Council action saying that "within 48 hours everything will be finished" and telling rebels they would have safe passage to leave the country.

"We don't want to kill, we don't want revenge, but you, traitors, mercenaries, you have committed crimes against the Libyan people: leave, go in peace to Egypt."

"Military operations are over. Within 48 hours everything will be finished. Our forces are almost in Benghazi. Whatever the decision, it will be too late."

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

A Welcome Challenge - By Najeeb Jung - The Times of India + Comments by Ghulam Muhammed

Both support and the opposition of Jamia's reconfirmation of its Minority Status, is politically motivated. In politics, nothing is permanent. Sixty Four years' Brahmin rule had a field day by demonizing Indian Muslims. The flux in the electoral game plans, threatens the citadels of oligarchic rule. Muslim should beware of the sleight of hand trickery that will help the oligarchy consolidate its stranglehold, without any cost to them in having to give any empowerment to Muslims. Muslims are still the beggars and have not cultivated the leverages to demand their legitimate share in the governance of their country. This step by step approach to appease Muslims in frivolous ways, without giving their rightful dues, is another fraud by the ruling oligarchy and must be seen by Muslims as such.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai





------------------------------
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/opinion/edit-page/A-Welcome-Challenge/articleshow/7719560.cms

THE TIMES OF INDIA

TOP ARTICLE

A Welcome Challenge

Najeeb Jung | Mar 17, 2011, 12.00am IST






The order of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions declaring the Jamia Millia Islamia a 'minority' institution has generated considerable comment. Since different viewpoints have been stated, the issue needs to be objectively evaluated, inclusive of the ideological arguments.

The Jamia Millia Islamia was formed in 1920, at the behest of Gandhi, as a counter to the increasing sense of alienation among a section of Muslims. A group of nationalist Muslim leaders including Maulana Mahmudul Hasan, Maulana Mohamed Ali, M A Ansari, Hakim Ajmal Khan and Abdul Majeed Khwaja brought in all their resources to form Jamia. Others like Zakir Hussain, Prof Mujeeb and Prof Abid Hussain were to follow and devote their lives to the cause of education, in particular of Muslims, who were way behind other communities.

Registered initially as a society, Jamia became a deemed university in 1962. All these years it retained its status as a minority institution. In 1988, it became a central university by which time it had established its major faculties and departments including engineering, education, history, social work, fine arts, natural sciences, and its famous mass communication school. At that time it had roughly 50% Muslim students. Today, 23 years after becoming a central university, it still has roughly the same number of Muslim students.

Therefore, it is firstly important to grasp that the ruling does not change anything: it formalises the status quo. In an educational context where Muslims are worryingly under-represented, Jamia has historically provided a path to secular higher education to thousands of young, underprivileged provincial Muslims who receive their school education in the traditional style, in maktabs and madrassas. It has also made singular contribution to the education of Muslim girls in whose case parents would be reluctant to send them elsewhere. Today, one of the glorious achievements of the university is that within its campus one frequently sees groups where girls in hijab mix easily with all others.

But then since Jamia is indeed having 50% or more Muslims, why declare it a minority institution? Two things stand out here. First, over the last 90 years Muslims have had a sense of ownership and a fierce attachment with Jamia. They believe it is an institution of higher learning set up by their forefathers, to further in essence the cause of Muslim education, and declaring it a minority institution

However, despite this, there are reasonable arguments, focussing on the bad consequences that might follow from minority status. The most significant is that the minimum 50% reservation that minority status permits will be exceeded and this will lead to Jamia becoming a Muslim ghetto. It is further argued that once Jamia becomes a minority institution, its students will be shunned in the job market because their degrees, and diplomas, fairly or unfairly, will have been devalued by its reputation as a 'Muslim' institution.

Two points need to be made here. All minority institutions, including the Vellore Medical College and St Stephen's College, are governed by the same rules of admission. These institutions continue to be beacons of excellence despite the fact that they can theoretically take more than 50% of their students from the Christian community. Every educational institution regardless of whether it is a minority institution or not faces a choice: does it want to recruit the best students under the rules that govern it or will it misuse the rules for the sake of patronage, nepotism or communalism?

Jamia, being an older institution than most in north India, has faced this choice for nearly a hundred years, in good times and bad, and has consistently made the right decision. The fact that at all times in its history it retained Muslim student numbers to around 50% is indicative of this maturity. There is no reason to believe this will change now.

It is also important to understand that Jamia is a recipient of public money, it has a duty to demonstrate that this money is scrupulously spent and that with the changed circumstance comes far greater responsibility. It will, therefore, have to commit itself to unprecedented levels of transparency, submitting its admission processes to national testing. Open competition with published merit lists for minority and non-minority students will shine daylight on the processes by which students are admitted.

At the same time, it will demonstrate that a commitment to the welfare of an underprivileged community can be combined with a commitment to openness, fairness and excellence. Better still, if Jamia could frame rules that part of that 50% reserved for Muslims becomes available to Muslim women and the backward Muslim community, it would manage a trifecta: pluralism, social justice and gender equality.

While this is a huge affirmative action on the part of the government that the Muslim community must accept with grace and gratitude, i believe the government has put an onus on the Muslims to prove that they can look beyond common perceptions of ghettoisation, fundamentalism and so on and understand that imbedded in this initiative is the challenge to be tested at the altar of competence, professionalism and, above all, commitment to fierce nationalism and secularism that has been the bedrock of Jamia for the past 90 years.

 The writer, a former civil servant, is the vice-chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia.
Copyright © 2011 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Wikileak confirmation --- WHY INDIA’S PETROLEUM MINISTER MANI SHANKAR AIYER IS STRIPPED OF HIS PETROLEUM PORTFOLIO? - By Ghulam Muhammed

WIKILEAK CONFIRMATION ----

THIS IS WHAT I WROTE AND CIRCULATED BACK IN 2006: (Please Mark the date --- same as US Embassy cable to State Department.):


Monday, January 30, 2006

WHY INDIA’S PETROLEUM MINISTER MANI SHANKAR AIYER IS STRIPPED OF HIS PETROLEUM PORTFOLIO?
           
Unless Manmohan Singh Government can come out with some outlandish explanations to suit the occasion, people in India and abroad, will be forced to believe that the stripping of Petroleum portfolio from his petroleum minister was the handiwork of US administration manipulators, out to thwart India’s attempts to diversify its energy sources and bring in Iran as one of its major suppliers of gas.

It is no secret that Bush and his neo-con Jewish supporters, have been ganging on Iran and are out to isolate Iran as one of the ‘axis of evil’ in the Middle East, with a view to cripple Iran’s Islamic government and bring it down to impose its own puppet government as it has managed to impose the Shah as King of Iran in years past. It cannot stomach an independent and democratically governed Iran which challenges American dictats right, center and left.

India’s now erstwhile Petroleum Minister, Mani Shankar Aiyar, had not reckoned with the clout of US Administration on his own government and had gone on a limb to finalize the IRAN-PAKISTAN-INDIA gas pipeline, with some vigor that was treated as open defiance by the Bush Administration’s policy handlers. A very hardworking, intelligent and incidentally a man of some old communist/Marxist background, had burnt midnight oil to see that he could manage long term energy security for India’s burgeoning economy from independent and diverse sources, without succumbing to US over-lordship or paying overriding commission or cut to US oil corporates, who want to monopolize on India’s oil supplies and reap unearned profits in decades to come.

At every step of the way, Mani Shankar Aiyar was hampered in his efforts to put final touches to Iran gas supplies. US took the matter so seriously, that it sent its States Department Secretary Condoleezza Rice at a crucial point of time, to warn India, not to go through with its deal with Iran.

Manmohan Singh Government had no spine to assert that Iran gas pipeline arrangement was in the ‘best interest of the nation’. As TOI reports, Aiyar has apparently displeased the PM ---- by his “foreign trips”. Those trips were to Tehran and Islamabad in full pursuit of his mission in the best interest of his nation. Apparently that displeased the Prime Minister, who is honour bound to make things smoother for US administration to sew up India into its own tapestry.

On the another hand, appointment of old Congress hand from Mumbai, Murli Deora, as the new Petroleum minister, shows up, how his ‘frequent foreign trips’ to the US to court Jewish community leaders and Jewish lobby organisations, corporate heads and Congress bigwig, was the crucial difference that tilted the balance in his favour.

It will appear that from now on, all clearances for high offices in New Delhi will have to be first vetted in Washington and New York. The far-sighted Murli Deora has fully understood which way the wind is blowing and had fully covered his flanks by courting key Jewish political and financial figures in the US, to lobby for a choice cabinet post, that will now on be at the beck and call of the Americans in making all moves over India’s energy needs and investments, without any references to ‘the best interest of India’, as long as it abides by the dictats of American Jewish lobby.

Both people and media have to be ever vigilant and articulate about the moves made by the US to subjugate India as its puppet in this part of the world. And its moves in the country’s internal affairs will be the test of its apparent success or failure in buying up India for its own national interest --- regardless of how Indian people are impacted by the exploitative inroads made by a hegemonical super power.

GHULAM MUHAMMED, MUMBAI




CHENNAI, March 15, 2011

Pro-U.S. tilt in Cabinet shuffle

By Suresh Nambath


Cabinet reshuffles in India clearly have foreign policy implications, serving external objectives. This at any rate is the reading provided by a U.S. Embassy cable sent on January 30, 2006 (51088: confidential), sent by Ambassador David C. Mulford to Washington.

 The January 2006 Cabinet reshuffle, which saw the removal of “contentious and outspoken Iran pipeline advocate” Mani Shankar Aiyar and the appointment of “pro-US” Murli Deora as Petroleum Minister was described by the American Embassy as signifying a “determination to ensure that US/India relations continue to move ahead rapidly.”

The changes also strengthened the cadre of “modernizing reformers” at the top in the Government of India, the Ambassador reported. The net effect of the reshuffle, he said, was a Cabinet that is “likely to be excellent for US goals in India (and Iran).”

These Cabinet changes, in January 2006, mark a steady shift to the Right, a pro-U.S. direction within the first tenure of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), more than two years before the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal came to fruition. The American Embassy clearly tracked India's tilt to the Right from early 2006 well ahead of UPA-I's rupture with the Left parties in July 2008. Although the nuclear deal was the tipping point that led to the Left's withdrawal of support to UPA-I, the cable shows that the foreign policy gap had begun to widen long before that.

Not surprisingly, Mr. Mulford could sense the Left's uneasiness more than any UPA leader could at that time. “The undeniable pro-American tilt of the Cabinet shuffle,” Mr. Mulford added, “has infuriated the Left, which will view it as a throwing down of the gauntlet and an invitation to open warfare.”

Mr. Mulford noted that Murli Deora was one of several figures inducted with longstanding ties to the Indo/U.S. Parliamentary Forum (IUPF) and the Embassy. “The UPA inducted a large number of serving MPs, including seven from the IUPF who have publicly associated themselves with our strategic partnership,” he added. “To ensure that there are no foreign policy ripples before the President's visit, PM Singh retained the critical MEA portfolio and is likely to hold on to it until after the next session of Parliament concludes and Congress has weathered crucial Assembly elections in Kerala and West Bengal in May.”

The Embassy's Foreign Ministry contacts welcomed Mr. Aiyar's departure, and commented that his energy diplomacy had “encroached on MEA turf too many times,” leading to MEA appeals to the Prime Minister's Office to intercede. “Despite the PMO warning to back off, Aiyar's Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas continued to interfere with MEA attempts to craft policy, our contacts said, citing Pakistan, China, Burma, Bangladesh, Iran and Sudan as areas of inter-governmental conflict.”

Mr. Aiyar's unwillingness to step back reportedly led to the Prime Minister's decision to remove him from this high-profile portfolio, and “cements MEA's position as the lead bureaucracy on strategic policy making.”

Mr. Mulford pointed out that unlike Mr. Aiyar, who cultivated a reputation for anti-Americanism, Mr. Deora has been associated with the U.S.-India relationship for years. Mr. Aiyar's “self-promoting maverick diplomacy” was too much for the Prime Minister to accommodate.

Mr. Deora's “long-standing connection” to the Reliance industrial group, which includes significant energy equities, was described by the cable as his “only vulnerability.” Besides Mr. Deora, the new entrants with strong pro-U.S. credentials, according to the cable, included Mr. Saifuddin Soz, Mr. Anand Sharma, Mr. Ashwani Kumar, and Mr. Kapil Sibal.


Keywords: cable51088The India CablesWikiLeaksCablegateDavid C. MulfordMurli DeoraMani Shankar AiyarIran pipelineCabinet reshuffle

Muslim India: Clash of Culture in Indian Islam By Ghulam Muhamme...

Muslim India: Clash of Culture in Indian Islam By Ghulam Muhamme...: "Saturday, March 12, 2011 Clash of Culture in Indian Islam By Ghulam Muhammed A brisk debate within the inner circle of a select group of Ula..."

Clash of Culture in Indian Islam By Ghulam Muhammed

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Clash of Culture in Indian Islam

By Ghulam Muhammed

A brisk debate within the inner circle of a select group of Ulama and Stock Brokers committed to Islamic Banking in India, has started with a Time of India news report (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-03-06/mumbai/28659934_1_islamic-finance-muslims-sharia): “Soon, a school to teach Islamic investments."

The news report hides the fact that a private commercial group has stolen the thunder from the other group that is more concerned with the basics of do’s and don’ts of Sharia Banking and is trying hard to prepare experts and consultants that will be required to oversee the working of all Islamic Banking institutions and products in India, when the time comes. The Ulama or scholar’s group plans to get its teeth from public acceptance of their religious commitments to Islamic banking and trading norm.

On the other hand, the commercial group is trying to show they will not be under any obligation to toe the line of the Ulama or amenable to control from any other Islamic groups, as Islam does not recognize any central authority like Church or Pope, in its religious affairs. Since India is not an Islamic State, the role and duties of a Caliph as a ruler may devolve on Ulama in a pluralist society to guide the Ummah in right path. They have enormous public mandate.

Even before Indian government could prepare for legislation to augur in Islamic Banking and its affiliated commercial activities, with the advent of news that something is got to give, mobilization of investible funds from Muslim community and channeling it all to stock market and insurance industry is progressing with breakneck speed. This financial industry interest in Islamic banking products has become more pronounced after the Wall Street meltdown that exposed the vulnerability of present banking and credit system to the greed and uncontrollable ingenuity of the manipulators in world markets to run miles ahead of any oversight attempt by state authorities.

The control of credit envisaged in Islamic norms of probity and fairness, has come into focus after the secondary market mortgage debacle in the US.

India has been known to have a comparatively well managed banking sector, that in the past had successfully withstood buffeting that unscrupulous operators like the Hungarian Jewish George Soros was able to unleash on East Asia, especially wrecking Malaysian economy. In the new atmosphere of liberalization and globalization, the conservatively controlled Indian Banking and insurance sectors, are being under tremendous pressure to open up and gear itself for a new wave of developments that will make India more in tune with the world markets. It is widely believed by Indian Muslim community that the refusal by Brahmin authorities both in government and in Reserve Bank of India to open up the market for Islamic financial products has to do with communal politics, and not for any reasons of financial prudence. India’s record on its treatment of its Muslim minority is most dismal and its institutions go to any length to see that Indian Muslims do not get any foothold in any area of empowerment, be that political, social, financial, trade and industry. The stranglehold of Brahmin mentality that is deaf and blind to the needs and concerns of Indian Muslim community is so strong that none can dare even mention its name. If readers’ comments are any indication, the recently posted article on Times of India website together readers’ comments is enough to prove, how poisonous is the general public atmosphere for anything Muslim in India.

And the state, ruled by Brahmin political parties like Indian National Congress, BJP and even the much pompous Communist Party of India (Maoist) which swears by its secular credentials, have been unabashedly anti-Muslim in all their deliberations and acts of commission and omission that concern Muslims.

A pioneering effort to float a Non-Banking Financial commercial public corporation by Kerala government’s open endorsement by offering to subscribe to its capital to the extent of ten percent, was instantly challenged by an extremist Hindutva political maverick figure, that has nightmares when he sees Muslims anywhere around in the country, in the government, in the media, industry, business et al. Fortunately, the judiciary threw out his challenge to state participation in a ‘religious’ institution, that ‘Islamic Banking’ would be known as, once its starts it activities. The same Hindutva political groupings openly flaunt constitutional ban on any political party soliciting votes on religious grounds and gets approval by judiciary on the ground that it is only a cultural Hindu and has nothing to do with the ‘religion’ of Hinduism or Hindutva.

The Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s recent visit to Malaysia exposed him to the high degree of development and acceptability that Islamic Banking has been witnessing in Muslim dominated ‘secular’ Malaysia. That is enough for India’s banker prime minister to stonewall any required legislation that could accommodate Islamic Banking needs of the 200 million strong Indian Muslim community over its vocal demand to allow them the constitutional freedom to practice their religion, by availing the compulsory adherence to non-interest banking and other Sharia requirement of dealing in finance and trade.

Not withstanding the unpromising response of Indian authorities to Indian demands on Islamic Banking, the interest in the new trend of Islamic finance and its products world-wide and the huge funds now being identified as being tied up to Islamic products, has motivated entrepreneurs and Sharia experts to prepare for the day, hopefully in not too distant future, to see India allotting a big role for Islamic Banking in India as well as in the wider world market.

Within the Indian Muslim community, there is an interesting development of clash of culture now openly attracting public notice. As Aakar Patel has written in a LIVEMINT article, Gujarat and Rajasthan seem to hold a monopoly on trade, industry and finance, especially in the now expanding Indian economy. According to Aakar Patel, India without the Gujaratis and Jain marwaris, will become Bangladesh, a basket case.

Indian Muslims of Gujarat State origin, too appear to share that uncanny gift of entrepreneurship with their Hindu Baniya and Jain counterparts from Gujarat and Rajasthan. Gujarati entrepreneurs from Memon, Ghanchi, Khoja, Bohra mercantile communities are in the forefront of new ventures in mobilization of funds towards Sharia compliant stocks on Dalal Street. This group has now achieved some prominence in identifying with the new emerging market.

A parallel attempt to promote and establish Islamic Banking and Finance institution and its regulation according to Sharia is very enthusiastically and doggedly taken up by some Muslim organisations. An enterprising group has finalized approval of a Sharia Stock index to help investors in Sharia compliant sector. Insurance companies, local as well as foreign joint venture groups now going overboard in infiltrating Indian market too are eager to interact with Sharia experts and consultants to familiarize with the Sharia limits in making suitable offers to a huge untapped Muslim community savings pool.

The clash of civilization is best symbolized by the recent upheaval in Muslim community over the election of a Gujarati Muslim Aalim (Scholar) and Educationist, Maulana Ghulam Mohammed Vastanvi to head the prestigious Darul Uloom Madarsa at Deoband. The Muslim community, long dominated by Ulama and community leaders from northern states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, is now making space for a new breed of enterprising Ulama, who are prepared to expand Madarsa education to new horizons and meet Muslim communities’ new challenges in the emerging New India. Islamic Banking and Finance institutions as planned and proposed by the Ulama are more strictly aligned to the letter and spirit of Sharia while the pragmatic Gujarati Muslim, though deeply religious and observant of Islamic Sharia, are ore flexible in observance of Sharia.

The difference between the two communities’ cultural groundings is becoming more pronounced, now that it is observed that the Brahmin Raj in India is gradually giving way to Baniya Raj.

A competition between Gujarat and the REST, has been as old as India’s freedom struggle. A Brahmin Nehru piped to the post by sidelining Gujarat’s ironman Sardar Vallahbhai Patel. Even the Gujarati Mahatma Gandhi intervened to give Brahmin a chance being acceptable to a wider casteist population, rather than a Kshatri or Baniya. However, new economic politics is bolstering private sector, which is dominated by Gujarat and Rajasthani mercantile class. A similar trend is now visible in Indian Muslim community. New challenges should be recognized and responded by all the flexibility by the Muslim community to keep pace with the joneses.

Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai




  • Posted: Thu, Mar 10 2011. 8:39 PM IST
  • Columns

Why India is part dysfunctional, fully functional

By Aakar Patel

I wonder how many Gujarati novels have Bengali translations. Probably none, but Gujarat needs the literature of others and I only discovered Camus through his Gujarati translations
Indian society functions as a whole. Observed in part, it’s dysfunctional. Let me explain. Without Gujaratis and Rajasthanis, India wouldn’t have an economy. Delete Tata/Birla/Ambani/Mittal/Premji and India begins to look like Bangladesh. The rest ofthe country—Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Kashmir, UP, etc.—will have lots of culture but little else.


Relocate: Violent agitation made Ratan Tata ditch Bengal for Gujarat for his Nano. Photo by Abhijit Bhatlekar/Mint
[Also Read |Aakar’s previous Lounge columns]

That such a tiny community monopolizes the ability to raise and manage capital is frightening. However, it needs to be understood as part of a whole. There are things missing in Gujarat and Rajasthan as well, whole chunks, without which those states wouldn’t function properly.
Gujarat’s contribution to the Armed Forces, for instance, is instructive. In 2009, The Indian Express reported, Gujarat sent its highest ever number of recruits to the Indian Army. How many? A total of 719, in an army of over a million soldiers. Mind you, this was after a big awareness campaign. In the preceding two years the number of Gujarati recruits was 230. Gujarat has 55 million people but it depends on the rest of India to defend it.

Gujarat also needs another thing, though some might disagree. As a mercantile culture, Gujarati literature is quite poor. The shelves of Crossword stores in Ahmedabad (Surat has none) are lined with volumes of Bengali novels in translation. I wonder how many Gujarati novels have Bengali translations. Probably none, but Gujarat needs the literature of others and I only discovered Camus through his Gujarati translations.

Gujaratis speak no English and though Azim Premji and Ratan Tata run billion-dollar information technology businesses, they are dependent on south Indians to staff their companies. This sort of dependency is everywhere we look in India.

Mumbai’s two dominant communities, Marathi and Gujarati, are incidental to Bollywood. Bollywood is properly the product of Punjab and the high culture (“Ganga-Jamuni”) of north India’s Hindustani speakers. Why is this so? Punjab’s peasants have an extroverted physical culture (writer Santosh Desai observed that bhangra was the only Indian dance form which exposed the armpit), which is unusual on the subcontinent. This culture is the basis and the setting for entertainment, and the reason why Bollywood migrates so easily to Pakistan. However, Punjabis and north Indians need the liberal environment that only Mumbai can give for their talents to flower. That’s why Pakistan doesn’t really have a film industry, though there is plenty of talent. Partition hurt Punjabi Muslims, because they are perfect for our film industry.

Why is Pakistan such a mess? Some would blame Islam, but they’d be wrong. The problem isn’t religion at all. The problem is lack of caste balance. There aren’t enough traders to press for restraint and there are too many peasants. Too many people concerned about national honour, and not enough people concerned about national economy. Put simply: Pakistan has too many Punjabis and not enough Gujaratis. The majority of Pakistanis live in Punjab, but well over 50% of government revenue comes from just one city in Sindh: Karachi. Why? That is where the Gujarati is.

Gujaratis are less than 1% of Pakistan’s population, but they dominate its economy because they are from trading communities. Colgate-Palmolive in Pakistan is run by the Lakhani Memons, the Dawood group is run by Memons from Bantva in Saurashtra (the great Abdus Sattar Edhi is also a Memon from Bantva). The Adamjee group, advertisers on BBC, are from Gujarat’s Jetpur village and founded Muslim Commercial Bank. The Khoja businessman Sadruddin Hashwani owns hotels including Islamabad’s bombed-out Marriott. Khojas founded Habib Bank, whose boards are familiar to Indians who watched cricket on television in the 1980s. The Habibs also manufacture Toyota cars through Indus Motors. Pakistan’s only beer is made by Murree Brewery, owned by a Parsi family, the Bhandaras. Also owned by Parsis is Karachi’s Avari Hotels.

People talk of the difference between Karachi and Lahore. I find that the rational view in Pakistani newspapers is put forward by letter-writers from Karachi. Often they have names like Gheewala, a Sunni Vohra name (same caste as Deoband’s rector from Surat, Ghulam Vastanvi), or Parekh, also a Surat name.

Today capital is fleeing Pakistan because of terrorism and poor governance. To convince investors things will get better, the Pakistani government has appointed as minister for investment a Gujarati, Saleem Mandviwalla. The Mandviwallas own Pakistan’s multiplexes, which now show Bollywood. The place where Gujaratis dominate totally, as they do also in India, is Pakistan’s capital market. Going through the list of members of the Karachi Stock Exchange (www.kse.com.pk) this becomes clear. However, few Pakistanis will understand this because as Muslims they have little knowledge of caste.

The Gujarati tries to hold up the Pakistani economy, but the peasant Punjabi (Jat) runs over his effort with his militant stupidity. Why cannot the Pakistani Punjabi also think like a trader? Simple. He’s not converted from the mercantile castes. There are some Khatris, like Najam Sethi, South Asia’s best editor, but they are frustrated because few other Pakistanis think like them. Are they an intellectual minority? Yes, but that is because they are a minority by caste. One great community of Pakistani Punjabi Khatris is called Chinioti. They are excellent at doing business but in a martial society they are the butt of jokes. I once heard Zia Mohyeddin tell a funny story about the cowardice of Chiniotis and I thought of how differently a Gujarati would look at the same story.

Can the individual escape caste? Of course he can. What defines behaviour in this sense is not genes but culture. Baniyas are brought up to seek compromise, to keep emotion in check, to identify value, to understand capital, to persist. This does not come automatically, and it is wrong to believe otherwise.

My teacher, the most learned writer in journalism, is from the Burki tribe of Waziristan. It isn’t the place you would look for intellectuals, but he cannot be defined by his tribe. It takes intellectual effort, however, to distance one’s self from culture and upbringing. This is especially true in a society that is collective. And yet examples of those who defy caste and community are all around us.

There aren’t many Sardarji jokes you can crack about Manmohan Singh, an austere and measured (he would say “meyyered”) intellectual. I believe it is not possible to understand India without feeling caste. That’s why I respect the individual who breaks away, and he is everywhere you look. Our army chiefs immediately after independence were drawn from warrior castes. The Coorgs Cariappa and Thimayya, and Saurashtra’s Jadeja (from a warrior caste Gujaratis call “Bapu”). But in a few decades we had Brahmins (Sharma and Joshi) and even traders (Malhotra, Malik and Kapoor). We can learn from each other since we live with each other.

However horrible a place it may be, India is balanced out by all of us: north Indians, south Indians, east Indians and west Indians. We are a unit, and the unit works.

Aakar Patel is a director with Hill Road Media.

Send your feedback to replytoall@livemint.com

Sunday, March 13, 2011

‘Enemy Property’ that does not belong to Enemy - By Ghulam Muhammed

Monday, March 14, 2011

‘Enemy Property’ that does not belong to Enemy

No day passes in India, when the Brahmins in BJP and Congress do not come out with measures to punish Indian Muslims for the ‘sins’ of partition, even though Brahmins themselves were the main cause that India was divided.

If they had been successful even by a fraud on Muslims, by giving them false hopes, the kind that Congress and CPIM Brahmins are experts at, India would have been one strong nation today. United India would have avoided the wanton bloodshed of millions in partition riots and later in meaningless wars. Even on the basis of their ethnic origins, majority of India Muslims, unlike the Aryan Brahmins, are not foreigners; but are the natives of India. It is the Brahmins who are the outsiders, however much they try to hoodwink their own kind, the people of India and the world at large.

It was their diabolic scheme, no doubt picked up from Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’ conspiracy, that forced them to agree to the British settlement terms of a part of India, for their own future strategic security, conveniently handed over to Jinnah, with or without any resort/reference to universal referendum of Muslims of India over partition. The people of India, for the ruling class, be that represented by Indian National Congress, Muslim League or British Colonials, were most inconsequential and worthless. The Brahmins traveled all the way to Spain, Italy and Germany, to study how to cleanse India of Muslims.

To their misfortune, just as Hitler failed to carry out the Final Solution, the sheer mass of Muslims in the subcontinent was so enormous, unlike the Jews of Europe, or Arabs of Spain, that their ‘ethnic cleansing’ grand scheme did not succeed, even after hundreds of thousands of organized communal riots all across the land, all throughout the free India’s short history of 64 years.

Failing to physically eliminate them in entirety, they had fallen on their time-tested conspiracy of ostracization of the unwanted ‘maleechh’. In last 64 years they have been enormously successful in marginalization of Muslims from the entire Indian polity. They have used every trick of the trade, using executive, legislature, judiciary and police and secret services, to ensure that Indian Muslims should never be given any space to be able to pose any threat to their Oligarchy. Not unlike George Bush, surrounded by warmongers, who could not stomach that Saddam should have access to oil wealth, lest he may raise an army or develop nuclear bomb, to threaten America’s security and Super-power status, the Brahmin establishment is very prompt and quick to spot the danger of Indian Muslims coming to wealth. With the new boom that India’s liberalization and influx of foreign investments pouring in, translating in astronomical rise in real estate prices, the Brahmins, both in Indian National Congress and BJP, both in tandem, have now focused on Awkaf and Enemy Property Administration, to see that Muslims should be deprived of any backdoor access to legitimate wealth. A case in Supreme Court giving Raja of Mahmoodabad the title and rights to properties valued around 5000 Crores has so incensed the Brahmins, both in Congress and in BJP that they are now conspiring to bring in legislation to completely block Indian judiciary from doing justice to legitimate right of property, which had been wrongly attached by successive governments.

The move to bring in a hastily conjured up bill in effect to give affect to their malicious scheme against poor and deprived Muslims, is fraught with injustice and mass disaffection. In these times, when the world is witnessing Jasmine Revolutions in one country after another, let this be a warning to Congress and BJP Brahmins not to stretch their luck too far. There are any numbers of disgruntled elements in the country, fed up with the continued Brahmin minority Raj and every single one of them is ready to join any movement to rid of this oligarchy.

Let Muslims not be the ones to become the trigger of such a revolt or revolution that could start by a single slap of a policeman to a street vendor in Tunisia and started the Tsunami that is yet not run its course.


Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai